DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Reference Data in Science Guidebooks for Elementary Teachers Developed for 2015 Revised Curriculum - Focusing on Physics Section for the Third-Sixth Grade -

2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 초등학교 과학과 교사용 지도서의 참고자료 분석 - 3~6학년 물리영역을 중심으로 -

  • 김형욱 (서울대학교 대학원) ;
  • 송진웅 (서울대학교 및 교육종합연구원)
  • Received : 2020.03.04
  • Accepted : 2020.04.14
  • Published : 2020.05.31

Abstract

This study analyzed reference data for the physics section in science guidebooks for the third-sixth grade in elementary schools, according to the 2015 revised curriculum. It analyzed the reference data by categorizing them in terms of subjects, objectives and presentation forms and the visual data used in the reference data by categorizing their types. The findings show that the ratio of the science knowledge type was highest (53.8%) among the subjects of reference data in guidebooks for the science section, followed by the application to real life, and then, supplementary inquiry experiments and activities. The ratios of other types such as advanced science, environment, scientists and science history were, however, less than 1%, so they need to be improved. The ratio of knowledge provision was highest (40.5%) among the objectives of reference data but the ratios of conceptual supplementation and deepening were similar in ratio. Meanwhile, While the expository type (88.4%) accounted for most of the present forms of reference data, and photographs and illustrations (93.6%) also accounted for most of visual data suggested with reference data. Thus more various types of presentation forms and the extension of visual data seemed to be needed. This study is expected to provide some suggestions for the meaningful use of reference data in guidebooks for teachers and for the development of science guidebooks for teachers in elementary schools.

Keywords

References

  1. Ann, J., Jung, Y., Lee, K. & Kang, S. (2019). Analysis of the reading materials in the chemistry domain of elementary school science and middle school science textbooks and chemistry i and ii textbooks developed under the 2009 revised national science curriculum. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 63(2), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.5012/JKCS.2019.63.2.111
  2. Appleton, K. (1995). Student teachers' confidence to teach science: Is more science knowledge necessary to improve self‐confidence?. International Journal of Science Education, 17(3), 357-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069950170307
  3. Ball, D. L. & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is-or might be-the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform. Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6-8, 14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1177151
  4. Chin, J., Seo, J., Kim, K. & Lee, N. (2007). The research on textbook evaluation(1): Establishing a system for textbook quality management. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation, RRC 2007-5.
  5. Choi, H. (2011). Preservice elementary teachers' views about physics and biology. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 27(4), 203-221.
  6. Dede, C. (2006). The evolution of online teacher professional development. Online professional development for teachers: Emerging models and methods, 1-11.
  7. Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher. Columbia Univ.: Teachers College Press.
  8. Jang, M., Joung, Y. & Kim, H. (2011). The elementary school teachers' conceptions and utilization on the general remarks in the science teacher's guide. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 30(4), 535-552. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2011.30.4.535
  9. Jang, M., Joung, Y. & Kim, H. (2011). The elementary school teachers' conceptions and utilization on the general remarks in the science teacher's guide. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 30(4), 535-552. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2011.30.4.535
  10. Jeon, Y. (2006). Understanding American teachers' use of teachers' manuals: Two case studies. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 23(3), 5-24.
  11. Kang, Y. & Shin, Y. (2011). The effect of various instructional activities using the history of science on science learning motivation of elementary school students. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 30(3), 330-339. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2011.30.3.330
  12. Kil, Y. (1999), An analysis of the educational context of teaching methods. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17(2), 39-63.
  13. Kim, G. (2013). Elementary school teachers' conceptions and utilization in the 5, 6th grade science teacher's guide revised in 2007. Daegu National University of Education. Master's thesis. Korea.
  14. Kim, G. & Lee, H. (2016). The analysis on question's patterns in elementary school science teacher's guidebooks of 5, 6th grade under the 2009 revised curriculum. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 35(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2016.35.1.001
  15. Kim, Y. & Yoo, J. (2019). Exploring elementary teachers' difficulties on teaching science by analyzing questions in an autonomous online teacher community: Focusing on physics questions in indischool. Journal of Korean Association of Science Education, 39(1), 73-88. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2019.39.1.73
  16. Koh, H., Seok, J. & Kang, S. (2017). Analysis of the reading materials in elementary school science textbooks developed under the 2009 revised national science curriculum. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 36(2), 129-142. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2017.36.2.129
  17. Kwak, Y. (2006). Definition of pedagogical content knowledge and ways of raising teaching professionalism as examined by secondary school science teachers. Journal of Korean Association of Science Education, 26(4), 527-536.
  18. Kwon, C., Park, B. (2011). The teacher's recognition and utilization for subject of new science teacher's guide in the elementary school. The Journal of Korea elementary education, 21(2), 247-260.
  19. Kwon, J., Jung, W. & Kim, Y. (2001). Teachers' perception and improvement on the elementary science teacher's guide. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 20(1), 75-89.
  20. Lee, S. A., Jhun, Y. S., Hong, J. E., Shin, Y. J., Choi, J. H. & Lee, I. H. (2007). Research articles : Difficulties experienced by elementary school teachers in science classes. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 26(1), 97-107.
  21. Lee, S. & Lim, H. (2016). Elementary school teachers' use of science teacher's guide for lesson preparation: focused on grade 3-4 science curriculum revised in 2009. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 35(2), 205-215. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2016.35.2.205
  22. Loughran, J., Milroy, P., Berry, A., Gunstone, R. & Mulhall, P. (2001). Documenting science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge through PaP-eRs. Research in Science Education, 31(2), 289-307. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013124409567
  23. Noh, M., Jeong, H. & Yoon, J. (2004). A study on the concept of textbook and it's internal system for effective teaching-learning in schools. Korea Textbook Research Foundation.
  24. Oh, P. (2011). "Unfillable cups": Meanings of science classes to elementary school teachers. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(2), 271-294. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2011.31.2.271
  25. Roth, W. M., Pozzer-Ardenghi, L. & Han, J. (2015). Critical graphi-cacy: Understanding visual representation practices in school science; Springer-Kluwer: Dordrecht, Holland.
  26. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
  27. Trowbridge, L. W., Bybee, R. W., Powell, J. C. & Teaching Secondary. (2004). School science: Strategies for developing scientific literacy, Pearson Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River.
  28. Varley, P. J. (1975). Science in the primary school. Research Branch, Department of Education, Queensland.
  29. Wellington, J. & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. buckingham, UK: Open University Press.