DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Characteristics of Academic Hatred Explained by Self-Determination Motivation: A Study of High School Seniors

자기결정성 동기에 따른 학업반감 특성에 관한 연구: 고등학교 3학년 학생들을 대상으로

  • Lee, Minyoung (Brain & Motivation Research Institute, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Sangeun (Department of Education, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Sang Min (Department of Education, Korea University)
  • 이민영 (고려대학교 두뇌동기연구소) ;
  • 이상은 (고려대학교 교육학과) ;
  • 이상민 (고려대학교 교육학과)
  • Received : 2020.09.16
  • Accepted : 2020.12.10
  • Published : 2020.12.30

Abstract

This study examined the relative influence of the five factors of the self-determination motivation on academic hatred. A total of 938 high school seniors (female 535, 57.0%) across eight schools in Seoul, Incheon, and Gyeonggi province were surveyed a month before Soo-neng (College Scholastic Ability Test). The findings of correlation analyses and hierarchical multiple regression analyses were summarized as follows. Academic hatred showed significant correlations with all the self-determination motivation factors except for introjected regulation. For hierarchical multiple regression analyses, starting with amotivation, the motivation factors indicating low level of self-determination were entered in order. In the final model, amotivation and introjected regulation had positive influence on academic hatred, and intrinsic regulation had negative influence on academic hatred. Specifically, introjected regulation which had no significant effect on academic hatred with amotivation and external regulation showed significant effect after identified regulation was added. Identified regulation lost its significant influence after intrinsic regulation was included. This study was meaningful in that it was the first study to clarify motivational characteristics of academic hatred based on self-determination theory. The study also presented its limitations, implications for school counseling intervention, and directions for future research.

본 연구는 학업반감에 영향을 미치는 자기결정성 동기의 다섯 가지 하위 요인의 상대적 영향력을 검증하기 위해 실시되었다. 수능을 1달 앞 둔 서울, 인천, 경기 소재 8개 고교에 재학중인 고등학교 3학년생 938명(여학생 535, 57.0%)을 대상으로 위계적회귀분석을 실시한 결과는 다음과 같다. 분석에서는 자기결정성 수준이 낮은 동기요인부터, 즉 무동기-외적조절-내사적조절-확인적조절-내재적조절의 순서대로 투입되었다. 그 결과, 최종적으로 무동기, 내사적 조절은 학업반감에 정적인 영향을 미치고 내재적 조절은 부적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 특히, 무동기, 외적 조절, 내사적 조절을 투입하였을 때 학업반감에 유의한 영향력을 미치지 않던 내사적 조절은 확인적 조절을 투입한 이후부터 유의한 영향을 보이기 시작하였으며, 확인적 조절은 내재적 조절이 투입되자 전 단계에서 보이던 유의한 영향력이 사라졌다. 본 연구는 자기결정성이론에 근거하여 학업반감의 동기적 특성을 밝힌 첫 연구라는 의미를 지니며, 이에 대한 한계 및 학교상담에서의 개입전략과 함의점, 후속 연구에서의 방향성 등을 제시하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

한국연구재단의 연구비 지원을 받아 작성하였습니다(NRF-2017S1A5A2A01025536).

References

  1. 강은화 (2020). 청소년의 자기결정성 동기, 스트레스 대처방식 및 지연행동의 구조적 관계. 경상대학교 교육대학원 석사학위 논문.
  2. 김아영 (2008). 한국형 학업적 자기조절 설문지 타당화 연구. 이화여자대학교 미간행 연구 논문.
  3. 김주영 (2010). 교사의 조건부 관심 및 자율성 지지와 학생의 학업참여 간의 관계에서 자기결정동기의 매개효과. 이화여자대학교 교육대학원 석사학위 논문.
  4. 김현진, 김현진 (2011). 한국 대학생들의 자기조절동기, 학업정서 및 인지적 자기조절 학습전략 사용 간의 경로 탐색 연구. 교육심리연구, 25(3), 693-716.
  5. 류지헌, 임지현 (2008). 초등학생의 자기결정성 동기요인이 인지전략과 학업성취에 미치는 인과관계 검증. 교과교육학연구, 12(1), 219-238. https://doi.org/10.24231/RICI.2008.12.1.219
  6. 성태제 (2014). SPSS/AMOS를 이용한 알기쉬운 통계분석 2판. 서울: 학지사.
  7. 신이나, 송영명 (2019). 자기결정성 이론에 기반한 학업동기 프로파일. 학습자중심교과 교육연구, 19(21), 125-152.
  8. 유계환 (2018). 초.중학생 부모의 비지지적 양육태도와 학교생활부적응 간 관계에서 학습무동기의 매개효과. 사고개발, 14(3), 43-64.
  9. 유계환, 조경신 (2019). 중학생이 인식하는 부모의 비지지적 양육태도와 또래애착이 학습무동기에 미치는 영향: 인터넷 중독의 매개효과. 인문사회 21, 10(3), 617-632.
  10. 유계환, 최연 (2020). 초등학교 고학년이 느끼는 부모의 방임이 자존감을 매개로 학습 무동기에 미치는 영향. 인문사회 21, 11(2), 2267-2283.
  11. 유정, 김봄메, 신형섭, 정주영, 최남희 (2010). 고등학생의 대학입시에 대한 스트레스(심리적 충격, 우울, 불안)와 자아존중감 및 스트레스 대처방식과의 관계. 한국위기관리논집, 6(3), 223-241.
  12. 이민영, 엄정호, 이경주, 이상은, 이상민 (2019). 학업반감에 영향을 미치는 환경적.심리적 영향요인 분석: 고등학교 3학년 학생을 대상으로. 한국심리학회지: 학교, 16(2), 89-110. https://doi.org/10.16983/KJSP.2019.16.2.89
  13. 이민영, 조수현, 이상민 (2019). 학업소진, 학업 반감, 학업불안에 관한 다변량 잠재성장 모형 분석: 대입 시험을 경험한 후기 청소년들을 대상으로. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 31(4), 1267-1287.
  14. 이영복, 이상민, 이자영 (2009). 한국형 학업소진 척도 개발 및 타당화. 한국교육학연구, 15(3), 59-78.
  15. 이은경, 곽현 (2017). 청소년 및 부모가 지각한 부모지원, 청소년의 무동기, 학업적 자기 효능감의 종단적 관계. 청소년문화포럼, 52, 73-101.
  16. 이은주 (2015). 무동기의 발달양상에 따른 잠재계층 분류 및 영향요인 검증. 교육학연구, 53(1), 111-135.
  17. 이은주 (2017). 자기결정성 동기와 학업적 성과의 관계 동일시 조절과 내사 조절의 효과 재조명. 교육심리연구, 31(4), 713-743.
  18. 이은희 (2009). 입시스트레스가 고등학교 3학년 수험생의 정신건강에 미치는 영향에 대한 탄력요인의 역할 연구. 정신건강과 사회복지, 31, 5-27.
  19. 정민주 (2011). 중학생이 지각하는 부모양육방식과 자기결정동기가 자기조절학습에 미치는 영향. 숙명여자대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.
  20. 정지영, 김희화 (2010). 한국 초등학생의 학업 동기 척도개발에 관한 연구: 자기결정성 이론을 근거로. 청소년학연구, 17(11), 117-137.
  21. 정현주 (2017). 고등학생의 학교상담에 대한 기대와 상담만족도의 관계에서 내담자 기본심리욕구충족의 매개효과. 한국교원대학교 교육대학원 석사학위 논문.
  22. 조수현, 이민영, 이장희, 이상민 (2018). 고등학생의 학업소진과 학업열의에 관한 연구: 직무요구-자원모형 검증을 중심으로. 한국교육학연구, 24(3), 1-26.
  23. 통계청 (2019). 한국의 사회동향 2019. http://kostat.go.kr/sri/srikor/srikor_pbl/3/index.board 에서 검색.
  24. 하규영, 이민영 (2020). 가정의 경제적 수준과 중학생의 삶의 만족도 관계에서 정서행동 문제의 매개효과: 부모구성 및 부모의 삶의 만족도에 따른 다집단 분석. 한국심리학회지: 학교, 17(1), 39-63. https://doi.org/10.16983/KJSP.2020.17.1.39
  25. 현지현, 김재철 (2019). 대입수험생 증후군 척도 개발을 위한 기초연구. 청소년학연구, 26(12), 305-334.
  26. 홍국진, 이은주 (2018). 청소년기 학습무동기의 변화에 대한 부모, 교사, 또래 관계의 동시효과와 지연효과. 한국교육문제연구, 36(4), 207-227.
  27. 황선미 (2012). 자기결정성의 발달 경향 탐색: 초등학교 5학년부터 고등학교 3학년까지. 전북대학교 교육대학원 석사학위 논문.
  28. Assor, A., Kaplan, H., Kanat-Maymon, Y. & Roth, G. (2005). Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction, 15, 397-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.008
  29. Assor, A., Roth, G. & Deci, E. L. (2004). The emotional costs of parents' conditional regard: A self-determination theory analysis. Journal of Personality, 72(1), 47-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00256.x
  30. Assor, A., Vansteenkiste, M. & Kaplan, A. (2009). Identified versus introjected approach and introjected avoidance motivations in school and in sports: The limited benefits of self-worth strivings. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 482-497. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014236
  31. Bailey, T. H. & Phillips, L. J. (2016). The influence of motivation and adaptation on students' subjective well-being, meaning in life and academic performance. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(2), 201-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1087474
  32. Baker, S. R. (2004). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational orientations: Their role in university adjustment, stress, well-being, and subsequent academic performance. Current Psychology, 23(3), 189-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-004-1019-9
  33. Black, A. E. & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740-756. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<740::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-3
  34. Burton, K. D., Lydon, J. E., D'Alessandro, D. U. & Koestner, R. (2006). The differential effects of intrinsic and identified motivation on well-being and performance: prospective, experimental, and implicit approaches to self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 750-762. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.750
  35. Chang, E., Lee, A., Byeon, E. & Lee, S. M. (2015). Role of motivation in the relation between perfectionism and academic burnout in Korean students. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 221-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.027
  36. Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 6(34), 169-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208411068
  37. Fischer, A., Halperin, E., Canetti, D. & Jasini, A. (2018). Why we hate. Emotion Review, 10(4), 309-320. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073917751229
  38. Froiland, J. M. & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Intrinsic motivation, learning goals, engagement, and achievement in a diverse high school. Psychology in the Schools, 53(3), 321-336. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21901
  39. Graham, M. H. (2003). Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology, 84(11), 2809-2815. https://doi.org/10.1890/02-3114
  40. Hardre, P. L. & Reeve, J. (2003). A motivational model of rural students' intentions to persist in, versus drop out of, high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 347-356. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.347
  41. Hayamizu, T. (1997). Between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Examination of reasons for academic study based on the theory of internalization. Japanese Psychology Research, 39, 98-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5884.00043
  42. Horst, P. (1941). The prediction of personal adjustment (SSRC Bulletine No. 48). New York, NY: Social Science Research Council.
  43. Horst, P. (1966). Psychological measurement and prediction. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  44. Howard, J., Gagne, M., Morin, A. J. & Van den Broeck, A. (2016). Motivation profiles at work: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 95, 74-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.07.004
  45. Ketonen, E. E., Dietrich, J., Moeller, J., Salmela-Aro, K. & Lonka, K. (2018). The role of daily autonomous and controlled educational goals in students' academic emotion states: An experience sampling method approach. Learning and Instruction, 53, 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.07.003
  46. Kousta, S. T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., & DelCampo, E. (2011). The representation of abstract words: why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(1), 14-34. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021446
  47. Kusurkar, R. A., Croiset, G. & Ten Cate, O. T. J. (2011). Twelve tips to stimulate intrinsic motivation in students through autonomy-supportive classroom teaching derived from self-determination theory. Medical Teacher, 33(12), 978-982. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.599896
  48. Laursen, B., Bukowski, W. M., Nurmi, J. E., Marion, D., Salmela-Aro, K. & Kiuru, N. (2010). Opposites detract: Middle school peer group antipathies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106(4), 240-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.03.001
  49. Lee, M. (2020). The moderating effects of social comparison styles on academic hatred. Doctoral dissertation, Korea University.
  50. Lee, M., Cho, S. & Lee, S. M. (2019). A multilevel analysis of change in hatred of academic work during high school: focusing on the sociocultural background of Korea. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 29(2), 166-176. https://doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2019.6
  51. Lee, M., Lee, K., Lee, S. M. & Cho, S. (2020a). From emotional exhaustion to cynicism in academic burnout among Korean high school students: Focusing on the mediation effects of hatred of academic work. Stress and Health. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2936
  52. Lee, M. Y., Lee, M. K., Lee, M. J., & Lee, S. M. (2020b). Academic burnout profiles and motivation styles among Korean high school students. Japanese Psychological research, 62(3), 184-195. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12251
  53. Litalien, D., Ludtke, O., Parker, P., & Trautwein, U. (2013). Different pathways, same effects: Autonomous goal regulation is associated with subjective well-being during the post-school transition. Motivation and Emotion, 37(3), 444-456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-012-9328-z
  54. Meyer, D. K. & Turner, J. C. (2002). Discovering emotion in classroom motivation research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_5
  55. Patall, E. A., Cooper, H. & Robinson, J. C. (2008). The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: a meta-analysis of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 270-300. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.270
  56. Patrick, B. C., Skinner, E. A. & Connell, J. P. (1993). What motivates children's behavior and emotion-joint effects of perceived control and autonomy in the academic domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 781-791. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.781
  57. Pekrun, R. (2000). A social-cognitive, control-value theory of achievement emotions. In J. Heckhausen (Ed.), Motivational Psychology of Human Development (pp.143-163). Oxford: Elsevier.
  58. Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9
  59. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students' self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4
  60. Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J. & Briere, N. M. (2001). Associations among perceived autonomy support, forms of self-regulation, and persistence: A prospective study. Motivation and Emotion, 25(4), 279-306. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014805132406
  61. Reeve, J. & Halusic, M. (2009). How K-12 teachers can put self-determination theory principles into practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104319
  62. Reeve, J. & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students' autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 209-218. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.209
  63. Reeve, J. & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students' engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
  64. Ryan, R. M. & Connell, J. P.(1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749-761. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749
  65. Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 66, 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  66. Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will?. Journal of Personality, 74, 1557-1586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00420.x
  67. Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L.(2008). A self-determination theory approach to psychotherapy: The motivational basis for effective change. Canadian Psychology/ Psychologie canadienne, 49(3), 186-193. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012753
  68. Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Publications.
  69. Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860.
  70. Schaufeli, W. B., Martinez, I. M., Pinto, A. M., Salanova, M. & Bakker, A. B. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 33(5), 464-481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033005003
  71. Scheel, M. J., & Gonzalez, J. (2007). An investigation of a model of academic motivation for school counseling. Professional School Counseling, 11(1), 49-56. https://doi.org/10.5330/PSC.n.2010-11.49
  72. Soenens, B., Sierens, E., Vansteenkiste, M., Dochy, F., & Goossens, L. (2012). Psychologically controlling teaching: Examining outcomes, antecedents, and mediators. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 108-120. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025742
  73. Stephan, W. G. & Stephan, C. W. (2013). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 33-56). Psychology Press.
  74. Sternberg, R. J. (2005). Understanding and combating hate. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The psychology of hate (pp. 37-49). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  75. Taylor, G., Jungert, T., Mageau, G. A., Schattke, K., Dedic, H., Rosenfield, S. & Koestner, R. (2014). A self-determination theory approach to predicting school achievement over time: The unique role of intrinsic motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(4), 342-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.08.002
  76. Toutkoushian, R. K. & Curtis, T. (2005). Effects of socioeconomic factors on public high school outcomes and rankings. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(5), 259-271. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.98.5.259-271
  77. Tzelgov, J., & Henik, A. (1991). Suppression situations in psychological research: Definitions, implications, and applications. Psychological Bulletin, 109(3), 524-536. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.109.3.524
  78. Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C. & Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 1003-1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004025
  79. Vandercammen, L., Hofmans, J., & Theuns, P. (2014). Relating specific emotions to intrinsic motivation: on the moderating role of positive and negative emotion differentiation. PloS one, 9(12), e115396. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115396
  80. Vansteenkiste, M., Zhou, M., Lens, W. & Soenens, B. (2005). Experiences of autonomy and control among chinese learners: Vitalizing or immobilizing? Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 468-483. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.468
  81. Waaler, R., Halvari, H., Skjesol, K. & Bagoien, T. E. (2013). Autonomy support and intrinsic goal progress expectancy and its links to longitudinal study effort and subjective wellbeing: The differential mediating effect of intrinsic and identified regulations and the moderator effects of effort and intrinsic goals. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(3), 325-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2012.656284
  82. Winch, A., Moberly, N. J. & Dickson, J. M. (2015). Unique associations between anxiety, depression and motives for approach and avoidance goal pursuit. Cognition and Emotion, 29(7), 1295-1305. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.976544