DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

PROBABILISTIC ANALYSIS OF A SYSTEM CONSISTING OF TWO SUBSYSTEMS IN THE SERIES CONFIGURATION UNDER COPULA REPAIR APPROACH

  • Raghav, Dhruv (Department of Computer Science, ITS Engineering College, Greater Noida, Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam Technical University) ;
  • Pooni, P.K. (Department of General Requirement, Sur College of Applied Sciences) ;
  • Gahlot, Monika (Department of Mathematics, Mewar University Chittorgarh) ;
  • Singh, V.V. (Department of Mathematics, Yusuf Maitama Sule University) ;
  • Ayagi, Hamisu Ismail (Department of Mathematics, Yusuf Maitama Sule University) ;
  • Abdullahi, Ameer Hassan (Department of Mathematics, Kano university of science and technology wudil)
  • Received : 2020.05.06
  • Accepted : 2020.08.02
  • Published : 2020.08.31

Abstract

Redundancy is commonly employed to improve system reliability. In most situations, components in the standby configurations are assumed statistically similar but independent. In many realistic models, all parts in standby are not treated as identical as they have different failure possibilities. The operational structure of the system has subsystem-1 with five identical components working under 2-out-of-5: G; policy, and the subsystem-2 has two units and functioning under 1-out-of-2: G; policy. Failure rates of units of subsystems are constant and assumed to follow an exponential distribution. Computed results give a new aspect to the scientific community to adopt multi-dimension repair in the form of the copula.

Keywords

References

  1. D.R. Cox: The analysis of non-Markov stochastic processes by the inclusion of supplementary variables. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 51 (1955), no. 3, 433-441. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100030437
  2. E.A. Oliveira, A.C.M. Alvim & P.F.F. Melo: Unavailability analysis of safety systems under aging by supplementary variables with imperfect repair. Annals of Nuclear Energy 32 (2005), no. 2, 241-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2004.06.003
  3. M.S. Moustafa: Availability of k-out-of-n: G systems with M failure modes. Microelectron Reliability 36 (1996), 385-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-2714(95)00062-3
  4. P.A. Kullstam: Availability, MTBF, MTTR for the repairable m-out-of-n system. IEEE Transaction Reliability R-30 (1981), 393-394. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.1981.5221134
  5. X. Liang, Y. Xiong & Z. Li: Exact reliability formula for consecutive k-out-of-n repairable systems. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 59 (2010), no. 2, 313-318. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2010.2046790
  6. M. Park & H. Pham: A generalized block replacement policy for a k-out-of-n system with respect to a threshold number of failed components and risk costs. IEEE Trans. System Man, Cybernet. A Syst. Humans 42 (2012), no. 2, 453-463. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2011.2162499
  7. P. Kumar & R. Gupta: Reliability analysis of a single unit M-G-1 system model with helping unit. Journal of Combinatorics, Information and System Sciences 32 (2007), no. 1-4, 209-219.
  8. E.J. Vanderperre: Reliability analysis of a warm standby system with general distributions. Microelectron Reliab. 30 (1990), no. 3, 487-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-2714(90)90403-A
  9. G.S. Mokaddis & M.L. Tawfik: Stochastic analysis of a two-dissimilar unit warm standby redundant system with two types of repair facilities. Microelectron Reliab. 35 (1995), no. 12, 1467-1472. https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-2714(95)00180-A
  10. P. Kumar & A. Sirohi: Stochastic analysis of a two-priority unit standby system with imperfect switch and correlated failure and repair times. Int. Journal of Adv Research in computer science and software engineering 4 (2014), no. 8, 621-628.
  11. B.S. Dhillon: Reliability and availability analysis of a system with warm standby and common cause failures. Microelectron Reliab. 33 (1993), no. 9, 1343-1349. https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-2714(93)90134-K
  12. R.B. Nelson: An Introduction to Copulas. (2006), 2nd edn, Springer, New York.
  13. A. Munjal & S.B. Singh: Reliability analysis of a complex repairable system composed of two 2-out-of-3: G subsystems connected in parallel. Journal of reliability and statistical studies 7 (2014), 89-111.
  14. N. Goyal, M. Ram, S. Amoli & A. Suyal: Sensitivity analysis of a three-unit series system under k-out-of-n redundancy. International Journal of Quality Reliability and Management 34 (2017), no. 6, 770-784. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-07-2016-0106
  15. V.V. Singh, J. Gulati, D.K. Rawal & C.K. Goel: Performance analysis of the complex system in the series configuration under different failure and repair disciplines using a copula. International Journal of reliability quality and safety engineering 23 (2016), 1-21.
  16. V.V. Singh, M. Ram & D.K. Rawal: Cost Analysis of an Engineering System involving subsystems in Series Configuration. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 10 (2013), 1124-1130. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2013.2266134
  17. A.K. Lado, V.V. Singh, K.H. Ismial & I. Yusuf: Performance and cost assessment of the repairable complex system with two subsystems connected in a series configuration. International Journal of Reliability and Applications 19 (2018), no. 1, 27-42.
  18. A. Kumar, S. Pant & S.B. Singh: Availability and cost analysis of an engineering system involving subsystems in series configuration. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 34 (2017), no. 6, 879-894. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-06-2016-0085
  19. R. Sharma & G. Kumar: Availability improvement for the successive k-out-of-n machining system-using standby with multiple working vacations. International Journal of Reliability and Safety 11 (2017), no. 3/4, 256-267. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRS.2017.089710
  20. M.A. El-Damcese & N.H. El-Sodany: Availability and Reliability Analysis for the k-out-of-n: G system with three failures using Markov model. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research 5 (2014), no. 12, 383-389.
  21. M. Ram & S.B. Singh: Availability and Cost Analysis of a parallel redundant complex system with two types of failure under preemptive-resume repair discipline using Gumbel-Hougaard family copula in repair. Int. J. Reliabil., Quality Safety Engineering 15 (2008), no. 4, 341-365. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021853930800309X
  22. V.V. Singh, S.B. Singh, M. Ram & C.K. Goel: Availability, MTTF and cost analysis of a system having two units in a series configuration with a controller. International Journal of System Assurance and Management 4 (2013), no. 4, 341-352.
  23. X. Bao & L. Cui: An analysis of availability for series Markov repairable system with neglected or delayed failures. IEEE Trans. Rel. 59 (2010), no. 4, 734-743. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2010.2055915
  24. Z. Zheng, L. Cui & A.G. Hawkes: A study on a single-unit Markov repairable system with repair time omission. IEEE Transaction on Reliability 55 (2006), no. 2, 182-188. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2006.874933
  25. A. Kumar & M. Ram: Reliability measures improvement and sensitivity analysis of a coal-handling unit for thermal power plant.. IJE Transactions C: Aspects 26 (2013), no. 9, 1059-1066.
  26. N. Goyal, M. Ram & S. Banga: Sensitivity assessment of air and refrigeration. Kuwait Journal of Science 45 (2018), no. 1, 29-38.
  27. M. El-Damcese, F. Abbas & E. El-Ghamry: Reliability analysis of three elements in series and parallel systems under time-varying Fuzzy failure rate. IJE Transactions A: Basics 27 (2014), no. 4, 553-560.
  28. M.A El- Damcese & N.H. El-Sodany: Reliability and Sensitivity analysis of the k-out-of- n: G warm standby parallel repairable system with replacement at common cause failure using Markov model. Journal. Stat. and Appl. Probability 5 (2016), no. 3, 521-533. https://doi.org/10.18576/jsap/050316