References
- FANR, Basic Safety Standards for Facilities and Activities Involving Ionizing Radiation Other than in Nuclear Facilities, UAE, 2014. FANR-REG-24, Version 1.
- IAEA. Occupational Radiation Protection, IAEA Safety Standards Series, Vienna, 1999. RS-G-1.1.
- X. Zhang, R. Srinivasan, GIS-based spatial precipitation estimation: a comparison of geostatistical approaches 1, JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 45 (4) (2009 Aug) 894-906. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00335.x
- L. Pesquer, A. Cortes, X. Pons, Parallel ordinary kriging interpolation incorporating automatic variogram fitting, Comput. Geosci. 37 (4) (2011 Apr 1) 464-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2010.10.010
- J. Aalto, P. Pirinen, J. Heikkinen, A. Venalainen, Spatial interpolation of monthly climate data for Finland: comparing the performance of kriging and generalized additive models, Theor. Appl. Climatol. 112 (1-2) (2013 Apr 1) 99-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-012-0716-9
- Z. Wang, J. Cai, Reconstruction of the neutron radiation field on nuclear facilities near the shield using Bayesian inference, Prog. Nucl. Energy 118 (2020 Jan 1) 103070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2019.103070
- J.J. Lee, C.S. Jang, S.W. Wang, C.W. Liu, Evaluation of potential health risk of arsenic-affected groundwater using indicator kriging and dose response model, Sci. Total Environ. 384 (1-3) (2007 Oct 1) 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.06.021
- G. Dubois, J. Malczewski, M. De Cort, in: Mapping Radioactivity in the Environment: Spatial Interpolation Comparison 97, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2003.
- G. Dubois, in: Automatic Mapping Algorithms for Routine and Emergency Monitoring Data: Spatial Interpolation Comparison 2004, EUR-OP, 2005.
- G. Dubois, S. Galmarini, Introduction to the spatial interpolation comparison (SIC) 2004 exercise and presentation of the datasets, Appl. GIS 1 (2) (2005), 9-1.
- P.H. Hiemstra, E.J. Pebesma, C.J. Twenhofel, G.B. Heuvelink, Real-time automatic interpolation of ambient gamma dose rates from the Dutch radioactivity monitoring network, Comput. Geosci. 35 (8) (2009 Aug 1) 1711-1721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2008.10.011
- B.A. Khuwaileh, P.J. Turinsky, Surrogate based model calibration for pressurized water reactor physics calculations, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 49 (6) (2017 Sep 1) 1219-1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2017.08.007
- K.D. Coleman, A. Lewis, R.C. Smith, B. Williams, M. Morris, B. Khuwaileh, Gradient-free construction of active subspaces for dimension reduction in complex models with applications to neutronics, SIAM/ASA J. Uncertain. Quantification 7 (1) (2019 Jan 17) 117-142. https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1075119
- Thomas P. Ryan, Modern Regression Methods, John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
- Agnar H€oskuldsson, PLS regression methods, J. Chemom. 2 (3) (1988) 211-228. https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.1180020306
- Raymond H. Myers, et al., Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, Wiley, New York, 1995.
- D.J. Lucia, P.S. Beran, W.A. Silva, Reduced-order modeling: new approaches for computational physics, Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 40 (1-2) (2004 Feb 1) 51-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2003.12.001
- N. Halko, P.G. Martinsson, J.A. Tropp, Finding structure with randomness: probabilistic algorithms for constructing approximate matrix decompositions, SIAM Rev. 53 (2) (2011 May 5) 217-288. https://doi.org/10.1137/090771806
- P.G. Constantine, E. Dow, Q. Wang, Active subspace methods in theory and practice: applications to kriging surfaces, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 36 (4) (2014 Jul 24) A1500-A1524. https://doi.org/10.1137/130916138
- B.M. Adams, K. Coleman, L.N. Gilkey, N. Gordon, R. Hooper, B.A. Khuwaileh, A. Lewis, K. Maupin, R.C. Smith, L.P. Swiler, P.J. Turinsky, User Guidelines and Best Practices for CASL VUQ Analysis Using Dakota, Los Alamos National Lab.(LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States), 2017 Oct.
- C.E. Rasmussen, C.K. Williams, Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, vol. 38, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2006, pp. 715-719, 2006.
- Walid A. Metwally, Samar El-Sayed, Ababneh Ahmad, et al., Flux measurements for a DD neutron generator using neutron activation analysis[J], Nucl. Sci. Tech. 29 (4) (2018) 52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-018-0385-1
- W.A. Metwally, O.A. Taqatqa, M.M. Ballaith, A.X. Chen, M.A. Piestrup, Neutron and photon dose mapping of a DD neutron generator, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 176 (3) (2017 Feb 16) 258-263. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncx004
- MathWorks documentation: fit a Gaussian process regression (GPR) model, Available from: https://www.mathworks.com/help/stats/fitrgp.html, 01 July 2019.
- R. Martinez-Cantin, Bayesopt, A bayesian optimization library for nonlinear optimization, experimental design and bandits, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15 (1) (2014 Jan 1) 3735-3739.
- B.M. Adams, K. Coleman, L.N. Gilkey, N. Gordon, R. Hooper, B.A. Khuwaileh, A. Lewis, K. Maupin, R.C. Smith, L.P. Swiler, P.J. Turinsky, User Guidelines and Best Practices for CASL VUQ Analysis Using Dakota, Los Alamos National Lab.(LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States), 2017 Oct 4.
- R.C. Smith, Uncertainty Quantification: Theory, Implementation, and Applications, Siam, 2013 Dec 2.
- Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), MCNP: A General Monte Carlo NParticle Transport Code, 2003. Oak Ridge, TN, United States. LA-UR-03-1987, Version 5.1.
Cited by
- Use of Gaussian process regression for radiation mapping of a nuclear reactor with a mobile robot vol.11, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93474-4