전기전자학회논문지 (Journal of IKEEE)

  • 제24권3호
  • /
  • Pages.877-882
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1226-7244(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-243X(eISSN)
한국전기전자학회 (Institute of Korean Electrical and Electronics Engineers)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

계통연계형 인버터의 전류제어기법 성능 비교

Performance comparison study of current control methods for grid connected inverters

  • Jeong, Horyeong (Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Jae Suk (Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Jeonbuk National University)
  • 투고 : 2020.09.08
  • 심사 : 2020.09.24
  • 발행 : 2020.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 논문에서는 계통연계형 인버터(Grid-connected inverter, GCI) 시스템을 위한 전류 제어 방법들의 성능 비교 연구를 제시한다. GCI 시스템을 위해 다양한 전류 제어 방법이 개발되었으며 각 제어기마다 장점과 한계를 가지고 있다. 본 논문에서는 GCI 전류 제어기들의 정상 상태 및 과도 상태에서의 동적 성능을 비교 분석한다. 제안한 전향보상기법(Command feedforward control, CFFC) 및 외란제거제어(Disturbance rejection control, DRC)가 모든 GCI 전류 제어기에 적용 전과 후의 성능을 비교 분석하였다. 제안된 CFFC와 DRC 제어 알고리즘을 주파수 영역에서 분석하고 성능 검증을 위해 각 GCI 전류 제어 방법들의 시뮬레이션 및 실험 모델을 개발하였다.

This paper presents performance comparison study of current control methods for grid connected inverter (GCI) system. Different current control methods have been developed for GCI systems and each controller has its own advantages and limitations. Steady state and transient dynamic performance of the GCI current controllers are compared in this paper. The performance of the proposed command feedforward control (CFFC) and disturbance rejection control (DRC) is analyzed before and after application to all GCI current controllers. The proposed CFFC and DRC control algorithms is analyzed in a frequency domain and the simulation and experiment models of each GCI current control methods are developed for verification of the performance.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. N. Lai and K. Kim, "An Improved Current Control Strategy for a Grid-Connected Inverter under Distorted Grid Conditions," Energies, Vol.9, No.3, 2016. DOI: 10.3390/en9030190
  2. D. Dhen, J. Zhang and Z. Qian, "An Improved Repetitive Control Scheme for Grid-Connected Inverter With Frequency-Adaptive Capability," IEEE Trans on Ind Electrs, vol.60, no.2, pp.814-823, 2012. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2012.2205364
  3. C. Lee and J. Choi, "Compensation strategy to eliminate the effect of current measurement offsets in grid-connected inverters," Journal of Power Electr, vol.14, no.2, pp.383-391, 2014. DOI: 10.6113/JPE.2014.14.2.383
  4. M. Chadorkar, D. Divan and R. Adapa, "Control of parallel connected inverters in standalone AC supply systems," IEEE Trans. on Ind. Appl., vol.29, no1, 1993. DOI: 10.1109/28.195899
  5. J. Ishida, S. Doki and S. Okuma, "Fast torque control system for PMSM based on model predictive control considering overmodulation region," The 2010 International Power Electronics Conference -ECCE ASIA-, 2010. DOI: 10.1109/IPEC.2010.5544570
  6. M. J. Ryan, W. E. Brumsickle and R. D. Lorenz, "Control topology options for single phase UPS inverters," IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol.33, no.2, 1997. DOI: 10.1109/28.568015
  7. N. M. Abdel-Rahim and J. E. Quaicoe, "Analysis and design of a multiple feedback loop control strategy for single phase voltage source UPS inverter," IEEE Trans. Power Electr, vol.11, no.4, 1996. DOI: 10.1109/63.506118
  8. E. Sariyildiz and K. Ohnishi, "Stability and robustness of disturbance observer-based motion control systems," IEEE Trans. on Ind. Electr, vol.62, no.1, pp.414-422, 2015. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2014.2327009
  9. J. Yang, H. Cui, S. Li, and A. Zolotas, "Optimized Active Disturbance Rejection Control for DC-DC Buck Converters With Uncertainties Using a Reduced-Order GPI Observer," IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, vol.65, no.2, pp.832-841, 2018. DOI: 10.1109/TCSI.2017.2725386
  10. W. Choi, C. Morris and B. Sarlioglu, "Modeling three phase grid connected inverter system using complex vector in synchronous dq reference frame and analysis on the influence of tuning parameters of synchronous frame PI controller," IEEE Power and Energy Conf at Illinois, 2016. DOI: 10.1109/PECI.2016.7459235