Current Photovoltaic Research

Korea Photovoltaic Society (한국태양광발전학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Case Study of Resolving Conflict in Energy Infrastructure Siting by the Solar PV Project

  • Received : 2020.09.04
  • Accepted : 2020.09.14
  • Published : 2020.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The growing demand for new energy infrastructure has often been encountered with the difficulties of siting in power plants and electric transmission lines. Siting such large-scale and complex facilities produces so many-sided issues that it is highly necessary to develop an approach to resolving the related problems and conflicts. This paper introduces how the stakeholders have handled the issues and resolved conflicts with residents opposed the construction of 765 kV transmission line. The solar photovoltaic power generation, called "Hee-Mang Sunlight Power project", is used for persuading residents to agree with constructing high-voltage transmission line and sharing benefits. It is considered how the project performance such as generation output and resident's profits is and proposed what the project should be revised and supplement. The project is shown that the intractable spiting in energy systems can be smartly resolved with cost-effective institutional solutions instead of relatively expensive technical ones.

Keywords

References

  1. Jeon, H. J. "An analysis of mediation communication for public conflict: focusing on the siting conflict of Buk-Ansan substation," Crisisonomy, Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 97-117, 2016.
  2. An, Y. C., “Managing public disputes; Lessons from the transmission line siting in the united states,” Institute of Governmental Studies, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 431-463, 2014. https://doi.org/10.19067/jgs.2014.20.2.431
  3. Dlouhy, M., “Location of unwanted facilities in Prague: NIMBY in public administration hierarchy,” Prague Economic Papers, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 1-13, 2016.
  4. Jeon, H. J., “Resident’s behavioral patterns in siting locally unwanted facilities-focusing on conflict cases on waste treatment facilities,” Crisisonomy, Vol. 13, No. 7, pp. 35-49, 2017.
  5. Choi, Y. U., “Improvement of NIMBY facilities route planning considering social conflict,” Journal of Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 487-496, 2018. https://doi.org/10.12652/KSCE.2018.38.3.0487
  6. Keegan, G., “The contribution of distributional justice to siting transmission lines,” Journal of Mediation and Applied Conflict Analysis, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 94-105, 2014. https://doi.org/10.33232/jmaca.1.2.5047
  7. Yi, H. and Feiock, R. C., “Renewable energy politics: Policy typologies, policy tools, and state deployment of renewables,” Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 391-415, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12066
  8. Lee, T. J., “An empirical assessment of the influence of transparency and trust in government on lay citizens’ communicative actions relative to conflict of interest in the public service,” Journal of Public Relations, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 84-112, 2016. https://doi.org/10.15814/jpr.2016.20.3.84
  9. Wei, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Cao, X., and Khan, M. A., "Multi-period planning of multi-energy micro-grid with multitype uncertainties using chance constrained information gap decision method," Applied Energy, Vol. 260, 114188, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114188
  10. Choi, Y. S., "Solar power system planning and design," Applied Science, Vol. 10, No. 1, p. 367, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10010367
  11. Li, Q., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Fan, Y., Bao, G., and Wang, X., "Multi-period generation expansion planning for sustainable power systems to maximize the utilization of renewable energy sources," Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 3, 1083, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031083
  12. Palmintier, B. S. and Webster, M. D., “Impact of operational flexibility on electricity generation planning with renewable and carbon targets,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 672-684, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2015.2498640