아태비즈니스연구 (Asia-Pacific Journal of Business)

  • 제11권4호
  • /
  • Pages.65-81
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2233-5900(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-3934(eISSN)
강원대학교 경영경제연구소 (KNU The Institute of Management & Economy Research)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

친환경 제품 효익 제시 방법에 따른 친환경 제품 선택 비율 차이: 비금전적 제시 vs 쾌락적 편집 가설에 따른 금전적 제시

How Framing of the Benefits of Eco-friendly Products Alters Consumers' Choices: Non-Monetary Framing vs. Monetary Framing Following Hedonic Editing Hypothesis

  • 김준용 (한양대학교 ERICA 캠퍼스 경영학부) ;
  • 정성현 (한양대학교 전략경영학과)
  • Kim, Junyong (Division of Business, Hanyang University ERICA) ;
  • Jeong, Seonghyeon (Graduate Department of Strategic Management, Hanyang University)
  • 투고 : 2020.11.30
  • 심사 : 2020.12.21
  • 발행 : 2020.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose - This research aims to investigate how consumers' eco-friendly product choice ratio changes as the benefits of eco-friendly products are framed as (1) non-monetary benefits, (2) monetary gain integrated with the loss or (3) monetary gain segregated from the loss. Design/methodology/approach - A mixed-design, scenario-based choice experiment was conducted. A series of chi-square tests and residual analyses were conducted to analyze the data. Findings - When the monetary gain was larger or slightly smaller than the loss, the participants' eco-friendly product choice ratio was higher when the monetary gain was integrated with the loss than those in the other two conditions. When the monetary gain was significantly smaller than the loss, the participants' eco-friendly product choice ratio was lower when the monetary gain was integrated with the loss than those in the other conditions. The ratio did not differ between the latter two conditions. Research implications or Originality - This research shows that marketers should frame the benefits of eco-friendly products and their costs in different manners depending on the relative magnitudes of them. This research also complements the existing literature by comparing the effectiveness of non-monetary framing of eco-friendly product benefits with that of monetary framing following hedonic editing hypothesis.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 박영민 (2020, 7월 24일), "정부, 친환경 일자리 '그린뉴딜' 국제사회에 알린다", ZDNET Korea, https://zdnet.co.kr/view/?no=20200724085816
  2. 산업통상자원부 (2018, 1월 16일), 2017년 자동차 산업 동향, 보도 자료, https://goo.gl/L5H4Jf
  3. 정보희, 김한구 (2014), "소형 하이브리드 자동차 시장에서 소비자의 추구 가치와 친환경 메시지 프레이밍 (message framing) 이 제품 선호도에 미치는 영향", 마케팅관리연구, 19(3), 139-186.
  4. Anderson, C. D. and J. D. Claxton (1982), "Barriers to Consumer Choice of Energy Efficient Products", Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 163-170. https://doi.org/10.1086/208909
  5. Arkes, H. R., D. Hirshleifer, D. Jiang and S. Lim (2008), "Reference Point Adaptation: Tests in the Domain of Security Trading", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105(1), 67-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.04.005
  6. Atlas, S. A. and D. M. Bartels (2018), "Periodic Pricing and Perceived Contract Benefits", Journal of Consumer Research, 45(2), 350-364.
  7. Camilleri, A. R. and R. P. Larrick (2014), "Metric and Scale Design as Choice Architecture Tools", Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 33(1), 108-125. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.12.151
  8. Camerer, C. and M. Weber (1992), "Recent Developments in Modeling Preferences: Uncertainty and Ambiguity", Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 325-370. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122575
  9. Cesarini, D., O. Sandewall and M. Johannesson (2006), "Confidence Interval Estimation Tasks and the Economics of Overconfidence", Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 61(3), 453-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2004.10.010
  10. Chang, C. (2004), "Country of Origin as a Heuristic Cue: The Effects of Message Ambiguity and Product Involvement", Media Psychology, 6(2), 169-192. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0602_3
  11. Chatterjee, S., T. B. Heath, S. J. Milberg and K. R. France (2000), "The Differential Processing of Price in Gains and Losses: The Effects of Frame and Need for Cognition", Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(1), 61-75. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1<61::AID-BDM343>3.0.CO;2-J
  12. Chu, H. and S. Liao (2010), "Buying While Expecting to Sell: The Economic Psychology of Online Resale", Journal of Business Research, 63(9-10), 1073-1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.03.023
  13. Cummings, R. G., G. W. Harrison and E. E. Rutstrom (1995), "Homegrown Values and Hypothetical Surveys: Is the Dichotomous Choice Approach Incentive-Compatible?", The American Economic Review, 85(1), 260-266.
  14. Diekmann, A. and P. Preisendorfer (2003), "Green and Greenback: The Behavioral Effects of Environmental Attitudes in Low-Cost and High-Cost Situations", Rationality and Society, 15(4), 441-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463103154002
  15. Di Mauro, C. and A. Maffioletti (2004), "Attitudes to Risk and Attitudes to Uncertainty: Experimental Evidence", Applied Economics, 36(4), 357-372. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840410001674286
  16. Evans, A. M. and J. I. Krueger (2017), "Ambiguity and Expectation Neglect in Dilemmas of Interpersonal Trust", Judgment and Decision Making, 12(6), 584-595.
  17. Ferreira, D. A., M. G. Avila and M. D. De Faria (2010), "Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumers' Perception of Price", Social Responsibility Journal, 6(2), 208-221. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471111011051720
  18. Gardner, G. T. and P. C. Stern (1996), Environmental Problems and Human Behavior, Allyn & Bacon.
  19. Greenleaf, E. A., E. J. Johnson, V. G. Morwitz and E. Shalev (2016), "The Price Does Not Include Additional Taxes, Fees, and Surcharges: A Review of Research on Partitioned Pricing", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(1), 105-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2015.04.006
  20. Griskevicius, V., J. M. Tybur and B. Van den Bergh (2010), "Going Green to Be Seen: Status, Reputation, and Conspicuous Conservation", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392-404. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017346
  21. Harinck, F., I. Van Beest, E. Van Dijk and M. Van Zeeland (2012), "Measurement-Induced Focusing and The Magnitude of Loss Aversion: The Difference Between Comparing Gains to Losses and Losses to Gains", Judgment and Decision Making, 7(4), 462-471.
  22. Heath, T. B., S. Chatterjee and K. R. France (1995), "Mental Accounting and Changes in Price: The Frame Dependence of Reference Dependence", Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1), 90-97. https://doi.org/10.1086/209437
  23. Heinzle, S. L. (2012), "Disclosure of Energy Operating Cost Information: A Silver Bullet for Overcoming the Energy-Efficiency Gap?", Journal of Consumer Policy, 35(1), 43-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-012-9189-6
  24. Ho, J. L., L. R. Keller and P. Keltyka (2002), "Effects of Outcome and Probabilistic Ambiguity on Managerial Choices", Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 24(1), 47-74. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013277310399
  25. Hogarth, R. M. and H. J. Einhorn (1990), "Venture theory: A Model of Decision Weights", Management Science, 36(7), 780-803. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.7.780
  26. Hopkins, M. S. and C. Roche, (2009), "What the 'Green' Consumer Wants", MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(4), 87-89.
  27. Hsee, C. K. and J. Zhang, (2010), "General Evaluability Theory", Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 343-355. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610374586
  28. Kahneman, D. (2011), Thinking Fast and Slow, New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
  29. Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky (1979), "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decisions Under Risk", Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
  30. Kim, H. M. (2006), "The Effect of Salience on Mental Accounting: How Integration versus Segregation of Payment Influences Purchase Decisions", Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19(4), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.534
  31. Kocher, M. G., A. M. Lahno and S. T. Trautmann (2018), "Ambiguity Aversion is Not Universal", European Economic Review, 101, 268-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.09.016
  32. Lacey, R., A. G. Close and R. Z. Finney (2010), "The Pivotal Roles of Product Knowledge and Corporate Social Responsibility in Event Sponsorship Effectiveness", Journal of Business Research, 63(11), 1222-1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.11.001
  33. Lanzini, P. and J. Thogersen (2014), "Behavioural Spillover in the Environmental Domain: An Intervention Study", Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 381-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.09.006
  34. Lee, S. and Y. Yi (2019). "Retail is Detail! Give Consumers a Gift Rather than a Bundle: Promotion Framing and Consumer Product Returns", Psychology & Marketing, 36(1), 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21154
  35. Lehenkari, M. (2009), "The Hedonic Editing Hypothesis: Evidence from the Finnish Stock Market", The Journal of Behavioral Finance, 10(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427560902719497
  36. Leighty, W. and A. Meier (2011), "Accelerated Electricity Conservation in Juneau, Alaska: A Study of Household Activities that Reduced Demand 25%", Energy Policy, 39(5), 2299-2309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.041
  37. Lim, S. S. (2006), "Do Investors Integrate Losses and Segregate Gains? Mental Accounting and Investor Trading Decisions", The Journal of Business, 79(5), 2539-2573. https://doi.org/10.1086/505243
  38. Lin, P. C. and Y. H. Huang (2012), "The Influence Factors on Choice Behavior Regarding Green Products Based on the Theory of Consumption Values", Journal of Cleaner Production, 22(1), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.002
  39. Lopes, L. L. (1984), "Risk and Distributional Inequality", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(4), 465-485. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.10.4.465
  40. Lopes, L. L. (1987), "Between Hope and Fear: The Psychology of Risk", In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 255-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60416-5
  41. Machina, M. (1987), "Choice under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved", Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1(1), 121-154. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.1.1.121
  42. McCarty, J. A. and L. J. Shrum (1994), "The Recycling of Solid Wastes: Personal Values, Value Orientations, and Attitudes about Recycling as Antecedents of Recycling Behavior", Journal of Business Research, 30(1), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(94)90068-X
  43. McKenzie, C. R., M. J. Liersch and I. Yaniv (2008), "Overconfidence in Interval Estimates: What Does Expertise Buy You?", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107(2), 179-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.02.007
  44. Mutz, D. C. and R. Pemantle (2015), "Standards for Experimental Research: Encouraging a Better Understanding of Experimental Methods", Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2(2), 192-215. https://doi.org/10.1017/xps.2015.4
  45. Olsen, M. C., R. J. Slotegraaf and S. R. Chandukala (2014), "Green Claims and Message Frames: How Green New Products Change Brand Attitude", Journal of Marketing, 78(5), 119-137. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.13.0387
  46. Onkal, D., J. F. Yates, C. Simga-Mugan and S. Oztin (2003), "Professional vs. Amateur Judgment Accuracy: The Case of Foreign Exchange Rates", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91(2), 169-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00058-X
  47. Ozaki, R. and K. Sevastyanova (2011), "Going Hybrid: An Analysis of Consumer Purchase Motivations", Energy Policy, 39(5), 2217-2227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.024
  48. Papista, E. and A. Krystallis (2013), "Investigating the Types of Value and Cost of Green Brands: Proposition of a Conceptual Framework", Journal of Business Ethics, 115(1), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1367-6
  49. Renfro, L. A. (2010), "Green Business Operations and Green Marketing", Gatton Student Research Publication, 2(2), 1-8.
  50. Romani, S., S. Grappi, and R. P. Bagozzi (2016), "Corporate Socially Responsible Initiatives and Their Effects on Consumption of Green Products", Journal of Business Ethics, 135(2), 253-264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2485-0
  51. Saqib, N. U., N. Frohlich and E. Bruning (2010), "The Influence of Involvement on the Endowment Effect: The Moveable Value Function", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(3), 355-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2010.06.019
  52. Schuhwerk, M. E. and R. Lefkoff-Hagius (1995), "Green or Non-Green? Does Type of Appeal Matter When Advertising a Green Product?", Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1995.10673475
  53. Schwartz, D., W. Bruine de Bruin, B. Fischhoff and L. Lave (2015), "Advertising Energy Saving Programs: The Potential Environmental Cost of Emphasizing Monetary Savings", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 21(2), 158. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000042
  54. Sharpe, D. (2015), "Your Chi-square Test is Statistically Significant: Now What?", Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 20(8), 1-10.
  55. Shen, J. and T. Saijo (2009), "Does An Energy Efficiency Label Alter Consumers' Purchasing Decisions? A Latent Class Approach Based on a Stated Choice Experiment in Shanghai", Journal of Environmental Management, 90(11), 3561-3573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.010
  56. Soll, J. B. and J. Klayman (2004), "Overconfidence in Interval Estimates", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 299-314. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.299
  57. Taylor, S. (1991), "Asymmetrical Effects of Positive and Negative Events: The Mobilization-Minimization Hypothesis", Psychological Bulletin, 110 (1), 67-85. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.67
  58. Thakur, S. and R. Aurora (2015), "Consumer Preferences Change When It Comes to Green Marketing", International Journal of Recent Research Aspects, 2(2), 245-255.
  59. Thaler, R. (1985), "Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice", Marketing Science, 4(3), 199-214. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.4.3.199
  60. Thaler, R. (1999), "Mental Accounting Matters", Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12(3), 183-206. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199909)12:3<183::AID-BDM318>3.0.CO;2-F
  61. Thaler, R. and E. Johnson (1990), "Gambling with the House Money and Trying to Break Even: The Effects of Prior Outcomes on Risky Choice", Management Science, 36(6), 643-660. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.6.643
  62. The Nielsen Company (2015, Oct), "The Sustainability Imperative: New Insights on Consumer Expectations", http://bitly.kr/ JNJpe6.
  63. Thieme, J., M. B. Royne, S. Jha, M. Levy and W. B. McEntee (2015), "Factors Affecting the Relationship Between Environmental Concern and Behaviors", Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 33(5), 675-690. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-08-2014-0149
  64. Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman, (1992), "Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty", Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122574
  65. Tversky, A. and E. Shafir (1992), "The Disjunction Effect in Choice under Uncertainty", Psychological Science, 3(5), 305-310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00678.x
  66. UNEP (2016). "United Nations Environment Assembly of UNEP", http://bitly.kr/9dDvM3.
  67. Van Dijk, E. and M. Zeelenberg (2003), "The Discounting of Ambiguous Information in Economic Decision Making", Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16(5), 341-352. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.450
  68. White, K., D. J. Hardisty and R. Habib (2019), "The Elusive Green Consumer", Harvard Business Review, 11(July-August), 124-133.
  69. Yaniv, I. and D. P. Foster (1997), "Precision and Accuracy of Judgmental Estimation", Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10(1), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199703)10:1<21::AID-BDM243>3.0.CO;2-G