DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Retrospective Clinical Study on the Survival Rate and the Evaluation of Marginal Bone Resorption on SNUCONE AF+II® Implants

  • Kim, Panjun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hankook General Hospital) ;
  • Jung, Myungjin (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hankook General Hospital) ;
  • Jeong, Jihye (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hankook General Hospital) ;
  • Choi, Sungyu (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hankook General Hospital) ;
  • Hur, Sunghwi (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hankook General Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Seulki (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hankook General Hospital)
  • Received : 2020.04.30
  • Accepted : 2020.06.12
  • Published : 2020.06.30

Abstract

Purpose: This study analyzes the clinical results of SNUCONE AF+II® (SNUCONE Implant) implants placed in the edentulous region to determine the implant survival rate and the marginal bone healing pattern in the healing process. Materials and Methods: Two hundred forty implants placed in 131 patients with SNUCONE AF+II® implant system from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 at Cheongju Hankook General Hospital were followed up for 5 years. Result: We evaluated 240 SNUCONE AF+II® implants of 131 patients from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 at Cheongju Hankook General Hospital, and the results are as following: 1) Three implants were failed out of 240 implants of 131 patients and the survival rate was 98.75%. 2) The marginal bone resorption was 0.95±1.84 mm for 4 years after prosthesis placement, showing favorable result. Conclusion: Although long-term cumulative evaluations and studies should be performed in the future, SNUCONE AF+II® implants show high cumulative survival and low marginal bone resorption according to the results of this study, which believed to give outstanding result in various dental implant procedure.

Keywords

References

  1. Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969; 3: 81-100. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844316909036699
  2. Schnitman PA, Shulman LB. Recommendations of the consensus development conference on dental implants. J Am Dent Assoc. 1979; 98: 373-7. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1979.0052
  3. Smith DE, Zarb GA. Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1989; 62: 567-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90081-4
  4. Misch CE. The implant quality scale: a clinical assessment of the health--disease continuum. Oral Health. 1998; 88:15-20, 23-5; quiz 25-6.
  5. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Dula K, Lang NP. Clinical experience with one-stage, non-submerged dental implants. Adv Dent Res. 1999; 13: 153-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959374990130010501
  6. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986; 1: 11-25.
  7. Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Consensus report: towards optimized treatment outcomes for dental implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 80: 641. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70048-4
  8. Krennmair G, Schmidinger S, Waldenberger O. Single-tooth replacement with the Frialit-2 system: a retrospective clinical analysis of 146 implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002; 17: 78-85.
  9. Romeo E, Lops D, Margutti E, Ghisolfi M, Chiapasco M, Vogel G. Long-term survival and success of oral implants in the treatment of full and partial arches: a 7-year prospective study with the ITI dental implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19: 247-59.
  10. Wennstrom JL, Ekestubbe A, Grondahl K, Karlsson S, Lindhe J. Implant-supported single-tooth restorations: a 5-year prospective study. J Clin Periodontol. 2005; 32: 567-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00715.x
  11. Rosen PS, Summers R, Mellado JR, Salkin LM, Shanaman RH, Marks MH, Fugazzotto PA. The bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation technique: multicenter retrospective report of consecutively treated patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999; 14: 853-8.
  12. Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1998. p. 91-123.
  13. Rosenberg ES, Cho SC, Elian N, Jalbout ZN, Froum S, Evian CI. A comparison of characteristics of implant failure and survival in periodontally compromised and periodontally healthy patients: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19: 873-9.
  14. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Coulthard P, Thomsen P, Worthington HV. A 5-year follow-up comparative analysis of the efficacy of various osseointegrated dental implant systems: a systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005; 20: 557-68.
  15. Hong JY, Chae GJ, Jung UW, Kim CS, Cho KS, Chae JK, Kim CK, Choi SH. Retrospective studies of dental implant placement at each intraoral site and situation. J Korean Acad Periodontol. 2007; 37: 805-24. https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2007.37.4.805
  16. Cochran DL. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces. J Periodontol. 1999; 70: 1523-39. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1999.70.12.1523
  17. Park HC, Kim SG, Oh JS, Jeong MC, Lee SK, Jeong MA, Kim JS, Kim SH. A study of stability of hydroxy-apatite coated implants and sandblasted, large-grit and acid-etched implants. Oral Biol Res. 2012; 36: 19-23. https://doi.org/10.21851/obr.36.1.201203.19
  18. Jang JW, Ryoo GH, Chung HJ. Survival analysis of dental implants in maxillary and mandibular molar regions; A 4-5 year report. J Korean Acad Periodontol. 2007; 37: 165-80. https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2007.37.2.165
  19. Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique. Compendium. 1994; 15: 152, 154-6, 158 passim; quiz 162.
  20. Rosenquist B, Grenthe B. Immediate placement of implants into extraction sockets: implant survival. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996; 11: 205-9.
  21. Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999. p. 21-32.
  22. Nevins M, Langer B. The successful use of osseointegrated implants for the treatment of the recalcitrant periodontal patient. J Periodontol. 1995; 66: 150-7. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1995.66.2.150
  23. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP. Longterm evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997; 8: 161-72. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x
  24. Astrand P, Engquist B, Dahlgren S, Grondahl K, Engquist E, Feldmann H. Astra Tech and Branemark system implants: a 5-year prospective study of marginal bone reactions. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004; 15: 413-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01028.x
  25. Cho JY, Kim YJ, Yu MG, Kook MS, Oh HK, Park HJ. The effect of surface treatment of the cervical area of implant on bone regeneration in mini-pig. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 34: 285-92.
  26. Davies JE. Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont. 1998; 11: 391-401.
  27. Finne K, Rompen E, Toljanic J. Clinical evaluation of a prospective multicenter study on 1-piece implants. part 1: marginal bone level evaluation after 1 year of follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007; 22: 226-34.
  28. Schliephake H, Neukam FW, Wichmann M. Survival analysis of endosseous implants in bone grafts used for the treatment of severe alveolar ridge atrophy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997; 55: 1227-33; discussion 1233-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(97)90173-7