한국수자원학회논문집 (Journal of Korea Water Resources Association)

  • 제53권6호
  • /
  • Pages.427-436
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2799-8746(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2799-8754(eISSN)
한국수자원학회 (Korea Water Resources Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

기후 및 토지이용 변화 시나리오 기반 한반도 미래 수문학적 및 생태학적 가뭄 전망

Projecting future hydrological and ecological droughts with the climate and land use scenarios over the Korean peninsula

  • 이재형 (연세대학교 건설환경공학과) ;
  • 김연주 (연세대학교 건설환경공학과) ;
  • 채여라 (한국환경정책연구원)
  • Lee, Jaehyeong (Department of Civil & Environment Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Yeonjoo (Department of Civil & Environment Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Chae, Yeora (Korea Environment Institute)
  • 투고 : 2020.02.12
  • 심사 : 2020.05.12
  • 발행 : 2020.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

기후 변화는 한반도 가뭄 특성에 영향을 미칠 것으로 예측되지만 불확실성이 존재한다. 이에, 본 연구는 지면 모델링 시스템 중 하나인 WRF-Hydro 모형에 기후변화와 토지이용 시나리오를 이용하여 한반도 미래 가뭄을 예측하는 것을 목표로 하였다. 기후 변화 자료는 RCP2.6과 RCP8.5 시나리오, 지표면 변화 자료는 공통사회경제경로(Shared Socio-economic Pathway, SSP) 시나리오를 사용하였다. 임계수준 방법을 적용하여 유출량과 순일차 생산량(Net Primary Productivity, NPP)값을 이용한 미래 수문학적 가뭄과 생태학적 가뭄을 정의하였고, 각 시나리오 별 가뭄의 기간과 강도의 특성을 평가하였다. 수문학적 가뭄 기간은 RCP2.6-SSP2 가까운 미래(2031-2050)와 RCP8.5-SSP2 먼 미래(2080-2099) 시나리오에서, 생태학적 가뭄 기간은 RCP2.6-SSP2 먼 미래와 RCP8.5-SSP2 가까운 미래에서 긴 가뭄 기간을 보였다. 가뭄 강도는 가뭄 기간과 다르게, 두 가뭄 모두 RCP2.6-SSP2 먼 미래와 RCP8.5-SSP2 가까운 미래에서 큰 강도를 보였다. 수문학적 가뭄의 경우 RCP2.6-SSP2 먼 미래가 가장 심도가 크고 임계수준의 크기의 영향을 많이 받았다. 그러나 생태학적 가뭄 심도는 RCP2.6-SSP2 가까운 미래와 RCP2.6-SSP2 먼 미래에서 큰 심도를 보이고, 임계수준에 따른 심도 크기의 시나리오 별 차이는 작았다. 이 연구는 기후변화와 토지이용변화에 따른 한반도 미래 수문학적 및 생태학적 가뭄 특성을 이해하고 관리하는데 도움이 될 것으로 기대된다.

It is uncertain how global climate change will influence future drought characteristics over the Korean peninsula. This study aims to project the future droughts using climate change and land use change scenarios over the Korean peninsula with the land surface modeling system, i.e., Weather Research and Forecasting Model Hydrological modeling system (WRF-Hydro). The Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) 2.6 and 8.5 are used as future climate scenarios and the Shared Socio-economic Pathways (SSPs), specifically SSP2, is adopted for the land use scenario. The using Threshold Level Method (TLM), we identify future hydrological and ecological drought events with runoff and Net Primary Productivity (NPP), respectively, and assess drought characteristics of durations and intensities in different scenarios. Results show that the duration of drought is longer over RCP2.6-SSP2 for near future (2031-2050) and RCP8.5-SSP2 (2080-2099) for the far future for hydrological drought. On the other hand, RCP2.6-SSP2 for the far future and RCP8.5-SSP2 for the near future show longer duration for ecological drought. In addition, the drought intensities in both hydrological and ecological drought show different characteristics with the drought duration. The intensity of the hydrological droughts was greatly affected by threshold level methods and RCP2.6-SSP2 for far future shows the severest intensity. However, for ecological drought, the difference of the intensity among the threshold level is not significant and RCP2.6-SSP2 for near future and RCP2.6-SSP2 for near future show the severest intensity. This study suggests a possible future drought characteristics is in the Korea peninsula using combined climate and land use changes, which will help the community to understand and manage the future drought risks.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn, S.R., Jang, C.H., Lee, J.W., and Kim, S.J. (2015). "Assessment of climate and land use change impacts on watershed hydrology for an urbanizing watershed." Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 567-577. https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2015.35.3.0567
  2. Chae, Y., Lee, J., and Chris, H. (2017). Economic analysis of climate change damage in Korea using SSP-RCP scenario matrix. Korea Environment Institute, pp. 56-72.
  3. Daly, C., Halbleib, M.D., Smith, J.I., and Gibson, W.P. (2008). "Physiographically-sensitive mapping of temperature and precipitation across the conterminous United States." International Journal of Climatology, Vol. 28, No. 15, pp. 2031-2064. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1688
  4. Gochis, D.J., Barlage, M., Dugger, A., FitzGerald, A., Karsten, L., McAllister, M., McCreight, J., Mills, J., RafieeiNasab, A., Read, L., Sampson, K., Yates, D., and Yu, W. (2018). National Center for Atmospheric Research, accessed 13 April 2018, .
  5. Gwak, Y., Cho, J., Jung, I., Kim, D., and Jang, S. (2018). "Projection of future changes in drought characteristics in Korea peninsula using effective drought index." Journal of Climate Change Research, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 31-45. https://doi.org/10.15531/ksccr.2018.9.1.31
  6. Han, W.S., Jeong, S.J., and Kim, B.S. (2015). "The analysis method of future flooding discharge considering climate and land-use change using Dyna-CLUE." Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 361-371. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2015.15.6.361
  7. Hisdal, H., Stahl, K., Tallaksen, L.M., and Demuth, S. (2001). "Have streamflow droughts in Europe become more severe or frequent?" International Journal of Climatology, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 317-333. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.619
  8. Im, E.S., Thanh, N.X., Kim, Y.H., and Anh, J.B. (2019). "2018 summer extreme temperatures in South Korea and their intensification under $3^{\circ}C$ global warming." Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 14, No. 9.
  9. Kang, H.S. (2013). "Ecological responses of plants to climate change: Research trends and its applicability in Korea." The Korean Society of Limnology, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 319-331. https://doi.org/10.11614/KSL.2013.46.3.319
  10. Kim, D.R., Lee, Y.G., Lee, J.W., and Kim, S.J. (2018). "Assessment of future climate and land use changes impact on hydrologic behavior in Anseong-cheon Gongdo urban-growing watershed." Journal Korea Water Resource, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 141-1506.
  11. Kim, H.K., Kang, M.S., Lee, E.J., and Park, S.W. (2011). "Climate and land use changes impacts on hydrology in a rural small watershed." Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers, Vol. 53, No. 6, pp. 75-84. https://doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2011.53.6.075
  12. Kim, J.E., Yoo, J., Chung, G.H., and Kim, T.W. (2019). "Hydrologic risk assessment of future extreme drought in South Korea using bivariate frequency analysis." Water, Vol. 11, No. 10, p. 2052. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11102052
  13. Kim, J.Y., Seo, D.I., and Lee, T.E. (2017). "Effectiveness of settling treatment system to reduce urban nonpoint source pollutant load by first flush." Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Engineers, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 140-148. https://doi.org/10.4491/KSEE.2017.39.3.140
  14. Lee, J.K., Kim, Y.O., and Kang, N. (2012). "Analysis of climate change researches related to water resources in the Korean peninsula." The Korean Society of Climate Change Research, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 97-88.
  15. Naabil, E., Lamptey, B.L., Arnault, J., Olufayo. A., and Kunstmann. H. (2017). "Water resources management using the WRF-Hydro modelling system: Case-study of the Tono dam in West Africa." Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, Vol. 12, pp. 196-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.05.010
  16. O'Neill, B., Krigler, E., Rhiahi, K., Ebi, K.L., Hallegatte, S., Carter, T.R., Mathur, R., and van Vuuren, D.P. (2014). "A new scenario framework for climate change research: The concept of shared socioeconomic pathways." Climatic Change, Vol. 122, pp. 387-400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0905-2
  17. Park, M., Sim, H.J., Park, Y., and Kim, S. (2015). "Drought severityduration-frequency analysis based on KMA 1-km resolution RCP scenario." Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, Vol. 15. pp. 347-355. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2015.15.3.347
  18. Sung, J.H., and Chung, E.S. (2014). "Development of streamflow drought severity-duration-frequency curves using the threshold level method." Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 18, pp. 3341-3351. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3341-2014
  19. Qi, S., Wang, Y., Sun, G., Xiao, Y., Zhu, J., Yang, H., Hu, X., Wu, B., Wang, Y., and McNulty, S.G. (2009). "Effects of forest composition and spatial patterns on storm flows of a small watershed." Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Vol. 45, No. 5, pp. 1142-1154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00350.x
  20. Yu, H., Lee, W.K., Son, Y., Kwak, D., Nam, K., Kim, M., Byun, J., and Kwon, T. (2013). "Estimating carbon stocks in Korean forests between 2010 and 2110: A prediction based on forest volume age relationships." Forest Science and Technology, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 105-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2013.801174
  21. Yucel, I., Onenm A., and Yilmaz, K. (2015). "Calibration and evaluation of a flood forecasting system: Utility of numerical weather prediction model, data assimilation and satellite-based rainfall." Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 523, pp. 49-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.042