Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Qualitative Assessment Tools of Leisure Activities for the Elderly :Convergence study

노인 여가활동 질적 평가도구 고찰에 대한 융합연구

  • Park, Da-Sol (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Graduate School of Yonsei University) ;
  • Shin, Ga-In (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Graduate School of Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Hey-Sig (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Graduate School of Yonsei University) ;
  • Park, Hae-Yean (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, College of Health Science, Yonsei University)
  • 박다솔 (연세대학교 일반대학원 작업치료학과) ;
  • 신가인 (연세대학교 일반대학원 작업치료학과) ;
  • 이혜식 (연세대학교 일반대학원 작업치료학과) ;
  • 박혜연 (연세대학교 보건과학대학 작업치료학과)
  • Received : 2020.04.13
  • Accepted : 2020.06.20
  • Published : 2020.06.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study comprehensively reviewed and summarized the research on the qualitative assessment tools of elderly leisure activities. 232 papers were searched in three databases, domestic and foreign, and nine were selected to meet the selection criteria. Five out of nine studies (55.5%) have been written in the last five years and have been implemented in six countries. As for the number of questions in the evaluation tool, 20 to 40 items were the most with 6 studies (66.6%), and 7 out of 9 studies used a 3-7 point Likert scale. There were a total of 37 variables related to leisure activities, and the most variables related to mental. Previously developed evaluation tools were biased toward the measurement of specific variables or did not fit the domestic situation. In the future, various variables of leisure activities for the elderly can be measured qualitatively, and a wide range of instruments that reflect the characteristics of the elderly in Korea should be developed.

본 연구는 노인 여가활동의 질적 측면 평가도구에 대한 연구를 통합적으로 고찰하고 정리하였다. 국내·외 3개의 데이터베이스에서 232편의 논문이 검색되었고 선정기준에 부합하는 9편을 선정하였다. 9편 중 5편(55.5%)이 최근 5년 이내에 작성되었고 6개 국가에서 시행되었다. 평가도구의 문항 수는 20~40문항이 6편(66.6%)으로 가장 많았고 답변방식은 9편 중 7편이 3~7점 리커트 척도를 사용하였다. 여가활동 관련 변수는 총 37개였고 정신관련 변수가 가장 많았다. 기존에 개발된 평가도구들은 특정 변수의 측정에 치우쳐있거나 국내 실정에 맞지 않았다. 노인여가활동에 대한 관심도가 높아짐에 따라 본 연구는 추후 국내 노인들의 여가활동 특성을 반영한 질적 평가도구 개발에 필요한 기초자료로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Statistics Korea. (2020). Cause of death(103 items)/by, gender, age, death rate. www.kostat.go.kr
  2. S. G. Nam & O. S. Shim. (2011). A Study on the Influence Factors on Quality of Life of Elderly with Chronic Disease. Korean Journal of Gerontological Social Welfare, 53(3), 239-259.
  3. H. H. Shin, M. A. Han, J. Park, S. Y. Ryu & S. W. Choi. (2017). The associations between social relations, activities of daily living, cognitive functions and depressive symptoms among the Korean elderly. Journal of Korean Geriatric Psychiatry, 21(2), 47-54.
  4. National Health Insurance Service. (2016). 2015 National health insurance statistical annual report. Wonju, Korea: National Health Insurance Service.
  5. American Occupational Therapy Association. (2014). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process(3rd Edition). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(Suppl.1), S1-S48. DOI:10.5014/ajot.2014. 682006
  6. P. G. Park. (2014). A study on the Leisure Activities of the Elderly. Korean journal of social science, 36(1), 45-69.
  7. K. H. Kim. (2019). The effect of leisure activities of the elderly on life satisfaction. Journal of Social Welfare Management, 6(2), 127-154.
  8. E. H. Jung. (2018). A Systematic Study on the Leisure Assessment Tool for the Elderly. Korean Journal of Occupational Therapy, 26(3), 39-55. DOI:10.14519/jksot.2018.26.3.04
  9. Kelly, J. R. & Freysinger, V. J. (2000). 21st century leisure: Current issues. Boston,USA: Allyn & Bacon.
  10. Auger, D. (2016). The diverse meanings of leisure / les diverses significations du loisir. Loisir Et Socieetee / Society and Leisure, 39(2), 173-176. DOI:10.1080/07053436.2016.1198599
  11. J. S. Kim. (2018). The Development of Global Leisure Meaning Scale for Korean Immigrants. Journal of Leisure Studies, 16(1), 1-28.
  12. Stevens, A. B. et al. (2004). Measurement of leisure time satisfaction in family caregivers. Aging &mental health, 8(5), 450-459. DOI: 10.1080/13607860410001709737
  13. D. S. Park, G. I. Shin, Y. S. Woo & H. Y. Park. (2018). A Study on the Effectiveness of Rehabilitation by Virtual Reality Program: Systematic Review. Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 22(3), 209-224. https://doi.org/10.16884/JRR.2018.22.3.209
  14. Martinez-Rodriguez, S., Iraurgi, I., Gomez-Marroquin, I., Carrasco, M., Ortiz-Marques, N. & Stevens, A. B. (2016). Psychometric properties of the leisure time satisfaction scale in family caregivers. Psicothema, 28(2), 207-213. DOI:10.7334/psicothema2015.278
  15. Schulz, R., Burgio, L., Burns, R., Eisdorfer, C., Gallagher-Thompson, D., Gitlin, L. N. & Mahoney, D. F. (2003). Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health (REACH): Overview, Site-Specific Outcomes, and Future Directions. Gerontologist, 43(4), 514-520. DOI:7334/psicothema2015.27 https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/43.4.514
  16. Honke, T., Yamada, T., Ishii, Y. & Kobayashi, N. (2016). Reliability and validity of the Japanese Elderly version of Leisure Activity Enjoyment Scale. The Journal of Japan Academy of Health Sciences, 19(3), 129-139.
  17. Badia, M., Orgaz-Baz, M. B., Verdugo, M. A., Martinez-Aguirre, M. M., Longo-Araujo-de-Melo, E. & Ullan-De-La-Fuente, A. M. (2012). Adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the leisure assessment inventory. Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 50(3), 233-242. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-50.3.233
  18. Hawkins, B. A., Ardovino, P., Rogers, N. B., Foose, A. & Olsen, N. (2002). Leisure assessment inventory. Ravensdale, WA: Idyll Arbor.
  19. M. H. Lee, Y. L. Park, G. Y. Lee & K. W. Um. (2014). An Exploratory Study on Design of an Assessment Tool for Leisure Tendency of Older Adults. Korean Journal of Gerontological Social Welfare, 65, 159-184.
  20. H. Cho, D. Y. Pyun & C. K. J. Wang. (2019). Leisure nostalgia: Scale development and validation. Journal of Leisure Research, 50(4), 330-349. DOI: 10.1080/00222216.2019.1602014
  21. Kara, F. M., Gurbuz, B. & Oncu, E. (2014). Leisure boredom scale: the factor structure and the demographic differences. The Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, 16(2), 28-35. DOI: 10.15314/TJSE.20142810
  22. Molanorouzi, K., Khoo, S. & Morris, T. (2014). Validating the physical activity and leisure motivation scale (PALMS). BMC public health, 14(1), 909. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-909
  23. Kueh, Y. C., Abdullah, N., Kuan, G., Morris, T. & Naing, N. N. (2018). Testing measurement and factor structure invariance of the physical activity and leisure motivation scale for youth across gender. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 1096. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01096
  24. J. S. Kim. (2018). Meaning Scale for Korean Immigrants. Journal of Leisure Studies, 16(1), 1-28.
  25. Yildirim Simsek, K. & Cevik, H. (2020). Development of the Leisure Activity Participation Scale (LAPS). Loisir et Societe/Society and Leisure, 1-18. DOI:10.1080/07053436.2020.1727661
  26. Y. S. Kim & W. Y. Ha. (2015). A Study of the Effect of Participation in Productive Leisure Activities on the Suicide Ideation and Physical and Mental Health of Elderly Living Alone. Helth and Welfare Review, 35(4), 344-374. DOI:10.15709/hswr.2015.35.4.344
  27. K. Y. Ko. (2014). Koreans' leisure, quantity and quality are insufficient. LGERI report, LG business Insight.