DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

CELL교육과정 참여가 대학생의 학습몰입, 학습동기, 학업적자기효능감, 자기주도학습능력에 미치는 효과

Effects of CELL curriculum participation on college students' learning flow, learning motivation, academic self-efficacy, and self-directed learning ability

  • 양재훈 (경성대학교 경제금융물류학부) ;
  • 조보람 (경성대학교 교육혁신추진센터) ;
  • 황인섭 (경성대학교 미래융합대학)
  • Yang, Jae-Hoon (School of Economics, Finance & Logistics, Kyungsung University) ;
  • Cho, Bo-Ram (Education Innovation Promotion Center, Kyungsung University) ;
  • Hwang, In-Seob (College of Future Convergence, Kyungsung University)
  • 투고 : 2020.06.25
  • 심사 : 2020.08.20
  • 발행 : 2020.08.28

초록

본 연구는 CELL교육과정 참여가 대학생의 학습몰입, 학습동기, 학업적자기효능감, 자기주도학습능력에 미치는 효과를 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 2020년 1학기에 K대학교 재학생 386명을 대상으로 사전·사후 설문조사를 실시하고 SPSS를 사용하여 분석하였다. 주요 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, CELL교육과정 참여가 대학생의 학습몰입, 학습 동기, 학업적자기효능감, 자기주도적학습능력에 통계적으로 유의한 향상을 보였다. 둘째, 성별에 따른 분석에서는 여학생의 경우에만 학습몰입, 학업적자기효능감, 자기주도학습능력에 유의한 향상을 보였다. 셋째, 학년별 분석에서는 2학년은 학습몰입과 자기주도학습능력에, 3학년은 모든 변인에, 4학년은 학업적자기효능감과 자기주도학습능력에 유의한 향상을 보였다. 넷째, 참여학생 인터뷰를 통해 참여소감과 개선점을 정리하였다. 본 연구는 CELL교육과정의 효과를 살펴보고 체계적인 운영과 지원을 위한 실천적인 방안을 제시하였다는 점에서 의의를 지닌다.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of CELL curriculum participation on learning flow, learning motivation, academic self-efficacy, and self-directed learning ability. To this end, in the first semester of 2020, 386 students from K University conducted a pre-post survey and analyzed using SPSS. The main research results are as follows. First, participation in the CELL curriculum showed statistically significant improvement in the student's learning flow, learning motivation, academic self-efficacy, and self-directed learning ability. Second, the analysis by gender showed significant improvement in learning flow, academic self-efficacy, and self-directed learning ability only for female students. Third, in the analysis by grade level, the sophomore showed significant improvement in learning flow and self-directed learning ability, the junior in all variables, and the senior in academic self-efficacy and self-directed learning ability. Fourth, participation impressions and improvements were summarized through interviews of participating students. This study is significant in that it examines the effectiveness of the CELL curriculum and suggests practical measures for systematic operation and support.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. J. Y. Kim & J. M. Tae. (2017). Comparison and analysis of the differences in creativity convergence competency of university students to develop a creativity convergence instruction. Journal of Curriculum Integration. 11(4), 145-164.
  2. Ministry of Education. (2017). Happy education where everyone grows, creative talent leading the future. Seoul: Ministry of Education work plan.
  3. D. H. Lee. (2017). A study of the possibilities and limitations of self-designed majoring system. The Politics of Education 24(3), 197-226.
  4. K. T. Kim & K. S. Park. (2008). Educational strategy for practical convergence using module curriculum in university. Korea Convergence Society. 9(7), 205-211. DOI : 10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.7.205
  5. S. H. Kwon & K. H. Kang. (2008). Practical approach to integrated curriculum of undergraduate liberal arts education- focused on hanyang university-self-efficacy in group investigation collaborative learning. Korean Journal of General Education. 2(2), 7-24.
  6. J. S. Heo. (2018). A case study on the experiences of university students participating in self-design semester. Korean Journal of Education Research, 56(3), 123-154.
  7. D. H. Ahn. (2016). Possibility of self-design major: focusing on the case in the united states. Culture and Convergence, 38(3), 275-300.
  8. D. R. Garrison. (2016). E-learning in the 21st century: a community of inquiry framework for research and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
  9. C. I. Lim. (2018). Direction of university education for leading the future society-report of the higher education future committee special committee. Seoul: Korea University Education Council.
  10. D. S. Kim & M H. Lee. (2019). Perception on online learning of faculty members in higher education. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(13), 848-870.
  11. S. C. Lee & J. A. Kim. (2018). Factors that affect student satisfaction with online courses. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(2), 115-138.
  12. D. S. Kim., M. H. Lee & Y. S. Lee. (2018). Development the measurement instrument of online self-regulated learning in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 901-927. DOI : 10.17232/KSET.34.4.901
  13. Y. S. Kim & K. H. Lee. (2017). The Effect of Online Self-directed Learning Class on Improvement of Self-concept of College Students. Global Creative Leader, 7(2), 71-89. DOI : 10.34226/gcl.2017.7.2.71
  14. S. Y. Cho. (2017). A study on korean traditional music education in universal liberal arts education using online. Korean Music Education, 44(44), 215-238. https://doi.org/10.35983/sikm.2008.44.215
  15. K. Y. Kim. (2020). A study on the development and effect of course based on online LMS. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(2), 839-859.
  16. S. H. Hyeon & M. K. Seo. (2017). A study on mediation effect of learning expectancy in social presence and educational satisfaction of online entrepreneurship education. Asia Pacific Journal of Business and Venturing, 12(5), 79-87.
  17. Y. J. Kim & K. S. Kang. (2018). Developing operating a content system for common curriculum based on online teaching course of personality education: focusing on 'D'university. The Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 21, 9(5), 113-127. https://doi.org/10.22143/hss21.9.5.9
  18. M. S. Konwles. (1975). Self-directed learning : a guide for learners and teachers. New York: Association Press.
  19. C. J. Hong. (2011). Analysis of the relationship between metacognitive ability and self-directed learning ability. Master's thesis. Korea University, Seoul.
  20. K. M. Choi & M. J. Kim. (2019). The effect of the university's non-curricular learning community activities on self-directed learning ability : based on an educational community using e-learning. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(1), 1283-1300.
  21. M. Csikszentmihalyi. (1990). Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. New York : Harper & Row.
  22. I. B. Seok. (2008). A study on personality analysis of learning immersion-focusing on learning motivation, academic achievement, and immersion model of Csikszentmihalyi. Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1). 187-212. DOI : 10.7739/jkafn.2020.27.1.52
  23. Y. R. Kim. (2001). An analysis on the validation of school learning motivation scale(A) & school-related coping scale(B) and relations between (A) & (B). CNU Journal of Educational Studies, 17, 3-37.
  24. B. H. Ha, B. H. Goo & H. C. Lee. (2009). The study on the effects of learning motive factors in e-learning classes on e-learning motivation. Journal of Human Resource Management Research, 16, 289-302.
  25. A. Bandura. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  26. D. H. Schunk. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3), 207-231. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_2
  27. S. A. Jackson & H. Marsh. (1996). Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: the flow state scale. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 18(1), 17-35. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.18.1.17
  28. M. Bong & D. Hocevar. (2002). Measuring self-efficacy: multitrait-multimethod comparison of scaling procedures. Applied Measurement in Education, 15, 143-171. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1502_02
  29. P. R Pintrich., D. A. F. Smith., T. Garcia & W. J. Mckeachie. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire(MSLQ). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
  30. Y. J. Seo., J. Y. Park & G. R. Ha. (2017). A study on the learning flow and learning performance on blended learning in management education. Journal of Business Research, 32(2), 315-337. https://doi.org/10.22903/JBR.2017.32.2.315
  31. S. Y. Lee & H. J. Kim. (2019). A study on the factors affecting flow in e-learning environment: focusing on interaction factors and affordance. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 19(10), 522-534.
  32. S. H. Lee. (2020). Factors contributing to learners' academic motivation and concentration. Humanities and Social Sciences 21, 11(2), 731-744. https://doi.org/10.22143/HSS21.11.2.50
  33. S. B. Yoon. (2018). The effect of video learning with relevance strategy on flip learning on learning motivation, participation in viewing, and academic achievement. Master's thesis. Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk
  34. Y. J. Lim & J. S. Kim. (2019). A study on the effectiveness of flipped learning in the design courses of the university. Bulletin of Korean Society of Basic Design & Art, 20(3), 253-264. https://doi.org/10.47294/KSBDA.20.3.20
  35. Y. J. Ha., S. J. Woo & N. S. Seo. (2018). A convergence study on the effects of blended learning on the self-directed learning ability and learning satisfaction of nursing students. Journal of Korea Convergence Society, 9(11), 509-517. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.11.509
  36. A. R. Kang. (2016). Meta-analysis of variables related to learning commitment of adult e-learning learners in Korea. Master's thesis. Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
  37. S. H. Kim. (2015). Self-directed learning programs at university: influences on self-awareness, learning motivation, and learning strategies. Global Creative Leader, 5(2), 71-91.
  38. K. W. Lee & J. Y. Kim. (2017). The effect of on-line creativity class on promotion of creative personality and self-concept. Journal of Education & Culture, 23(1), 33-64. https://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2017.23.1.33
  39. J. W. Creswell. (2011). Research method: design of qualitative, quantitative and mixed studies (3rd edition). Seoul: Sigma Press.