The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of repetitive firing on passive fit of metal substructure produced by the laser sintering in implant-supported fixed prosthesis

  • Altintas, Musa Aykut (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cumhuriyet University) ;
  • Akin, Hakan (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Sakarya University)
  • Received : 2020.01.07
  • Accepted : 2020.03.20
  • Published : 2020.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. The aim of the present study was to investigate the passive fit of metal substructure after repetitive firing processes in implant-supposed prosthesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Five implants (4 mm diameter and 10 mm length) were placed into the resin-based mandibular model and 1-piece of screw-retained metal substructure was produced with the direct metal laser sintering (DMSL) method using Co-Cr compound (n = 10). The distance between the marked points on the multiunit supports and the marginal end of the substructure was measured using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) at each stage (metal, opaque, dentin, and glaze). 15 measurements were taken from each prosthesis, and 150 measurements from 10 samples were obtained. In total, 600 measurements were carried out at 4 stages. One-way ANOVA test was used for statistical evaluation of the data. RESULTS. When the obtained marginal range values were examined, differences between groups were found to be statistically significant (P<.001). The lowest values were found in the metal stage (172.4 ± 76.5 ㎛) and the highest values (238.03 ± 118.92 ㎛) were determined after glaze application. When the interval values for groups are compared with pairs, the differences between metal with dentin, metal with glaze, opaque with dentin, opaque with glaze, and dentin with glaze were found to be significant (P<.05), whereas the difference between opaque with metal was found to be insignificant (P=.992). CONCLUSION. Passive fit of 1-piece designed implant-retained fixed prosthesis that is supported by multiple implants is negatively affected by repetitive firing processes.

Keywords

References

  1. Sailer I, Muhlemann S, Zwahlen M, Hammerle CH, Schneider D. Cemented and screw-retained implant reconstructions: a systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:163-201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02538.x
  2. Wittneben JG, Millen C, Bragger U. Clinical performance of screw- versus cement-retained fixed implant-supported reconstructions-a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:84-98. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g2.1
  3. Millen C, Bragger U, Wittneben JG. Influence of prosthesis type and retention mechanism on complications with fixed implant-supported prostheses: a systematic review applying multivariate analyses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015;30:110-24. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3607
  4. Yannikakis S, Prombonas A. Improving the fit of implant prosthetics: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:126-34. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2346
  5. Rungruanganunt P, Taylor T, Eckert SE, Karl M. The effect of static load on dental implant survival: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:1218-25. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2888
  6. Al-Otaibi HN, Akeel RF. The effects of two torque values on the screw preload of implant-supported prostheses with passive fit or misfit. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:1058-63. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3419
  7. Ucar Y, Akova T, Akyil MS, Brantley WA. Internal fit evaluation of crowns prepared using a new dental crown fabrication technique: laser-sintered Co-Cr crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102:253-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60165-7
  8. Witkowski S. CAM in dental technology. Quintessence Dent Technol 2005;128:169-84.
  9. Wu L, Zhu H, Gai X, Wang Y. Evaluation of the mechanical properties and porcelain bond strength of cobalt-chromium dental alloy fabricated by selective laser melting. J Prosthet Dent 2014;111:51-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.09.011
  10. Shillingburg HT, Sather DA, Wilson EL, Cain JR, Mitchell DL, Blanco LJ, Kessler JC. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. Illinois; Quintessence Publishing Company; 2010.
  11. Colpani JT, Borba M, Della Bona A. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic crown copings. Dent Mater 2013;29:174-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.10.012
  12. Zeng L, Zhang Y, Liu Z, Wei B. Effects of repeated firing on the marginal accuracy of Co-Cr copings fabricated by selective laser melting. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:135-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.09.004
  13. Quante K, Ludwig K, Kern M. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology. Dent Mater 2008;24:1311-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.011
  14. Lakhani SA, Ercoli C, Moss ME, Graser GN, Tallents RH. Influence of cold working and thermal treatment on the fit of implant-supported metal-ceramic fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:159-69. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.127592
  15. Gemalmaz D, Berksun S, Kasapoglu C, Alkumru HN. Distortion of metal-ceramic fixed partial dentures resulting from metal-conditioning firing. Quintessence Int 1996;27:193-201.
  16. Gemalmaz D, Alkumru HN. Marginal fit changes during porcelain firing cycles. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:49-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80272-0
  17. Balkaya MC, Cinar A, Pamuk S. Influence of firing cycles on the margin distortion of 3 all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:346-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.02.003
  18. Shillingburg HT Jr, Hobo S, Fisher DW. Preparation design and margin distortion in porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1973;29:276-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(73)90007-3
  19. DeHoff PH, Anusavice KJ, Boyce RJ. Analysis of thermallyinduced stresses in porcelain-metal systems. J Dent Res 1983;62:593-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345830620051901
  20. Campbell SD, Sirakian A, Pelletier LB, Giordano RA. Effects of firing cycle and surface finishing on distortion of metal ceramic castings. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:476-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80348-8
  21. Ando N, Hakamura K, Namiki T, Sugata T, Suzuki T, Moriyama K. Deformation of porcelain bonded gold alloys. J Jpn Soc Appar Mater 1972;13:237-48.
  22. Dederich DN, Svare CW, Peterson LC, Turner KA. The effect of repeated firings on the margins of nonprecious ceramometals. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:628-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(84)90406-2
  23. Hamaguchi H, Cacciatore A, Tueller VM. Marginal distortion of the porcelain- bonded-to-metal complete crown: an SEM study. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:146-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90178-0
  24. DeHoff PH, Anusavice KJ. Effect of metal design on marginal distortion of metal-ceramic crowns. J Dent Res 1984;63:1327-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630111501
  25. Anusavice KJ, Carroll JE. Effect of incompatibility stress on the fit of metal-ceramic crowns. J Dent Res 1987;66:1341-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660081101
  26. Harish V, Mohamed Ali SA, Jagadesan N, Mohamed I, Senthil S, Debasish B, Huda F, Priyanka. Evaluation of internal and marginal fit of two metal ceramic system - in vitro study. J Clin Diag Res 2014;8:53-6. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/10372.5300
  27. Pompa G, Di Carlo S, De Angelis F, Cristalli MP, Annibali S. Comparison of conventional methods and laser-assisted rapid prototyping for manufacturing fixed dental prostheses: An in vitro study. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:318097.
  28. Castillo-Oyague R, Osorio R, Osorio E, Sanchez-Aguilera F, Toledano M. The effect of surface treatments on the microroughness of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast base metal alloys for dental prosthetic frameworks. Microsc Res Tech 2012;75:1206-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.22050
  29. Ortorp A, Jonsson D, Mouhsen A, Vult von Steyern P. The fit of cobalt-chromium three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated with four different techniques: a comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater 2011;27:356-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.015
  30. Xu D, Xiang N, Wei B. The marginal fit of selective laser melting-fabricated metal crowns: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1437-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.018
  31. Iseri U, Ozkurt Z, Kazazoglu E. Shear bond strengths of veneering porcelain to cast, machined and laser-sintered titanium. Dent Mater J 2011;30:274-80. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2010-101
  32. Xiang N, Xin XZ, Chen J, Wei B. Metal-ceramic bond strength of Co-Cr alloy fabricated by selective laser melting. J Dent 2012;40:453-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.006
  33. Almeida e Silva JS, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D, Araujo E, Stimmelmayr M, Vieira LC, Guth JF. Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:515-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-0987-2