DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Lactic Acid Bacteria Treatment on Nutritive Value and In Vitro Ruminal Fermentation of Italian Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.) Silage

  • Lee, Kihwan (Department of Animal Science, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Marbun, Tabita Dameria (Department of Animal Science, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Suyeon (Department of Animal Science, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Song, Jaeyong (Department of Animal Science, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kwon, Chan Ho (Department of Animal Science, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Yoon, Duhak (Department of Animal Science, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kang, Jungsun (Genebiotech Co. Ltd.) ;
  • Lee, Chanho (Genebiotech Co. Ltd.) ;
  • Cho, Sangbuem (Department of Animal Sciences, Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Eun Joong (Department of Animal Science, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2020.09.11
  • Accepted : 2020.09.21
  • Published : 2020.09.29

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) inoculation to domestically-cultivated Italian ryegrass (IRG) on silage fermentation and in vitro ruminal fermentation. There were six treatments based on the LAB inoculants: 1) no addition of LAB (negative control: NC), additions of 2) commercially-available LAB (positive control: PC), 3) Lactobacillus plantarum (LPL), 4) L. paracasei (LPA), 5) L. acidophilus (LA), and 6) L. pentosus (LPT). All treatments were inoculated at a concentration of 106 CFU/g and ensiled for 3, 7, 21, and 42 days in triplicate and analyzed for nutritive values when ensiling was terminated. Day 42 silage from all treatments were also examined for in vitro ruminal fermentation. After 42 days, LAB-inoculated silages had higher (P<0.05) lactic acid concentration compared to the NC. In terms of nutritive values, the silages treated with LPA, LA, and LPT showed higher (P<0.05) crude protein and lower (P<0.05) neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber content compared to the rest of the treatment. In vitro ruminal dry matter degradability was not affected by LAB addition. However, LAB-treated IRG had shown higher (P<0.05) ammonia-N compared with that of the NC. LPA had shown the highest (P<0.05) volatile fatty acid concentration among the LAB examined. In conclusion, the addition of a single strain of LAB appeared to produce a quality IRG silage compared with the NC and the PC. Among the strains examined, LPA seemed to be superior to the others.

Keywords

References

  1. AOAC. 2005. Official methods of analysis (18th ed.). AOAC International. Gaithersburg, MD.
  2. Bolsen, K.K., Ashbell, G. and Weinberg, Z.G. 1996. Silage fermentation and silage additives-Review. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 9:483-494. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.1996.483
  3. Buchanan-Smith, J.G. 1990. An investigation into palatability as a factor responsible for reduced intake of silage by sheep. Animal Science. 50:253-260. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100004700
  4. Chaney, A.L. and Marbach, E.P. 1962. Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clinical Chemistry. 8:130-132. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/8.2.130
  5. Contreras-Govea, F.E., Muck, R.E., Armstrong, K.L. and Albrecht, K.A. 2009. Nutritive value of corn silage in mixture with climbing beans. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 150:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2008.07.001
  6. Contreras-Govea, F.E., Muck, R.E., Mertens, D.R. and Weimer, P.J. 2011. Microbial inoculant effects on silage and in vitro ruminal fermentation, and microbial biomass estimation for alfalfa, BMR corn, and corn silages. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 163:2-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.09.015
  7. Erwin, E.S., Marco, G.J. and Emery, E.M. 1961. Volatile fatty acid analyses of blood and rumen fluid by gas chromatography. Journal of Dairy Science. 44:1768-1771. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(61)89956-6
  8. Hiltner, P. and Dehority, B.A. 1983. Effect of soluble carbohydrates on digestion of cellulose by pure cultures of rumen bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 46:642-648. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.46.3.642-648.1983
  9. Huhtanen, P.J., Miettinen, H.O. and Toivonen, V.F.J. 1997. Effects of silage fermentation and post-ruminal casein supplementation in lactating dairy cows: 1-diet digestion and milk production. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 74:450-458. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199708)74:4<450::AID-JSFA818>3.0.CO;2-W
  10. Kim, J.G., Ham, J.S., Chung, E.S., Yoon, S.H., Kim, M.J., Park, H.S., Lim, Y.C. and Seo, S. 2008. Evaluation of fermentation ability of microbes for whole crop rice silage inoculant. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 28:229-236. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2008.28.3.229
  11. Kim, J.G., Park, H.S., Ko, H.J., Jeong, J.S. and Kim, M.J. 2015. Assessment of animal palatability for domestic developed Italian ryegrass Lolium multiflorum Lam. in South Korea. The 23rd International Grassland Congress. New Delhi, India. Range Management Society of India.
  12. Kim, W.H., Kim, K.Y., Jung, M.W., Ji, H.C., Lim, Y.C., Seo, S., Kim, J.D., Yoon, B.K. and Lee, H.W. 2011. Dry matter yield and forage quality at mixture of annual legumes and Italian ryegrass on paddy field. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 31:33-38. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2011.31.1.33
  13. Lima, R., Lourenco, M., Diaz, R.F., Castro, A. and Fievez, V. 2010. Effect of combined ensiling of sorghum and soybean with or without molasses and lactobacilli on silage quality and in vitro rumen fermentation. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 155:122-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.10.008
  14. Liu, C., Lai, Y., Lu, X., Guo, P. and Luo, H. 2016. Effect of lactic acid bacteria inoculants on alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) silage quality: Assessment of degradation (in situ) and gas production (in vitro). Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 15:2834-2841. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2095-3119(16)61424-7
  15. McDonald, P., Henderson, A.R. and Heron, S.J.E. 1991. The biochemistry of silage. Chalcombe Publications. Marlow, Bucks, UK.
  16. McDougall, E.I. 1948. Studies on ruminant saliva. 1. The composition and output of sheep's saliva. Biochemical Journal. 43:99-109. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj0430099
  17. Mohd-Setapar, S.H., Abd-Talib, N. and Aziz, R. 2012. Review on crucial parameters of silage quality. APCBEE Procedia. 3:99-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcbee.2012.06.053
  18. Morrison, I.M. 1979. Changes in the cell wall components of laboratory silages and the effect of various additives on these changes. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 93:581-586. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600038983
  19. Muck, R.E., Nadeau, E.M.G., McAllister, T.A., Contreras-Govea, F.E., Santos, M.C. and Kung Jr, L. 2018. Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives. Journal of Dairy Science. 101:3980-4000. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13839
  20. Nsereko, V.L., Smiley, B.K., Rutherford, W.M., Spielbauer, A., Forrester, K.J., Hettinger, G.H., Harman, E.K. and Harman, B.R. 2008. Influence of inoculating forage with lactic acid bacterial strains that produce ferulate esterase on ensilage and ruminal degradation of fiber. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 145:122-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.06.039
  21. Orskov, E. 2000. The in situ technique for the estimation of forage degradability in ruminants. In D.I. Givens, E. Owen, R.F.E. Axford and H.M. Omed (Eds.), Forage evaluation in ruminant nutrition (pp. 175-188). CABI publishing, Wallingforfd, UK.
  22. Rigout, S., Hurtaud, C., Lemosquet, S., Bach, A. and Rulquin, H. 2003. Lactational effect of propionic acid and duodenal glucose in cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 86:243-253. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73603-0
  23. Ryu, C.H., Park, M.S., Park, C., Choi, N.J. and Cho, S.B. 2017. Fermentation of environmental friend total mixed ration and alteration of rumen fermentation characteristics. Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture. 25:461-473. https://doi.org/10.11625/KJOA.2017.25.2.461
  24. Santos, E.M., Silva, T., Macedo, C.H.O. and Campos, F.S. 2013. Lactic acid bacteria in tropical grass silages. In J.M. Kongo (Ed.), Lactic acid bacteria (pp. 335-362). R & D for Food, Health and Livestock Purposes, In Tech, London.
  25. Seale, D.R. 1986. Bacterial inoculants as silage additives. Journal of Applied Bacteriology. 61:9-26.
  26. Tilley, J.M.A. and Terry, R.A. 1963. A two‐stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Grass and Forage Science. 18:104-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x
  27. Van Soest, P.V., Robertson, J. and Lewis, B. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science. 74:3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(91)78551-2
  28. Wanapat, M. and Pimpa, O. 1999. Effect of ruminal $NH_3$-N levels on ruminal fermentation, purine derivatives, digestibility and rice straw intake in swamp buffaloes. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 12:904-907. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.1999.904
  29. Weinberg, Z.G. and Muck, R.E. 1996. New trends and opportunities in the development and use of inoculants for silage. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 19:53-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-6445(96)00025-3
  30. Weinberg, Z.G., Muck, R.E., Weimer, P.J., Chen, Y. and Gamburg, M. 2004. Lactic acid bacteria used in inoculants for silage as probiotics for ruminants. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 118:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:118:1-3:001
  31. Weinberg, Z.G., Shatz, O., Chen, Y., Yosef, E., Nikbahat, M., Ben-Ghedalia, D. and Miron, J. 2007. Effect of lactic acid bacteria inoculants on in vitro digestibility of wheat and corn silages. Journal of Dairy Science. 90:4754-4762. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0176
  32. Winters, A., Merry, R., Muler, M., Davies, D., Pahlow, G. and Muller, T. 1998. Degradation of fructans by epiphytic and inoculant lactic acid bacteria during ensilage of grass. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 84:304-312. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.1998.00342.x