한국조경학회지 (Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture)

  • 제48권3호
  • /
  • Pages.22-33
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1225-1755(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-9566(eISSN)
한국조경학회 (The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

퍼지 종합 평가를 활용한 태산(泰山)등산로 사인시스템 만족도 분석

The Satisfaction Analysis of Mount Tai Mountaineering Road Sign System Using Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation

  • 위잉 (경북대학교 대학원 조경학과) ;
  • 정태열 (경북대학교 조경학과)
  • Yu, Ying (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Jung, Taeyeol (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Kyungpook National University)
  • 투고 : 2020.04.29
  • 심사 : 2020.06.18
  • 발행 : 2020.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

사인시스템은 현재 관광지구에서 가장 널리 사용하는 안내매체 중 하나이며, 그것의 역할은 관광지의 자원과 문화적 가치를 소개하고, 관광객들의 관광 체험을 더 잘 할 수 있도록 도와주는 것이다. 이에 본 연구는 관광객에게 있어서 태산 관광지구 사인시스템의 영향 요인을 도출하고, 만족도를 분석하여 향후 관광객의 만족도를 높이기 위한 태산등산로 사인시스템을 제언하는 것이 목적이다. 연구방법은 선행연구에서 파악된 사인시스템의 평가항목을 도출하고, 통합 세분화하여 태산등산로 사인시스템의 평가항목을 선정하였으며, 설문조사와 요인분석을 실시하여 영향요인을 도출했다. 그리고 관광객의 만족도를 알아보기 위해 퍼지 종합 평가(Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation)를 실시했다. 본 논문의 결과를 요약하면, 첫째, 태산등산로 사인시스템의 4가지 영향요인으로 해설내용, 외관조형, 해설방식, 배치관리를 도출하였다. 둘째, 영향요인의 높은 가중치 순서는 해설내용, 외관조형, 해설방식, 배치관리 순으로 나타났으며, 중요도에서 실용성과 미관을 더 중시한다는 점을 유도해 낼 수 있었다. 셋째, 사인시스템 만족도는 해설내용, 외관조형, 배치관리요인의 등급은 '좋음' 이며, 해설방식요인의 등급은 '보통'으로 나타났다. 이는 태산등산로 자연 경치와 문화 가치에 대한 관광객의 이해를 심화시키지 못한 것으로 생각된다. 이런 결과는 향후 사인시스템을 재정비할 때 계획 및 설계에 필요한 이론적 근거를 제공하여 관광체험의 전반적인 만족도를 높이고자 하는데 의의가 있다.

Sign system is one of the most widely used guide media in scenic spots. It plays vital role in introducing cultural values of destinations to tourists with better visit experience. The purpose of this study is to derive the influence factors of the sign system of Mount Tai scenic area for tourists, analyze the satisfaction of tourists, and provide suggestions for the sign system of Mount Tai Mountaineering Road to improve tourists' satisfaction in the future. The evaluation items of Mount Tai Mountaineering Road sign system were derived from the previous studies and then subdivided comprehensively. Survey by questionnaires was carried out to obtain the influence factors. In order to understand the satisfaction degree of tourists, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation was implemented. The research results of this study are summarized as follows. First, four influence factors of the sign system on Mountaineering Road of Mount Tai were concluded as the interpretation content, appearance modeling, interpretation methods and layout management. Second, the order of weight values of influence factors was the interpretation content, appearance modeling, interpretation methods and layout management respectively from high to low, which means that tourists paid more attention to practicality and aesthetics. Third, the satisfaction degree of the tourists on the sign system was different. The satisfaction level for the three factors (interpretation content, appearance modeling, layout management) was good, while the satisfaction for interpretation method was medium. The reason was that it failed to deepen the understanding of tourists on the natural and cultural values of Mount Tai Mountaineering Road. These results indicate great significance to provide theoretical basis for the later readjustment and design of the sign system and to improve the overall satisfaction of tourists on tourism experience.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Beck, L. and T. Cable(2000) The Trend of Interpretation in the Twenty-first Century -- 15 Guiding Principles for Interpreting Nature and Culture, Taipei: Pinto Co., Ltd.
  2. Chang, Z. J. (2009) Study on the Plan and Design of Huaqing Hot Spring's Sign System. Master, Dissertation. Xi'an University of Architecture.
  3. Deng, M. Y. (2010) Study on the optimization of tourism interpretation system of heritage scenic spots based on demand analysis Tourism Tribune 7(25): 35-40.
  4. Dierking, L. D. and W. Pollock(1998) Questioning Assumptions : An Introduction to Front-end Studies in Museums. Washington. DC : Association of Science Technology.
  5. Feng, Z. C. and F. Q. Huang(2009) SPSS Course of Social Science at the Same Price. Beijin: Tsinghua University.
  6. Gross, M., R. Zimmermanet and J. Buchholz(2006) Signs Trailsand Wayside Exhibits: Connecting People and Places. Wisconsin: UWSP Foundation.
  7. Ham, S. H. (1993) Environmental Interpretation: A Practical Guide for People with Big Ideas and Small Budgets Golden, CO: Fulcrum Publishing.
  8. Hu, Y. J. and S. H. He(2000) Comprehensive Evaluation Method. Science Press.
  9. Huang, R. (2013) Study on personalization design approach of sign system in tourist attractions a case study of three Gorges Chexi Folk Custom Tourist Spot. Resource Development & Market, 30(5): 614-618. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-8141.2014.05.025
  10. Ji, S. S. and Y. K. So(2014) Research reports: A preceding study for the suggestion on effective sign design system at hantangang auto-camping site, Journal of the Korea Society of Design Culture (9): 323-331.
  11. Kim, J. P., J. H. Suh and H. S. Yeo(2015) A study on guidance facilities design considering color characteristics of rural areas -Focused on Gyeonggi-do Hwaseong-si Cheongmir Dinosaur Village, Korea Design Knowledge Society 34(6): 143-153.
  12. Kuehn, D. M., T. T. Ted and B. Larry(1995) Interpretation of Cultural and Natural Resources State College PA: Venture.
  13. Lai, G. Y. and C. Chen(2010) SPSS 17.0 common functions and application examples. Beijing Electronic Industry.
  14. Laws, E. (1998) Conceptualizing visitor satisfaction management inheritage settings : An exploratory blueprinting analysis of Leeds Castle, Kent. Tourism Management 19(6): 545-554. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(98)00056-9
  15. Lewis, W. J. (1980) Philadelphia, PA: Eastern National Parkand Monument Association, Interpreting for Park Visitors.
  16. Luo, F., Y. D. Zhong, J. Li and H. J. Fu(2005) Types and effectiveness of tourism interpretation in Huangshan park. Tourism Science 5: 34-37.
  17. Madin, E., M. P. and D. M. Fenton(2004) Environmental interpretation in thegreat barrier reef marine park: An assessment of programme effectiveness. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 12(2): 121-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580408667228
  18. Niu, X. (2008) Study on the tourism interpretation system of Beijing urban park: Taking Taoranting Park as an example, Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science Edition) 12(6): 74-82.
  19. Pan, Z. Q. (2015) A study on the interpretation validity of tourist signs based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation - A case study of Shanghai Historical District, Resources Science 37(5): 1861-1869.
  20. Parks, C. (1978) Ottawa: Parks Canada, Engineering and Architecture Branch.
  21. Roggenbuck, J. W. (1979) The filed experiment: A suggested method for interpretive evaluation Journal of Interpretation 4(1): 9-11.
  22. Tang, J. L. (2003) An initial discussion about tourist interpretation system :A case study of Yinlusong Scenic Spot in Mt .Daowu, Tourism Tribune 18(3): 14-17. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2003.03.003
  23. Tang, M. D. (2006) A framework for interpretation system in tourist areas, Tourism Tribune 21(1): 64-68. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2006.01.018
  24. Tilden, F. (1957) Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, Interpretingn Our Heritage.
  25. Veverka, J. A. (2008) Tourism interpretation system planning. Translated by Guo Yujie, Wu Bihu, Yu Ping. Beijing: China Tourism.
  26. Wagar, A. J. (1976) Evaluating the effectiveness of interpretation Journal of Interpretation 1(1): 1-8.
  27. Wang, J. (2014) Researches on the interpretive planets effects based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation: A case study of Songshan National Nature Reserves, Tourism Science 28(5): 21-30.
  28. Wang, X. (1989) Study report on the planning of interpretation system of Tailuge Park: Tailuge Park Management Office.
  29. Won, Y. K. and D. J. Kim(2017) A study on evaluation of micropressure wave reduction technology using fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, International Journal of Contents 17(10): 231-240.
  30. Wu, J. (2009) A Study on the Interpretation Effect of Scenic Spot Logo System Taking Zizhuyuan Park as an Example, Beijing: Master's Thesis of Capital Normal University.
  31. Zhang, J. H. (2004) Investigation and analysis method in planning and design - Factor analysis Gardens in China, Chinese Landscape Architecture 9: 73-78.
  32. Zhang, L. M. and D. H. Hu(2006) Planning and design of interpretation system for tourist attractions. Beijing: China Tourism.
  33. Zhang, M. X. and Y. X. Lin(2002) Introduction to Interpretation. Taipei: Taiyuan.
  34. Zhang, M. (2016) A study on the persuasive effect of standard signs in scenic spots - Based on the matching effect of language style and color potency, Journal of Tourism 31(3): 79-87.
  35. Zhong, L. S. and J. Wang(2011) Investigation and analysis on situation of ecotourism development in protected areas of China. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 31(24): 7450-7457.
  36. Zhong, L. S., J. S. Chen and Y. H. Wang(2000) Planning and design of signage system in Bitahai ecotourism zone. Chinese Landscape Architecture 16(3): 50-51.
  37. Zhong, Y. D. and F. Luo(2006) Discussion on the planning and design method and technology of tourist interpretation board. Journal of Zhongnanlin University 1: 95-99.
  38. Chinese scenery of interest to foreigners. Qilu News, 2014, Retrieved March 23, 2020 from http://taian.iqilu.com/taianmansheng/2014/2176797.shtml
  39. Mount tai mountaineering road's(middle road) figure. 2019.11.21. updated date, Download with 91 satellite maps software(Mount Tai in Shandong, China).