The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of marginal discrepancy in metal frameworks fabricated by sintering-based computer-aided manufacturing methods

  • Kaleli, Necati (Department of Dentistry Services, Vocational School of Health Services, Ondokuz Mayis University) ;
  • Ural, Cagri (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis University) ;
  • Us, Yesim Olcer (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Bahcesehir University)
  • Received : 2019.10.31
  • Accepted : 2020.04.01
  • Published : 2020.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of sintering procedures on marginal discrepancies of fixed partial metal frameworks fabricated using different sintering-based computer-aided design and computer/aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Forty resin die models of prepared premolar and molar abutment teeth were fabricated using a three-dimensional (3D) printer and divided into four groups (n = 10) according to the fabrication method of metal frameworks used: HM (via hard milling), SM (via soft metal milling), L25 (via direct metal laser melting [DMLM] with a 25 ㎛ layer thickness), and L50 (via direct DMLM with a 50 ㎛ layer thickness). After the metal frameworks were fabricated and cemented, five vertical marginal discrepancy measurements were recorded in each site (i.e., buccal, facing the pontic, lingual, and facing away from the pontic) of both abutment teeth under a stereomicroscope (×40). Data were statistically analyzed at a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS. No statistically significant differences (P>.05) were found among the four axial sites of metal frameworks fabricated by sintering-based CAD/CAM techniques. The HM and L25 groups showed significantly (P<.001) lower marginal discrepancy values than the SM and L50 groups. CONCLUSION. Marginal discrepancy in the sites facing the pontic was not influenced by the type of sintering procedure. All fabrication methods exhibited clinically acceptable results in terms of marginal discrepancies.

Keywords

References

  1. Roberts HW, Berzins DW, Moore BK, Charlton DG. Metalceramic alloys in dentistry: a review. J Prosthodont 2009;18:188-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849x.2008.00377.x
  2. Willer J, Rossbach A, Weber HP. Computer-assisted milling of dental restorations using a new CAD/CAM data acquisition system. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:346-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70136-2
  3. Bindl A, Mormann WH. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:441-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01446.x
  4. Kokubo Y, Tsumita M, Kano T, Sakurai S, Fukushima S. Clinical marginal and internal gaps of zirconia all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthodont Res 2011;55:40-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2010.09.001
  5. Yeo IS, Yang JH, Lee JB. In vitro marginal fit of three all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:459-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.08.005
  6. Strub JR, Rekow ED, Witkowski S. Computer-aided design and fabrication of dental restorations: current systems and future possibilities. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:1289-96. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0389
  7. Kaleli N, Sarac D. Influence of porcelain firing and cementation on the marginal adaptation of metal-ceramic restorations prepared by different methods. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:656-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.016
  8. van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012;28:3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014
  9. Ortorp A, Jonsson D, Mouhsen A, Vult von Steyern P. The fit of cobalt-chromium three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated with four different techniques: a comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater 2011;27:356-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.015
  10. Ekren O, Ozkomur A, Ucar Y. Effect of layered manufacturing techniques, alloy powders, and layer thickness on metalceramic bond strength. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:481-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.04.007
  11. Santos EC, Shiomi M, Osakada K, Laoui T. Rapid manufacturing of metal components by laser forming. Int J Mach Tools Manufact 2006;46:1459-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.09.005
  12. Koutsoukis T, Zinelis S, Eliades G, Al-Wazzan K, Rifaiy MA, Al Jabbari YS. Selective laser melting technique of Co-Cr dental alloys: A review of structure and properties and comparative analysis with other available techniques. J Prosthodont 2015;24:303-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12268
  13. Mazzoli A. Selective laser sintering in biomedical engineering. Med Biol Eng Comput 2013;51:245-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-012-1001-x
  14. Bae EJ, Kim JH, Kim WC, Kim HY. Bond and fracture strength of metal-ceramic restorations formed by selective laser sintering. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6:266-71. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.4.266
  15. Chockalingam K, Jawahar N, Chandrasekhar U. Influence of layer thickness on mechanical properties in stereolithography. Rapid Prototyping J 2006;12:106-13. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540610652456
  16. Mercelis P, Kruth JP. Residual stresses in selective laser sintering and selective laser melting. Rapid Prototyping J 2006;12:254-65. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540610707013
  17. Sames WJ, List F, Pannala S, Dehoff RR, Babu SS. The metallurgy and processing science of metal additive manufacturing. Int Mater Rev 2016;61:315-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2015.1116649
  18. Schaub DA, Chu KR, Montgomery DC. Optimizing stereolithography throughput. J Manuf Syst 1997;16:290-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-6125(97)89099-1
  19. Withers PJ, Bhadeshia H. Residual stress Part II - nature and origins. Mater Sci Technol 2001;17:366-75. https://doi.org/10.1179/026708301101510087
  20. Tara MA, Eschbach S, Bohlsen F, Kern M. Clinical outcome of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with laser-sintering technology. Int J Prosthodont 2011;24:46-8.
  21. Sun J, Zhang FQ. The application of rapid prototyping in prosthodontics. J Prosthodont 2012;21:641-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00888.x
  22. Kim EH, Lee DH, Kwon SM, Kwon TY. A microcomputed tomography evaluation of the marginal fit of cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated by new manufacturing techniques and alloy systems. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:393-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.002
  23. Lambert H, Durand JC, Jacquot B, Fages M. Dental biomaterials for chairside CAD/CAM: State of the art. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:486-95. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.6.486
  24. Park JK, Kim HY, Kim WC, Kim JH. Evaluation of the fit of metal ceramic restorations fabricated with a pre-sintered soft alloy. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:909-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.024
  25. Stawarczyk B, Eichberger M, Hoffmann R, Noack F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D, Beuer F. A novel CAD/CAM base metal compared to conventional CoCrMo alloys: an in-vitro study of the long-term metal-ceramic bond strength. Oral Health Dent Manag 2014;13:446-52.
  26. Wettstein F, Sailer I, Roos M, Hammerle CH. Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures. Eur J Oral Sci 2008;116:272-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00527.x
  27. Buchi DL, Ebler S, Hammerle CH, Sailer I. Marginal and internal fit of curved anterior CAD/CAM-milled zirconia fixed dental prostheses: an in-vitro study. Quintessence Int 2014;45:837-46.
  28. Komine F, Gerds T, Witkowski S, Strub JR. Influence of framework configuration on the marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide ceramic anterior four-unit frameworks. Acta Odontol Scand 2005;63:361-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350500264313
  29. Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:389-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60124-3
  30. Kocaagaoglu H, Kilinc HI, Albayrak H, Kara M. In vitro evaluation of marginal, axial, and occlusal discrepancies in metal ceramic restorations produced with new technologies. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:368-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.013
  31. Sulaiman F, Chai J, Jameson LM, Wozniak WT. A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:478-84.
  32. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971;131:107-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
  33. Pasali B, Sarac D, Kaleli N, Sarac YS. Evaluation of marginal fit of single implant-supported metal-ceramic crowns prepared by using presintered metal blocks. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:257-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.03.015
  34. Vojdani M, Torabi K, Atashkar B, Heidari H, Torabi Ardakani M. A comparison of the marginal and internal fit of cobaltchromium copings fabricated by two different CAD/CAM systems (CAD/ milling, CAD/ Ceramill Sintron). J Dent (Shiraz) 2016;17:301-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(89)90047-X
  35. Kaleli N, Ural C, Ozkoylu G, Duran I. Effect of layer thickness on the marginal and internal adaptation of laser-sintered metal frameworks. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:922-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.08.018
  36. Gu D, Shen Y. Balling phenomena in direct laser sintering of stainless steel powder: Metallurgical mechanisms and control methods. Mater Des 2009;30:2903-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.01.013