DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic vulnerability assessment of RC buildings according to the 2007 and 2018 Turkish seismic codes

  • Yon, Burak (Munzur University Department of Civil Engineering)
  • 투고 : 2020.02.21
  • 심사 : 2020.06.06
  • 발행 : 2020.06.25

초록

Fragility curves are useful tools to estimate the damage probability of buildings owing to seismic actions. The purpose of this study is to investigate seismic vulnerability of reinforced concrete (RC) buildings, according to the 2007 and 2018 Turkish Seismic Codes, using fragility curves. For the numerical analyses, typical five- and seven-storey RC buildings were selected and incremental dynamic analyses (IDA) were performed. To complete the IDAs, eleven earthquake acceleration records multiplied by various scaling factors from 0.2g to 0.8g were used. To predict nonlinearity, a distributed hinge model that involves material and geometric nonlinearity of the structural members was used. Damages to confined concrete and reinforcement bar of structural members were obtained by considering the unit deformation demands of the 2007 Turkish Seismic Code (TSC-2007) and the 2018 Turkey Building Earthquake Code (TBEC-2018). Vulnerability evaluation of these buildings was performed using fragility curves based on the results of incremental dynamic analyses. Fragility curves were generated in terms of damage levels occurring in confined concrete and reinforcement bar of structural members with a lognormal distribution assumption. The fragility curves show that the probability of damage occurring is more according to TBEC-2018 than according to TSC-2007 for selected buildings.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ATC (1985), "Earthquake damage evaluation data for California, ATC-13 Report", Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California. U.S.A.
  2. Baker, J.W. (2013), "An introduction to probabilistic seismic hazard analysis", White Paper Version, 1, 72.
  3. Celik, O.C. and Ellingwood, B.R. (2010) "Seismic fragilities for non-ductile reinforced concrete frames-Role of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties", Struct. Safe. 32(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.04.003.
  4. Chaulagain, H., Rodrigues, H., Spacone, E. and Varum, H. (2015), "Assessment of seismic strengthening solutions for existing low-rise RC buildings in Nepal", Earthq. Struct., 8(3), 511-539. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.8.3.511.
  5. Disaster and Emergency Management Authority (AFAD), http://kyhdata.deprem.gov.tr
  6. Duan, H. and Hueste, M.B.D. (2012), "Seismic performance of a reinforced concrete frame building in China", Eng. Struct. 41, 77-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.030.
  7. Ellingwood, B.R., Celik, O.C. and Kinali, K. (2007), "Fragility assessment of building structural systems in Mid-America", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(13), 1935-1952. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/eqe.693.
  8. Erberik, M.A. (2008), "Fragility-based assessment of typical mid-rise and low-rise RC buildings in Turkey", Eng. Struct., 30(5), 1360-1374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.016.
  9. Institute of Turkish Standard (2000), "TS 500 design and construction rules of reinforced concrete structures", Ankara, Turkey.
  10. Khaloo, A., Nozhati, S., Masoomi, H. and Faghihmaleki, H. (2016), "Influence of earthquake record truncation on fragility curves of RC frames with different damage indices", J. Build. Eng., 7, 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2016.05.003.
  11. Kircil, M.S. and Polat, Z. (2006), "Fragility analysis of mid-rise R/C frame buildings", Eng. Struct., 28(9), 1335-1345, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.01.004.
  12. Kwon, O.S. and Elnashai, A. (2006) "The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structure", Eng. Struct. 28(2), 289-303, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.07.010.
  13. Kwon, O.S. and Kim, E. (2010) "Case study: Analytical investigation on the failure of a two-story RC building damaged during the 2007 Pisco-Chincha earthquake", Eng. Struct., 32(7), 1876-1887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.12.022.
  14. Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J.N. and Park, R. (1988), "Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete", J. Struct. Eng., 114(8), 1804-1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804)
  15. Mwafy, A. (2011), "Assessment of seismic design response factors of concrete wall buildings", Earth. Eng. Eng. Vib., 10(1), 115-127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-011-0051-7.
  16. Mwafy, A.M. and Elnashai, A.S. (2001), "Static pushover versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC buildings", Eng. Struct., 23(5), 407-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00068-7.
  17. Onat, O., Yon, B. and Calayir, Y. (2018), "Seismic assessment of existing RC buildings before and after shear-wall retrofitting", Gradevinar 70(8), 703-712. https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.2068.2017.
  18. Oncu, M.E. and Yon, M.S. (2016), "Assessment of nonlinear static and incremental dynamic analyses for RC structures", Comp. Conc., 18(6), 1195-1211. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/cac.2016.18.6.1195.
  19. Ortega, J., Vasconcelos, G., Rodrigues, H. and Correia, M. (2019), "A vulnerability index formulation for the seismic vulnerability assessment of vernacular architecture", Eng. Struct., 197, 109381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109381.
  20. Park, J., Towashiraporn, P., Craig, J.I. and Goodno, B.J. (2009), "Seismic fragility analysis of low-rise unreinforced masonry structures", Eng. Struct., 31(1), 125-137. https://doi.org/: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.07.021.
  21. Pavel, F. and Carale, G. (2019), "Seismic assessment for typical soft-storey reinforced concrete structures in Bucharest, Romania", Int. J. Disas. Risk Reduc., 41, 101332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101332.
  22. Rajeev, P. and Tesfamariam S (2012), "Seismic fragilities for reinforced concrete buildings with consideration of irregularities", Struct. Safe, 39, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2012.06.001.
  23. Rodrigues, H.F.P. (2012), "Biaxial seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete columns", Ph.D. Thesis, Aveiro University Civil Engineering Department.
  24. Rossetto, T and Elnashai, A. (2005), "A new analytical procedure for the derivation of displacement-based vulnerability curves for populations of RC structures", Eng. Struct., 27(3), 397-409. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.11.002.
  25. Rossetto, T. and Elnashai, A. (2003), "Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data", Eng. Struct. 25(10), 1241-1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00060-9.
  26. Rossetto, T., Gehl, P., Minas, S., Galasso, C., Duffour, P., Douglas, J. and Cook, O. (2016), "FRACAS: A capacity spectrum approach for seismic fragility assessment including record-to-record variability", Eng. Struct. 125, 337-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.06.043.
  27. Sadraddin, H.L., Shao, X. and Hu, Y. (2016), "Fragility assessment of high-rise reinforced concrete buildings considering the effects of shear wall contributions", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Buil., 25(18), 1089-1102. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1299.
  28. Schittkowski, K. (2002), "EASY-FIT: A software system for data fitting in dynamical systems", Struct. Multidis. Opt., 23(2), 153-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-002-0174-6.
  29. SeismoStruct v7- A computer program developed for the accurate analytical assessment of structures, subjected to earthquake strong motion.
  30. Senel, S.M. and Kayhan, A.H. (2010), "Fragility based damage assesment in existing precast industrial buildings: A case study for Turkey", Struct. Eng. Mech., 34(1), 39-60., https://doi.org/ 10.12989/sem.2010.34.1.039.
  31. Shinozuka, M., Feng, M.Q., Lee, J. and Naganuma, T. (2000), "Statistical analysis of fragility curves", J. Eng. Mech., 126(12), 1224-1231. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1224).
  32. TS 498 Design Loads for Buildings, Turkish Standards Institute, Ankara, Turkey
  33. Turkey Building Earthquake Code (2018), Ankara, Turkey
  34. Turkish Seismic Code (2007), Ankara, Turkey
  35. Wu, D., Tesfamariam, S., Stiemer, S.F. and Qin, D. (2012), "Seismic fragility assessment of RC frame structure designed according to modern Chinese code for seismic design of buildings", Earth. Eng. Eng. Vib., 11(3), 331-342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-012-0125-1.
  36. Yon, B. and Calayir, Y. (2014) "Effects of confinement reinforcement and concrete strength on nonlinear behaviour of RC buildings", Comp. Conc., 14(3), 279-297. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2014.14.3.279.
  37. Yon, B. and Calayir, Y. (2015), "The soil effect on the seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete buildings", Earthq. Struct., 8(1), 133-152. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.8.1.133.
  38. Yon, B., Oncu, M.E. and Calayir, Y. (2015) "Effects of seismic zones and local soil conditions on response of RC buildings", Gradevinar, 67(6), 585-596. https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.1192.2014.
  39. Zhang, J.H. and Hu, S.D. (2005), "State of the Art of Bridge Seismic Vulnerability Analysis Research", Struct. Eng. 21(5), 76-80. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-0159.2005.05.017
  40. Zhou, J., Li, S., Nie, G., Fan, X., Deng, Y. and Xia, C. (2020), "Research on seismic vulnerability of buildings and seismic disaster risk: A case study in Yancheng, China", Int. J. Dis.Risk Reduc., 45, 101477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101477.

피인용 문헌

  1. Seismic performance of non-ductile detailing RC frames: An experimental investigation vol.19, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2020.19.6.485
  2. SSI effects on the redistribution of seismic forces in one-storey R/C buildings vol.20, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.20.3.261
  3. Development of a uniform seismic vulnerability index framework for reinforced concrete building typology vol.47, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103838