DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Moral Disengagement on Cyberbullying Perpetration in Middle School Students and the Moderating Role of Self-Control

중학생의 도덕적 이탈이 사이버불링 가해행동에 미치는 영향과 자기통제력의 조절효과

  • Jung, Do Young (Department of Child & Family Studies, Yonsei University) ;
  • Park, Ju Hee (Department of Child & Family Studies, Yonsei University)
  • 정도영 (연세대학교 아동.가족학과) ;
  • 박주희 (연세대학교 아동.가족학과)
  • Received : 2019.09.27
  • Accepted : 2020.01.30
  • Published : 2020.02.28

Abstract

This study examined the effects of moral disengagement (cognitive restructuring and blaming the victim) and self-control on cyberbullying perpetration and investigated if self-control moderated the relationship between moral disengagement (cognitive restructuring and blaming the victim) and cyberbullying perpetration. Participants in the study consisted of 551 middle school students (273 boys and 278 girls) from five middle schools in Seoul and Gyeonggi-do. Cyberbullying perpetration, moral disengagement and self-control were measured using the Bullying/Victimization Questionnaire, the Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement Scale, and the Self-Control Scale for children and adolescents. Data were analyzed by means of descriptive statistics and a hierarchical regression analysis. The moderating effect of self-control was analyzed using procedures proposed by Baron and Kenny (1986). The results indicated that both levels of cognitive restructuring and blaming the victim increased cyberbullying perpetration whereas the level of self-control decreased cyberbullying perpetration. In addition, self-control moderated the effect of cognitive restructuring on cyberbullying perpetration. The influence of cognitive restructuring on cyberbullying perpetration was greater when the level of self-control was low, compared to when it was high.

Keywords

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  2. Ainslie, G. (2006). Cruelty may be a self-control device against sympathy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(3), 224-225. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X06229054
  3. Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31(2), 101-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724022014322
  4. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364-374. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364
  5. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  6. Barriga, A., Landau, J., Stinson, B., Liau, A., & Gibbs, J. (2000). Cognitive distortion and problem behaviors in adolescents. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27(1), 36-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854800027001003
  7. Bauman, S., Cross, D., & Walker, J. (2013). Principles of cyberbullying research: Definitions, measures, and methodology. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  8. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 351-355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00534.x
  9. Bussey, K., Fitzpatrick, S., & Raman, A. (2015). The role of moral disengagement and self-efficacy in cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence, 14(1), 30-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.954045
  10. Calvete, E. (2008). Justification of violence and grandiosity schemas as predictors of antisocial behavior in adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36(7), 1083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-008-9229-5
  11. Campfield, D. C. (2008). Cyber bullying and victimization: Psychological characteristics of bullies, victims, and bully-victims (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
  12. Carden, S. W., Holtzman, N. S., & Strube, M. J. (2017). Cahost: An excel workbook for facilitating the Johnson-Neyman technique for twoway interactions in multiple regression. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1293. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01293
  13. Chu, B. W. (2012). Online moral disengagement and the tasks of internet ethics education. Journal of Korean Ethics Studies, 87, 119-141. https://doi.org/10.15801/je.1.87.201212.119
  14. Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., & Hymel, S. (2014). Moral disengagement among children and youth: A meta analytic review of links to aggressive behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 40(1), 56-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21502
  15. Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
  16. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  17. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior, 29(2), 129-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620701457816
  18. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2014). Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and responding to cyberbullying(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
  19. Hymel, S., & Bonanno, R. A. (2014). Moral disengagement processes in bullying. Theory into Practice, 53(4), 278-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2014.947219
  20. Hymel, S., Rocke-Henderson, N., & Bonanno, R. A. (2005). Moral disengagement: A framework for understanding bullying among adolescents. Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2012.1.12
  21. Kanfer, F. H. (1984). Self-management methods. In F. H. Kanfer & A. P. Goldstein(2nd Eds.), Helping People change(pp. 30-43). New York, NY: Pergamon.
  22. Kendall, P. C., & Braswell, L. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for impulsive children. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  23. Korea Internet & Security Agency. (2019). 2018 Survey on the internet usage. Retrieved September 20, 2019, from http://www.kisa.or.kr
  24. Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073-1137. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618
  25. Kowalski, R. M., Limber, S. P., & Agatston, P. W. (2012). Cyberbullying: Bullying in the digital age. Chichester, WS: John Wiley & Sons.
  26. Lee, C., Shin, N., & Ha, E. (2014). A study on the situation of youth cyberbullying and measures to prevent it(Report No. 14-R07). Retrieved July 18, 2019, from https://www.nypi. re.kr
  27. Lee, S. S. (2011). Testing both risk and control factors of juvenile delinquency in offline, internet, and cell phone media. Korean Criminological Review, 22(1), 111-135.
  28. Lee, S., Jung, H., & Han, H. (2017). Development of an educational program to prevent cyberbullying in Korean youths. Korean Journal of Communication Studies, 25(2), 107-134. https://doi.org/10.23875/kca.25.2.4
  29. Lee, S., Kim, E., & Kim, J. (2014). A study on the relationship between moral cognitive distortion and peer bullying of children and adolescents. Journal of Korean Home Management Association, 32(3), 99-114. https://doi.org/10.7466/JKHMA.2014.32.3.99
  30. Lim, S. S. (2003). An inquiry into the methodology of information ethics education. Journal of Korean Ethics Studies, 54(3), 261-291.
  31. Marcum, C. D., Higgins, G. E., Freiburger, T. L., & Ricketts, M. L. (2014). Exploration of the cyberbullying victim/offender overlap by sex. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(3), 538-548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-013-9217-3
  32. Ministry of Education. (2019). The first student survey on school violence in 2019. Retrieved September 4, 2019, from https://www.moe.go.kr
  33. Nam, H. M. (1999). The effects of psychological family environment, selfcontrol and friends characteristics of middle school students on their problems behaviors (Unpublished master's thesis). Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  34. Nam, S. I., & Kweon, N. H. (2013). A study on the factors that influence adolescent offenders'of cyberbullying. Journal of Future Oriented Youth Society, 10(3), 23-43.
  35. Nam, S. J. (2011). The effect of tension and low self-control on cyber deviation: Analyzing the mediating effect of internet addiction and moderating effect of anonymity. Family and Environment Research, 49(2), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.6115/khea.2011.49.2.063
  36. National Information Society Agency. (2018). 2018 Survey on Cyberbullying. Retrieved July 11, 2019, from https://www.nia.or.kr
  37. National Youth Policy Institute. (2018). The survey on rights of the children and youths. Retrieved December 3, 2019, from https://www.kosis.kr
  38. Nixon, C. L. (2014). Current perspectives: The impact of cyberbullying on adolescent health. Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, 5, 143-158. https://doi.org/10.2147/AHMT.S36456
  39. Paciello, M., Fida, R., Tramontano, C., Lupinetti, C., & Caprara, G. V. (2008). Stability and change of moral disengagement and its impact on aggression and violence in late adolescence. Child Development, 79(5), 1288-1309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01189.x
  40. Park, J. H. (2018). Effect of the amount of time online on cyberbullying perpetration in middle school students and moderating role of justice sensitivity. Family and Environment Research, 56(6), 619-626. https://doi.org/10.6115/fer.2018.044
  41. Park, Y. S., & Park, J. H. (2016). The effects of school violence victimization on cyberbullying perpetration in middle school students and the moderating role of self-control. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 37(3), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.5723/kjcs.2016.37.3.39
  42. Perren, S., & Gutzwiller-Helfenfinger, E. (2012). Cyberbullying and traditional bullying in adolescence: Differential roles of moral disengagement, moral emotions, and moral values. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 195-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2011.643168
  43. Pornari, C. D., & Wood, J. (2010). Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: The role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 36(2), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20336
  44. Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31(4), 437-448. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986031004437
  45. Robson, C., & Witenberg, R. T. (2013). The influence of moral disengagement, morally based self-esteem, age, and gender on traditional bullying and cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence, 12(2), 211-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2012.762921
  46. Runions, K. C., & Bak, M. (2015). Online moral disengagement, cyberbullying, and cyber-aggression. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(7), 400-405. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0670
  47. Ryu, S. J. (2013). A study on adolescents'experiences of cyberviolence and offline violence. Korean Society for Journalism and Communication Studies, 57(5), 297-324.
  48. Seo, M. J. (2013). The influences of moral disengagement and moral emotions on bullying assistant behavior. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 34(6), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.5723/KJCS.2013.34.6.123
  49. Seo, M. J., & Kim, K. Y. (2006). Analysis of variables for classifying types of outsiders in bullying situations. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 27(6), 35-51.
  50. Spiller, S. A., Fitzsimons, G. J., Lynch, J. G., & MccClelland, G. H. (2013). Spotlights, floodlights, and the magic number zero: Simple effects tests in moderated regression. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(2), 277-288. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.12.0420
  51. Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321-326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295
  52. Sung, S. H., Hong, C. H., & Kim, G. A. (2014). The effect of the selfregulation program on self-control, impulsiveness, aggression of juvenile delinquents. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 28(2), 157-175. https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2014.28.2.009
  53. Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High selfcontrol predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271-324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x
  54. Vazsonyi, A. T., Machackova, H., Sevcikova, A., Smahel, D., & Cerna, A. (2012). Cyberbullying in context: Direct and indirect effects by low self-control across 25 European countries. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 210-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2011.644919
  55. Williams, K. R., & Guerra, N. G. (2007). Prevalence and predictors of internet bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.018
  56. Wolak, J., Mitchell, K. J., & Finkelhor, D. (2007). Does online harassment constitute bullying? An exploration of online harassment by known peers and online-only contacts. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.019
  57. Wolfer, R., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Zagorscak, P., Jakel, A., Gobel, K., & Scheithauer, H. (2014). Prevention 2.0: Targeting cyberbullying@ school. Prevention Science, 15(6), 879-887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-013-0438-y
  58. Wright, M. F., & Li, Y. (2013). Normative beliefs about aggression and cyber aggression among young adults: A longitudinal investigation. Aggressive Behavior, 39(3), 161-170. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21470
  59. Yeum, D., Kim, S., & Lee, S. (2014). A study of the effect of adolescents'overuse of internet on their cyber delinquency: Focusing on the moderating effect of self-control. Studies on Korean Youth, 25(4), 159-183. https://doi.org/10.14816/sky.2014.11.75.159
  60. Yoo, G. R., & Park, J. H. (2019). Influence of hostile attribution bias on cyberbullying perpetration in middle school students and the multiple additive moderating effect of justice sensitivity. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 40(4), 79-93. https://doi.org/10.5723/kjcs.2019.40.4.79

Cited by

  1. A Meta-Analytic Review of Moral Disengagement and Cyberbullying vol.12, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.681299