Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science (구강회복응용과학지)

Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion (대한턱관절교합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of attachments and palatal coverage of maxillary implant overdenture on stress distribution: a finite element analysis

상악 임플란트 피개의치에서 유지장치 종류와 구개 피개 유무에 따른 응력분포에 대한 유한요소분석

  • Park, Jong-Hee (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Wang, Yuan-Kun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Jeong-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Park, Yeon-Hee (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Seo, Jae-Min (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Kyoung-A (Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Eulji University)
  • 박종희 (전북대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 왕원곤 (전북대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 이정진 (전북대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 박연희 (전북대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 서재민 (전북대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 김경아 (을지대학교 의과대학 치과학교실)
  • Received : 2020.03.17
  • Accepted : 2020.05.21
  • Published : 2020.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of attachments and palatal coverage on stress distribution in maxillary implant overdenture using finite element analysis. Materials and Methods: Four maxillary overdenture 3-D models with four implants placed in the anterior region were fabricated with computer-aided design. 1) Ball-F: Non-splinted ball attachment and full palatal coverage, 2) Ball-P: Non-splinted ball attachment and U-shaped partial palatal coverage, 3) Bar-F: Splinted milled bar attachment and full palatal coverage, 4) Bar-P: Splinted milled bar attachment and U-shaped partial palatal coverage. Stress distribution analysis was performed with ANSYS workbench 14. 100 N vertical load was applied at the right first molar unilaterally and maximum stress was calculated at the implant, peri-implant bone and mucosa. Results: The use of the ball attachment showed lower maximum stress on implant and peri-implant bone than the use of the milled bar attachment. But it showed contrary tendency in the mucosa. Regardless of attachment, full palatal coverage showed lower maximum stress on implant, peri-implant bone and mucosa. Conclusion: Within the limitation of this study, ball attachment improved stress distribution on implant and peri-implant bone rather than milled bar attachment in maxillary implant overdenture. Also, full palatal coverage is more favorable in stress distribution.

목적: 상악 임플란트 피개의치에서 유지장치 종류와 구개 피개 유무에 따른 응력분포를 3차원 유한요소분석법을 통해 알아보고자 한다. 연구 재료 및 방법: CAD를 이용하여 전방부에 4개의 임플란트를 식립한 4종류의 상악 임플란트 피개의치에 대한 3차원 모델을 디자인하였다. 1) Ball-F: 볼 유지장치를 사용하고 구개를 피개한 군, 2) Ball-P: 볼 유지장치를 사용하고 구개를 피개하지 않은 군, 3) Bar-F: 바 유지장치를 사용하고 구개를 피개한 군, 4) Bar-P: 바 유지장치를 사용하고 구개를 피개하지 않은 군. 응력분석은 유한요소 분석 프로그램인 ANSYS Workbench Ver. 14를 사용하였으며, 편측 저작의 상황을 고려하여 우측 제1대구치에 100 N의 정적하중을 적용하여 임플란트, 임플란트 주위 골, 점막에 발생하는 최대 응력값을 기록하였다. 결과: 볼 유지장치를 사용한 군이 바 유지장치를 사용한 군보다 임플란트 및 임플란트 주위골에 발생하는 최대 응력값이 작았다. 하지만 점막에서의 최대 응력값은 그 반대로 나타났다. 구개를 피개하면 유지장치의 종류와 무관하게 임플란트, 임플란트 주위 골, 점막 모두에서 최대응력값이 작아졌다. 결론: 본 연구의 한계 내에서 상악동 전방부에 4개의 임플란트를 식립하여 수복된 피개의치에서 바 유지장치보다는 볼 유지장치를 사용하고 구개를 완전히 피개하는 경우가 임플란트와 임플란트 주위 골의 응력분산에 효과적이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Jemt T, Book K, Karlsson S. Occlusal force and mandibular movements in patients with removable overdentures and fixed prostheses supported by implants in the maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:301-8.
  2. Lewis S, Sharma A, Nishimura R. Treatment of edentulous maxillae with osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:503-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90419-B
  3. Naert I, Quirynen M, Theuniers G, van Steenberghe D. Prosthetic aspects of osseointegrated fixtures supporting overdentures. A 4-year report. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:671-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90205-B
  4. Mericske-Stern RD, Taylor TD, Belser U. Management of the edentulous patient. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11 Suppl 1:108-25. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011S1108.x
  5. Engquist B, Bergendal T, Kallus T, Linden U. A retrospective multicenter evaluation of osseointegrated implants supporting overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:129-34.
  6. Hutton JE, Heath MR, Chai JY, Harnett J, Jemt T, Johns RB, McKenna S, McNamara DC, van Steenberghe D, Taylor R, et al. Factors related to success and failure rates at 3-year follow-up in a multicenter study of overdentures supported by Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:33-42.
  7. Jemt T, Chai J, Harnett J, Heath MR, Hutton JE, Johns RB, McKenna S, McNamara DC, van Steenberghe D, Taylor R, Watson RM, Herrmann I. A 5-year prospective multicenter follow-up report on overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:291-8.
  8. Brunski JB, Puleo DA, Nanci A. Biomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial implants: current status and future developments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:15-46.
  9. Hoshaw SJ, Brunski JB, Cochran GV. Mechanical Loading of Branemark Implants Affects Interfacial Bone Modeling and Remodeling. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:345-60.
  10. Lavelle CL. Biomechanical considerations of prosthodontic therapy: the urgency of research into alveolar bone responses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:179-85.
  11. Narhi TO, Hevinga M, Voorsmit RA, Kalk W. Maxillary overdentures retained by splinted and unsplinted implants: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16;259-66.
  12. Quirynen M, Naert I, Van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and future success in the $Branemark^{(R)}$ system. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:104-11. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030302.x
  13. Shafie H. Principles of attachment selection. Clinical and Laboratory Manual of Implant Overdentures. Ames, Iowa; Blackwell; 2007.
  14. Ochiai KT, Williams BH, Hojo S, Nishimura R, Caputo AA. Photoelastic analysis of the effect of palatal support on various implant-supported overdenture designs. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:421-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.02.017
  15. Tokuhisa M, Matsushita Y, Koyano K. ln Vitro Study of a Mandibular Implant Overdenture Retained with Ball, Magnet, or Bar Attachments: Comparison of Load Transfer and Denture Stability. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:128-34.
  16. Barao VAR, Assuncao WG, Tabata LF, Delben JA, Gomes EA, de Sousa EA, Rocha EP. Finite element analysis to compare complete denture and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems. J Craniofac Surg 2009;20:1066-71. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181abb395
  17. Tanino F, Hayakawa I, Hirano S, Minakuchi S. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:193-8.
  18. Hussein MO. Stress-strain distribution at bone-implant interface of two splinted overdenture systems using 3D finite element analysis. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:333-40. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.3.333
  19. Giddon DB, Dreisbach ME, Pfaffman C, Manly RS. Relative abilities of natural and artificial dentition patients for judging the sweetness of solid foods. J Prosthet Dent 1954;4:263-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(54)90104-3
  20. Shannon IL, Terry JM, Nakamoto RY. Palatal coverage and parotid flow rate. J Prosthet Dent 1970;24:601-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(70)90095-8
  21. Strain JC. The influence of complete dentures upon taste perception. J Prosthet Dent 1952;2:60-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(52)90013-9
  22. Palmqvist S, Sondell K, Swartz B. Implant-supported maxillary overdentures: outcome in planned and emergency cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:184-90.
  23. Kim HS, Shin SW. Three-dimensional analysis of the normal dentition and edentulous maxilla of Koreans. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2005;43:191-203.
  24. Kydd WL, Daly CH, Wheeler 3rd JB. The thickness measurement of masticatory mucosa in vivo. Int Dent J 1971;21:430-41.
  25. Hong HR, Pae A, Kim Y, Paek J, Kim HS, Kwon KR. Effect of implant position, angulation, and attachment height on peri-implant bone stress associated with mandibular two-implant overdentures: a finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:69-76.
  26. Osman RB, Elkhadem AH, Ma S, Swain MV. Finite element analysis of a novel implant distribution to support maxillary overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:1-10.
  27. Je HJ, Jeon YC, Jeong CM, Lim JS, Hawong JS. Effect of anchorage systems and palatal coverage of denture base on load transfer with maxillary implant-supporting overdentures: A three-dimensional photoelastic stress analysis. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2004;42:397-411.
  28. Williams BH, Ochiai KT, Hojo S, Nishimura R, Caputo AA. Retention of maxillary implant overdenture bars of different designs. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:603-7. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.120838
  29. Ogata K, Satoh M. Centre and magnitude of vertical forces in complete denture wearers. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:113-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1995.tb00244.x
  30. Kim MJ, Hong SO. Finite element analysis on stress distribution of maxillary implant-retained overdentures depending on the Bar attachment design and palatal coverage. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8:85-93. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.2.85
  31. Sertgoz A, Guvener S. Finite element analysis of the effect of cantilever and implant length on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:165-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90301-7
  32. Yokoyama S, Wakabayashi N, Shiota M, Ohyama T. Stress analysis in edentulous mandibular bone supporting implant-retained 1-piece or multiple superstructures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:578-83.
  33. Vafaei F, Khoshhal M, Bayat-Movahed S, Ahangary AH, Firooz F, Izady A, Rakhshan V. Comparative stress distribution of implant-retained mandibular ball-supported and bar-supported overlay dentures: a finite element analysis. J Oral Implantol 2011;37:421-9. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00057
  34. Zembic A, Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D. Within-subject comparison of maxillary implant-supported overdentures with and without palatal coverage. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:570-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12125
  35. Al-Zubeidi MI, Alsabeeha NH, Thomson WM, Payne AG. Patient satisfaction with maxillary 3-implant overdentures using different attachment systems opposing mandibular 2-implant overdenture. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:696-707. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00306.x