DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Methods to Reduce Conflicts on Energy Transition to Hydro Energy: Focused on the Application of Design Thinking

수소에너지의 에너지전환 활용을 둘러싼 갈등해결 방안: 디자인씽킹 방법론 적용을 중심으로

  • 김태윤 (녹색기술센터&고려대학교 에너지환경대학원 에너지환경정책) ;
  • 최한나 (한양대학교 기술경영전문대학원) ;
  • 김민철 (녹색기술센터)
  • Received : 2020.05.04
  • Accepted : 2020.06.09
  • Published : 2020.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present a solution to the conflict when hydrogen energy is used for national energy transition through design thinking methodology. Research shows that design thinking enables joint design of policies for hydrogen energy transition between government and stakeholders. This is a macro approach based on empathy and cooperation, and can form consensus on the policy design process in the early stages. Starting with an understanding of hydrogen energy conflicts, ideas can be found based on the experiences gained from conflicts of stakeholders, disputes or lawsuits. And based on this, additional ideas on hydrogen energy transition will be verified the realization of the ideas. Collaboration with stakeholders to improve conflicts can create new values. In the process of reconfiguring the definition of energy transition problems, the opinions of stakeholders can be integrated with continuous empathy. Through design thinking methodology, we can integrate opinions of stakeholders and prevent conflicts.

본 논문은 디자인 씽킹 방법론을 통해 수소에너지를 국가 에너지전환에 활용할 때의 갈등을 해결하는 방안을 제시하는데 그 목적이 있다. 연구결과, 디자인 씽킹을 통해 갈등 주체와 정부와 이해관계자 간 수소에너지 전환을 위한 정책의 공동 설계가 가능하며, 이는 공감과 협력을 바탕으로 하는 거시적인 접근 방법으로, 정책설계 프로세스에 대한 공감대를 초기에 형성할 수 있다. 수소 에너지 갈등에 대한 이해부터 시작하여 이해관계자의 갈등, 분쟁이나 소송의 결과에서 얻은 경험을 바탕으로 아이디어를 찾을 수 있다. 그리고 이를 바탕으로 수소 에너지전환에 대한 추가적인 아이디어를 도출하고 프로토타이핑과 테스트를 통해 아이디어의 실현을 구체화 및 검증하게 된다. 갈등 개선을 위한 이해관계자들과의 협업은 새로운 가치를 창출할 수 있으며, 에너지 전환의 관점에서는 이해관계자의 갈등에 대한 공감과 통찰력이 새로운 협업 환경을 촉진할 수 있다. 또한 에너지 전환 문제점에 대한 정의를 재구성하는 과정에서 아이디에이션을 통해 다양한 관점을 반영하며, 프로토타입 정책을 시행하는 과정에서 이해관계자 간 갈등 협의의 프로세스에서 지속적인 공감으로 이해관계자의 의견을 통합하여 갈등을 예방할 수 있음을 알 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Brown, T., & Katz, B., 2011, Change by design, Journal of product innovation management, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 381-383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00806.x
  2. Brown, T., & Wyatt, J., 2010, Design thinking for social innovation, Development Outreach, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 29-43 https://doi.org/10.1596/1020-797X_12_1_29
  3. Carlgren, L. et al., 2016, Framing design thinking: The concept in idea and enactment, Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 38-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12153
  4. Carr, S. D. et al., 2010, The influence of design thinking in business: Some preliminary observations, Design Management Review, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 58-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7169.2010.00080.x
  5. Dalton, J., & Kahute, T., 2016, Why empathy and customer closeness is crucial for design thinking, Design Management Review, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 20-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/drev.12004
  6. Davis, B. M., 2010, Creativity & innovation in business 2010 teaching the application of design thinking to business, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 6532-6538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.04.062
  7. GEA, 2012, Global energy assessment-toward a sustainable future, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  8. Glen, R. et al., 2014, The need for design thinking in business schools, Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 653-667. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2012.0308
  9. Holloway, M., 2009, How tangible is your strategy? How design thinking can turn your strategy into reality, Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 30, No. 2/3, pp. 50-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/02756660910942463
  10. KEEI, 2018, A Survey on the Public's Perception of Low Carbon, Environment-Friendly Energy Transition Policy of the Government(in Korean)
  11. KEIA, 2019, 2019 Energy National Recognition Survey(in Korean)
  12. Kim Minchul, 2019, Pre-legislative Evaluation of Hydrogen Economy Bill in Response to Climate Change(in Korean), KLRI Legislative Evaluation Issue Paper 19-14-1, KLRI
  13. Lee, J. et al., 2020, An Integrative Approach to International Technology Transfer for Recycling Vietnam Coal Ash with Consideration of the Technological, Legal, and Network Perspectives, Sustainability, Vol. 12.
  14. Meinel, C., & Leifer, L., 2012, Design thinking research, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 1-11.
  15. MOTIE, 2019, Roadmap for revitalizing the hydrogen economy(in Korean)
  16. Pachauri, R. K., & Meyer, L., 2014, Climate change 2014 Synthesis Report-Summary for Policymakers
  17. Razzouk, R., & Shute, V., 2012, What is design thinking and why is it important?. Review of educational research, Vol. 82, No. 3, pp. 330-348. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429
  18. R.F. Dam and S.T. Yu, 2020, 5 Stages in the Design Thinking Process, Interaction Design Foundation
  19. https://www.edaily.co.kr/
  20. http://www.energiewende-global.com/en/
  21. https://www.hankyung.com/
  22. http://www.h2korea.or.kr/
  23. https://www.irena.org/energytransition
  24. http://www.keei.re.kr
  25. http://www.keia.or.kr
  26. http://www.lawnb.com
  27. https://www.motie.go.kr
  28. https://www.seoul.co.kr