Korean Journal of Radiology

  • 제21권8호
  • /
  • Pages.955-966
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1229-6929(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-8330(eISSN)
대한영상의학회 (The Korean Society of Radiology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Nipple Ultrasound: A Pictorial Essay

  • Angelica Chiorean (Department of Radiology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy) ;
  • Roxana Maria Pintican (Department of Radiology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy) ;
  • Madalina Szep (Department of Radiology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy) ;
  • Diana Feier (Department of Radiology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy) ;
  • Liliana Rogojan (Department of Pathology, County Clinical Emergency Hospital) ;
  • Bogdan Fetica (Department of Pathology, County Clinical Emergency Hospital) ;
  • George Dindelegan (Department of Surgery, County Clinical Emergency Hospital) ;
  • Bura Vlad (Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, County Clinical Emergency Hospital) ;
  • Magdalena Duma (Department of Radiology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy)
  • 투고 : 2019.11.05
  • 심사 : 2020.03.09
  • 발행 : 2020.08.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Ultrasound (US) is an attractive diagnostic approach to identify both common and uncommon nipple pathologies, such as duct ectasia, nipple abscess, nipple leiomyoma, nipple adenoma, fibroepithelial polyp, ductal carcinoma in situ (restricted to nipple), invasive carcinoma, and Paget's disease. US is the reliable first-line imaging technique to assess nipple pathologies. It is useful to identify and characterize nipple lesions. Additionally, we have presented the mammography and MRI outcomes correlated with histopathologic features for the relevant cases.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Pandya S, Moore RG. Breast development and anatomy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2011;54:91-95  https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0b013e318207ffe9
  2. Nicholson BT, Harvey JA, Cohen MA. Nipple-areolar complex: normal anatomy and benign and malignant processes. Radiographics 2009;29:509-523  https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.292085128
  3. Patel BK, Falcon S, Drukteinis J. Management of nipple discharge and the associated imaging findings. Am J Med 2015;128:353-360  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.09.031
  4. Waldman RA, Finch J, Grant-Kels JM, Stevenson C, Whitaker-Worth D. Skin diseases of the breast and nipple: benign and malignant tumors. J Am Acad Dermatol 2019;80:1467-1481  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2018.08.066
  5. Robertson FM, Bondy M, Yang W, Yamauchi H, Wiggins S, Kamrudin S, et al. Inflammatory breast cancer: the disease, the biology, the treatment. CA Cancer J Clin 2010;60:351-375  https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.20082
  6. Bahl M, Gadd MA, Lehman CD. Journal Club: diagnostic utility of MRI after negative or inconclusive mammography for the evaluation of pathologic nipple discharge. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017;209:1404-1410  https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.17.18139
  7. Yilmaz R, Bender O, Celik Yabul F, Dursun M, Tunaci M, Acunas G. Diagnosis of nipple discharge: value of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in comparison with ductoscopy. Balkan Med J 2017;34:119-126  https://doi.org/10.4274/balkanmedj.2016.0184
  8. Bahl M, Baker JA, Greenup RA, Ghate SV. Diagnostic value of ultrasound in female patients with nipple discharge. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;205:203-208  https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.13354
  9. Lubina N, Schedelbeck U, Roth A, Weng AM, Geissinger E, Honig A, et al. 3.0 tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with nipple discharge when mammography and ultrasound fail. Eur Radiol 2015;25:1285-1293  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3521-2
  10. Hooley RJ, Scoutt LM, Philpotts LE. Breast ultrasonography: state of the art. Radiology 2013;268:642-659  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13121606
  11. Stavros AT. Breast anatomy: the basis for understanding sonography. In: Stavros AT, ed. Breast ultrasound. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2004:56-108 
  12. Yoon JH, Yoon H, Kim EK, Moon HJ, Park YV, Kim MJ. Ultrasonographic evaluation of women with pathologic nipple discharge. Ultrasonography 2017;36:310-320  https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.17013
  13. Lee SH, Chang JM, Cho N, Koo HR, Yi A, Kim SJ, et al. Practice guideline for the performance of breast ultrasound elastography. Ultrasonography 2014;33:3-10  https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.13012
  14. Lee SH, Chang JM, Kim WH, Bae MS, Seo M, Koo HR, et al. Added value of shear-wave elastography for evaluation of breast masses detected with screening US imaging. Radiology 2014;273:61-69  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14132443
  15. Yu JH, Kim MJ, Cho H, Liu HJ, Han SJ, Ahn TG. Breast diseases during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2013;56:143-159  https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2013.56.3.143
  16. Tiu CM, Chiou SY, Chou YH, Lai CH, Chiou HJ, Chiang HR, et al. Clinical significance of ductal dilatation on breast ultrasonogram. J Med Ultrasound 2005;13:127-134  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-6441(09)60101-6
  17. Dixon JM. Breast infection. BMJ 2013;347:f3291 
  18. Dilek N, Dilek AR, Saral Y, S˛ehitog˘lu I. Epidermoid cyst on the nipple: a rare location. Breast J 2014;20:203-204  https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.12243
  19. Geffroy D, Doutriaux-Dumoulins I. Clinical abnormalities of the nipple-areola complex: the role of imaging. Diagn Interv Imaging 2015;96:1033-1044  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2015.07.001
  20. Song HS, Jung SE, Kim YC, Lee ES. Nipple eczema, an indicative manifestation of atopic dermatitis? A clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical study. Am J Dermatopathol 2015;37:284-288  https://doi.org/10.1097/DAD.0000000000000195
  21. Da Costa D, Taddese A, Cure ML, Gerson D, Poppiti R Jr, Esserman LE. Common and unusual diseases of the nipple-areolar complex. Radiographics 2007;27 Suppl 1:S65-S77  https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.27si075512
  22. Gokdemir G, Sakiz D, Koslu A. Multiple cutaneous leiomyomas of the nipple. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2006;20:468-469  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2006.01451.x
  23. Nakamura S, Hashimoto Y, Takeda K, Nishi K, Ishida-Yamamoto A, Mizumoto T, et al. Two cases of male nipple leiomyoma: idiopathic leiomyoma and gynecomastia-associated leiomyoma. Am J Dermatopathol 2012;34:287-291  https://doi.org/10.1097/DAD.0b013e31822a3075
  24. Shaaban AM, Turton EP, Merchant W. An unusual case of a large fibroepithelial stromal polyp presenting as a nipple mass. BMC Res Notes 2013;6:345 
  25. Belli AK, Somuncu E, Aydogan T, Bakkaloglu D, Ilvan S, Aydogan F. Fibroepithelial polyp of the nipple in a woman. Breast J 2013;19:111-112  https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.12063
  26. Spohn GP, Trotter SC, Tozbikian G, Povoski SP. Nipple adenoma in a female patient presenting with persistent erythema of the right nipple skin: case report, review of the literature, clinical implications, and relevancy to health care providers who evaluate and treat patients with dermatologic conditions of the breast skin. BMC Dermatol 2016;16:4 
  27. Ganesan S, Karthik G, Joshi M, Damodaran V. Ultrasound spectrum in intraductal papillary neoplasms of breast. Br J Radiol 2006;79:843-849  https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/69395941
  28. Oyama T, Koerner FC. Noninvasive papillary proliferations. Semin Diagn Pathol 2004;21:32-41  https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semdp.2003.10.011
  29. Wang LJ, Wu P, Li XX, Luo R, Wang DB, Guan WB. Magnetic resonance imaging features for differentiating breast papilloma with high-risk or malignant lesions from benign papilloma: a retrospective study on 158 patients. World J Surg Oncol 2018;16:234 
  30. Sanders MA, Brock JE, Harrison BT, Wieczorek TJ, Hong X, Guidi AJ, et al. Nipple-invasive primary carcinomas: clinical, imaging, and pathologic features of breast carcinomas originating in the nipple. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2018;142:598-605  https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2017-0226-OA
  31. Geffroy D, Doutriaux-Dumoulins I, Labbe-Devilliers C, Meingan P, Houdebine S, Sagan C, et al. [Paget's disease of the nipple and differential diagnosis.] J Radiol 2011;92:889-898  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jradio.2011.07.010
  32. Lim HS, Jeong SJ, Lee JS, Park MH, Kim JW, Shin SS, et al. Paget disease of the breast: mammographic, US, and MR imaging findings with pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2011;31:1973-1987 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.317115070