DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ice Floe-induced Ship Resistances using Explicit Finite Element Analyses with a User-subroutine

사용자-서브루틴과 양해법 유한 요소 해석을 이용한 선박의 유빙 저항 추정

  • Han, Donghwa (Dept. of Naval Architecture & Ocean Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Paik, Kwang-Jun (Dept. of Naval Architecture & Ocean Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Jeong, Seong-Yeop (Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering (KRISO)) ;
  • Choung, Joonmo (Dept. of Naval Architecture & Ocean Engineering, Inha University)
  • 한동화 (인하대학교 조선해양공학과) ;
  • 백광준 (인하대학교 조선해양공학과) ;
  • 정성엽 (선박해양플랜트연구소) ;
  • 정준모 (인하대학교 조선해양공학과)
  • Received : 2019.12.24
  • Accepted : 2020.02.11
  • Published : 2020.04.20

Abstract

There have been many attempts to predict resistance of vessels in ice floe environment, but they mostly have both strong and weak points at the same time; for instance, simplified formulas are very fast but less flexible to types of ship and ice conditions and other numerical techniques need high computing cost for increased accuracy. A new numerical simulation technique of combining explicit finite element analysis code with a user-subroutine to control real-time forces acting on ice floes was proposed, thereby it was possible to predict ship-to-ice floe resistance with higher convenience and accuracy than other proposed approaches. The basic theory on how real-time hydrostatic and hydrodynamic forces acting on ice floes could be generated using user-subroutine was explained. The heave motion of a single ice floe was simulated using the user-subroutine and the motion amplitudes and periods were almost consistent with analytic values. Towing tests of an icebreaker model ship were simulated using explicit finite element analyses with the user-subroutine. The ice-induced resistance obtained from the towing experiments and simulations showed significant differences. Intentional increase of the drag coefficient to increase the contact duration between the ice floes and rigid model ship leaded the total resistance to be substantially consistent between the model tests and numerical simulations.

Keywords

References

  1. An, W.S., Lee, T.K., & Hwang, M.R., 2018. Calculation of fatigue life of bow frame of ARAON considering navigating in ice and open waters. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology, 32(6), pp.458-465. https://doi.org/10.26748/KSOE.2018.32.6.458
  2. Cho, S., & Choi, K., 2019. Modification of local ice load prediction formula based on IBRV ARAON's arctic field data. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology, 33(2), pp.161-167. https://doi.org/10.26748/KSOE.2019.013
  3. Det Norske Veritas (DNV), 2010. DNV-RP-C205 Environmental conditions and environmental loads. DNV.
  4. Kim, H., & Lee, J.B., 2018 Estimation method for ice load of managed ice in an oblique condition. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology, 32(3), pp.184-191. https://doi.org/10.26748/KSOE.2018.6.32.3.184
  5. Kim, J., Park, J.C., Kim, S.P., Kim, H.S., & Cho, Y.G., 2018a Multibody dynamics simulation on ice resistance of ship in pack ice environment. Proceedings of the ASME 2018 37th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Madrid Spain, 12(S1), pp.88-99.
  6. Kim, Y.S., Kim, J.H., Kang, K.J., Han, S., & Kim, J., 2018b Ice load generation in time domain based on ice load spectrum for arctic offshore structures. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology, 32(6), pp.411-418. https://doi.org/10.26748/KSOE.2018.32.6.411
  7. Liu, J., Liu X., & Chen Y., ABS, 2016. Numerical simulations of ice loads on fixed and floating offshore structures using the discrete element method. Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference 2016, Newfoundland Canada.
  8. Poznyak, I., & Ionov, B., 1981. The division of icebreaking resistance into components. Proceedings of the 6th STAR Symposium, New York US, pp.249-252.
  9. Read, L., Sveinung, L., Wenjun, L., Andrei, T., & Marnix, N., 2018. Simulator for arctic marine structures (SAMS). Proceedings of the ASME 2018 37th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Madrid Spain.
  10. Seok, W.c., Seo, J.H., & Rhee, S.H., 2018. Application of ice-fluid interaction analysis considering external force term for 6dof motion of an icebreaker. Proceedings of Korean Society for Computational Fluids Engineering, pp.98-99.
  11. Shimansky, Y., 1938. Conditional standards of ice qualities of a ship, Northern Sea Route Administration Publishing House, vol. 130.
  12. Simens, 2019. Star CCM+ user manual. Simens.
  13. Simulia. 2018. ABAQUS user manual. Providence (RI): Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp.
  14. Song, S., Jeon, W., & Park, S., 2019. Flow and scour analysis around monopole of fixed offshore platform using method that couples computational fluid dynamics and discrete element method. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology, 33(3), pp.245-251. https://doi.org/10.26748/KSOE.2019.034
  15. Spencer, D., 1992. A standard method for the conduct and analysis of ice resistance model tests. Proceeding of the 23rd American Towing Tank Conference, New Orleans US, pp.301-307.