References
- So, K. H. (2015). Things intended and realized in the 2013 revision of the national curriculum in England: Significance and limitation. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(3), 199-220. https://doi.org/10.15708/kscs.33.3.201509.009
- Lee, S. M., Lee, B. C., Baek, K. S., Bae, H. S., Lee, G. N., Kim, S. H., Kim, H. K., Lee, Y. A., & Oh, S. J. (2015). National curriculum design for elementary and lower secondary school in compliance with the strengthening of educational autonomy policy(RRC 2019-7). ChungBuk: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
- Hong, M. J., Park, S. Y., & Kim, H. Y. (2013). The comparison of the ancient-modern and post-modern theory views of school education. Theory and practice of education, 18(3), 73-93.
- Hong, H. J. (2017). Easy curriculum. Seoul: Hakjisa.
- Alberta Education (2016). The guiding framework for the design and development of kindergarten to grade 12 provincial curriculum.
- Askew, M. (2015). Numeracy for the 21st century: a commentary. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47, 707-712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0709-0
- Bullock,E. C. (2013). An archaeological/genealogical historical analysis of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics' Standards document(doctoral dissertation).
- Callingham, R., Beswick, K., Ferme, E. (2015). An initial exploration of teachers’ numeracy in the context of professional capital. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(4), 549-560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0666-7
- Commonwealth of Australia (2009). Shape of the Australian Curriculum: Mathematics.
- Craig, J. (2018). The promises of numeracy. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99, 57-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9824-5
- Department for Education, UK. (2014). The national curriculum in England Framework document. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/381344/Master_final_national_curriculum_28_Nov.pdf (2020. 3. 3. 검색)
- Department for Education, UK. (2020). Professional skills test. http://sta.education.gov.uk/ (2020. 3. 5. 검색)
- Geiger, V., Forgasz H. & Goos, M. (2015). A critical orientation to numeracy across the curriculum. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(4), 611-624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0648-1
- Goos, M., Dole, S., & Geiger, V. (2011). Improving numeracy education in rural schools: a professional development approach. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 23(2), 129-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-011-0008-1
- Jablonka, E. (2015). The evolvement of numeracy and mathematical literacy curricula and the construction of hierarchies of numerate or mathematically literate subjects. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47, 599-609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0691-6
- Karaali, G.,Villafane Hernandez, E. H., & Taylor, J. A. (2016). What’s in a name? A critical review of definitions of quantitativ literacy, numeracy, and quantitative reasoning. Numeracy, 9(1), 1-34.
- Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J. & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
- Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A Quantitative approach to content validity. Pesronal Psychology, 28(4), 563-575.
- Lerman, S., & Zevenbergen, R. (2004). The socio-political context of the mathematics classroom. In P. Valero & R. Zevenbergen(eds)., Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education:Issues of power in theory and methodology(pp.27-42). NY: Springer.
- OECD (2013). Returns to skills around the world: Evidence from PIAAC. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 101.
- OECD (2018). The Future of education and skills: Education 2030. Position paper.
- Parnis, A. J. & Petocz, P. (2016). Secondary school students’ attitudes towards numeracy: an Australian investigation based on the National Assessment Program- Literacy and Numeracy. Australian Education Research, 43, 551-566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-016-0218-3