Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Priority Decision of Cross-Compliance of Public-Benefit Direct Payment for Agriculture and Rural Area

농업·농촌 공익형 직불제 상호준수의무 우선순위 결정

  • Chae, Hong-Gi (Department of Agricultural Economics, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Se-Hyuk (Life and Industry Convergence Institute, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Kyun (Department of Agricultural Economics, Kyungpook National University)
  • 채홍기 (경북대학교 농업경제학과) ;
  • 김세혁 (부산대학교 생명산업융합연구원) ;
  • 김태균 (경북대학교 농업경제학과)
  • Received : 2020.01.10
  • Accepted : 2020.04.03
  • Published : 2020.04.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study analyzed the priorities of the cross-compliance items of public-benefit direct payment using an Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Decision Making Analysis. The valuation criteria are policy efficiency, farm acceptability, and feasibility, and the valuation targets are the basic and additional cross-compliance items. The survey was performed by targeting 50 experts from each class, and conducted for about a month starting from the beginning of July 2019. The results show that the weight of the valuation criteria is higher in the order of farm acceptability, feasibility, and policy efficiency. Compliance with PLS standards, compliance with disposal standards of waste vinyl and pesticides, soil testing, compliance with toxic substance standards, education, etc. are comparatively evaluated to be higher cross-compliance items in basic cross-compliance. Disposing of an abandoned well, jointly collecting and disposing of agricultural by-products, common area care and cleaning, maintenance of empty houses and poor facilities, growing green manure crops during the fallow period, etc. are comparatively evaluated to be higher cross-compliance items for the additional cross-compliance. The results of this study are expected to contribute to the government's policy related to the cross-compliance of public-benefit direct payment.

현재 정부는 공익형 직불제를 통해 농업의 공익적 기능을 제고하기 위해 노력하고 있지만, 상호준수의무 세부항목에 대한 연구는 미흡한 실정이다. 이에 본 연구는 평가기준을 이용한 정량적 연구방법인 계층화 분석법과 퍼지 다기준 의사결정법을 이용하여 공익형 직불제 상호준수의무의 우선순위를 결정하고 정책적 시사점을 도출하고자 한다. 평가기준은 정책의 효율성, 농가수용성, 실행가능성이고, 평가 대상은 기본형 상호준수의무 후보와 부가형 상호준수의무 후보이다. 조사대상은 사회과학계(16명), 자연과학계(15명), 정책 및 언론단체(13명), 농업인 단체(6명)의 전문가 50명이며, 2019년 7월부터 약 한 달간 설문조사를 실시하였다. 분석결과 평가기준의 가중치는 농가수용성, 실행가능성, 정책의 효율성 순으로 높게 나타났다. 기본형 상호준수의무의 우선순위는 PLS 기준준수, 폐비닐 및 농약병 폐기준수, 토양검정실시, 유해물질 허용 기준 준수, 교육이수 항목 등이 높게 평가되었다. 부가형 상호준수의무는 미사용지하수 관정 폐공처리, 농업부산물 공동수거 및 처리, 공동공간 관리 및 청소, 빈집 및 불량시설 정비, 휴경기 녹비작불 재배 및 토양환원 항목 등이 높은 순위로 평가되었다. 본 연구는 공익형 직불제의 개편과 함께 논의되고 있는 상호준수의무의 우선순위를 정량적인 방법으로 결정하였다는 점에서 의의가 있으며, 향후 공익형 직불제의 상호준수의무 도입을 위한 기초자료로 활용될 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. T. H. Kim, C. H. Yu, M. S. Jung, N. W. Oh, J. Y. Park, Detailed plan for reform of the agricultural direct payment system: Extension reorganization of a public-purpose direct payment, Korea Rural Economic Institute, Korea. pp.20-27, 2018.
  2. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Public-benefit direct payment system reorganization, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, c2018 [cited 2018 December 18], Available From: http://www.mafra.go.kr/2019plan/1727/subview.do (accessed Nov. 12, 2019)
  3. T. G. Kim, K. S. Chae, J. Y. Heo, A Study on the Detailed Implementation of a Public-purpose Direct Payment Program, Korea Rural Economic Institute, Korea, pp.11-19, 2010.
  4. H. S. Oh, J. B. Yim, J. I. Kim, Operation details and inspection system of the agricultural direct payment in the EU and US, Korea Rural Economic Institute, Korea. pp.22, 2018.
  5. T. Y. Kim, M. S. Bae, "Significance and Challenges of Public-purpose Direct payment", Research in Agriculture Policy, Vol.69, pp.60-106, Apr. 2019.
  6. R. W. Saaty, "The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used", Mathematical Modelling, Vol.9, No.3-5, pp.161-176, 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8
  7. T. W. Kim, "Priorities on Specialized Types of Agricultural Items by AHP in Hamyang", The Korean Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol.53, No.2, pp.73-90, June 2012.
  8. S. J. Kwak, J. S. Lee, "The Analysis of the House Demander's Preference on the Location Condition Factors in Cheonan", Journal of the Korean Regional Science Association, Vol.27, No.1, pp.69-82, Mar. 2011.
  9. S. J. Kwak, J. S. Lee, "Deduction of Attributes' Weight for Companies' Job Creation by Applying Fuzzy Decision Making Analysis", Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, Vol.16, No.11, pp.7971-7977, Nov. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2015.16.11.7971
  10. G. T. Jo, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Donghyun Publushers, pp.3-47, 2003.
  11. Y. K. Shin, C. G. Kim, T. Y. Kim, "An Priority Analysis of Agri-Environmental Policy Measures Using an Analytic Hierarchy Process", Journal of Rural Development, Vol.28, No.2, pp.37-54, July 2005.
  12. J. Y. Jeon, C. H. Rhew, E. S. Hwang, "A Study on Prioritizing Food Policy : Application of AHP", Korea Journal of Agricultural Management and Policy, Vol.43, No.1, pp.130-151, Mar. 2016.
  13. H. K. Choi, H. J. Kang, E. H. Oh, A. J. Kwon, A Study on the Development of Seven Major Social Welfare Satisfaction Indexes on the Perspective of the Consumer, National Assembly Research Service, Korea, pp.40-50, 2014.