DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An integrative review of learning experiences for nursing students in Korea: Based on qualitative research

한국 간호대학생의 학습경험에 대한 통합적 문헌고찰: 질적연구를 중심으로

  • 홍수민 (연세대학교 일반대학원 간호학과) ;
  • 김상희 (연세대학교 간호대학.김모임간호학연구소)
  • Received : 2019.11.06
  • Accepted : 2020.03.17
  • Published : 2020.05.31

Abstract

Purpose: In the Fourth Industrial Revolution, nursing education will change in a different way than before. The purpose of this study was to analyze characteristics of qualitative research on learning experiences for nursing students, and to suggest directions for nursing education geared to the needs of the future. Methods: An integrative review method was used. Based on Whittemore & Knafl's approach, five steps were applied. Results: Eleven papers met the selection criteria and had above average ratings in quality appraisals. Three characteristics related to the learning experiences of nursing students were derived: (1) overcoming difficulties in the learning process and concentrating on problem-solving, (2) improving self-efficacy through experiencing achievement in the learning process, (3) establishing nursing professionalism, (4) identifying the importance of self-directed and self-reflected learning, and (5) developing teamwork. Conclusion: This review found that various learning experiences were conducted for practical experience and learner-oriented learning. Nursing students overcame difficulties to achieve their learning outcomes, and developed their professionalism. Further study is required to comprehensively explore research including other countries, and the experiences of instructors.

Keywords

References

  1. Alfaro-Lefevre, R. (2016). Critical thinking, clinical reasoning, and clinical judgment: A practical approach (6th ed.). Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences.
  2. Baldwin, C. (2015). Narrative ethics for narrative care. Journal of Aging Studies, 34, 183-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2015.02.014
  3. Barrows, H. S. (1994). Practice-based learning: Problem-based learning applied to medical education. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.
  4. Benner, P., Sutphen, M., Leonard, V., & Day, L. (2009). Educating nurses: A call for radical transformation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  5. Blum, C. A., & Parcells, D. A. (2012). Relationship between high-fidelity simulation and patient safety in prelicensure nursing education: A comprehensive review. Journal of Nursing Education, 51(8), 429-435. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20120523-01
  6. Brauer, D. G., & Ferguson, K. J. (2015). The integrated curriculum in medical education: AMEE guide No. 96. Medical Teacher, 37, 312-322. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2014.970998
  7. Choi, K. O., & Park, Y. M. (2014). The effects of team-based learning on problem solving ability, critical thinking disposition and self-directed learning in undergraduate nursing students. Journal of East-West Nursing Research, 20(2), 154-159. https://doi.org/10.14370/jewnr.2014.20.2.154
  8. Colaizzi, P. (1978). Psychological research as phenomenologist views it. In R. S. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential phenomenological alternatives for psychology (pp.48-71). New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
  9. Finnerty, E. P., Chauvin, S., Bonaminio, G., Andrews, M., Carroll, R. G., & Pangaro, L. N. (2010). Flexner revisited: The role and value of the basic sciences in medical education. Academic Medicine, 85(2), 349-355. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c88b09
  10. Gastmans, C. (1999). Care as moral attitude in nursing. Nursing Ethics, 6(3), 214-223. https://doi.org/10.1177/096973309900600304
  11. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Forth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  12. Huang, Y. M., Pliego, J. F., Henrichs, B., Bowyer, M. W., Siddall, V. J., McGaghie, W. C., et al. (2008). 2007 simulation education summit. The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 3(3), 186-191. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181828156
  13. Jeffreis, P. R., Rodgers, B., & Adamson, K. (2015). NLN Jeffries simulation theory: Brief narrative description. Nursing Education Perspectives, 36(5), 292-293. https://doi.org/10.1097/00024776-201509000-00004
  14. Jho, H. (2017). The changes of future society and educational environment according to the fourth industrial revolution and the tasks of school science education. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 36(3), 286-301. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2017.36.3.286
  15. Kang, K. (2019). Study on the analysis of the direction of university education and the teaching capacity of professor in the fourth industrial revolution era: Focused on the paradigm of lifelong education. Journal of Education and Culture, 25(1), 49-82. https://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2019.25.1.49
  16. Kim, H. (2018). Nursing students’ experience on team-based learning. Journal of the Korean Academia Industrial Cooperation Society, 19(9), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2018.19.9.30
  17. Kim, J. K. (2011). Narrative as a medium of virtue and practice in medicine. Korean Journal of Medical Ethics, 14(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.35301/ksme.2011.14.1.1
  18. Kong, B. H. (2018). Nursing ethics. Seoul: Hynmoonsa.
  19. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed). Beverly Hills: Sage.
  20. Kuiper, R. A., O'Donnell, S., Pesut, D., & Turrise, S. (2017). The essentials of clinical reasoning for nurses. Indianapolis: Sigma Theta Tau International.
  21. Lee, S. H., & Jeon, W. T. (2015). The relationship between academic self-efficacy and academic burnout in medical students. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 27(1), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2015.27.1.27
  22. Li, Y., Wang, X., Zhu, X. R., Zhu, Y. X., & Sun, J. (2019). Effectiveness of problem-based learning on the professional communication competencies of nursing students and nurses: A systematic review. Nurse Education in Practice, 37, 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2019.04.015
  23. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  24. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 30, 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1427
  25. McIntosh, C. E., Thomas, C. M., Wilczynski, S., & McIntosh, D. E. (2018). Increasing nursing students’ knowledge of autism spectrum disorder by using a standardized patient. Nursing Education Perspectives, 39(1), 32-34. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.nep.0000000000000179
  26. Merisier, S., Larue, C., & Boyer, L. (2018). How does questioning influence nursing students' clinical reasoning in problem-based learning? A scoping review. Nurse Education Today, 65, 108-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.03.006
  27. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  28. Oh, H. S. (2017). Influence of learning motivation, communication skill, academic self-efficacy on self-directed learning ability in nursing students. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(8), 311-321. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.8.311
  29. Oh, Y. J., & Kang, H. Y. (2013). Metacognition, learning flow and problem solving ability in nursing simulation learning. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing, 20(3), 239-247. https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2013.20.3.239
  30. Sandelowski, M. (1986). The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(3), 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-198604000-00005
  31. Shin, H., Lee, J. M., & Kim, S. J. (2018). An integrative review of smartphone utilization for nursing education among nursing college students in South Korea. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 24(4), 376-390. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2018.24.4.376
  32. Shin, S., Yang, E. B., Hwang, E., Kim, K., Kim, Y., & Jung, D. (2017). Current status and future direction of nursing education for clinical practice. Korean Medical Education Review, 19(2), 76-82. https://doi.org/10.17496/kmer.2017.19.2.76
  33. Simmons, B. (2010). Clinical reasoning: Concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(5), 1151-1158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05262.x
  34. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.
  35. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basic of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  36. Taylor, C. (1997). Problem solving in clinical nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26(2), 329-336. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997026329.x
  37. Thorne, S. (2008). Interpretive description. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
  38. Van Kaam, A. (1969). Existential Foundations of Psychology. New York : Doubleday.
  39. Wittemore, R., & Knafle, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546-553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
  40. Yang, E., Lee, S., & Hwang, E. (2008). Teaching medical students in primary and secondary care: A resource book. Seoul: Koonja Publishing.