말소리와 음성과학 (Phonetics and Speech Sciences)

  • 제12권2호
  • /
  • Pages.39-49
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2005-8063(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2586-5854(eISSN)
한국음성학회 (Korean Society of Speech Sciences)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

따라말하기 과제를 통한 자폐범주성 장애 아동과 일반 아동의 평서문과 의문문의 음향학적 특성 비교

A study of the prosodic patterns of autism and normal children in the imitating declarative and interrogative sentences

  • 이진형 (충남대학교 언어병리학과) ;
  • 성철재 (충남대학교 언어학과)
  • 투고 : 2020.03.31
  • 심사 : 2020.04.18
  • 발행 : 2020.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

언어의 운율은 억양, 리듬, 강세로 구성되어 있고 운율 요소는 상호 복합적인 작용을 통하여 언어의 고유한 리듬을 형성한다. 자폐범주성 장애 아동은 자연스러운 운율 학습에 어려움이 있어 정확한 의미와 정보 전달에 어려움이 있어 자폐범주성 장애 아동의 운율에 대한 연구가 중요하다. 평서문과 의문문 따라말하기 과제를 통하여 자폐범주성 장애 아동 집단과 일반 아동 집단 간의 운율 특성 차이를 구명하고 어말 길이에 따라 의문문에서의 음도기울기와 청자와의 지각관계를 알아보았다. 7-12세 일반 아동 30명, 자폐범주성 장애 아동 20명을 대상으로 언어 평가 후 20문장 따라말하기 과제를 실시하였다. 청지각 과제로는 115문장이 사용되었다. 자폐범주성 장애 아동이 일반 아동에 비해 음도와 강도가 높고, 발화속도가 느리며 음도 기울기가 낮았다. 자폐범주성 장애 아동은 평서문과 의문문의 산출에서 음도와 강도에 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 자폐범주성 장애 아동은 의문문 1음절에서 평서문과 가장 큰 기울기 차이를 보였으며 5음절 의문문 산출에서 가장 낮은 기울기 값을 보였다. 청지각 평가 결과 청자는 4.3%만 자폐범주성 장애 아동의 의문문을 의문문으로 지각하였다. 결과적으로 평서문과 의문문 따라말하기에서 자폐범주성 장애아동이 일반 아동에 비해 음도와 강도가 높고, 발화속도가 느리며, 낮은 음도기울기를 보였다. 이러한 운율패턴 때문에 청자는 의문문을 평서문으로 인식하였고 원인은 규명되지 않았지만 화용능력이나 다른 자폐적 특징의 결함과 관련이 있다고 할 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 자폐범주성 장애 아동의 이러한 억양 패턴을 확인하였고 운율 개선을 위한 치료 개발의 필요성을 제시했다.

The prosody of children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) has several abnormal features, including monotonous speech. The purpose of this study was to compare acoustic features between an ASD group and a typically developing (TD) group and within the ASD group. The study also examined audience perceptions of the lengthening effect of increasing the number of syllables. 50 participants were divided into two groups (20 with ASD and 30 TD), and they were asked to imitate a total of 28 sentences. In the auditory-perceptual evaluation, seven participants chose sentence types in 115 sentences. Pitch, intensity, speech rate, and pitch slope were used to analyze the significant differences. In conclusion, the ASD group showed higher pitch and intensity and a lower overall speaking rate than the TD group. Moreover, there were significant differences in s2 slope of interrogative sentences. Finally, based on the auditory-perceptual evaluation, only 4.3% of interrogative sentences produced by participants with ASD were perceived as declarative sentences. The cause of this abnormal prosody has not been clearly identified; however, pragmatic ability and other characteristics of autism are related to ASD prosody. This study identified prosodic ASD patterns and suggested the need to develop treatments to improve prosody.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Baltaxe, C. A. M., & Simmons III, J. Q. (1985). Prosodic development in normal and autistic children. In E. Schopler, & G. B. Mesibov (Eds.), Communication problems in autism. Boston, MA: Springer (pp. 95-25).
  2. Cutler, A., & Isard, S. (1980). The production of prosody. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production 1 (pp. 245-269). London, UK: Academic Press.
  3. Cooper. W. E., & Sorensen, J. M. (1981). Fundamental frequency in sentence production. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
  4. Fletcher, E. C. (1976). A comparison of pitch patterns of normal and autistic children (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Santa Barbara, CA.
  5. Fox, W., & Hampton, A. (2008). Stuttering and natural speech processing of semantic and syntactic constraints on verbs. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51(5), 1058-1071. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0164)
  6. Fosnot, S. M., & Jun, S. A. (1999, August). Prosodic characteristics in children with stuttering or autism during reading and imitation. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 1925-1928). San Francisco, CA.
  7. Goldfarb, W., Goldfarb, N., Braunstein, P., & Scholl, H. (1972). Speech and language faults of schizophrenia children. Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 2, 219-233. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537616
  8. Hargrove, P. (1997). Prosodic aspects of language impairment in children. Topics in Language Disorders, 17(4), 76-83. https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363-199708000-00009
  9. Hale-Haniff, M., & Siegel, G., M. (1981). The effect of context on verbal elicited imitation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 46(1), 27-30. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.4601.27
  10. Kim, H. W. (2004). Prosodic features in high functioning autism children (Master's thesis). Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea.
  11. Ko, D. H. (1988). Declarative intonation in Korean: An acoustical study of F0 declination (Doctoral dissertation). University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
  12. Lee, I. S. (1992). Research on Korean orthography. Seoul, Korea: SNU Press.
  13. Lee, J. M. (2001). The production of grammatical morphemes of children with SLI in sentence repetition (Master's thesis). Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea.
  14. Lee, Y. G. (1988). A study of Korean interrogative prosody, Hangeul, 191, 15-38.
  15. Lim, S. M. (2009). Prosodic control of high functioning autism and normal children in relation to question-statement contrast. (Master's thesis). Ehwa University, Seoul, Korea.
  16. Nadig, A., & Shaw, H. (2012). Acoustic and perceptual measurement of expressive prosody in high-functioning autism: Increased pitch range and what it means to listeners. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(4), 499-511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1264-3
  17. Paul, R. (1987). Communication. In D. J. Cohen, & F. R. Volkmar (Ed.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  18. Park, E. J. (2003). 4 to 8 year-old children's performance of repeating sentences according to the length and structure of sentences. (Master's thesis). Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea.
  19. Pronovost, W., Wakstein, M. P., & Wakstein, D. J. (1966). A longitudinal study of the speech behavior and language comprehension of fourteen children diagnosed atypical or autistic. Exceptional Children, 33(1), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440296603300104
  20. Tager-Flusberg, H., & Thurber, C. (1993). Pauses in the narratives produced by autistic, mentally retarded, and normal children as an index of cognitive demand. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 23, 309-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01046222
  21. Schwartz, A. H., & Daly, D. A. (1976). Some explicit guidelines for constructing and scoring elicited imitation tasks. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools. 7, 33-41. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461.0701.33
  22. Seong, C. J. (1995). Experimental phonetic study of the standard current Korean speech rhythm: With respect to its temporal structure (Doctoral dissertation). Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  23. Sharkey, S. G., & Folkins, J. W. (1985). Variability of lip and jaw movements in children and adults: Implications for the development of speech motor control. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 28(1), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2801.08
  24. Sharda, M., Subhadra, T. P., Sahay, S., Nagaraja, C., Singh, L., Mishra, R., Sen, A., ... Singh, N. C. (2010). Sounds of melody-pitch patterns of speech in autism. Neuroscience Letters, 478(1), 42-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2010.04.066