Korean Journal of Culture and Social Issue (한국심리학회지 : 문화 및 사회문제)

Korean Psychological Association of Culture and Social Issues (한국문화및사회문제심리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Validation of the Korean Version of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory-Expanded

외상 후 성장 척도 확장판(The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory-Expanded: PTGI-X)의 한국판 타당화 연구

  • Kim, Si Hyeong (Department of Education Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Lim, Sujeong (Department of Education Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Shin, Jiyoung (Department of Education Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Lee, Deok Hee (Department of Education Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Lee, Dong Hun (Department of Education Sungkyunkwan University)
  • 김시형 (성균관대학교 교육학과) ;
  • 임수정 (성균관대학교 교육학과) ;
  • 신지영 (성균관대학교 교육학과) ;
  • 이덕희 (성균관대학교 교육학과) ;
  • 이동훈 (성균관대학교 교육학과)
  • Received : 2020.04.08
  • Accepted : 2020.07.15
  • Published : 2020.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to validate the Korean version of the post-traumatic growth inventory-expanded(K-PTGI-X), which has been widely used to assess posttraumatic growth. The PTGI-X is a measure of the addition of the items to measure the existential growth as the need for modification to the factors of the 'increase of spiritual interest' in the existing PTGI is suggested. We examined the factor structure, reliability, and validity of a Korean version of the PTGI-X among 625 Korean adults who have experienced trauma events. First, EFA confirmed the appropriate PTGI-X factor structure and found that the 4-factor structure was the most appropriate. Next, as a result of CFA, it was found that the model to which correlation between items was added to the 4-factor model was good. Next, testing internal consistency, CR, and AVE of the K-PTGI-X showed that PTGI-X's items are reliable. Also, we tested the concurrent validity and discriminative validity. All of the K-PTGI-X scales significantly correlated with measures of deliberate rumination and core-belief except for the intrusive rumination. Finally, to add an understanding of K-PTGI-X, t-test according to demographic variables was conducted. Recommendations for future research and implications were discussed.

본 연구는 외상 후 성장의 정도를 측정하는 외상 후 성장 척도의 확장판(The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory-X: PTGI-X)을 국내에 타당화하고자 하였다. PTGI-X 척도는 기존 PTGI의 '영적·종교적 관심의 증가 요인'에 대한 보완의 필요성에 따라 실존적 깊이 증가를 측정하는 문항이 추가된 척도이다. 이를 위해 외상 경험이 있는 성인 625명을 대상으로 K-PTGI-X의 요인구조를 확인하고, 타당도와 신뢰도를 검증하였다. 먼저, 탐색적 요인분석을 통해 외상을 경험한 국내 성인을 대상으로 적절한 PTGI-X의 요인구조를 확인하였고, 4요인 구조가 가장 적절한 것으로 나타났다. 다음으로, 확인적 요인분석을 실시한 결과 4요인 모형에 문항 간 상관을 추가한 모형이 모형적합도가 좋은 것으로 나타났다. 내적 신뢰도, 분산추출지수, 개념 신뢰도를 검토하여 문항들이 요인을 구성하는 데에 문제가 없으며 신뢰로운 도구임을 확인하였다. 타당도를 확인하기 위해 관련성이 높은 것으로 알려진 핵심신념붕괴, 의도적 반추와의 유의한 상관관계를 확인하여 동시 타당도를 검증하였고, 침습적 반추와 통계적으로 유의하지 않은 관계를 확인하여 변별 타당도를 검증하였다. 마지막으로 K-PTGI-X의 이해를 더하기 위해 인구통계학적 변인에 따른 차이분석을 실시하였다. 연구결과를 바탕으로 본 연구의 논의와 시사점을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 고은심, 이민규 (2018). 침습적 반추가 외상 후 성장에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 23(3), 785-800. https://doi.org/10.17315/KJHP.2018.23.3.010
  2. 권선중, 김교헌 (2007). 한국판 스트레스 관련 성장 척도(K-SRGS-R)의 타당화 연구. 연차학술발표대회 논문집, 2007.
  3. 김보라, 신희천 (2010). 자아탄력성과 삶의 의미가 외상 후 성장에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 22(1), 117-136.
  4. 김영애 (2017). 외상 경험자를 대상으로 한현실치료가 외상후 성장에 미치는 효과. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 36(4), 550-564. https://doi.org/10.15842/kjcp.2017.36.4.007
  5. 박경 (2011). 수용, 외상 후 성장, 우울과 자살사고의 관계. 스트레스硏究, 19(4), 281-292.
  6. 박주언, 김원형, 노대영, 원성두, 김하경, 강석훈, 홍나래, 박성용, 김대호, 채정호 (2016). 재난정신건강평가 워크북. 대안불안의학회.
  7. 박준성 (2010). 한국인의 신앙심: 구성요인 및 삶의 의미에 미치는 효과. 중앙대학교 박사 학위논문.
  8. 송승훈, 이홍석, 박준호, 김교헌 (2009). 한국판 외상후 성장 척도의 타당도 및 신뢰도 연구. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 14(1), 193-214.
  9. 신선영, 정남운 (2012). 삶의 의미와 사회적 지지가 외상 후 성장에 미치는 영향: 성장적 반추를 매개 변인으로. 인간이해, 33(2), 217-235.
  10. 안현의, 주혜선, 민지원, 심기선 (2013). 한국판사건관련 반추 척도(K-ERRI)의 타당화. 인지행동치료, 13(1), 149-172.
  11. 이덕희, 이동훈, 정하영 (2019). 잠재프로파일 분석 (LPA) 을 활용한 PTSD 증상과 외상 후 성장 수준의 양상: 폭식, 비자살적 자해, 문제성 음주행동에서의 차이. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 25(4), 325-351.
  12. 이동훈, 이수연, 윤기원, 최수정, 김시형 (2017). 성격 5요인, 외상 후 인지, 사건관련 반추, PTSD 증상, 외상 후 성장의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 36(2), 241-270. https://doi.org/10.22257/kjp.2017.06.36.2.241
  13. 이수림 (2013). 외상 유형이 외상후성장 및 지혜에 미치는 영향: 사회적 지지와 대처의 매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 19(3), 319-341.
  14. 이유리, 장현아 (2016). 관계 상실 경험 여고생의 자기노출, 사회적 지지가 외상후 성장에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 21(1), 65-80.
  15. 임선영 (2015). PTGI 영적 변화 요인(spiritual change)의 심리측정적 이질성: 성장에 대한 인식과 종교 변인에 따른 비교. 인지행동치료, 15(2), 377-400.
  16. 임선영, 권석만 (2012a). 관계상실을 통한 성장이 성격적 성숙과 정신건강에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 31(2) 427-447.
  17. 임선영, 권석만 (2012b). 대학생의 관계상실을 통한 성장에 관한 연구: 인지적 유연성과 인지적 정서조절 방략을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 31(2), 261-281.
  18. 임선영, 권석만 (2013). 역경후 성장에 영향을 미치는 인지적 처리방략과 신념체계의 특성: 관계상실 경험자를 대상으로. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 32(3), 567-588.
  19. 정민선 (2014). 대학생의 자기노출, 사회적 지지와 외상후 성장과의 관계에서 의도적 반추의 매개효과. 상담학연구, 15(1), 415-430.
  20. 정아름, 김종남 (2016). 한국판 외상 후 심리적 안녕감 변화 척도의 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 21(1), 195-224.
  21. 조선화, 강영신 (2015). 애도 회피에 따른 침투적 반추가 심리적 성장에 이르는 과정에 서 의도적 반추 및 자기노출의 역할. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 27(3), 641-663.
  22. 조성미 (2012). 청년의 외상 후 성장에 대한 인지요인: 사회적지지 및 리질리언스의 인과적 관련성. 부산대학교 석사학위논문.
  23. 최승미 (2008). 외상 후 성장 관련 변인의 탐색. 고려대학교 박사학위논문.
  24. 최재인, 성승연 (2016). 외상 후 성장과 적응의 관계에서 실존적 의미의 매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 28(3), 829-854.
  25. 통계청 (2016). 2015 인구주택총조사 표본 집계 결과 인구.가구.주택 기본특성항목. http://kostat.go.kr
  26. 한상미, 조용래 (2017). 긍정심리개입이 외상경험 대학생들의 심리적 건강 및 외상 후 성장에 미치는 효과. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 36(2), 223-241. https://doi.org/10.15842/kjcp.2017.36.2.007
  27. Bosson, J. V., Kelley, M. L., & Jones, G. N. (2012). Deliberate cognitive processing mediates the relation between positive religious coping and posttraumatic growth. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 17(5), 439-451. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2011.650131
  28. Brugha, T., Bebbington, P., Tennant, C., & Hurry, J. (1985). The list of threatening experiences: A subset of 12 life event categories with considerable long-term contextual threat. Psychological Medicine, 15(1), 189-194. https://doi.org/10.1017/s003329170002105x
  29. Cadell, S., Regehr, C., & Hemsworth, D. (2003). Factors contributing to posttraumatic growth: A proposed structural equation model. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 73(3), 279-287. https://doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.73.3.279
  30. Calhoun, L. G., Cann, A., Tedeschi, R. G., & McMillan, J. (2000). A correlational test of the relationship between posttraumatic growth, religion, and cognitive processing. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 13(3), 521-527. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007745627077
  31. Calhoun, L. G., Cann, A., & Tedeschi, R. G. (2010). The posttraumatic growth model: Sociocultural considerations. In T. Weiss, & R. Berger (Eds.), Posttraumatic growth and culturally competent practice (pp. 1-14). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
  32. Calhoun, L. G., Cann, A., & Tedeschi, R. G. (2010). The posttraumatic growth model: Sociocultural considerations. In T. Weiss & R. Berger (Eds.), Posttraumatic growth and culturally competent practice (p. 114). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  33. Calhoun, L. G., & Tedeschi, R. G. (1999). Facilitating posttraumatic growth: A clinician's guide. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  34. Calhoun, L. G., & Tedeschi, R. G. (2013). Posttraumatic growth in clinical practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
  35. Calhoun, L. G., & Tedeschi, R. G. (2014). Handbook of posttraumatic growth: Research and practice. NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  36. Calhoun, L. G., Tedeschi, R. G., Cann, A., & Hanks, E. A. (2010). Positive outcomes following bereavement: Paths to posttraumatic growth. Psychologica Belgica, 50(1-2), 125-143. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb-50-1-2-125
  37. Cann, A., Calhoun, L. G., Tedeschi, R. G., Kilmer, R. P., Gil-Rivas, V., Vishnevsky, T., & Danhauer, S. C. (2010). The Core Beliefs Inventory: A brief measure of disruption in the assumptive world. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 23(1), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800802573013
  38. Cann, A., Calhoun, L. G., Tedeschi, R. G., & Solomon, D. T. (2010). Posttraumatic growth and depreciation as independent experiences and predictors of well-being. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 15(3), 151-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325020903375826
  39. Cann, A., Calhoun, L. G., Tedeschi, R. G., Taku, K., Vishnevsky, T., Triplett, K. N., & Danhauer, S. C. (2010). A short form of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 23(2), 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800903094273
  40. Cann, A., Calhoun, L. G., Tedeschi, R. G., Triplett, K. N., Vishnevsky, T., & Lindstrom, C. M. (2011). Assessing posttraumatic cognitive processes: The event related rumination inventory. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 24(2), 137-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2010.529901
  41. Cerny, B. A., & Kaiser, H. F. (1977). A study of a measure of sampling adequacy for factor-analytic correlation matrices. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 12(1), 43-47. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1201_3
  42. Cao, C., Wang, L., Wu, J., Li, G., Fang, R., Cao, X., et al. (2018). Patterns of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and posttraumatic growth in an epidemiological sample of Chinese earthquake survivors: A latent profile analysis. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 1549. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01549
  43. Danhauer, S. C., Case, L. D., Tedeschi, R., Russell, G., Vishnevsky, T., Triplett, K., et al. & Avis, N. E. (2013). Predictors of posttraumatic growth in women with breast cancer. Psycho oncology, 22(12), 2676-2683. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3298
  44. Dekel, S., Ein-Dor, T., & Solomon, Z. (2012). Posttraumatic growth and posttraumatic distress: A longitudinal study. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 4(1), 94-101. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021865
  45. Fornell, C. & Laker, D. F., (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  46. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice hall.
  47. Helgeson, V. S., Reynolds, K. A., & Tomich, P. L. (2006). A meta-analytic review of benefit finding and growth. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(5), 797-816. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.74.5.797
  48. Hill, P. C., & Pargament, K. I. (2008). Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality: Implications for physical and mental health research. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, S(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1037/1941-1022.S.1.3
  49. Ho, S. M. Y., Chan, C. L. W., & Ho, R. T. H. (2004). Posttraumatic growth in Chinese cancer survivors. Psycho Oncology, 13(6), 377-389. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.758
  50. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
  51. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  52. Huguelet, P., & Koenig, H. G. (2009). Religion and spirituality in psychiatry. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  53. Hullmann, S. E., Fedele, D. A., Molzon, E. S., Mayes, S., & Mullins, L. L. (2014). Posttraumatic growth and hope in parents of children with cancer. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 32(6), 696-707. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2014.955241
  54. Jaarsma, T. A., Pool, G., Sanderman, R., & Ranchor, A. V. (2006). Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the posttraumatic growth inventory among cancer patients. Psycho Oncology, 15(10), 911-920. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1026
  55. Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992). Shattered assumptions. New York, NY: The Free Press.
  56. Janoff-Bulman, R. (2006). Schema-change perspectives on posttraumatic growth. In L. G. Calhoun & R. G. Tedeschi (Eds.), Handbook of posttraumatic growth (pp. 81-99). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
  57. Joseph, S., & Linley, P. A. (2008). Positive psychological perspectives on posttraumatic stress: An integrative psychosocial framework. In Joseph, S. & Linley, P. A. (Eds.), Trauma, recovery, and growth: Positive psychological perspectives on posttraumatic stress (pp. 3-20). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  58. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
  59. Lindstrom, C. M., Cann, A., Calhoun, L. G., & Tedeschi, R. G. (2013). The relationship of core belief challenge, rumination, disclosure, and sociocultural elements to posttraumatic growth. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 5(1), 50-55. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022030
  60. Linley, P. A., & Joseph, S. (2004). Positive change following trauma and adversity: A review. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17(1), 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTS.0000014671.27856.7e
  61. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
  62. Maercker, A., & Zoellner, T. (2004). The Janus face of self-perceived growth: Toward a two-component model of posttraumatic growth. Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 41-48.
  63. Morris, B. A., & Shakespeare-Finch, J. (2011). Rumination, post traumatic growth, and distress: structural equation modelling with cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology, 20(11), 1176-1183. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1827
  64. Morris, B. A., Shakespeare-Finch, J., Rieck, M., & Newbery, J. (2005). Multidimensional nature of posttraumatic growth in an Australian population. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 18(5), 575-585. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20067
  65. O'Leary, V. E., Alday, C. S., & Ickovics, J. R. (1998). Models of life change and posttraumatic growth. In R. G. Tedeschi, C. L. Park, & L. G. Calhoun (Eds.), Posttraumatic growth: Positive changes in the aftermath of crisis (pp. 127-151). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  66. Oshiro, R., Kopitz, J., Soejima, T., Kibi, S., Kamibeppu, K., Sakamoto, S., & Taku, K. (2019). Perceptions of positive and negative changes for posttraumatic growth and depreciation: Judgments from Japanese undergraduates. Personality and Individual Differences, 137, 17-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.07.040
  67. Pan, X., Liu, J., Li, L. W., & Kwok, J. (2016). Posttraumatic growth in aging individuals who have lost their only child in China. Death studies, 40(7), 395-404. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2016.1169234
  68. Regel, S., & Joseph, S. (2010). The facts posttraumatic stress. UK: Oxford university press.
  69. Shaw, A., Joseph, S., & Linley, P. A. (2005). Religion, spirituality, and posttraumatic growth: A systematic review. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 8(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/1367467032000157981
  70. Solomon, Z., & Dekel, R. (2007). Posttraumatic stress disorder and posttraumatic growth among Israeli ex pows. Journal of Traumatic Stress: Official Publication of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, 20(3), 303-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20216
  71. Splevins, K., Cohen, K., Bowley, J., & Joseph, S. (2010). Theories of posttraumatic growth: Cross-cultural perspectives. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 15(3), 259-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325020903382111
  72. Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 5). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  73. Taku, K., Cann, A., Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2009). Intrusive versus deliberate rumination in posttraumatic growth across US and Japanese samples. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 22(2), 129-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800802317841
  74. Taku, K., Calhoun, L. G., Cann, A., & Tedeschi, R. G. (2008). The role of rumination in the coexistence of distress and posttraumatic growth among bereaved Japanese university students. Death Studies, 32(5), 428-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481180801974745
  75. Taku, K., Calhoun, L. G., Tedeschi, R. G., Gil-Rivas, V., Kilmer, R. P., & Cann, A. (2007). Examining posttraumatic growth among Japanese university students. Anxiety, stress, and coping, 20(4), 353-367. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800701295007
  76. Tedeschi, R. G., & Blevins, C. L. (2015). From mindfulness to meaning: Implications for the theory of posttraumatic growth. Psychological Inquiry, 26(4), 373-376. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2015.1075354
  77. Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1995). Trauma and transformation: Growing in the Aftermath of Suffering, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  78. Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1996). The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9(3), 455-471. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.2490090305
  79. Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological inquiry, 15(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1501_01
  80. Tedeschi, R. G., Cann, A., Taku, K., Senol-Durak, E., & Calhoun, L. G. (2017). The posttraumatic growth inventory: a revision integrating existential and spiritual change. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 30(1), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22155
  81. Tedeschi, R. G., Shakespeare-Finch, J., Taku, K., & Calhoun, L. G. (2018). Posttraumatic growth: theory, research, and applications. New York, NY: Routledge.
  82. Weathers, F. W., Blake, D. D., Schnurr, P. P., Kaloupek, D. G., Marx, B. P., & Keane, T. M. (2013). The life events checklist for DSM-5 (LEC-5). Instrument available from the National Center for PTSD at www.ptsd.va.gov.
  83. Weiss, T., & Berger, R. (2006). Reliability and validity of a Spanish version of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory. Research on Social Work Practice, 16(2), 191-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731505281374
  84. Yalom, I. (1980). Existential psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.
  85. Zoellner, T., & Maercker, A. (2006). Posttraumatic growth in clinical psychology-A critical review and introduction of a two component model. Clinical psychology review, 26(5), 626-653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2006.01.008