한국지구과학회지 (Journal of the Korean earth science society)

  • 제41권3호
  • /
  • Pages.291-306
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1225-6692(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-4518(eISSN)
한국지구과학회 (The Korean Earth Science Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

다층 서답형 문항을 이용한 태양계 구조 학습 발달과정 개발 및 타당성 검증

The Development and Validation of Learning Progression for Solar System Structure Using Multi-tiers Supply Form Items

  • 오현석 (서울대학교사범대학부설중학교) ;
  • 이기영 (강원대학교 과학교육학부)
  • Oh, Hyunseok (Middle School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Kiyoung (Division of Science Education, Kangwon National University)
  • 투고 : 2020.05.25
  • 심사 : 2020.06.24
  • 발행 : 2020.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구에서는 다층 서답형 문항을 이용하여 태양계 구조에 대한 학습 발달과정을 개발하고 그 타당성을 검증하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 Wilson(2005)이 제안한 구인 모델링 방식을 적용하여 '태양계 구성원', '태양계 행성의 크기와 거리의 경향성', '태양계 모델링'을 발달 변인(progress variables)으로 설정하고 각각에 대한 다층 서답형 문항을 개발하여 검사지로 구성하였다. 개발된 문항을 초등학교 5학년 150명을 대상으로 '태양계와 별' 단원 수업의 사전 및 사후에 적용하였다. 평가 결과를 기술하기 위해 각각의 평가 문항에 대한 학생 응답을 범주화 하는 과정을 거쳤으며, 이범주들을 구인별로 5개 수준으로 분류하였다. Rasch 모델의 부분점수 모형을 적용하여 작성된 Wright map을 분석함으로써 학생들의 응답 결과를 기반으로 작성된 학습 발달과정의 수준이 적절한지 검토하였다. 또한, 수업 전후 학생들의 수준 변화를 추적함으로써 학습 발달과정에서 설정한 가설적인 경로의 타당성을 검증하였다. 연구 결과는 다음과 같다: 다층 서답형 문항을 이용한 상향식 연구방법으로 초등학교에 적용할 수 있는 태양계 구조에 대한 경험적 학습 발달과정을 정교하게 설정할 수 있었다. 그리고 학습 발달과정의 구인 타당도가 높게 나타나며 학생들의 발달이 학습 발달과정을 따라 변화하는 것으로 나타났다.

In this study, we developed a learning progression for the structure of the solar system using multi-tier supply form items and validated its appropriateness. To this end, by applying Wilson's (2005) construct modeling approach, we set up 'solar system components,' 'size and distance pattern of solar system planets,' and 'solar system modeling' as the progress variables of the learning progression and constructed multi-tier supply form items for each of these variables. The items were applied to 150 fifth graders before and after the classes that dealt with the 'solar system and star' unit. To describe the results of the assessment, the students' responses to each item were categorized into five levels. By analyzing the Wright map that was created by applying the partial credit Rasch model, we validated the appropriateness of the learning progression based on the students' responses. In addition, the validity of the hypothetical pathway that was established in the learning progression was verified by tracking changes in the developmental level of students before and after the classes. The results of the research are as follows. The bottom-up research method that used multi-tier supply form items was able to elaborately set the empirical learning progression for the conceptualization of the structure of the solar system that is taught in elementary school. In addition, the validity of the learning progression was high, and the development of students was found to change with the learning progression.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. American Geological Institute, 2012, EarthComm., Second Edition: Project-based Space and Earth System Science (2nd Ed.); Teacher's Edition, Volume 1, Chapters 1-4, Its-About-Time. NY, USA, 1018 p.
  2. Alonzo, A. C. and Gotwals, A. W., 2012, Learning progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions. Springer Science & Business Media.
  3. Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O. and Orion, N., 2005, Development of system thinking skills in the context of Earth System education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 518-560. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20061
  4. Bond, T., and Fox, C., 2007, Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd edition). New York, NY: Routledge. 352 p.
  5. Corcoran, T., Mosher, F. A., and Rogat, A., 2009, Learning progressions in science: An evidence based approach to reform. Consortium for Policy Research in Education Report #RR-63. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
  6. Duncan, R. G., and HmeloSilver, C. E., 2009, Learning progressions: Aligning curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 606-609. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20316
  7. Heo, J. and Lee, K, 2018, A Proposal of Curriculum and Teaching Sequence for Seasonal Change by Exploring a Learning Progression. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 39, 260-274. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2018.39.3.260
  8. Ji, E. and Chae, S., 2000, Theory and practice of Rasch model. Seoul: Kyoyook-Kwahak-Sa. 100 p. (in Korean)
  9. Lee, K., Maeng, S., Park, Y., Lee, J. and Oh, H., 2014, A case study of middle school science teachers' topicspecific pedagogical content Knowledge on the unit of stars and universe. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34, 393-406. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.4.0393
  10. Lee, J., Lee, K., Park, Y., Maeng S. and Oh, H., 2016, Validation of learning progressions for earth's motion and solar system in elementary grades: focusing on construct validity and consequential validity. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36, 177-190. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.1.0177
  11. Liu, X. 2010, Using and developing measurement instruments in science education: A Rasch modeling approach. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc., 280 p.
  12. Maeng, S. and Lee, K., 2015, Cross-sectional item response analysis of geocognition assessment for the development of plate tectonics learning progressions: rash model. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35, 37-52. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.1.0037
  13. Maeng, S., Lee, K., Park, Y., Lee, J. and Oh, H., 2014, Development and validation of a learning progression for astronomical systems using ordered multiple-choice items. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34, 703-718. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.8.0703
  14. Maeng, S., Seong, Y. and Jang, S., 2013, Present states, methodological features, and an exemplar study of the research on learning progressions. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33, 161-180. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.1.161
  15. Masters, G.N. A, 1982, A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149-174. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296272
  16. National Assessment Governing Board (NAGB), 2008, Science Framework for the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress; NAGB, U.S. Department of Education: Washington, DC, USA.
  17. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1991, Professional standards for teaching mathematics, Inc. Reston: VA. 196 p.
  18. National Research Council (NRC). 2005, Systems for state science assessments. In M.R. Wilson & M.W. Bertenthal (Eds.), Committee on testing design on K-12 science achievement. The National Academy Press., Washington, DC, USA, 248 p.
  19. National Research Council (NRC). 2007, Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grade K-8. In R.A. Duschl, H.A. Schweingruber, & A.W. Shouse (Eds.), Committee on science learning, kindergarten through eighth grade. The National Academy Press., Washington, DC, USA, 404 p.
  20. National Research Council (NRC), 2012, A framework for k-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. The National Academies Press., Washington, DC, USA, 358 p.
  21. Oh, H., Lee, K., Park, Y., Maeng, S. and Lee, J., 2015, An analysis of systems thinking revealed in middle school astronomy classes: the case of science teachers' teaching practices for the unit of stars and universe. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 36, 591-608. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2015.36.6.591
  22. Oh, H. and Lee, K. 2018, Exploring 6 th Graders Learning Progression for Lunar Phase Change: Focusing on Astronomical Systems Thinking. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 39, 103-116. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2018.39.1.103
  23. Oh, P. S., Lee, S. K., Lee, K. H., Kim, C. J., Kim, H. B., Jeon, C. H. and Oh, S. D., 2008, Methodological review of research literature on the expertise of science teachers. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 28, 47-66. (in Korean)
  24. Orion, N. and Basis, T., 2008, Characterization of High School Students' System Thinking Skills in the Context of Earth Systems. Presented in the 2008 NARST Annual Meeting. March, 2008. Baltimore, U.S.A.
  25. Plummer, J.D., 2014, Spatial thinking as the dimension of progress in an astronomy learning progression. Studies in Science Education, 50, 1-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.869039
  26. Richmond, B., 2004, An introduction to systems thinking. Isee Systems. Lebanon, USA 165 p.
  27. Seong, Y., Maeng, S. and Jang, S., 2013, A learning progression for water cycle from fourth to sixth graders with ordered multiple-choice items. Journal of the Korean Elementary Science Education Society, 32, 139-158. (in Korean)
  28. So, K. H., 2003, Reconceptualization of teacher professionalism: Exploration of new directions. Curriculum Studies, 21, 77-96. (in Korean)
  29. Wilson, M., 2005, Constructing measures; An item response modeling approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 213 p.