DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Variations in the body surface temperature of sows during the post weaning period and its relation to subsequent reproductive performance

  • Weng, Ruey-Chee (Department of Animal Science, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2019.07.22
  • Accepted : 2019.08.22
  • Published : 2020.07.01

Abstract

Objective: A study was made investigate factors affecting body surface temperature changes after weaning in sows, whether these can be used to aid detection of natural estrus and how they relate to subsequent reproductive performance. Methods: A total of 132 sows were selected during summer from a breeding farm, with mean parity of 3.6±2.3 and 28.5±0.9 days lactation length. Four daily measurements (6:00, 8:00, 16:00, and 18:00) of vulva (VST), udder (UST), ear base and central back skin temperatures for individual sows were taken by an infrared thermometer, continuing up to 8 days post weaning. Results: The VST obtained from sows showing estrus at 4 days post-weaning (4DPW), 5DPW, and 6DPW showed a peak at the fourth day post-weaning, but then started to decrease. The VST of sows not detected in standing heat (NDPW) remained at a lower level during the experiment, but UST was increased soon after weaning. The VST-UST temperature differences during daytime of sows that were showing behavioural standing heat on 4DPW, 5DPW, 6DPW, and 7DPW were 0.46℃±0.123℃, 0.71℃±0.124℃, 0.66℃ ±0.171℃, and 0.58℃±0.223℃, respectively. The NDPW sows had the highest UST observed, but also the lowest VST so that a more negative value of temperature difference (-0.31℃) was seen during first few days post-weaning. A total of 119 sows were observed to show standing heat and were bred. The later the estrus, the smaller the litter size (p = 0.005). Conclusion: Sows which did not show behavior indicative of stable standing heat after weaning had a VST which remained at a lower level, but the UST increased soon after weaning. Therefore, for sow heat detection under field conditions, the changes of VST and UST and difference between the two should be considered together to increase the accuracy of detection.

Keywords

References

  1. Berckmans D, Guarino M. From the Editors: Precision livestock farming for the global livestock sector. Anim Front 2017;7:4-5. https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2017.0101
  2. Morota G, Ventura RV, Silva FF, Koyama M, Fernando SC. Big data analytics and precision animal agriculture symposium: Machine learning and data mining advance predictive big data analysis in precision animal agriculture. J Anim Sci 2018;96:1540-50. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky014
  3. Soede NM, Wetzels CCH, Zondag W, de Koning MAI, Kemp B. Effects of time of insemination relative to ovulation, as determined by ultrasonography, on fertilization rate and accessory sperm count in sows. J Reprod Fertil 1995;104:99-106. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.1040099
  4. Nissen AK, Soede NM, Hyttel P, Schmidt M, D'Hoore L. The influence of time of insemination relative to time of ovulation on farrowing frequency and litter size in sows, as investigated by ultrasonography. Theriogenology 1997;47:1571-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(97)00162-3
  5. Soede M, Helmond FA, Kemp B. Periovulatory profiles of oestradiol, LH and progesterone in relation to oestrus and embryo mortality in multiparous sows using transrectal ultrasonography to detect ovulation. J Reprod Fertil 1994;101:633-41. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.1010633
  6. Kauffold J, Althouse GC. An update on the use of B-mode ultrasonography in female pig reproduction. Theriogenology 2007;67:901-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006. 12.005
  7. Waberski D, Kunz-Schmidt A, Borchardt Neto G, Richter L, Weitze KF. Real-time ultrasound diagnosis of ovulation and ovarian cysts in sows and its impact on artificial insemination efficiency. J Anim Sci 2000;77(Suppl):E1-8. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas2000.00218812007700ES0037x
  8. Rezac P, Kukla R, Poschl M. Effect of sow parity on vaginal electrical impedance. Anim Reprod Sci 2002;72:223-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(02)00089-1
  9. Stokhof S, Soede NM, Kemp B. Vaginal mucus conductivity as measured by the Walsmeta MKIV does not accurately predict the moment of ovulation or the optimum time for insemination in sows. Anim Reprod Sci 1996;41:305-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4320(95)01454-3
  10. Rezac P, Poschl M, Krivanek I. Effect of probe location on changes in vaginal electrical impedance during the porcine estrous cycle. Theriogenology 2003;59:1325-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01168-8
  11. Scolari SC, Clark SG, Knox RV, Tamassia M. Vulvar skin temperature changes significantly during estrus in swine as determined by digital infrared thermography. J Swine Health Prod 2011;19:151-5.
  12. Simoes VG, Lyazrhi F, Picard-Hagen N, Gayrard V, Martineau GP, Waret-Szkuta A. Variations in the vulvar temperature of sows during proestrus and estrus as determined by infrared thermography and its relation to ovulation. Theriogenology 2014;82:1080-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.07.017
  13. Abrams RM, Thatcher WW, Bazer FW, Wilcox CJ. Effect of estradiol-17beta on vaginal thermal conductance in cattle. J Dairy Sci 1973;56:1058-62. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(73)85305-6
  14. Sterning M. Oestrous symptoms in primiparous sows. 2. Factors influencing the duration and intensity of external oestrous symptoms. Anim Reprod Sci 1995;40:165-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4320(95)01410-2
  15. Langendijk P, van den Brand H, Soede NM, Kemp B. Effect of boar contact on follicular development and on estrus expression after weaning in primiparous sows. Theriogenology 2000;54:1295-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(00) 00436-2
  16. Soerensen DD, Sonnik C, James BM, Pedersen LJ. Determining the emissivity of pig skin for accurate infrared thermography. Comput Electron Agric 2014;109:52-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2014.09.003
  17. Sykes DJ, Couvillion JS, Cromiak A, et al. The use of digital infrared thermal imaging to detect estrus in gilts. Theriogenology 2012;78:147-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.therio genology.2012.01.030
  18. Cornou C. Automated oestrus detection methods in group housed sows: review of the current methods and perspectives for development. Livest Sci 2006;105:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2006.05.023
  19. SPSS. IBM Corp. Released. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY, USA: IBM Corp; 2013.
  20. Soede NM, Hazeleger W, Broos J, Kemp B. Vaginal temperature is not related to the time of ovulation in sows. Anim Reprod Sci 1997;47:245-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378- 4320(97)00006-7
  21. Hoshino Y, Koketsu Y. A repeatability assessment of sows mated 4-6 days after weaning in breeding herds. Anim Reprod Sci 2008;108:22-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007. 06.029
  22. Tummaruk P, Tantasuparuk W, Techakumphu M, Kunavongkrit A. Influence of repeat-service and weaning-to-first-service interval on farrowing proportion of gilts and sows. Prev Vet Med 2010;96:194-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed. 2010.06.003
  23. Weitze KF, Wagner-Rietschel H, Waberski D, Richte L, Krieter J. The onset of heat after weaning, heat duration, and ovulation as major factors in AI timing in sows. Reprod Domest Anim 1994;29:433-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.1994.tb00590.x
  24. Kemp B, Soede NM. Relationship of weaning-to-estrus interval to timing of ovulation and fertilization in sows. J Anim Sci 1996;74:944-9. https://doi.org/10.2527/1996.745944x