The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

  • 제12권4호
  • /
  • Pages.189-196
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2005-7806(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-7814(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effects of different surface treatments on the shear bond strengths of two dual-cure resin cements to CAD/CAM restorative materials

  • 투고 : 2019.09.30
  • 심사 : 2020.06.12
  • 발행 : 2020.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

PURPOSE. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of surface treatments on the bond strengths between polymer-containing restorative materials and two dual-cure resin cements. MATERIALS AND METHODS. In the present study, rectangular samples prepared from Lava Ultimate (LU) and Vita Enamic (VE) blocks were used. The specimen surfaces were treated using CoJet sandblasting, 50 ㎛ Al2O3 sandblasting, % 9 HF (hydrofluoric) acid, ER,Cr:YSGG laser treatment, and Z-Prime. Dual-cure resin cements (TheraCem and 3M RelyX U 200) were applied on each specimen's treated surface. A micro-tensile device was used to evaluate shear bond strength. Statistical analysis was performed using the SAS 9.4v3. RESULTS. While the bond strength using TheraCem with LU or VE was not statistically significant (P=.164), the bond strength using U200 with VE was statistically significant (P=.006). In the TheraCem applied VE groups, Z-Prime and HF acid were statistically different from CoJet, Laser, and Sandblast groups. In comparison of TheraCem used LU group, there was a statistically significant difference between HF acid and other surface treatments. CONCLUSION. The bonding performance between the restorative materials and cements were material type-dependent and surface treatment had a large effect on the bond strength. Within the limitations of the study, the use of both U200 and TheraCem may be suggested if Z-prime was applied to intaglio surfaces of VE. The cementation of LU using TheraCem is suitable after HF acid conditioning of the restoration surfaces.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Frencken JE, Mount GJ. Minimal intervention dentistry-a review. FDI Commission Project 1-97. Int Dent J 2000;50:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595X.2000.tb00540.x
  2. Tian T, Tsoi JK-H, Matinlinna JP, Burrow MF. Evaluation of microtensile bond strength on ceramic-resin adhesion using two specimen testing substrates. Int J Adhes Adhes 2014;54:165-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.06.003
  3. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:268-74. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.50
  4. Garcia-Sanz V, Paredes-Gallardo V, Mendoza-Yero O, Carbonell-Leal M, Albaladejo A, Montiel-Company JM, Bellot-Arcis C. The effects of lasers on bond strength to ceramic materials: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2018;13:e0190736. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190736
  5. Helbling F, Ozcan M. Adhesion of resin cement to contemporary hybrid ceramic and polymeric CAD/CAM materials: effect of conditioning methods and ageing. J Adhe Sci Technol 2019;33:886-902. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2018.1564528
  6. Motevasselian F, Amiri Z, Chiniforush N, Mirzaei M, Thompson V. In vitro evaluation of the effect of different surface treatments of a hybrid ceramic on the microtensile bond strength to a luting resin cement. J Lasers Med Sci 2019;10: 297-303. https://doi.org/10.15171/jlms.2019.48
  7. Oz FD, Canatan S, Bolay S. Effects of surface treatments on the bond strength of composite resin to hybrid computer-assisted design/manufacturing blocks. J Adhes Sci Technol 2019;33:986-1000. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2019.1575566
  8. Manso AP, Carvalho RM. Dental cements for luting and bonding restorations: self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Clin North Am 2017;61:821-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2017.06.006
  9. Beatty MW, Swartz ML, Moore BK, Phillips RW, Roberts TA. Effect of crosslinking agent content, monomer functionality, and repeat unit chemistry on properties of unfilled resins. J Biomed Mater Res 1993;27:403-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820270314
  10. Kerby RE, Knobloch LA, Schricker S, Gregg B. Synthesis and evaluation of modified urethane dimethacrylate resins with reduced water sorption and solubility. Dent Mater 2009;25:302-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.07.009
  11. Vrochari AD, Eliades G, Hellwig E, Wrbas KT. Water sorption and solubility of four self-etching, self-adhesive resin luting agents. J Adhes Dent 2010;12:39-43. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a17539
  12. Zorzin J, Petschelt A, Ebert J, Lohbauer U. pH neutralization and influence on mechanical strength in self-adhesive resin luting agents. Dent Mater 2012;28:672-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.03.005
  13. Roedel L, Bednarzig V, Belli R, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U, Zorzin J. Self-adhesive resin cements: pH-neutralization, hydrophilicity, and hygroscopic expansion stress. Clin Oral Investig 2017;21:1735-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1947-4
  14. Sterzenbach G, Karajouli G, Tunjan R, Spintig T, Bitter K, Naumann M. Damage of lithium-disilicate all-ceramic restorations by an experimental self-adhesive resin cement used as core build-ups. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:281-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1263-9
  15. Chen L, Yang J, Wang JR, Suh BI. Physical and biological properties of a newly developed calcium silicate-based selfadhesive cement. Am J Dent 2018;31:86-90.
  16. Ihsan SSA, Mohammed SA. Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic buccal tube bonded to zirconia crown after using two different (10-MDP)-containing adhesive systems. Health Sci 2019;8:69-78.
  17. Altan B, Cinar S, Tuncelli B. Evaluation of shear bond strength of zirconia-based monolithic CAD-CAM materials to resin cement after different surface treatments. Niger J Clin Pract 2019;22:1475-82. https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_157_19
  18. Cevik P, Eraslan O, Eser K, Tekeli S. Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to surface-treated feldspathic porcelain after thermocycling. Int J Artif Organs 2018;41:160-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0391398818756181
  19. Kursoglu P, Motro PF, Yurdaguven H. Shear bond strength of resin cement to an acid etched and a laser irradiated ceramic surface. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:98-103. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.2.98
  20. Frankenbergera R, Hartmannb V, Krechc M, Kramer N, Reich S, Braun A, Roggendorf M. Adhesive luting of new CAD/CAM materials. Int J Comput Dent 2015;18:9-20.
  21. Gungor MB, Nemli SK, Bal BT, Unver S, Dogan A. Effect of surface treatments on shear bond strength of resin composite bonded to CAD/CAM resin-ceramic hybrid materials. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8:259-66. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.4.259
  22. Campos F, Almeida CS, Rippe MP, de Melo RM, Valandro LF, Bottino MA. Resin bonding to a hybrid ceramic: Effects of surface treatments and aging. Oper Dent 2016;41:171-8. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-057-L
  23. Elsaka SE. Bond strength of novel CAD/CAM restorative materials to self-adhesive resin cement: the effect of surface treatments. J Adhes Dent 2014;16:531-40. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a33198