DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Mechanical Properties of PVB 3D Printed Output Fumigated with Ethanol

에탄올 훈증처리한 3D 프린팅 PVB 출력물의 기계적 특성

  • Kang, Eun-Young (Graduate School of Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Lim, Ji-Ho (Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Choi, Seunggon (Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Mun, Jong Wook (Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Lee, Yu Kyung (Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Lee, Sun Kon (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Jeong, Dae-Yong (Graduate School of Engineering, Inha University)
  • 강은영 (인하대학교 공학대학원) ;
  • 임지호 (인하대학교 신소재공학과) ;
  • 최승곤 (인하대학교 신소재공학과) ;
  • 문종욱 (인하대학교 신소재공학과) ;
  • 이유경 (인하대학교 신소재공학과) ;
  • 이선곤 (인하대학교 기계공학과) ;
  • 정대용 (인하대학교 공학대학원)
  • Received : 2020.03.15
  • Accepted : 2020.07.05
  • Published : 2020.07.27

Abstract

FDM 3D printing structures have rough surfaces and require post-treatment to improve the properties. Fumigation is a representative technique for removing surface unevenness. Surface treatment by fumigation proceeds by dissolving the surface of the protruding structure using a vaporized solvent. In this study, 3D printed PVB outputs are surface-treated with ethyl-alcohol fumigation. As the fumigation time increases, the surface flattens as ethanol dissolves the mountains on the surface of PVB and the surface valleys are filled with dissolved PVB. Through the fumigation process, the mechanical strength tends to decrease, and deformation rate increases. Ethanol vapor permeates into PVB, widening the distance between chains and resulting in weak bonding strength between chains. In order to confirm the effect of fumigation only, an annealing process is performed at 80 ℃ for 1, 5, 10, 30, and 50 minutes and the results of the fumigation are compared.

Keywords

References

  1. Y. He, G. Xue and J. Fu, Sci. Rep., 4, 6973 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06973
  2. J. W. Choi and H. C. Kim, J. Korean Soc. Manuf. Process. Eng., 14, 1 (2015).
  3. J. Jang and D. W. Cho, J. Korean Soc. Manuf. Process. Eng., 14, 142 (2015). https://doi.org/10.14775/ksmpe.2015.14.6.142
  4. N. A. Mohajer, C.-Y. Wu, T. Ladun, D. A. Rajon and Y. Huang, Build. Environ., 93, 293 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.07.013
  5. A. Lalehpour, C. Janeteas and A. Barari, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 95, 1505 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1165-5
  6. R. Singh, S. Singh, I. P. Singh, F. Fabbrocino and F. Fraternali, Compos. Part B Eng., 111, 228 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.062
  7. A. Garg, A. Bhattacharya and A. Batish, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech., 89, 2175 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9257-1
  8. K. F. Leong, C. K. Chua, G. S. Chua and C. H. Tan, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 83, 36 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00041-7
  9. P. Kulkarni and D. Dutta, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 122, 100 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.538891
  10. R. E. Williams and V. L. Melton, Rapid Prototyping J., 4, 56 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1108/13552549810207279
  11. P. M. Pandey, N. V. Reddy and S. G. Dhande, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 132, 323 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00953-6
  12. K.-H. Jo, Y.-S. Jeong, J.-H. Lee and S.-H. Lee, Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., 17, 1541 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-016-0180-z
  13. K. Xu, T. Xi and C. Liu, J. Phys. Conf., 1303, 012061 (2019).
  14. C.-C. Kuo and R.-C. Mao, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 31, 1113 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2015.1090594
  15. K. W. Seo and D. Kim, Polymer (Korea), 26, 168 (2002).
  16. J. Wu and W. Sun, Numer. Math., 102, 343 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00211-005-0647-9
  17. X. Zhang, J. Wu and D. Yu, Int. J. Comput. Math., 87, 855 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207160802226517
  18. T. Yu, C. M. Wu, C. Y. Chang, C. Y. Wang and S. P. Rwei, Express Polym. Lett., 6, 318 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.35
  19. A. El-Hadi, R. Schnabel, E. Straube, G. Muller and S. Henning, Polym. Test., 21, 665 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9418(01)00142-8