재활치료과학 (Therapeutic Science for Rehabilitation)

  • 제9권1호
  • /
  • Pages.45-55
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2635-9340(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-4329(eISSN)
대한신경계작업치료학회 (Korean Society of Neurological Occupational Therapy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

뇌졸중 환자의 시지각 능력이 운전수행에 미치는 영향

Effects of Visual Perception Skills on Driving Performance of Patients With Stroke

  • 곽호성 (우송대학교 작업치료학과)
  • 투고 : 2019.06.12
  • 심사 : 2019.08.26
  • 발행 : 2020.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적 : 본 연구의 목적은 국내에 거주하는 뇌졸중 환자를 대상으로 시지각 능력이 운전수행에 미치는 영향을 알아보고 운전수행능력 향상을 위한 시지각 훈련의 중요성을 제시하고자 하였다. 연구 방법 : 2014년 10월부터 11월까지 서울시 소재 병원에 입원중인 뇌졸중 환자 19명을 대상으로 MVPT(Motor-free Visual Perception Test), TMT A&B(Trail Making Test A & B), UFOV(Useful Field Of View test)를 사용하여 시지각능력 검사를 실시하였으며, 가상현실 운전시뮬레이터를 이용하여 운전수행능력을 검사하였다. 결과 : 뇌졸중 환자의 운전수행은 다양한 시지각 능력 평가도구와 관련성이 있었으며, UFOV 하위검사 2, TMT B, MVPT에서 가장 높은 상관관계가 나타났다. 또한, 시지각 능력 평가결과는 운전시뮬레이터 평가결과(합격/불합격)를 민감도 100.0%, 특이도 80.0%, 정확도 89.5%로 판별할 수 있었다. 결론 : 뇌졸중 환자의 운전수행에 있어 시지각 능력이 운전수행능력과 매우 높은 관련성이 있는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구를 통해 운전 재활 분야에서 시지각 능력과 관련된 운전재활 및 운전수행능력 평가를 시행하는데 유용하게 사용될 것으로 기대한다.

Objective : The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of visual perception on driving performance and the importance of visual training for improving driving performance in patients with stroke. Methods : The evaluations, using MVPT(Motor-free Visual Perception Test), TMT A&B(Trail Making Test A & B), UFOV(Useful Field Of View test), and a driving simulator, were carried out with patients in department of physical medicine and rehabilitation in a rehabilitation hospital from October 2014 to November 2014. Results : Driving performance was related to the ability of various visual perceptions of patients with stroke, and the highest correlation was found in the UFOV subtest 2, TMT B, and MVPT. The results of discriminant analysis indicated a sensitivity of 100.0%, specificity of 80.0%, and predicted the results of the driving simulator with 89.5% accuracy. Conclusion : This study found that visual-perception skills influence driving performance and suggested the importance of visual-perception skill training for driving.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 명묘희. (2003). 장애인 운전면허제도 개선 기본방향. 장애인 운전면허제도 개선을 위한 전문가 간담회 자료집. 서울: 도로교통안전관리공단
  2. 법제처. (2014). 도로교통법 시행규칙. 서울: 법제처
  3. Ball, K. K., Beard, B. L., Roenker, D. L., Miller, R. L., & Griggs, D. S. (1988). Age and visual search: Expanding the useful field of view. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 5, 2210-2219. https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.5.002210
  4. Ball, K., & Owsley, C. (1993). The useful field of view test: A new technique for evaluating age-related declines in visual function. Journal of the American Optometric Association, 63(1), 71-79.
  5. Bouska, M. J., & Kwatny, E. (1983). Manual for application of the motor free visual perception test to the adult population. Philadelphia, PA: Academic Therapy Publication.
  6. Classen, S., Horgas, A., Awadzi, K., Messinger-Rapport, B., Shechtman, O., & Joo, Y. (2008). Clinical predictors of older driver performance on a standardized road test. Traffic Injury Prevention, 9(5), 456-462, doi:10.1080/15389580802260026
  7. Fisk, G. D., Owsley, C., & Mennemeier, M. (2002). Vision, attention, and self-reported driving behaviors in community-dwelling stroke survivors. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83(4), 469-477. doi:10.1053/apmr.2002.31179
  8. George, S., & Crotty, M. (2010). Establishing criterion validity of the useful field of view assessment and stroke drivers' screening assessment: Comparison to the result of onroad assessment. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 114-122. doi:10.5014/ajot.64.1.114
  9. Hills, B. L. (1980). Vision, visibility, and perception in driving. Perception, 9, 183-216. https://doi.org/10.1068/p090183
  10. Korner-Bitensky, N. A., Mazer, B. L., Sofer, S., Gelina, I., Meyer, M. B., Morrison, C., ... White, M. (2000). Visual testing for readiness to drive after stroke: A multicenter study. American Journal Physical Mededicine & Rehabilitation, 79(3), 253-259.doi:10.1097/00002060-200005000-00007
  11. Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
  12. Lim, M. H., Park, S. W., & Choi, E. S. (2011). Assessment for driving of people with brain injury -Application of cognitive perceptual assessment for driving(CPAD)-. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 19(4), 41-50.
  13. Marshall, S. C., Molnar, F., Man-Son-Hing, M., Blair, R., Brosseau, L., Finestone, H. M., ... Wilson, K. G. (2007). Predictors of driving ability following stroke: A systematic review. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 14(1), 98-114. doi: 10.1310/tsr1401-98
  14. Mazer, B. L., Korner-Bitensky, N. A., & Sofer, S. (1998). Predicting ability to drive after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 79(7), 743-750. doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90350-1
  15. Mazer, B. L., Sofer, S., Korner-Bitensky, N. A., & Gelinas, I. (2001). Use of the UFOV to evaluate and retrain visual attention skills in clients with stroke: A pilot study. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(5), 552-557. doi:10.5014/ajot.55.5.552
  16. Novack, T. A., Banos, J. H., Alderson, A. L., Schneider, J. J., Weed, W., Blankenship, J., ... Salisbury, D. (2006). UFOV performance and driving ability following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 20(5), 455-461. doi: 10.1080/02699050600664541
  17. Owsley, C., Ball, K., Mcgwin, G., Sloane, M. E., Roenker, D. L., White, M. F., & Overley, E. T. (1998). Visual processing impairment and risk of motor vehicle crash among older adults. Journal of the American Medical Association, 279, 1083-1088. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.279.14.1083
  18. Renee, S. M., Karlene, K. B., Thomas, D. K., David, L. R., & Kathryn, T. G. (2000) Relation of useful field of view and other screening tests to on-road driving performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91(1), 279-290. doi: 10.2466/pms.2000.91.1.279
  19. Richard, T. K., & Robert, S. G. (1990). Driving safety after brain damage: Follow-up of twenty-two patients with matched controls. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 71(2), 133-137.
  20. Schneider, G. E. (1967). Contrasting visuomotor functions of tectum and cortex in the golden hamster. Psychologische Forschung, 31(1), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00422386
  21. Seo, E. H., Lee, D. Y., Kim, K. W., Lee, J. H., Jhoo, J. H., Youn, J. C., ... Woo, J. I. (2006). A normative study of the trail making test in Korean elders. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21(9), 844-852. doi: 10.1002/gps.1570
  22. Simms, B. (1985). Perception and driving: Theory and practice. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48(12), 363-366. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802268504801204
  23. Stacey, G., & Maria, C. (2010). Establishing criterion validity of the useful field of view assessment and stroke drivers' screening assessment: Comparison to the result of on-road assessment. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(1), 114-122. doi:10.5014/ajot.64.1.114
  24. Staplin, L., Lococo, K. H., Gish, K. W., & Decina, L. E. (2003). Model driver screening and evaluation program final technical report, volume II: Maryland pilot older driver study. Report no. DOT HS 809 583. Washington, DC: United States Department of Transportation.