Journal of KIBIM (한국BIM학회 논문집)

Korean Institute of Building Information Modeling (한국BIM학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Spatial Impacts of Brownfield Redevelopments on Neighborhood Housing Turnover and Stability - Case Study of Cuyahoga County, Ohio in the US -

브라운필드 재개발이 주변 지역 주택소유회전 및 주거 안정성에 미치는 공간적 파급효과 - 미국 오하이오주 쿠야호가 카운티를 중심으로 -

  • 우아영 (한양대학교 도시대학원)
  • Received : 2020.08.29
  • Accepted : 2020.08.31
  • Published : 2020.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

There is growing consensus among planners and policymakers that brownfield remediation has positive impacts on neighborhoods in terms of housing prices, public health, and environmental quality. However, there is a limited understanding of how brownfield redevelopments spatially affect neighborhood housing turnover and stability. This paper addresses the spatial impacts of brownfield redevelopments on neighboring housing turnover in Cuyahoga County, Ohio. This study examines housing turnover before and after the remediation of brownfield sites countywide and in housing submarkets stratified by household income. Based on housing sales data between 1996 and 2007, the extended Cox Hazard model with the difference-in-difference approach is employed to clarify the causal relationships between brownfield redevelopments and neighboring housing turnover. Additionally, along with the results of the previous study examining impacts of brownfield remediation on nearby housing prices, this paper estimates the change of neighborhood stability due to brownfield redevelopments based on both attributes of housing prices and turnovers.

Keywords

References

  1. Adams, D., De Sousa, C., Tiesdell, S. (2010). Brownfield development: A comparison of North American and British approaches. Urban studies, 47(1), pp. 75-104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009346868
  2. Choi, Y. (2013). Policy Instruments for Brownfield Reuse Projects: A Case of Cleveland Metro Area. Korean Urban Management Association, 26(3), pp. 219-244.
  3. De Sousa, C. (2000). Brownfield redevelopment versus greenfield development: A private sector perspective on the costs and risks associated with brownfield redevelopment in the Greater Toronto Area. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43(6), pp. 831-853. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560020001719
  4. De Sousa, C. (2001). Contaminated sites: The Canadian situation in an international context. Journal of Environmental Management, 62(2), pp. 131-154. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2001.0431
  5. De Sousa, C. A., Wu, C., Westphal, L. M. (2009). Assessing the effect of publicly assisted brownfield redevelopment on surrounding property values. Economic Development Quarterly, 23(2), pp. 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242408328379
  6. Galster, G., Tatian, P., Smith, R. (1999). The impact of neighbors who use Section 8 certificates on property values. Housing Policy Debate, 10(4), pp. 879-918. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.1999.9521354
  7. Greenberg, M., Lowrie, K., Mayer, H., Miller, K. T., Solitare, L. (2001). Brownfield redevelopment as a smart growth option in the United States. Environmentalist, 21(2), pp. 129-143. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010684411938
  8. Kaufman, D. A., Cloutier, N. R. (2006). The impact of small brownfields and greenspaces on residential property values. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 33(1), pp. 19-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-006-8272-7
  9. Kim, T.-K., Horner, M. W. (2003). Exploring spatial effects on urban housing duration. Environment and Planning A, 35, pp. 1415-1429. https://doi.org/10.1068/a35170
  10. Kirkwood, N. (2001). Why is there so little residential redevelopment of brownfields? Framing issues for discussion. Retrieved from Cambridge, MA:
  11. Koschinsky, J. (2009). Spatial heterogeneity in spillover effects of assisted and unassisted rental housing. Journal of Urban Affairs, 31(3), pp. 319-347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2009.00462.x
  12. Lee, S., Mohai, P. (2011). Racial and socioeconomic assessments of neighborhoods adjacent to small-scale brownfield sites in the Detroit region. Environmental Practice, 13(4), pp. 340-353. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466046611000366
  13. McCarthy, L. (2009). Off the mark? Efficiency in targeting the most marketable sites rather than equity in public assistance for brownfield redevelopment. Economic Development Quarterly, 23(3), pp. 211-228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242408331159
  14. Nathanail, C. P. (2011). Sustainable brownfield regeneration. In F. A. Swartjes (Ed.), Dealing with Contaminated Sites: From theory towards practical application (pp. 1079-1104). London: Springer.
  15. Ross, C. E., Reynolds, J. R., Geis, K. J. (2000). The contingent meaning of neighborhood stability for residents' psychological well-being. American Sociological Review, 65, pp. 581-597. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657384
  16. Sampson, R. J. (1985). Neighborhood and crime: The structural determinants of personal victimization. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22(1), pp. 7-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427885022001002
  17. Sampson, R. J., Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), pp. 774-802. https://doi.org/10.1086/229068
  18. Woo, A., Joh, K., Van Zandt, S. (2016a). Impacts of the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program on neighborhood housing turnover. Urban Affairs Review, 52(2), pp. 247-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087414561824
  19. Woo, A., Joh, K., Van Zandt, S. (2016b). Unpacking the impacts of the Low-Icnome Housing Tax Credit program on nearby property values. Urban Studies, 53(12), pp. 2488-2510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015593448
  20. Woo, A., Lee, S. (2016). Illuminating the impacts of brownfield redevelopments on neighboring housing prices: Case of Cuyahoga County, Ohio in the US. Environment and Planning A, 48(6), pp. 1107-1132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16636380
  21. Woo A., Yu C. (2017). Beyond affordable shelters: Subsidized housing and surrounding environments for pedestrian safety. Applied geography 83: 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.03.014