DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Why SNS Sites Are Using Advertising Models Like You: An Explanation from Construal-Level Theory

  • Received : 2020.04.30
  • Accepted : 2020.08.08
  • Published : 2020.12.31

Abstract

Based on the Construal Level Theory, we aim to study a most favorable fit among the advertising model, media type, and message construals, which are important factors in an advertisement. A two (social distance of the ad model in an ad: distal (low similarity) vs proximal (high similarity) by two (social distance of a media type: distal (portal) vs. proximal (SNS)) by two (message construal: abstract vs concrete) laboratory experiment was conducted to examine attitude changes on ad messages. The results show that abstract messages were more effective in attitude toward advertisement and purchase intention under the distal social distance (i.e. advertising model in low-similarity and portal media type) while concrete messages were so under the proximal social distance and SNS media type.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2017S1A5A2A01025189).

References

  1. Amit, E., Algom, D., and Trope, Y. (2009). Distance-dependent processing of pictures and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 400-415. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015835
  2. Bornemann, T., and Homburg, C. (2011). Psychological distance and the dual role of price. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(3), 490-504. https://doi.org/10.1086/659874
  3. Brin, S., and Page, L. (2012). Reprint of: The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer Networks, 56(18), 3825-3833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2012.10.007
  4. Brown, S. P., and Stayman, D. M. (1992). Antecedents and consequences of attitude toward the ad: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(1), 34-51. https://doi.org/10.1086/209284
  5. Chandy, R. K., Tellis, G. J., MacInnis, D. J., and Thaivanich, P. (2001). What to say when: Advertising appeals in evolving markets. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(4), 399-414. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.4.399.18908
  6. Cho, H. O. (1997). A structural analysis of the relative effects of Ad recall and Ad attitude on consumers' buying process. Journal of Korean Marketing Association, 12(1), 137-156.
  7. Curtain, P. A., Dougall, E., and Mersey, R. D. (2007). Study compares Yahoo! News story preferences. Newspaper Research Journal, 28(4), 22-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/073953290702800403
  8. Dahl, D. W., Frankenberger, K. D., and Manchanda, R. V. (2003). Does it pay to shock? Reactions to shocking and nonshocking advertising content among university students. Journal of Advertising Research, 43(3), 268-280. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021849903030332
  9. Dehaene, S. (2003). The neural basis of the Weber-Fechner law: A logarithmic mental number line. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(4), 145-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00055-X
  10. Dhar, R., and Kim, E. Y. (2007). Seeing the forest or the trees: Implications of construal level theory for consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 96-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70014-1
  11. Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., and Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers' product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307-319.
  12. Edwards, S. M., Lee, J. K., and Ferle, C. L. (2009). Does place matter when shopping online? Perceptions of similarity and familiarity as indicators of psychological distance. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 10(1), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2009.10722161
  13. Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Jo u rn a l o f Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
  14. Erdogan, B. Z., Baker, M. J., and Tagg, S. (2001). Selecting celebrity endorsers: The practitioner's perspective. Journal of Advertising Research, 41(3), 39-48. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-41-3-39-48
  15. Fiedler, K. (2007). Construal level theory as an integrative framework for behavioral decision-making research and consumer psychology. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 101-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70015-3
  16. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  17. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1981). Acceptance yielding and impact: Cognitive processes in persuasion. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  18. Fujita, K., Henderson, M. D., Eng, J., Trope, Y., and Liberman, N. (2006). Spatial distance and mental construal of social events. Psychological Science, 17(4), 278-282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01698.x
  19. Heider, F. (2013). The psychology of interpersonal relations. London, UK: Psychology Press.
  20. Huang, N., Burtch, G., Hong, Y., and Polman, E. (2016). Effects of multiple psychological distances on construal and consumer evaluation: A field study of online reviews. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(4), 474-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2016.03.001
  21. Idson, L. C., and Mischel, W. (2001). The personality of familiar and significant people: The lay perceiver as a social-cognitive theorist. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(4), 585-596. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.4.585
  22. Joinson, A. N. (2008). Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people? Motives and use of Facebook. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI '08), New York, NY: ACM, 1027-1036.
  23. Kamins, M. A. (1989). Celebrity and noncelebrity advertising in a two-sided context. Journal of Advertising Research, 29(3), 34-42.
  24. Kim, J. H., Kim, H. Y., and Boo, S. H. (2012). Communication through social media focus on prosocial behavior: The effect of message framing and social distance towards media. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 23(1), 183-205.
  25. Kim, H. S., Kim, N. R., Yoo, D. K., and Shin, S. H. (2012). The effect of consumer response about sports brand application advertisement by utilizing smartphone on advertising attitude, product attitude, and purchase intention. Korean Journal of Sport Management, 17(1), 13-28.
  26. Kim, B. K., Zauberman, G., and Bettman, J. R. (2012). Space, time, and intertemporal preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 867-880. https://doi.org/10.1086/666464
  27. Kim, K., Zhang, M., and Li, X. (2008). Effects of temporal and social distance on consumer evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(4), 706-713. https://doi.org/10.1086/592131
  28. Langley, Q. (2014). Brandjack: How your reputation is at risk from brand pirates and what to do about it. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  29. Ledgerwood, A., Wakslak, C. J., and Wang, M. A. (2010). Differential information use for near and distant decisions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(4), 638-642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.001
  30. Lee, S. Y., and Cho, Y. S. (2010). Do web users care about banner ads anymore? The effects of frequency and clutter in web advertising. Journal of Promotion Management, 16(3), 288-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496490903582594
  31. Liberman, N., Trope, Y., and Stephan, E. (2007). Psychological distance. In A. W. Kruglanski and E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 353-383). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  32. Liberman, N., Trope, Y., and Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal level theory and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 113-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70017-7
  33. Lim, S., Cha, S. Y., Park, C., Lee, I., and Kim, J. (2012). Getting closer and experiencing together: Antecedents and consequences of psychological distance in social media-enhanced real-time streaming video. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1365-1378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.02.022
  34. Lipsman, A., Mudd, G., Rich, M., and Bruich, S. (2012). The power of "like": How brands reach (and influence) fans through social-media marketing. Journal of Advertising Research, 52(1), 40-52. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-52-1-040-052
  35. Liviatan, I., Trope, Y., and Liberman, N. (2008). Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: Implications for perception of others' actions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1256-1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.007
  36. Lou, L., and Koh, J. (2017). Enhancing fan participation in social media based virtual brand communities: The case of like, comment, and share activities. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 27(1), 54-76. https://doi.org/10.14329/apjis.2017.27.1.54
  37. Lutz, R. J. (1975). First-order and second-order cognitive effects in attitude change. Communication Research, 2(3), 289-299. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365027500200309
  38. MacKenzie, S. B., and Lutz, R. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. The Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 48-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298905300204
  39. Maglio, S. J., and Polman, E. (2014). Spatial orientation shrinks and expands psychological distance. Psychological Science, 25(7), 1345-1352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614530571
  40. Maglio, S. J., Trope, Y., and Liberman, N. (2013). Distance from a distance: Psychological distance reduces sensitivity to any further psychological distance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(3), 644-657. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030258
  41. Mathes, R., and Pfetsch, B. (1991). The role of the alternative press in the agenda-building process: Spill-over effects and media opinion leadership. European Journal of Communication, 6(1), 33-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323191006001003
  42. McGuire, W. J. (1978). An information-processing model of advertising effectiveness. In H. L. Davis and A. J. Silk (Eds.), Behavioral and management science in marketing (pp. 156-180). New York, NY: Ronald Press.
  43. McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., and Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334-359. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81
  44. Nan, X. (2007). Social distance, framing, and judgment: A construal level perspective. Human Communication Research, 33(4), 489-514. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00309.x
  45. Papasolomou, I., and Melanthiou, Y. (2012). Social media: Marketing public relations' new best friend. Journal of Promotion Management, 18(3), 319-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2012.696458
  46. Plummer, R. (2008, May 22). Will fake business blogs crash and burn? BBC News, Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7287413.stm
  47. Schroeder, J. (2016). Will this app disrupt the $160 $160 billion ad industry by replacing ads with positive messages? Forbes, [1] Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/julesschroeder/2016/06/02/will-this-app-disrupt-the-160-billion-ad-industry-by-replacing-ads-with-positive-messages/#51e9c7d14e5e
  48. Schuhwerk, M. E., and Lefkoff-Hagius, R. (1995). Green or non-green? Does type of appeal matter when advertising a green product? Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1995.10673475
  49. Sharma, P. (2011). Demystifying cultural differences in country-of-origin effects: Exploring the moderating roles of product type, consumption context, and involvement. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 23(5), 344-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2011.602952
  50. Singleton, R. A. J., and Straits, B. C. (1999). Approaches to social research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  51. Smith, P. K., and Trope, Y. (2006). You focus on the forest when you're in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 578-596. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.578
  52. Statista (2018a). Digital advertising spending worldwide from 2015 to 2020 (in billion U.S. dollars). Available at https://www.statista.com/statistics/237974/online-advertising-spending-worldwide/ Retrieved May 5, 2018.
  53. Statista (2018b). Mobile internet advertising spending worldwide from 2015 to 2020 (in billion U.S. dollars). Available at https://www.statista.com/statistics/280640/mobile-advertising-spending-worldwide/ Retrieved May 5, 2018.
  54. Stephan, E., Liberman, N., and Trope, Y. (2010). Politeness and psychological distance: A construal level perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 268-280. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016960
  55. Stephan, E., Liberman, N., and Trope, Y. (2011). The effects of time perspective and level of construal on social distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(2), 397-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.11.001
  56. Sung, J., and Park, S. (2019). Consumers' channel selection behavior based on psychological distance cue: Regulartory-focus as moderator. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 29(2), 248-167.
  57. Trope, Y., and Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403-421. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403
  58. Trope, Y., and Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440-463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
  59. Trope, Y., Liberman, N., and Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70013-X
  60. Yan, D. (2014). Future events are far away: Exploring the distance-on-distance effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(4), 514-525. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036066
  61. Zhao, D., and Rosson, M. B. (2009). How and why people Twitter: The role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work. Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work, New York, NY: ACM, 243-252.
  62. Zhao, M., and Xie, J. (2011). Effects of social and temporal distance on consumers' responses to peer recommendations. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 486-496. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.48.3.486