Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship (벤처창업연구)

The Korean Society of Business Venturing (한국벤처창업학회)
권호 표지

Impact of Information Orientation and Technology Commercialization Capability on Technical Performance: Focusing on Mediating Effect of Technology Commercialization Capacity and Moderating Effect of Technology Accumulation Capacity

정보지향성과 기술사업화능력이 기술성과에 미치는 영향: 기술사업화능력의 매개효과 및 기술축적역량의 조절효과 중심으로

  • Han, Sung Hyun (Dept. of Management Information, Graduate School of Venture, Hoseo University) ;
  • Heo, Chul Moo (Dept. of Management Information, Graduate School of Venture, Hoseo University)
  • 한성현 (호서대학교 벤처대학원) ;
  • 허철무 (호서대학교 벤처대학원)
  • Received : 2019.12.22
  • Accepted : 2020.02.19
  • Published : 2020.02.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study analyzed the effects of information orientation and technology commercialization ability on technological performance of corporate workers. Information Orientation consisted of information technology capability, information management ability, information behavior and value, and technology commercialization capability consisted of productization capability, production capability, and marketing capability as sub-variables, and technology accumulation capacity was used as a coordinating variable. An empirical analysis was performed on 349 online and offline questionnaires collected from corporate employees. Analysis results using SPSS v22.0 and Process macro v3.4 First, information orientation and technical performance were found to have a significant effect.In addition, information orientation had a significant effect on technology commercialization capability. The magnitude of the influence on the productive capacity and the productive capacity in the variable of competency was in the order of information technology ability, information management ability, information behavior and value, but the influence on marketing capability was different from the previous results. Information management ability and information technology ability were in order. Second, the product commercialization capability, production capability, and marketing ability of technology commercialization ability had a significant effect on technology performance independently of information orientation. Third, the information technology ability and information management ability had a significant influence on the technical performance, but the indirect effect through the commercialization ability and marketing ability in information behavior and value was significant, the indirect effect of transit was not significant. Fourth, only the interaction terms of production capacity and technology accumulation capacity were significant among the sub-variables of technology commercialization capacity, and technology accumulation capacity, commercialization capacity, and marketing ability were not significant. Therefore, the relationship between productive capacity and technological performance can be interpreted as lower in firms with high technology accumulating ability than in lower firms, subsequent studies will require the introduction of other independent variables, models through the introduction of parameters and control variables.

본 연구는 기업 근무자를 대상으로 정보지향성과 기술사업화능력이 기술성과에 미치는 영향에 관하여 분석하였다. 정보지향성은 정보기술능력, 정보관리능력, 정보행위 및 가치를 기술사업화능력은 제품화능력, 생산화능력, 마케팅능력을 하위변수로 구성하였고 기술축적역량을 조절변수로 하였다. 기업 직장인으로부터 수집한 온라인과 오프라인 설문지 349부에 대한 실증분석을 실시하였다. SPSS v22.0과 Process macro v3.4를 사용한 분석결과 첫째, 정보지향성과 기술성과는 유의적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났고, 정보지향성이 기술사업화능력에 미치는 영향에서는 모두 유의적으로 나타났고, 기술사업화능력의 변수에서 제품화능력과 생산화능력에 미치는 영향력의 크기는 정보기술능력, 정보관리능력, 정보행위 및 가치의 순으로 나타났으나, 마케팅역량에 미치는 영향에서는 앞선 결과와 다르게 정보행위 및 가치, 정보관리능력, 정보기술능력의 순으로 나타났다. 둘째, 기술사업화능력이 기술성과에 미치는 영향에서 정보지향성과 독립적으로 기술사업화능력의 제품화능력, 생산화능력, 마케팅능력은 기술성과에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 정보기술능력과 정보관리능력은 기술성과에 유의적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으나, 정보행위 및 가치에서 제품화능력과 마케팅능력을 경유하는 간접효과는 유의적으로 나타났으나, 생산화능력을 경유하는 간접효과는 비유의적으로 나타났다. 넷째, 기술사업화능력의 하위변수 중 생산화능력과 기술축적 역량의 상호작용항만이 유의적으로 나타났고, 기술축적역량과 제품화능력, 마케팅능력은 비유의적으로 나타났다. 그러므로 생산화능력과 기술성과 간의 관계가 기술축적능력이 높은 기업이 낮은 기업보다 낮을 것이라고 해석할 수 있으며 후속 연구로는 다른 독립변수의 도입, 매개변수 및 조절변수가 도입된 모형을 통한 연구가 필요할 것으로 보인다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bowen, H. K., Holloway, C. A., & Clark, K. B.(1994). The perpetual enterprise machine: Seven keys to corporate renewal through successful product and process development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Chen, C. J.(2009). Technology commercialization, incubator and venture capital and new venture performance. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 93-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.003
  3. Cho, B. J., Sim, C., & Lim, J. S.(2002). An Impact of Market Orientation and Creating Knowledge Competence on the Competitive Advantage of New Products in Korean Venture Business. Journal of Marketing Management Research, 7(1), 1-23.
  4. Cho, M. Y., & Yang, D. W.(2014). The Empirical study on relationship between the degree of preparation and the R&D performance of technology based startup companies. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 9(6), 65-77. https://doi.org/10.16972/APJBVE.9.6.201412.65
  5. Choi, J. Y.(2015). A Study on the Effects of Technology Commercialization Competences, Information Orientation, Entrepreneurial Orientationon Creative Environment and Firm Performances in Technology-based SMEs. Doctoral dissertation, Gachon University.
  6. Clark, K. B., & Fujimoto, T.(1991). Product development performance: Strategy, organization and management in the world auto industry. Boston: HBS Press.
  7. Cooper, R.(1986). Winning at new products. MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
  8. Cooper, R. G.(2000). Product innovation and technology strategy. Research-Technology Management, 43(1), 38-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2000.11671329
  9. Damanpour, F., & Evan, W. M.(1984). Organizational innovation and performance: the problem of organizational lag. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3), 392-409. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393031
  10. Gatignon, H., & Xuereb, J. M.(1997). Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379703400107
  11. Grant, R. M.(1991). Porter's 'competitive advantage of nation and assessment. Strategic Management Journal, 12(7), 535-548. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120706
  12. Han, J. W.(2018). The Relationship among Organizational Creativity, Information Orientation, Technology Commercialization Capability and Firm Performane. Doctoral dissertation, Gachon University.
  13. Hayes, A. F.(2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.962683
  14. Hayes, A. F.(2018). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis(2nd Ed.). NY: The Guilford Press.
  15. Homburg, C., & Pflesser, C.(2000). Market research: methods - applications: practical examples. Wiesbaden: Gabler.
  16. Hwang, K. Y., Sung, E. U., & Moon, H. C.(2016). The Impact of Learning Capability and Knowledge Creation on Technology Commercialization and Export Performance. Management & Information Systems Review, 35(5), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.29214/damis.2016.35.5.001
  17. Jeon, I. O.(2017). The Impact of Entrepreneurship on Corporate Performance: Focusing on the Effects of Technological Innovation and Marketing Competence. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 12(3), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.12.3.201706.87
  18. Jeon, J. I.(2019). A Study on the Effects of Absorption Capability, Technological Innovation Capability, and Technology Commercialization Capability on New Product Performance in SMEs. Doctoral dissertation, Myongji University.
  19. Jolley, V. K.(1997). Commercializing new technologies: Getting from mind to market. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
  20. Jung, H. S.(2016). Impact of Organizational Resources, Absorption Capacity and Innovative Capabilities on the Technology Commercialization Competences. Doctoral dissertation, Kyungil University.
  21. Kim, G. T.(2016). The Study on Effect of Technology Commercialization Activities in the Company's Performance. Doctoral dissertation, Kon-Kuk University.
  22. Kim, S. K.(2009). A Study on Technology Innovation Performance through R&D Capability and Technology Commercialization Capability of IT SME. Doctoral dissertation, Yonsei University.
  23. Ko, D. K.(2003). A Study on the Performance Improvement of New Product Development by Implementing R&D Six Sigma. Doctoral dissertation, KonKuk University.
  24. Ko, Y. K.(2017). A Study on the Effect of Business Models of Technology-Based Enterprises on Technology Commercialization Performance. Doctoral dissertation, Soongsil University.
  25. Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J.(1990). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400301
  26. Lee, D. S., & Chung, L. C.(2010). A Study on the Effect of Technological Innovation Capability and Technology Commercialization Capability on Business Performance in SMEs of Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Small Business, 32(1), 65-87.
  27. Lee, H. Y.(2012). Research Methodology, Seoul: Cheonglam.
  28. Lee, J. H.(2000). Comparative analyses of new product success and failure between Korea and U.S. Doctoral dissertation, KAIST.
  29. Lee, J. H.(2018). The Effect of R&D Capacity on Technology Commercialization Performancein Medical Device Manufacturing Companies. Doctoral dissertation, KonKuk University.
  30. Lee, J. M.(2014). A Study on theEffects of Firms' Technology Management Capability on their Performances. Doctoral dissertation, KonKuk University.
  31. Lee, S. H.(2012). The study on the Effectof R&D Investment and Technology Commercialization Capabilities on Business Performance. Master's Thesis, Sungkyunkwan University.
  32. Lee, T. H.(2017). A Study on the Information Orientation & Technology Commercialization Ability, Transformational Leadership on Management Performance. Doctoral dissertation, Korea Polytechnic University.
  33. Lee, Y. D.(2005). Understanding of new technology commercialization. Seoul: Dunam.
  34. Lin, B. W., Lee, Y., & Hung, S. C.(2006). R&D intensity and commercialization orientation effects on financial performance. Journal of Business Research, 59(6), 679-685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.01.002
  35. Marchand, D. A., Kettinger, W. J., & Rollins, J. D.(2001). Information orientation: The link to business performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  36. Mitchell, W., & Singh, K.(1996). Survival of business using collaborative relationships to commercialize complex goods. Strategic Management Journal, 17(3), 169-195. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199603)17:3<169::AID-SMJ801>3.0.CO;2-#
  37. Narver, J., & Slater, S.(1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability, Journal of Marketing. 54(4), 20-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400403
  38. Nevens, T. M.(1990). Commercializing technology: What the best companies do. Planning Review, 18(6), 20-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb054310
  39. Park, J. B.(2016). Factors Influencing on Technology Commercialization in Printed Electronics Industry. Master's Thesis, Sungkyunkwan University.
  40. Ryu, G. H.(2016). The Effects of Technology Innovation ability, Technology Commercialization ability and R&D intensity on The R&D Performance. Doctoral dissertation, Anyang University.
  41. Song, X. M., & Parry, M. E.(1997). A cross-national comparative study of new product development processes: Japan and the United State. The Journal of Marketing, 61(April), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299706100201
  42. Yam, R. C., Guan, J. C., Pun, K. F., & Tang, E. P.(2004). An audit of technological innovation capabilities in Chinese firms: some empirical findings in Beijing. China. Research Policy, 33(8), 1123-1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.05.004
  43. Yap, C. M., & Souder, W. E.(1994). Factors influencing new product success and failure in small entrepreneurial high-technology electronics firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11(5), 418-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1150418
  44. Yeo, I. G.(2013). Technology Commercialization Theory and Practice. Paju: Hakhyunsa.