참고문헌
- Task Force for Model Standards of Practice for Child Custody Evaluation, Martindale DA, Lorraine M, Austin WG, Drozd L, Gould-Saltman D, et al. Model standards of practicefor child custody evaluation. Fam Court Rev 2007;45:70-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2007.129_3.x
- American Psychological Association. Guidelines for child custody evaluations in family law proceedings. Am Psychol 2010;65:863-867. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021250
- Emery RE, Otto RK, O'Donohue WT. A critical assessment of child custody evaluations: limited science and a flawed system. Psychol Sci Public Interest 2005;6:1-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00020.x
- Maccoby EE, Mnookin RH. Dividing the child: Social and legal dilemmas of custody. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press;1992.
- Kraus LJ, Thomas CR, Bukstein OG, Walter HJ, Benson RS, Chrisman A, et al. Practice parameter for child and adolescent forensic evaluations. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2011;50:1299-1312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2011.09.020
- Riggio HR. Parental marital conflict and divorce, parent-child relationships, social support, and relationship anxiety in young. Pers Relationships 2004;11:99-114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00073.x
- Johnston JR. High-conflict divorce. Future Child 1994;4:165-182. https://doi.org/10.2307/1602483
- Goldstein J, Freud A, Solnit A. Beyond the best interests of the child. New York, NY: Free Press;1973.
- American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers. Child Custody Evaluation Standards. J Am Acad Matrimonial Law 2013;25:251-294.
- Wyer MM, Gaylord SJ, Grove ET. The legal context of child custody evaluations. In: Weithorn LA, editor. Psychology and child custody determinations: knowledge, roles, and expertise. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press;1987. p.4-22.
- JUSTIA US Law. Ex Parte Devine [cited 2020 Jan 31]. Available from URL: https://law.justia.com/cases/alabama/supremecourt/1981/398-so-2d-686-1.html.
- Lyman RD, Roberts MC. Mental health testimony in child custody litigation. Law Psychol Rev 1985;9:15-34.
- Mason MA. From father's property rights to children's rights: the history of child custody in the United States. New York, NY: Columbia University Press;1994.
- Hall AS, Pulver CA, Cooley MJ. Psychology of the best interest standard: fifty state statutes and their theoretical antecedents. Am J Fam Ther 1996;24:171-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926189608251029
- Mnookin RH. Child-custody adjudication: Judicial functions in the face of indeterminacy. Law Contemp Probl 1975;39:226-293. https://doi.org/10.2307/1191273
- Goldstein J, Freud A, Solnit AJ. Before the best interests of the child. New York, NY: Free Press;1979.
- Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act, 9A Uniform Laws Annotated, Sec. 316 (1979).
- Feller JN, Davidson HA, Hardin M, Horowitz RM. Working with the courts in child protection. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services;1992.
- Shuman DW. The role of mental health experts in custody decisions: science, psychological tests, and clinical judgment. Fam Law Q 2002;36:135-162.
- Wald M. State intervention on behalf of "neglected" children: a search for realistic standards. Stanford Law Review 1975:27:985-1040. https://doi.org/10.2307/1228197
- Garrison M. How do judges decide divorce cases?: an empirical analysis of discretionary decision making. North Carol Law Rev 1996;74:401-552.
- Chambers DL. Rethinking the substantive rules for custody disputes in divorce. Mich Law Rev 1984;83:477-569. https://doi.org/10.2307/1288561
- Scott ES. Pluralism, paternal preferences, and child custody. Calif Law Rev 1992;80:615-672. https://doi.org/10.2307/3480710
- Warshak RA. Punching the parenting time clock: the approximation rule, social science, and the baseball bat kids. Fam Court Rev 2007;45:600-619. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2007.00174.x
- Mckay J, Shaver-Hast L, Sharnoff W, Warren E, Wright H. A family approach to treatment of postpartum depression. Zero Three 2009;29:35-39.
- Jang CG. Child centered judgement in family court. Seoul: Joint Research Committee for Parental Education;2017.
- Seoul Family Court. Guidance to consultation on familial judgment, familial mediation;2017 [cited 2020 Feb 2]. Available from URL: http://yeslaw.com/lims/front/page/fulltext.html?pAct=view&pPromulgationNo=180178#nolink.
- Schwartz LL. A nightmare for King Solomon: the new reproductive technologies. J Fam Psychol 2003;17:229-237. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.17.2.229
- Bernet W. Child custody evaluations. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 2002;11:781-804. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1056-4993(02)00019-6