Journal of Ecology and Environment

The Ecological Society of Korea (한국생태학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Population structure and regeneration of Himalayan endemic Larix species in three high-altitude valleys in Nepal Himalaya

  • Received : 2020.07.01
  • Accepted : 2020.09.10
  • Published : 2020.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: The Himalayan forests are of great importance to sustain the nature and community resource demands. These forests are facing pressures both from anthropogenic activities and ongoing global climatic changes. Poor natural regeneration has been considered a major problem in mountainous forests. To understand the population structure and regeneration status of Larix (Larix griffithiana and Larix himalaica), we conducted systematic vegetation surveys in three high-altitude valleys namely Ghunsa (Kanchenjunga Conservation Area, KCA), Langtang (Langtang National Park, LNP), and Tsum (Manaslu Conservation Area, MCA) in Nepal Himalaya. The average values of diameter at breast height (DBH), height, and sapling height were compared for three sites and two species using Kruskal-Wallis test. Population structure was assessed in terms of proportion of seedlings, saplings, and trees. Regeneration was analyzed using graphical representation of frequencies of seedlings, saplings, and trees in histograms. Results: The results showed that the population structure of Larix in terms of the proportion of seedling, sapling, and tree varied greatly in the three study areas. KCA had the highest record of seedling, sapling, and tree compared to other two sites. Seedlings were the least among three forms and many plots were without seedlings. We found no seedling in MCA study plots. The plot level average DBH variation among sites was significant (Kruskal-Wallis χ2 = 7.813, df = 2, p = 0.02) as was between species (Kruskal-Wallis χ2 = 5.9829, df = 1, p = 0.014). Similarly, the variation in average tree height was significant (Kruskal-Wallis χ2 = 134.23, df = 2, p < 0.001) among sites as well as between species (Kruskal-Wallis χ2 = 128.01, df = 1, p < 0.001). All the sites showed reverse J-shaped curve but more pronounced for KCA and MCA. In comparing the two species, Larix griffithiana has clear reverse J-shaped diameter distribution but not Larix himalaica. Conclusion: The varied responses of Larix manifested through regeneration status from spatially distinct areas show that regeneration limitations might be more pronounced in the future. In all the three studied valleys, regeneration of Larix is found to be problematic and specifically for Larix griffithiana in MCA and Larix himalaica in LNP. To address the issues of disturbances, especially serious in LNP, management interventions are recommended to sustain the unique Himalayan endemic conifer.

Keywords

References

  1. Ali A, Dai D, Akhtar K, Teng MJ, Yan ZG, Urbina-Cardona N, et al. Response of understory vegetation, tree regeneration, and soil quality to manipulated stand density in a Pinus massoniana plantation. Glob Ecol Conserv. 2019;20:e00775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00775
  2. Aryal PC, Dhamala MK, Gaire NP, Bhatta S, Suwal MK, Bhuju DR, et al. Tree-ring climate response of two Larix species from the Central Nepal Himalaya. Trop Ecol. 2020;61:215-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42965-020-00082-w
  3. Aryal S, Maraseni TN, Cockfield G. Sustainability of transhumance grazing systems under socio-economic threats in Langtang, Nepal. J Mt Sci-Eng. 2014;11:1023-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-013-2684-7
  4. Barnett TP, Adam JC, Lettenmaier DP. Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions. Nature. 2005;438:303-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04141
  5. Bayton R, Grimshaw J. Trees and shrubs onlinehttp://treesandshrubsonline.org/articles/larix/larix-himalaica/. Accessed 07 September; 2020.
  6. Bell DM, Bradford JB, Lauenroth WK. Mountain landscapes offer few opportunities for high-elevation tree species migration. Glob Chang Biol. 2013;20(5):1441-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12504
  7. Benavides R, Escudero A, Coll L, Ferrandis P, Ogaya R, Gouriveau F, et al. Recruitment patterns of four tree species along elevation gradients in Mediterranean mountains: not only climate matters. For Ecol Manag. 2016;360:284-96.
  8. Bhatta S, Dhamala MK, Aryal PC, Chauhan R, Dawadi B. Climate variability and associated response of Larix griffithii in Kanchenjunga conservation area of Nepal. Appl Ecol Environ Sci. 2018;6(1):23-30. https://doi.org/10.12691/aees-6-1-4
  9. Bhutiya Y, Gudasalamani R, Ganesan R, Saha S. Assessing forest structure and composition along the altitudinal gradient in the state of Sikkim, eastern Himalaya, India. Forests. 2019;10(8):633. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10080633
  10. Bondarev A. Age distribution patterns in open boreal Dahurican larch forests of Central Siberia. For Ecol Manag. 1997;93(3):205-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03952-7
  11. Byers AC. Historical and contemporary human disturbance in the upper Barun valley, Makalu-Barun National Park and conservation area. Mt Res Dev. 1996;16(5):235-47. https://doi.org/10.2307/3673946
  12. Byers AC. Landscape change in Sagarmatha (Mt. Everest) National Park, Khumbu, Nepal. Himalaya. 1997;17(2):16.
  13. Camp AE. Age structure and species composition changes resulting from altered disturbance regimes on the eastern slopes of the cascades range, Washington. J Sustainable For. 1999;9:39-67.
  14. Carpenter C, Ghimire S, Brown T. Report on the flora and fauna of Kanchenjunga region. Kathmandu: WWF Nepal; 1994.
  15. Carpenter C, Zomer R. Forest ecology of the Makalu-Barun National Park and conservation area, Nepal. Mt Res Dev. 1996;16(2):135-48. https://doi.org/10.2307/3674007
  16. Castro J, Zamora R, Godar JA, Gomez JM. Seedling establishment of a boreal tree species (Pinus sylvestris) as its southernmost distribution limit: consequences of being in a marginal Mediterranean habitat. J Ecol. 2004;92:266-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00870.x
  17. Chaudhary RP, Uprety Y, Joshi SP, Shrestha KK, Basnet KB, Basnet G, et al. Kangchenjunga landscape Nepal: from conservation and development perspectives. Kathmandu: Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation (MoFSC), Government of Nepal; Research Centre for Applied Science and Technology (RECAST), Tribhuvan University; and International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD); 2015.
  18. Cui J, Qin J, Sun H. Population spatial dynamics of Larix potaninii in alpine treeline ecotone in the eastern margin of the Tibetan plateau, China. Forests. 2017;8(10):356. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8100356
  19. Dang H, Zhang Y, Zhang K, Jiang M, Zhang Q. Age structure and regeneration of subalpine fir (Abis fargesii) forests across an altitudinal range in the Qinling Mountains, China. For Ecol Manag. 2010;259(3):547-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.11.011
  20. Daniels LD, Veblen TT. Altitudinal treelines of the southern Andes near $40\;^{\circ}S$. For Chron. 2003;79(2):237-41. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc79237-2
  21. DFRS. State of Nepal's forests. Kathmandu: Department of Forest Research and Survey, Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation; 2015.
  22. Dolanc CR, Thorne JH, Safford HD. Widespread shifts in the demographic structure of subalpine forests in the sierra Navada, California, 1934-2007. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2012;22(3):264-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00748.x
  23. Dolezal J, Srutek M. Altitudinal changes in composition and structure of mountain temperate vegetation: a case study from the western Carpathians. Plant Ecol. 2002;158:201-21. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015564303206
  24. Farjon A. World checklist and biogeography of conifers. Kew: The Royal Botanical Gardens; 2001.
  25. Gairola S, Rawal RS, Todaria NP, Bhatt A. Population structure and regeneration patterns of tree species in climate-sensitive subalpine forests of Indian Western Himalaya. J For Res. 2014;25:343-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-014-0463-0
  26. Gaston KJ. Geographic range limits of species. Proc R Soc B. 2009;276:1391-3. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.0100
  27. Kala CP, Singh SK, Rawat GS. Effects of sheep and goat grazing on the species diversity in the alpine meadows of Western Himalaya. Environmentalist. 2002;22:189-202.
  28. Karauchi N, Brang P, Schonenberger W. Forests of mountainous regions: gaps in knowledge and research needs. For Ecol Manag. 2000;132(1):73-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00382-0
  29. Kent M, Cocker P. Vegetation description and analysis: a practical approach. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1992.
  30. Kunwar RM. Assessment of climate change impacts on non timber forest products (NTFPs), medicinal and aromatic plants (MAPs) and important tree species (ITS) in the sacred Himalayan landscape, Nepal. Kathmandu: WWF Nepal Program; 2011.
  31. Leak WB. An expression of diameter distribution for unbalanced, uneven-aged stands and forests. For Sci. 1964;10:39-50.
  32. Liang W, Wei X. Factors promoting the natural regeneration of Larix principisrupprechtii plantation in the Lvliang Mountains of Central China. PeerJ. 2020;8:e9339. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9339
  33. Mamet SD, Brown CD, Trant AJ, Laroque CP. Shifting global Larix distributions: northern expansion and southern retraction as species respond to changing climate. J Biogeogr. 2019;46:30-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13465
  34. Maren IE, Karki S, Prajapati C, Yadav RK, Shrestha BB. Facing north or south: does slope aspect impact forest stand characteristics and soil properties in a semiarid trans-Himalayan valley? J Arid Environ. 2015;121:112-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.06.004
  35. Maren IE, Sharma LN. Managing biodiversity: impacts of legal protection in mountain forests of the Himalayas. Forests. 2018;9:476. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9080476
  36. Miehe G, Miehe S. Comparative high mountain research on the treeline ecotone under human impact. Erdkunde. 2000;54(1):34-50. https://doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.2000.01.03
  37. Mokany K, Thomson JJ, Lynch AJJ, Jordan GJ, Ferrier S. Linking changes in community composition and function under climate change. Ecol Appl. 2015;25(8):2132-41. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-2384.1
  38. Moktan MR. Impacts of recent policy changes on rural communities and species diversity in government-managed forests of Western Bhutan. Mt Res Dev. 2010;30(4):365-72. https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-10-00015.1
  39. Moktan MR, Gratzer G, Richards WH, Rai TB, Dukpa D, Tenzin K. Regeneration of mixed conifer forests under group tree selection harvest management in western Bhutan Himalayas. For Ecol Manag. 2009;257:2121-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.02.022
  40. Mu Y, Nepal SK, Lai P. Tourism and sacred landscape in Sagarmatha (Mt. Everest) National Park, Nepal. Tour Geogr. 2019;21(3):442-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2018.1558454
  41. Nepal SK. Tourism as a key to sustainable mountain development: the Nepal Himalaya in retrospect. Unasylva. 2002;53:38-45.
  42. Neupane GP, Lew AP, Tatsugawa K. Perceptions of trekking tourism and social and environmental change in Nepal's Himalayas. Tour Geogr. 2014;16(3):415-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2014.942233
  43. Normand S, Zimmermann NE, Schurr FM, Lischke H. Demography as the basis for understanding and predicting range dynamics. Ecography. 2014;37(2):1149-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.01490
  44. Pagel J, Schurr FM. Forecasting species ranges by statistical estimation of ecological niches and spatial population dynamics. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2012;21:293-304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00663.x
  45. Pandey A, Badola HK, Rai S, Singh SP. Timberline structure and woody taxa regeneration towards treeline along latitudinal gradients in Khangchendzonga National Park, eastern Himalaya. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0207762. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207762
  46. Peters RL. Effects of global warming on forests. For Ecol Manag. 1990;35:13-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(90)90229-5
  47. Piermattei A, Renzaglia F, Urbinati C. Recent expansion of Pinus nigra Arn. Above the timberline in the central Apennines, Italy. Ann For Sci. 2012;69:509-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-012-0207-2
  48. Pratt RB, Jacobsen AL, Hernandez J, Ewers FW, North GB, Davis SD. Allocation tradeoffs among chaparral shrub seedlings with different live story types (Rhamnaceae). Am J Bot. 2012;99(9):1464-76. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1200193
  49. Purves DW. The demography of range boundaries versus range cores in eastern US tree species. Proc R Soc B. 2009;276:1477-84. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1241
  50. Qiaozhi M, Makoto W, Takayoshi K. Growth characteristics of two promising tree species for afforestation, birch and larch in the northern part of Asia. Eurasian J Forest Res. 2010;13(2):69-76.
  51. Rai ID, Adhikari BS, Rawat GS, Bargali K. Community structure along timberline ecotone in relation to micro-topography and disturbances in Western Himalaya. Notulae Sci Biol. 2012;4(2):41-52. https://doi.org/10.15835/nsb427411
  52. Rickebusch S, Lischke H, Bugmann H, Guisan A, Zimmermann NE. Understanding the low-temperature limitations to forest growth through calibration of a forest dynamics model with tree-ring data. For Ecol Manag. 2007;246(2-3):251-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.04.030
  53. Roy A, Rathore P. Western Himalayan forests in climate change scenario. In: Navalgund R, Kumar A, Nandy S, editors. Remote sensing of northwest Himalayan ecosystems. Singapore: Springer; 2019. p. 265-86.
  54. Sacareau I. Changes in environmental policy and mountain tourism in Nepal. J Alpine Res (Online). 2009;97(3):1-11.
  55. Sakai A, Malla SB. Winter hardiness of tree species at high altitudes in the east Himalaya, Nepal. Ecology. 1981;61(5):1288-98. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937293
  56. Schickhoff U. The upper treeline in the Himalayas, Hindu Kush and Karakorum: a review of geographical and ecological aspects. In Broll G, Keplin B. mountain ecosystems. Heidelberg: Springer; 2005.
  57. Sharma E, Chhetri N, Tse-ring K, Shrestha AB, Jing F, Mool P, et al. Climate change impacts and vulnerability in the eastern Himalayas Kathmandu: ICIMOD; 2009.
  58. Shrestha BB, Ghimire B, Lekhak HD, Jha PK. Regeneration of treeline birch (Betula utilis D. Don) forest in a trans-Himalayan dry valley in Central Nepal. Mt Res Dev. 2007;27(3):259-67. https://doi.org/10.1659/mrdd.0784
  59. Shrestha UT. Adaptation to climate change in water management, agro-biodiversity and forestry with species reference to Nepal. Initiation. 2008;2:113-20. https://doi.org/10.3126/init.v2i1.2532
  60. Singh S, Malik ZA, Sharma CM. Tree species richness, diversity, and regeneration status in different oak (Quercus spp.) dominated forests of Garhwal Himalaya, India. J Asia-Pac Biodivers. 2016;9:293-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2016.06.002
  61. Stevens S. Tourism and deforestation in the Mt. Everest region of Nepal. Geogr J. 2003;169(3):255-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4959.00089
  62. Subba S, Lachunga S, Subba S, Nepal S. Analysis of vegetation in a representative temperate plant community in Lachung range of the Sikkim Himalaya. NeBIO. 2015;6(3):18-24.
  63. Sujakhu H, Gosai KR, Karmacharya SB. Forest structure and regeneration pattern of Betula utilis D. Don in Manaslu conservation area, Nepal. ECOPRINT. 2013;20:107-13.
  64. Suwal MK, Shrestha KB, Guragain L, Shakya R, Shrestha K, Bhuju DR, et al. Land-use change under a warming climate facilitated unslope expansion of Himalayan silver fir (Abies spectabilis (D. Don) Spach). Plant Ecol. 2016;217(8):993-1002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-016-0624-7
  65. Tambe S, Arrawatia ML, Sharma N. Assessing the priorities for sustainable forest management in the Sikkim Himalaya, India: a remote sensing based approach. J Indian Soc Remote Sens. 2011;39:555-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-011-0110-6
  66. Taylor AH, Zisheng Q, Jie L. Structure and dynamics of subalpine forests in the Wang Lang natural reserve, Sichuan, China. Vegetatio. 1996;124:25-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00045141
  67. Tewari VP, Verma RK. Gadow Kv. Climate change effects in the Western Himalayan ecosystems of India: evidence and strategies. For Ecosyst. 2017;4(13):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-016-0088-1
  68. Vetaas OR. The effect of environmental factors on the regeneration of Quercus semecarpifolia Sm. In central Himalaya, Nepal. Plant Ecol. 2000;146:137-44. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009860227886
  69. Weat DC, Shugart HH, Ranney JW. Population structure of forests over a large area. For Sci. 1981;27:701-10.
  70. Wong MH, Duan C, Long Y, Luo Y, Xie G. How will the distribution and size of subalpine Abies georgei forest respond to climate change? A study in Northwest Yunnan, China. Phys Geogr. 2010;31(4):319-35. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3646.31.4.319
  71. Xu C, Liu H, Anenkhonov OA, Korolyuk AY, Sandanov DV, Balsanova LD, et al. Long-term effect resilience to climate change indicated by mortality, regeneration, and growth in semiarid southern Siberia. Glob Chang Biol. 2017;23(6):2370-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13582
  72. Xu J, Grumbine RE, Shrestha A, Eriksson M, Yang X, Wang Y, et al. The melting Himalayas: cascading effects of climate change on water, biodiversity and livelihoods. Conserv Biol. 2009;23:520-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01237.x
  73. Zheng-yi W, Raven PH. Editors. Flora of China, volume 4. Beijing and St. Louis: Science Press and Missouri Botanical Garden; 1999.