DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Use of big data analysis to investigate the relationship between natural radiation dose rates and cancer incidences in Republic of Korea

  • Joo, Han Young (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, Jae Wook (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Dankook University) ;
  • Moon, Joo Hyun (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Dankook University)
  • Received : 2019.09.30
  • Accepted : 2020.01.13
  • Published : 2020.08.25

Abstract

In this study, we investigated whether there is a significant relationship between the natural radiation dose rate and the cancer incidences in Korea by using a big data analysis. The natural dose rate data for this analysis were the measurement data obtained from the 171 monitoring posts of the 113 administrative districts in Korea over the 10 years from 2007 to 2016. The relative cancer incidences for this analysis were the difference in the cancer patients per hundred thousand people year-on-year in the administrative districts with the five highest and the five lowest natural gamma dose rates each year over the same period. To analyze the correlation between the two variables, Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between the two rates was derived using R, a well-known big data analysis tool. The analysis showed that Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was more than 0.05 and that the correlation between the two variables was not statistically significant.

Keywords

References

  1. UN Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR), Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, 2000. New York.
  2. Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety (KINS), Radiation Environment in Korea, vol. 48, Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, 2016. ER-028.
  3. T.E. Johnson, Ch. 7 Biological basis for radiation safety, in: Introduction to Health Physics, fifth ed., McGraw-Hill Education, New York, 2017, pp. 285-337.
  4. W.-L. Hsu, D.L. Preston, M. Soda, H. Sugiyama, S. Funamoto, K. Kodama, A. Kimura, N. Kamada, H. Dohy, M. Tomonaga, M. Iwanaga, Y. Miyazaki, H.M. Cullings, A. Suyama, K. Ozasa, R.E. Shore, K. Mabuchi, The incidence of leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma among atomic bomb survivors: 1950-2001, Radiat. Res. 179 (2013) 361-382, https://doi.org/10.1667/rr2892.1.
  5. D.L. Preston, E. Ron, S. Tokuoka, S. Funamoto, N. Nishi, M. Soda, K. Mabuchi, K. Kodama, Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958-1998, Radiat. Res. 168 (2007) 1-64, https://doi.org/10.1667/rr0763.1.
  6. J.K. Lee, Ch. 9 Radiation measurement, in: Principles of Radiation Protection, vol. 1, Korean Association for Radiation Application, Seoul, 2016, pp. 381-450.
  7. M. Tubiana, L.E. Feinendegen, C. Yang, J.M. Kaminski, The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data, Radiology 251 (2009) 13-22, https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2511080671.
  8. F.R. Tang, K. Loganovsky, Low dose or low dose rate ionizing radiationinduced health effect in the human, J. Environ. Radioact. 192 (2018) 32-47, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2018.05.018.
  9. S. Koyama, E. Narita, N. Shinohara, J. Miyakoshi, Effect of low-dose X-ray irradiation on micronucleus formation in human embryo, newborn and child cells, Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 92 (2016) 790-795, https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2016.1221544.
  10. J.H. Kim, Ch. 8: correlation analysis, in: Environmental Statistics & Data Analysis, Hannarae, Seoul, 2018, pp. 180-202.
  11. M.K. Seo, Ch. 7: statistical analysis, in: R for Practical Data Analysis, Gilbut, Seoul, 2014, pp. 342-350.
  12. G.S. Kim, Ch. 9: correlation analysis, in: R Big Data Analysis for Value Creation, Hannarae, Seoul, 2017, pp. 217-240.
  13. D.A. Haber, P.C. Burnley, C.T. Adcock, R.L. Malchow, K.E. Marsac, E.M. Hausrath, Modeling background radiation in Southern Nevada, J. Environ. Radioact. 171 (2017) 41-64, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.01.020.
  14. Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (GIGAM). https://mgeo.kigam.re.kr.
  15. K.H. Kim, R. Van der Voo, Jurassic and triassic paleomagnetism of South Korea 9 (1990) 699-717. https://doi.org/10.1029/TC009i004p00699
  16. A.P. Rovai, J.D. Baker, M.K. Ponton, Social Science Research Design and Statistics: A Practitioner's Guide to Research Methods and IBM SPSS, Watertree Press, 2013.

Cited by

  1. Research on the Data Driven Practice Teaching Mode: Take the Didi Data Set as Example vol.105, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/ast.105.348
  2. Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis of the In-Vessel Hydrogen Generation for Gen-III PWR and Phebus FPT-1 with MELCOR 2.2 vol.14, pp.16, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/en14164884