Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Application of Coding Education through Gamification for Tourism Experience - Focusing on "Computational Thinking" Factor Analysis -

관광경험 증대를 위한 게이미피케이션 코딩교육 활용 방안 - 컴퓨팅 사고력 요소 분석 중심으로 -

  • Kim, Tae-Gyu (Graduate School of Smart Convergence, KwangWoon University) ;
  • Kim, Kyoung-Bae (Tourism Research Institute, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kang, Shin-Young (Sol International Hotel and Foodservice Department, Woosong Collage)
  • 김태규 (광운대학교 스마트융합대학원) ;
  • 김경배 (한양대학교 관광연구소) ;
  • 강신영 (우송정보대학교 글로벌호텔외식과)
  • Received : 2019.11.27
  • Accepted : 2020.04.20
  • Published : 2020.04.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Gamification can be more fun and interesting than boring and it can be used for variety of educational subjects. Through the fun and flow of the learner, the learner understands the meaning and context of the problem to be solved. It will be able to collect, analyze and creatively solve data in a way that computers understand. Training through gamification will be an effective and memorable coding education for the efficient learning of coding education among the newly designated compulsory education. It is considered to be highly useful as a convergence study to increase tourism experience. Currently, in the field of school, coding education is mainly conducted using entry and scratch, which are educational programming languages, and coding education using gamification is not extensively used in the current education field. It is also expected to be used to increase the tourism experience, and it can be used to enhance the learner's computational thinking ability and creativity.

게이미피케이션(Gamification)은 자칫 지루할 수 있는 학습 활동에 재미와 흥미를 줄 수 있으며 다양한 교육과 목에 활용할 수 있다. 또한, 학습자의 재미와 몰입을 통해 학습자는 해결해야 할 문제의 의미와 맥락을 이해하고, 컴퓨터가 이해하는 방법으로 자료를 수집, 분석하고 이를 창의적으로 해결할 수 있을 것이다. 새롭게 의무 교육으로 지정한 소프트웨어 교육 중 게이미피케이션을 통한 교육은 효과적이고 기억에 잘 남는 코딩교육이 될 것이며 관광경험 증대를 위한 융복합적 연구로써 활용도가 높을 것으로 사료된다. 현재 학교 현장에서는 주로 교육용 프로그램 언어인 엔트리와 스크래치 등을 활용해 코딩교육을 하고 있으며 게이미피케이션을 활용한 코딩교육은 현재 교육현장에서 적극적으로 활용되고 있지 않다. 게이미피케이션의 교육적인 요소와 재미, 흥미 요소의 활용을 통해 학습효과를 극대화할 수 있을 것이며 컴퓨팅 사고력 강화와 창의력을 높이는 데 활용할 수 있을 것이다. 또한, 소프트웨어 알고리즘의 개념과 원리 및 코딩의 순차적 구조에 대한 이해 학습에 적극적으로 활용할 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahmel Baytak. (2010). A case study of educational game design by and for kids. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 5242-5246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.853
  2. Y. J. Choi. (2017). Development and Implementation of Gamification-based Museum Education Program for Elementary School Students : Focused on The National Folk Museum of Korea. Master thesis, Seoul National University of Education.
  3. B. Lee, H. Byun & J. Cho. (2017). The impact of gamification on travel experience Academic Society of Event & Convention, 13(3), 117-133.
  4. N. Y. Kim. (2017). A Study on the effect of coding education and improvement of learning achievement using educational game. Journal of Korea Game Society, 17(4), 161-168. https://doi.org/10.7583/JKGS.2017.17.4.161
  5. Tao Xie. (2015). Where Software Engineering, Education, and Gaming Meet. Computer Games and Software Engineering, 132.
  6. Jakub Swacha. (2013). Gamification-based e-learning Platform for Computer Programming Education. X World Conference on Computers in Education.
  7. D. Y. Lee. (2011). What is Gamification and How Gamification will change our life?, Journal of Digital Design, 11(4), 449-457. https://doi.org/10.17280/JDD.2011.11.4.044
  8. H. S. Yun. (2009). A Study on the Fun Evaluation Model of MMORPG. Korea game Society, 6(1), 66-69.
  9. S. G. Yoo. (2009). The Effect of the Enjoyment Factor and Flow Experience of Leisure Sports on Participant's Leisure Satisfaction, Adherence and Word-of-mouth Intention Journal of Sport and Leisure Studies, 38, 1375-1390. https://doi.org/10.51979/KSSLS.2009.11.38.1375
  10. M. Jeong & I. Kim. (2019). Investigating Fun of Virtual Reality in Maximizing Participants' Satisfaction and Its Effect on Storytelling Intention in Game Exhibition. Tourism Research, 44(3), 197-211. https://doi.org/10.32780/KTIDOI.2019.44.3.197
  11. Y. Lee & B. Lee. (2019). Investigating the Relationships among Gamification Dynamics and Tourists' Fun, Flow, and Memorable Tourism Experiences, Journal of Tourism Sciences, 43(2), 205-227.
  12. H. J. Park. (2017). Analytical study of behavioral intention on visual representation elements of gamification utilized for educational application, Ph.D thesis. Yeungnam University, Daegu.
  13. J. H. Park. (2017). The elements of Gamification in John Dewey's pedagogy. Journal of Korea Game Society Apr; 17(2), 7-16. https://doi.org/10.7583/JKGS.2017.17.2.7
  14. M. Y. Lee. (2017). A Study of Early Childhood Teacher's Stage of Concern and Perception on Coding Education for Young Children, Master thesis, Kyungsung University, Busan.
  15. Kim S. W. (2017). The Effect of SW Coding Educationon Career Maturity, Level of the Social Contribution Consciousness for Scientifically Gifted Elementary Students and General Students, Master thesis. Gyeongin National University of Education, Incheon.
  16. Anabela Gomes. (2007). An environment to improve programming education. International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies, 4-19, 1-6.
  17. Mitchel Resnick. (2009). Scratch: Programming for All. Communications of the ACM, 51, 61-67. https://doi.org/10.1145/1327452.1327480
  18. U. W. Lee & J. Y. Lee. (2013). Analysis on structural relationships of leaner characteristics, interaction, flow, perceived usefulness and learning satisfaction in SMART education environments-with focus on elementary school. Educational Information Media Reserch, 19(3), 573-603.
  19. Y. H. Song. (2013). Identifying the Predictability of Presence and flow on Learning Outcomes in Elementary School Students Who Use Digital Mathematics Textbooks. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 17(1), 151-172. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2013.17.1.151
  20. J. Y. Park & M. H. Kang. (2015). Structural Relationships Among Learners' Characters, Learning Flow, and Thinking Ability in a SCRATCH Programming Course for Elementary School Students. The Journal of Elementary Education, 28(4), 145-170.
  21. I. B. Suk & E. C. Kang. (2007). Development and validation of the learning flow scale. Journal of Educational Technology, 23(1), 121-154. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.23.1.121
  22. I. Donna & P. Novak. (1996). Marketing in Hypermedia Computer_Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60. 50-68. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251841
  23. H. Y. Rim. (2017). A Study on Teaching using Website 'Code.org' in Programming Education based on Computational Thinking. Journal of Korea Multimedia Societ, 20(2), 382-395. https://doi.org/10.9717/kmms.2017.20.2.382
  24. Jeannette M. (2006). Computational Thinking", Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
  25. D. S. Kim. (2016). Software and computing thinking. Paju : Life and power press