Korean Journal of School Psychology (한국심리학회지:학교)

Korean School Psychology Association (학교심리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Promoting Motivation through Effort-inducing Instructions and Positive Feedback on Task Performance

노력 유도와 긍정 피드백을 통한 동기 활성화가 과제수행에 미치는 영향

  • Received : 2020.08.31
  • Accepted : 2020.11.13
  • Published : 2020.12.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of motivation promotion on task performance. Unlike most previous studies that have used survey methods, this study examined the effects of motivation promotion on arithmetic and linguistic task performances under experimental conditions. Effort-inducing instructions and positive feedbacks were used to promote participants' motivation. Experiments 1 and 2 examined the effect of effort-inducing instructions and positive feedback on participants' autonomous selection of task difficulty when performing arithmetic and linguistic tasks. The results of the both experiments showed that the experimental group which received effort-inducing instructions and positive feedback chose more difficult task than the control group did. Experiment 3 examined whether motivation promotion enhances task performance and task persistence. The experimental group was more accurate and persistent than the control group. The results of the current study offer experimental evidence suggesting that activating intrinsic motivation through motivation promotion improves attitudes toward tasks and task performance.

본 연구의 목적은 동기조작이 과제수행에 미치는 영향을 알아보는 것이다. 기존에 동기와 과제수행과의 관련성을 살펴본 선행연구들은 대부분 자기 보고식 설문지를 사용하여 진행되었는데 자기보고식 검사는 왜곡되거나 편향된 응답을 제공할 가능성이 높다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 실험 상황에서 노력 유도 지시문과 과제수행 태도에 대한 긍정피드백을 통한 동기 활성화가 과제수행에 어떠한 영향을 미치는가를 살펴보고자 하였다. 본 연구에서는 또한 실험 자극으로 실제 학습장면과 연관 지을 수 있는 수학·언어 영역의 과제를 사용하였다. 실험 1에서는 수학과제 수행 시 동기조작이 과제 난이도 선택에 미치는 영향을 살펴보았다. 그 결과 실험집단의 참가자들이 통제집단에 비해 어려운 난이도의 과제를 더 많이 선택했다. 실험 2에서는 실험 1과 동일한 패러다임을 언어 과제에 적용하여 동기조작에 따른 집단 간 차이를 살펴보았는데 그 결과 실험 1과 동일하게 실험집단의 참가자들이 높은 난이도의 과제를 더 많이 선택하였다. 실험 3에서는 동기조작이 수행 정확률과 과제 지속성에도 영향을 미치는지 살펴보았으며 실험 결과 실험집단의 경우 통제집단에 비해 과제 정확률과 지속성 모두 더 높게 관찰되었다. 본 연구의 결과는 노력 유도 및 긍정 피드백을 통한 내재적 동기의 활성화가 과제수행에 영향을 미친다는 것을 보여주는 실험적 증거라 할 수 있다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 2017년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단(NRF-2017S1A2A2041854) 글로벌연구네트워크지원사업의 지원을 받아 수행되었음.

References

  1. 권은주, 김성일 (2003). 성취목표와 피드백 유형이 내재동기와 지각된 유능감에 미치는 영향. 교육학연구, 41(4), 341-364
  2. 김성빈, 임규연 (2017). 온라인 고등.평생교육 학습자의 학습참여 동기와 학습 만족도 관계에서 지각된 유용성, 자기조절학습 능력의 조절효과 검증. 평생학습사회, 13(3), 85-107.
  3. 김아영 (2002). 자기결정성 이론에 따른 학습 동기 유형 분류체계의 타당성. 교육심리연구, 16(4), 169-187.
  4. 김은빈, 김정섭 (2015). 칭찬-격려 선호에 따른 언어적 피드백이 초등학생의 내재적 동기에 미치는 효과. 교육심리연구, 29(2), 285-301.
  5. 김주환, 김은주, 홍세희 (2006). 한국 남녀 중학생 집단에서 자기결정성이 학업성취도에 주는 영향. 교육심리연구, 20(1), 243-264.
  6. 박병기, 이종욱, 홍승표 (2005). 자기결정성이론이 제안한 학습동기 분류형태의 재구성. 교육심리연구, 19(3), 699-717.
  7. 박영신, & 김의철 (2003). 한국 학생의 자기효능감, 성취동기와 학업성취. 교육심리연구, 17(1), 37-54.
  8. 성희은, 김은주 (2017). 자녀가 지각한 부모의 생애목표가 기본심리욕구와 내재동기를 매개로 학업성취도 및 학교생활만족도에 미치는 영향. 청소년학연구, 24(2), 347-368.
  9. 유경훈 (2009). 내.외재동기, 자기결정성 동기가 창의적 성향에 미치는 영향. 창의력교육연구, 9, 69-88.
  10. 이경임, 안창규 (1996). NEO-PI-R 의 임상적 활용. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 8(1), 65-79.
  11. 이명희, 김아영 (2008). 자기결정성이론에 근거한 한국형 기본 심리 욕구 척도 개발 및 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 22(4), 157-174. https://doi.org/10.21193/KJSPP.2008.22.4.010
  12. 이민희, 정태연 (2008). 자기결정이론을 토대로 한 학습동기 경로 모형 검증. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 14(1), 77-99.
  13. 이은주 (2001). 몰입에 대한 학습동기와 인지 전략의 관계. 교육심리연구, 15(3), 199-216.
  14. 태진이, 이상은, 이윤형, 권유안 (2016). 과제에 부과된 인지적 부담과 정서적 부담이수행에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 28(2), 253-270. https://doi.org/10.22172/COGBIO.2016.28.2.003
  15. Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The Work Preference Inventory: assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 66(5), 950-967. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.66.5.950
  16. Amitay, S., Halliday, L., Taylor, J., Sohoglu, E., & Moore, D. R. (2010). Motivation and intelligence drive auditory perceptual learning. PloS one, 5(3), e9816. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009816
  17. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  18. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  19. Bandura, A., & Jourden, F. J. (1991). Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision making. Journal of personality and social psychology, 60(6), 941-951. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.60.6.941
  20. Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 41(3), 586-598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.3.586
  21. Blanck, P. D., Reis, H. T., & Jackson, L. (1984). The effects of verbal reinforcement of intrinsic motivation for sex-linked tasks. Sex Roles, 10(5-6), 369-386. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287554
  22. Cameron, J. (2001). Negative effects of reward on intrinsic motivation-A limited phenomenon: Comment on Deci, Koestner, and Ryan (2001). Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071001029
  23. Cameron, J., & Pierce, W. D. (1994). Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational research, 64(3), 363-423. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543064003363
  24. Costa, P. T., & McCrea, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  25. deCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation: The internal affective determinants of behavior. New York: Academic Press.
  26. Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 18(1), 105-115. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030644
  27. Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum.
  28. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M.(1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
  29. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of personality and social psychology, 53(6), 1024-1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1024
  30. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological bulletin, 125(6), 627-668. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627
  31. Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., & Koestner, R. (2001). The Pervasive Negative Effects of Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation: Response to. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 43-51. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071001043
  32. Dignath, C., & Buttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and learning, 3(3), 231-264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9029-x
  33. Gottfried, A. E. (1985). Academic intrinsic motivation in elementary and junior high school students. Journal of educational psychology, 20, 205-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070000
  34. Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of personality and social psychology, 85(3), 541-553. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.541
  35. Grolnick, W. S., & Apostoleris, N. H. (2004). What makes parents controlling. In E.L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 161-181). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
  36. Harackiewicz, J. M., & Larson, J. R. (1986). Managing motivation: The impact of supervisor feedback on subordinate task interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(3), 547-556. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.547
  37. Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Tauer, J. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of educational psychology, 100, 105-122. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.105
  38. Harter, S. (1981). A new self-report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom: Motivational and informational components. Developmental psychology, 17(3), 300-312. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.17.3.300
  39. Lee, H., Seong, E., Choi, W., & Lowder, M. W. (2018). Development and assessment of the Korean Author Recognition Test. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1-40.
  40. Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the over-justification hypothesis. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 28(1), 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035519
  41. Levesque, C., Zuehlke, A. N., Stanek, L. R., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Autonomy and competence in German and American university students: A comparative study based on self-determination theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 68-84. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.68
  42. Luyten, H., & Lens, W. (1981). The effect of earlier experience and reward contingencies on intrinsic motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 5(1), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993659
  43. Moneta, G. B., & Siu, C. M. (2002). Trait intrinsic and extrinsic motivations, academic performance, and creativity in Hong Kong college students. Journal of College Student Development, 43(5), 664-683.
  44. Niemiec, C. P., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2009). The path taken: Consequences of attaining intrinsic and extrinsic aspirations in post-college life. Journal of research in personality, 43(3), 291-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.09.001
  45. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of educational research, 66(4), 543-578. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004543
  46. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Prentice Hall.
  47. Reeve, J. (2005). Understanding motivation and emotion (4th ed.). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
  48. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  49. Sarason, I. G., & Sarason, B. R. (1990). Test anxiety. In H.Lettenverg (Ed.), Handbook of social and evaluation anxiety (pp. 475-495). New York: Plenum Press.
  50. Shibata, K., Yamagishi, N., Ishii, S., & Kawato, M. (2009). Boosting perceptual learning by fake feedback. Vision research, 49(21), 2574-2585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2009.06.009
  51. Stipek, D. (1988). Motivation to Learn: From Theory to Practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  52. Stipek, D. J. (2002). Motivation to learn: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  53. Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L., & Cooper, H. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational psychologist, 39(2), 111-133. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_3
  54. Vallerand, R. J. (1983). The effect of differential amounts of positive verbal feedback on the intrinsic motivation of male hockey players. Journal of Sport Psychology, 5(1), 100-107. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsp.5.1.100
  55. Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: the synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of personality and social psychology, 87(2), 246-260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.246
  56. Zimmerman, B. J., & Risemberg, R. (1997). Self-regulatory dimensions of academic learning and motivation. In Handbook of academic learning (pp. 105-125). Academic Press.