한국융합학회논문지 (Journal of the Korea Convergence Society)

  • 제11권7호
  • /
  • Pages.297-308
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2233-4890(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6353(eISSN)
한국융합학회 (Korea Convergence Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국민기초생활보장 수급자와 비수급자의 복지태도(결정)에 관한 비교: 사회학적 해석 중심으로

Comparison of the Welfare Attitudes determination between livelihood Recipients and Non-Recipients: Focusing on Sociological Analysis

  • 엄주란 (한세대학교 산학협력단) ;
  • 문재우 (한세대학교 사회복지학)
  • Eom, Joo-Ran (Industry-University Cooperation Foundation, Hansei University) ;
  • Moon, Jae-Woo (Division of Social Welfare, Hansei University)
  • 투고 : 2020.04.28
  • 심사 : 2020.07.20
  • 발행 : 2020.07.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 국민기초생활보장 수급자와 비수급자의 복지태도에 대한 상호관계 이해도를 바탕으로 비교하여 살펴보는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 한국복지패널(Korea Welfare Panel Study) 2016년(11차) 자료를 활용하였으며, 성인 382명을 대상으로 성향점수(PSM) 매칭 후 차이분석(DID)과 구조방정식 AMOS을 이용하여 분석하였다. 주요 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 국민기초생활보장 수급자는 비수급자 보다 복지태도에 유의한 영향을 미치지 않았다. 둘째, 국민기초생활보장 수급자와 비수급자 모두 특수적 프로그램 복지정책이 복지태도에 유의한 영향을 미쳤다. 셋째, 가치인식인 정부신뢰, 사회인식은 국민기초생활보장 수급자와 비수급자 모두 유의한 영향을 미치지 않았다. 본 연구결과를 통해 사회 구성원의 삶의 품질을 높이는 정책 방향 정립에 있어 기초자료를 제공하였다.

The purpose of this study is to compare and examine the understanding of the mutual relationship between the welfare attitude of the recipients and the non-recipients of the National Basic Livelihood Security. For this purpose, data from the Korea Welfare Panel Study 2016 (11th) were used and the data were analyzed by using difference analysis (DID) and structural equation AMOS after matching propensity scores (PSM) to 382 adults. The main results are as follows: First, Welfare attitudes were not significantly different for the National Basic Livelihood Security than the non- recipients. Second, Positive program welfare policy had a significant effect on welfare attitude for both the recipients and non-recipients of the National Basic Livelihood Security. Third, The value recognition government trust and social awareness did not have a significant effect on both the recipients of the National Basic Livelihood Security and the non-recipients. The results of this study provide basic data the establishment of policy directions to improve the quality of life of members of society.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. J. S. Ryu. (2004). The Characteristics and Determinants of Welfare Attitudes. Korean Journal of Social Welfare, 56(4), 79-101. UCI : G704-000330.2004.56.4.010
  2. Y. S. Kim & E. G. Yeo. (2011). Korean's Welfare attitude: Focusing on the inconsistency and insignificance of class difference in welfare attitude. Economy and society, 91, 211-240. UCI : G704-000107.2011..91.003
  3. Y. T. Kim, H. S. Ryuo & H. H. Lee. (2013). Political Dynamics of Welfare Attitudes in Korea: Revaluation of the end of class politics and political opportunities. The Journal of Korean Studies, 45, 183-212. DOI : 10.17790/kors.2013..45.183
  4. J. J. Lee & D. M. No. (2015). Determinants of Public Attitude toward Welfare Recipients. Korean Party Studies Review, 14(2), 195-224. UCI : G704-001868.2015.14.2.005
  5. Ministry of Health & Welfare. (2016). National Basic Livelihood Security Supply Status of paper.
  6. Ministry of Health and welfare. (2017). National Basic Livelihood Security Supply Status of paper.
  7. Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2018). National Basic Livelihood Security Supply Status of paper.
  8. Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2019). National Basic Livelihood Security Supply Status of paper.
  9. Y. M. Kim. (2016). Discourse about Recipients of the National Basic Livelihood Security by the press. Journal of Critical Social Welfare, (53), 282-325.
  10. Noamchomsky. (2018). Requiem for the american dream. K. Y. Eun(translator). Seoul. idea Publishing.
  11. H. J. Kim. (2017). A Study on the Needy Female Householder's Experience of the Welfare System. doctoral dissertation. Mokpo National University, Jeonnam.
  12. J. H. Lee. (2016). Health Inequalities in Children and Adolescents: A Review with Implications for The Sociology of Education. Korean journal of sociology of education, 26(4), 69-95. DOI : 10.32465/ksocio.2016.26.4.003
  13. S. h. Ahn (2005). An Integrative Approach to the Study of 'Quality of Life' and Social Dimensions of Consumption Environmental Quality from the Social Korean Society For Quality Management Systems. Perspective Systems Perspective, Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management, 33(2), 51-63. UCI : G704-000306.2005.33.2.00707
  14. C. H. Lee. (2015). A Study on Influences of the Awareness of Poverty Cause and Inequality on Welfare Attitude. Journal of Korean social welfare administration, 17(3), 375-401. https://doi.org/10.22944/KSWA.2015.17.3.014
  15. Gough, Ian. (1990). (The) Political economy of the welfare state. Y. M. Kim & S. O. Lee(translator). Seoul. Hanul Publishing.
  16. E. S. Kim. (2002). Content Orgnization and sequence of social studies in aspect of social cognition. master's thesis. Seoul national university of education, Seoul.
  17. H. Y. Lee & S. L. Park. (2016). Determinants of Attitudes toward Welfare Expansion: Beyond Self-Interest. The Journal of Social Paradigm Studies, 31(1), 267-298. UCI : G704-SER000012878.2016.31.1.011
  18. S. Y. Heo & H. S. Kim. (2016). A Study of Welfare Attitudes in South Korea. Korean Social Security Studies, 32(3), 203-235. UCI : G704-000662.2016.32.3.005
  19. Rothstein, B. (2009). Creating political legitimacy: Electoral democracy versus quality of government. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(3), 311-330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764209338795
  20. S. H. Lee. (2013). Study on Difference of Suicidal Ideation between Beneficiaries and Non-Beneficiaries of the National Livelihood Security System. master's thesis. Seoul. Seoul National University.
  21. J. Y. Lee. (2015). The Effect of the Social Conflict Perception on Welfare Attitude. doctoral dissertation. Konkuk University. Seoul.
  22. J. D. Yang, K. H. Koh & A. S. Park (2009). A Study on the Overall Current Livelihood and the Need for Social Welfare Services of the Hearing Impaired Elderly. Journal of Public Welfare Administration, 19(1), 47-72.
  23. Lawler III, E. E & Suttle, J. L. (1973). Expectancy theory and job behavior. Organizational behavior and human performance, 9(3), 482-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(73)90066-4
  24. Pierson, P. (1994). Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. NewYork: Cambridge University Press.
  25. J. W. Moon & D. S. Jae. (2013). Social Welfare outline, Seoul, gyechukmunwhasa Publishing.
  26. S. H. Oh & K. S. Ahn. (1994). The Study On theories Of the Outputs of welfar Policy. The Collection Of Chinju Tec. Col, 17, 163-190.
  27. G. E. Choi. (2016). The Effect of Welfare Status on Welfare Attitudes: Focusing on the Moderating Effect of Trust in Government. Korean Association of Social Policy, 23(1), 125-150. DOI : 10.17000/kspr.23.1.201603.125
  28. E. S. Joo & J. M. Baek. (2007). Class, Public Welfare Experience and Welfare Attitudes in Korea. Journal of Social welfare Studies, 34, 203-225. DOI : 10.16999/kasws.2007..34.203
  29. Lewis, O. (2013). The children of Sanchez, autobiography of a Mexican family. H. S. Park(translator). Seoul. imagine Publishing.
  30. Rawls, J. (2016). (A)Theory of justice, K. S. Hwang(translator). Seoul. Ehaksa Publishing.
  31. S. H. Oh & K. S. Ahn. (1994). The Study on theories of the Outputs of welfare policy. The Collection of Chinju Tec. Col. 17, 163-190.
  32. K. H. Kim. (2003). A Study On the Convergence of law and morality in Contemporary legal Philosophy. master's thesis. Ewha womans university, Seoul.
  33. O. S. Oh & H. T. Jung & D. J. Lee (2014). Social Welfare Values and Ethics Moral Philosophy, Gyeonggi-do, knowledge community Publishing.
  34. Y. G. Chang. (2013). Causes of Public Trust: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Governmental Studies, 19(3), 189-214. UCI : G704-000703.2013.19.3.006
  35. S. H. Ahn, J. Y. Park & S. W. Kim. (2013). The Effect of Housing-related Material Interests on Koreans' Welfare Attitudes: Focusing on the Variables Related to the 'Housing Status'. Social Welfare Policy, 40(4), 375-398. DOI : 10.15855/swp.2013.40.4.375
  36. S. H. Kim. (2012). The experience effect of social welfare service for the elderly on welfare perception: Double difference analysis using propensity score matching(PSM), Korean Association of Social Policy, 19(1), 9-38. DOI : 10.17000/kspr.19.1.201203.9
  37. J. W. Nahm & H. R. Shin. (2017). The Change of Attitudes towards Welfare according to the Experience of receiving the Basic Pension. Korean social security studies, 33(2), 41-75. UCI : I410-ECN-0102-2018-300-000609156
  38. Staerkle, C., Svallfors, S. & Van Oorschot, W. (2007). The future ESS IV module on welfare attitudes: stakes, challenges and prospects. In Proceedings of the 34th CEIES seminar on Perspectives of Improving Economic Welfare Measurement in a Changing Europe. Comite Consultatif Europeen de l'Information Statistique dans les Domaines Economique et Social (CEIES).
  39. S. W. Kim. (2011). Public Attitudes towards olds-age pension welfare states and dynamics of political Cleavages. The Korea Social Security Association, 27(2), 251-278. UCI : G704-000662.2011.27.2.012
  40. H. W. Lee & S. N. Park. (2016). Determinants of Attitudes toward Welfare Expansion: Beyond Self-Interest. OUGHTOPIA, 31(1), 267-298. DOI : 10.15709/hswr.2016.36.4.5
  41. S. G. Kim & J. W. Oh. (1995). A Study on the Welfare Consciousness of Koreans in the '90s. Korean journal of social welfare, 25, 1-33.
  42. Korean Women's Development Institute (2000). Welfare State and Women's Policy, Seoul. New Wave
  43. Korea welfare panel study (2016). 11th, Survey data User's Guide. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.
  44. J. H. Lee, M. J. Kim, B. H. Lee & J. W. Noh. (2015). Factors Affecting on Suicidal Ideation in Public Assistance Recipients. The Journal of the Korea contents Association, 15(8), 366-374. DOI : 10.5392/JKCA.2015.15.08.366
  45. Baber, B. (1983). The logic and limits of trust, Reviews.
  46. Kline, R. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd edn Guilford Press. New York.
  47. Iacus, S. M., King, G. & Porro, G. (2011). Multivariate matching methods that are monotonic imbalance bounding. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 106(493), 345-361. https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2011.tm09599
  48. Y. P. Lee. (2001). A Comparative study on the characteristics of mental health, subjective quality of life and service needs of the public aid recipient Alcoholics and Non-alcoholics. Alcohol and Health Behavior Research, 2(2), 5-12.
  49. C. H. Kang & K. S. Kim (2003). A Study of Labor Entry of Conditional Welfare Recipients : An Exploration of the Predictors. Korean journal of social welfare, 52, 5-32.
  50. Papadakis, E. (1992). Public opinion, public policy and welfare state. Political Studies, 40(1), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1992.tb01758.x
  51. S. C. Kim & M. E. Lee. (2012). The Benefit Fraud Prevention Model in Korea: In light of the Experiences of the UK Benefit Fraud Inspectorate(BFI). Journal of Association for Korean Public Administration History, 30, 273-292. DOI : 10.15856/jakpah.2012..30.273
  52. I. H. Lee. (2019). Congruity effects of University Students' Self-Image on the Satisfaction to Social Enterprise: Focused on SEN Clubs, Asia-Pacific. Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 14(5), 175-185. DOI : 10.16972/apjbve.14.5.201910.175
  53. J. R. Park. (2016). Impacts of Factors of Welfare Attitude for Social Workers in Seoul. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 16(2), 432-448. DOI : 10.5392/JKCA.2016.16.02.432
  54. M. J. Park, J. K. Kim & Y. H. Kim. (2019). Collaborating Community-Oriented Medical and Social Services: Baldrige Model and Societal Contributions. The Korea Service Management Society, 20(4), 109-124. DOI : 10.15706/jksms.2019.20.4.006
  55. S. Y. Min, S. W. Kim & H. R. Jeong. (2019). Community collaboration experiences of the integrated child protection specialized services demonstration project. Journal of the Korean society of child welfare, (66), 1-37. DOI : 10.24300/jkscw.2019.06.66.1
  56. Caliendo, M. & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of economic surveys, 22(1), 31-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x