한국환경복원기술학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology)

  • 제23권1호
  • /
  • Pages.37-48
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1229-3032(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-5011(eISSN)
한국환경복원기술학회 (The Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

중요생물다양성지역(KBAs) 기준 적용을 통한 설악산 보호구역 평가

Assesment of Protected Mt. Seorak Areas in Korea Applied by the Key Biodiversity Areas(KBAs)

  • 성정원 (국립백두대간수목원 기획운영본부) ;
  • 강신구 (산림청 수목원조성사업단) ;
  • 김근호 (영남대학교 산림자원 및 조경학과)
  • Sung, Jung-Won (Division of Planning and Operations, Baekdudaegan National Arboretum) ;
  • Kang, Shin-Gu (Department of Arboretum Development Project, Korea Forest Service) ;
  • Kim, Keun-Ho (Department of Forest Resources and Landscape Architecture, Yeungnam University)
  • 투고 : 2019.11.12
  • 심사 : 2020.02.20
  • 발행 : 2020.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study was aimed to design core areas applied by the global conservation criteria to promote the public awareness to the protected areas and the value cognition of the Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs), targeting the Mt Seorak, according to the designation of globally important biodiversity areas. As a method for carrying out this study, the biota were cataloged through literature reviews and field trips. With applied by the Global Red List criteria of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), only nine species were categorized in the studied area; plants were classified into six species as follows: Megaleranthis saniculifolia ohwi, Bupleurum euphorbioides Nakai, Hanabusaya asiatica Nakai, Thuja koraiensis Nakai, Leontopodium leiolepis Nakai, Androsace cortusaefolia Nakai, fish was classified one species as follow: Pungitius sinensis Tanaka, and the mammal was classified as two species as follows: Hydropotes inermis, Naemorhedus caudatus. According to the occupation area (EoO, Extent of Occurrence) and Minimum Viable Population(MVP), the size of protected area was 234.56㎢ for plants, 235.07㎢ for mammals, and 0.14㎢ for fish, and the Key Biodiversity Area (KBA) of Mt. Seolak suggested as 286.72㎢.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Fahrig, L. and G. Merriam. 1994. Conservation of fragmented populations. Conservation biology, 8(1) : 50-59. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08010050.x
  2. Gang, H. S.. J. Y. Kim and K. Park. 2005. Habitat Connectivity between Soraksan and Odaesan National Parks with a Consideration of Wildlife Home Range, Kor, J. Env. Eco, 19(2) : 150-161.(in Korean)
  3. Han, S. Y. 1998. The Ecological studies of eurasian otter(Lutra lutra) in South Korea. Ph.D. Dissertation, Univ. of Kyungnam, Changwon, 112.(in Korean)
  4. Hong, M. P.. H. J. Lee. Y. M Chun and B. R. Hong. 2010. Flora of Mt. Seorak, Gangwondo. Kor. J. Env. Eco, 24(4): 436-486.(in Korean)
  5. Hong, J. P. and Shim, Y. J. 2018. Development of an Integrated Evaluation Method for National Protected Areas Based on Aichi Biodiversity Target 11, J. Korean. Env. Res. Tech. 21(1) : 83-94.(in Korean)
  6. Hong, J. P..Shim, Y. J and Heo, H. Y. 2017. Identifying Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures for Expanding National Protected Areas, Korean. Env. Res. Tech. 20(6) : 93-105.(in Korean)
  7. IUCN, 2001. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria version 3.1. IUCN
  8. IUCN, 2007. Identification and Gap Analysis of Key Biodiversity Areas Targets for Comprehensive Protected Area Systems. IUCN. 134.
  9. Jang, M. H.. G. I. Cho. J. Y. Ha. K. S. Jeong. S. B. Park and G. J. Joo. 2002. Fish Distribution in Seorak National Park, Korea. Korean J. Ichthyol. 14(4) : 278-288.(in Korean)
  10. Jo, J. W.. K. C. Kim. G, H. Kwun. G, W. Ki m. B. K. Lee. B. C. Song and J. G. Park. 2015. Current status of population size and habitat selection of the long-tailed goral (Naemorhedus caudatus) in Seorakans National Park. Kor. J. Env. Eco. 29(5) : 710-717.(in Korean) https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2015.29.5.710
  11. Kim, Y. S.. K. H. Kang. J. K. Bae and H. T. Shin. 1997. Flora of Oesorak in Soraksan Nation Park. Kor. J. Env. Eco. 10(2) : 211-239.(in Korean)
  12. Kim, Y. S.. D. O. Lim. S. H. Chun. K. H. Kang and H. T. Shin. 1998. Flora of Naesorak in Soraksan National Park. Kor. J. Env. Eco. 11(4) : 415-432.(in Korean)
  13. Kim, T. W and S. H. Chun. 1992. A study on flora and vegetation structure of alpine region around Daecheong peak in Mt. Seolag area. Seoul National Univ. Col. of Agric. Rec. 12 : 1-12.(in Korean)
  14. Kim, S. J. 2019. The study on identifying Key Biodiversity Areas(KBAs) based on the flora of Demilitarized Zone(DMZ) and transboundary in Korea. Yeongnaml National Univ. 255.(in Korean)
  15. Korea National Park Service, 2005. Resource Monitoring for Sorak National Park.: Fourth year. Sorak Management office of Korea National Park Service, 443.(in Korean)
  16. Korea National Park Service, 2006. A Study on the Application of IUCN Category to Protected Areas in Korea Focus on Korea National Park, 150.(in Korean)
  17. Korea National Park Service, 2010. Survey of Natural Resources in Seoraksan National Park. Korea National Park Service, 698.(in Korean)
  18. Kwon, Y. S. 2013. A Study on Avian Distribution and Conservation Strategies in National Parks, South Korea. Proc. Korean Soc. Environ. Ecol. Con. 23(2) : 16-17.(in Korean)
  19. Langhammer, P. F.. M. I. Bakarr. L. A. Bennun. T. M. Brooks. R. P. Clay. W. Darwall. N. DeSilva. G. J. Edgar. G. Eken. L. D. Fishpool. G. A. Da Fonseca. M. N. Foster. D. H. Knox. P. Matiku. E. A. Radford. A. S. Rodrigues. P. Salaman. W. Sechrest and A. W. Tordoff. 2007a. Identification and Gap Analysis of Key Biodiversity Areas: Targets for Comprehensive Protected Area Systems. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
  20. Langhammer, P. F.. M. I. Bakarr. L. Bennun and T. M. Brooks. 2007b. Identification and gap analysis of key biodiversity areas: targets for comprehensive protected area systems (No. 15). IUCN.
  21. Lee, K. I.. J. H. Hwang. R. I. Jang. J. E. Ryu and S. W. Jeon. 2018. Study on the Appropriate Spatial unit to Measure Biodi- versity Using National Ecosystem Survey Data. J. Korean. Env. Res. Tech. 21(5) : 29-37.(in Korean)
  22. Margules, C. R and R. L. Pressey. 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405 : 243-253. https://doi.org/10.1038/35012251
  23. Ministry of Environment, 2005. Endemic species of Korea. Ministry of Environment, 458.(in Korean)
  24. Ministry of Environment, Korea National Park Service, Jejudo and IUCN, 2009. Protect Area of Korea 'Evaluation of effectiveness on the protected area system'. Ministry of Environment, 149.(in Korean)
  25. Ministry of Environment and National Institute of Biological Resources, 2010. 2010 Winter Bird Simultaneous Sensing. National Institute of Biological Resources, Incheon, 588. (in Korean)
  26. National Institute of Environmental Research, 2010. 2010 A Study on the Ecosystem of Baekdudaegan Protection Area. National Institute of Environmental Research, 174.(in Korean).
  27. Olson, D. M. and E. Dinerstein. 1998. The Global 200: a representation approach to conserving the Earth’s most biologically valuable ecoregions. Conservation Biology 12 : 502-515. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.012003502.x
  28. Park, K. H.. J. I. Son and J. H. Gwon. 2011. A Study on Vascular Plants around the Seobuk -Ridgeline of Seoraksan National Park. Journal of National park Research 2(1) : 19-32.(in Korean)
  29. Park, B. S. 1998. Herpetofauna in Sǒraksan National Park. Kor. J. Env. Eco. 10(2) : 184-190.(in Korean)
  30. Park, J. Y. 2002. Current status and distribution of birds in Korea. Ph. D. Dissertation, Univ. of Kyunghee, Seoul, 530.(in Korean)
  31. Pressey, R. L.. Johnson, I. R and P. D. Wilson. 1994. Shades of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution of sites to a reservation goal. Biodiversity & Conservation, 3(3) : 242-262. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055941
  32. Pressey, R. L and K. H. Taffs. 2001. Scheduling conservation action in production landscapes: priority areas in western New South Wales defined by irreplaceability and vulnerability to vegetation loss. Biological Conservation, 100(3) : 355-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00039-8
  33. Shaffer, M. L. 1981. Minimum population sizes for species conservation. BioScience, 31(2) : 131-134. https://doi.org/10.2307/1308256
  34. Shaffer, M. L. 1990. Population viability analysis. Conservation biology, 4(1) : 39-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00265.x
  35. Shin, H. T. 1997. Study on the Size of Plant Community in Fragmented Habitats. M.S. Thesis, Univ. of Yeungnam, Gyeongsan, 41 (in Korean).
  36. Son, S. H.. J. Y. Kim. J. I. Jo and D. S. Kong. 2011. Altitudinal Distribution Aspect of Benthic Macroinvertebrates in a Mountain Stream of Seoraksan. Kournal of Korean Society on Water Quality 27(5) : 680-688(in Korean).
  37. Suzuki, K.. T. Shimamoto. Y. Takizawa. H. Kamigaichi. M. Ando and H. Yanagawa. 2011. Nest site characteristics of Pteromys momonga in the Tanzawa Mountains. Journal of the Mam- malogical Society of Japan 51(1) : 65-69.
  38. Way, D. S. 1978 Terrain analysis. A guide to site selection using aerial photographic interpretation. Van Nostrand. New York. 400.