The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Clinical outcomes of rigid and non-rigid telescopic double-crown-retained removable dental prostheses: An analytical review

  • Seo, Jeong-Gyo (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Cho, Jin-Hyun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2019.02.11
  • Accepted : 2020.02.12
  • Published : 2020.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. The objective of this literature review was to analyze the cumulative survival rates (CSRs) of rigid and non-rigid double-crown-retained removable dental prostheses. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Screening of the literature published from January 1995 to December 2019 was performed by using electronic data base (Pubmed) and manual search. The CSRs of rigid and non-rigid double crown removable dental prostheses were investigated. RESULTS. A total of 403 articles were reviewed and 56 relevant articles of them were selected. Subsequently, 25 articles were included for data extraction. These articles were classified according to rigid and non-rigid type double crowns and further subdivided into teeth, implants, and teeth-implant combination types. The CSRs of rigid type double crown ranged from 68.9% to 95.1% of 5 to 10 years in tooth abutments, 94.02% to 100% over a 3-year mean observation periods in implant abutments, and 81.8% to 97.6% in tooth-implant combination. Non-rigid type double crowns had various CSR ranges from 34% to 94% maximum during 10 years observation in teeth abutment. The CSRs of non-rigid type had over 98% in implant abutments, and ranged from 85% to 100% in tooth-implant combination. CONCLUSION. The CSRs of double crowns varies according to types. With accurate evaluation of the remaining teeth and plan of the strategic implant placement, it could be successful treatment alternatives for partially or completely edentulous patients.

Keywords

References

  1. Weaver JD. Telescopic copings in restorative dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:429-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90008-5
  2. Isaacson GO. Telescope crown retainers for removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1969;22:436-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(69)90211-X
  3. Korber KH. Conus crowns: the rational telescope system introduction to clinics and technology [in German]. 5th ed. Heidelberg: Dr. Alfred Huthig Verlag GmbH; 1988. p. 81-6.
  4. Korber KH. Cone crowns-a physically defined telescopic system. German Dent J 1968;23:619-30.
  5. Bottger H, Engelhardt JP. Telescopic system in dental practice [in German]. Die Quintessenz 1970;21:69-72.
  6. Engels J, Schubert O, Guth JF, Hoffmann M, Jauernig C, Erdelt K, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F. Wear behavior of different double-crown systems. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:503-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0746-9
  7. Lehmann KM, Gente M. Double crowns used to support removable partial dentures [in German]. German Dent Cal 1988;47:106-12.
  8. Weber H, Frank G. Spark erosion procedure: a method for extensive combined fixed and removable prosthodontic care. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:222-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90144-D
  9. Langer A. Telescope retainers and their clinical application. J Prosthet Dent 1980;44:516-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(80)90070-0
  10. Koller B, Att W, Strub JR. Survival rates of teeth, implants, and double crown-retained removable dental prostheses: a systematic literature review. Int J Prosthodont 2011;24:109-17.
  11. Wenz HJ, Lehmann KM. A telescopic crown concept for the restoration of the partially edentulous arch: the Marburg double crown system. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:541-50.
  12. Verma R, Joda T, Bragger U, Wittneben JG. A systematic review of the clinical performance of tooth-retained and implant-retained double crown prostheses with a follow-up of ${\geq}$ 3 years. J Prosthodont 2013;22:2-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00905.x
  13. Wenz HJ, Hertrampf K, Lehmann KM. Clinical longevity of removable partial dentures retained by telescopic crowns: outcome of the double crown with clearance fit. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:207-13.
  14. Frisch E, Ziebolz D, Rinke S. Long-term results of implantsupported over-dentures retained by double crowns: a practice-based retrospective study after minimally 10 years followup. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:1281-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02568.x
  15. Frisch E, Ziebolz D, Ratka-Kruger P, Rinke S. Double crownretained maxillary overdentures: 5-year follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:22-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12087
  16. Frisch E, Ratka-Kruger P, Wenz HJ. Unsplinted implants and teeth supporting maxillary removable partial dentures retained by telescopic crowns: a retrospective study with >6 years of follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:1091-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12407
  17. Krennmair G, Suto D, Seemann R, Piehslinger E. Removable four implant-supported mandibular overdentures rigidly retained with telescopic crowns or milled bars: a 3-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:481-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02169.x
  18. Krennmair G, Seemann R, Weinlander M, Piehslinger E. Comparison of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 5-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:598-606.
  19. Krennmair G, Krainhofner M, Waldenberger O, Piehslinger E. Dental implants as strategic supplementary abutments for implant-tooth-supported telescopic crown-retained maxillary dentures: a retrospective follow-up study for up to 9 years. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:617-22.
  20. Rinke S, Ziebolz D, Ratka-Kruger P, Frisch E. Clinical outcome of double crown-retained mandibular removable dentures supported by a combination of residual teeth and strategic implants. J Prosthodont 2015;24:358-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12214
  21. Rinke S, Buergers R, Ziebolz D, Roediger M. Clinical outcome of double crown-retained implant overdentures with zirconia primary crowns. J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7:329-37. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.4.329
  22. Rinke S, Schneider L, Schulz X, Wiedemann V, Burgers R, Rodiger M. Overdentures borne on less than four abutments with telescopic crowns: 5-year results of a retrospective clinical study. Clin Oral Investig 2019;23:3153-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2734-1
  23. Wostmann B, Balkenhol M, Weber A, Ferger P, Rehmann P. Long-term analysis of telescopic crown retained removable partial dentures: survival and need for maintenance. J Dent 2007;35:939-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.09.010
  24. Szentpetery V, Lautenschlager C, Setz JM. Frictional telescopic crowns in severely reduced dentitions: a 5-year clinical outcome study. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25:217-20.
  25. Zou D, Wu Y, Huang W, Zhang Z, Zhang Z. A 5- to 8-year retrospective study comparing the clinical results of implantsupported telescopic crown versus bar overdentures in patients with edentulous maxillae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:1322-30. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3100
  26. Zou D, Wu Y, Huang W, Wang F, Wang S, Zhang Z, Zhang Z. A 3-year prospective clinical study of telescopic crown, bar, and locator attachments for removable four implant-supported maxillary overdentures. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26:566-73. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3485
  27. Zou D, Wang F, Wu Y, Huang W, Zhang C, Zhang Z. Implant-supported telescopic crown-retained overdentures for oral rehabilitation of patients with severe bony defects: A 5-year retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015;30:937-44. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3697
  28. Guarnieri R, Ippoliti S. Restoration of periodontally compromised dentitions using telescopic full-arch retrievable prosthesis supported by tooth-implant combination: A long-term retrospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2018;38:217-24. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.3102
  29. Kern JS, Hanisch O, Hammacher C, Yildirim M, Wolfart S. Telescopic crowns on implants and teeth: Evaluation of a clinical study after 8 to 12 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2019;34:977-86. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.7204
  30. Stober T, Bermejo JL, Seche AC, Lehmann F, Rammelsberg P, Bomicke W. Electroplated and cast double crown-retained removable dental prostheses: 6-year results from a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:1129-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1335-x
  31. Weigl P, Trimpou G, Lorenz J, Nentwig GH, Lauer HC. Prefabricated taper crowns for the retention of implant superstructures: Three-year results of a prospective clinical trial. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:618-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.07.004
  32. Zierden K, Kurzrock L, Wostmann B, Rehmann P. Nonprecious alloy vs precious alloy telescopic crown-retained removable partial dentures: Survival and maintenance needs. Int J Prosthodont 2018;31:459-64. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.5820
  33. Fobbe H, Rammelsberg P, Lorenzo Bermejo J, Kappel S. The up-to-11-year survival and success of implants and abutment teeth under solely implant-supported and combined toothimplant- supported double crown-retained removable dentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2019;30:1134-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13527
  34. Mengel R, Wendt J, Peleska B. Prosthodontic treatment outcomes in periodontally compromised patients: A 6- to 20-year long-term cohort study. Int J Prosthodont 2019;32:153-61. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.5917
  35. Widbom T, Lofquist L, Widbom C, Soderfeldt B, Kronstrom M. Tooth-supported telescopic crown-retained dentures: an up to 9-year retrospective clinical follow-up study. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:29-34.
  36. Romanos GE, May S, May D. Immediate loading of toothimplant-supported telescopic mandibular prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:1534-40.
  37. Romanos GE, May S, May D. Implant-supporting telescopic maxillary prostheses and immediate loading. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16:412-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12003
  38. Schwindling FS, Dittmann B, Rammelsberg P. Double-crownretained removable dental prostheses: a retrospective study of survival and complications. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:488-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.02.017
  39. Eitner S, Schlegel A, Emeka N, Holst S, Will J, Hamel J. Comparing bar and double-crown attachments in implant-retained prosthetic reconstruction: a follow-up investigation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:530-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01500.x
  40. Behr M, Kolbeck C, Lang R, Hahnel S, Dirschl L, Handel G. Clinical performance of cements as luting agents for telescopic double crown-retained removable partial and complete overdentures. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22:479-87.
  41. Rammelsberg P, Bernhart G, Lorenzo Bermejo J, Schmitter M, Schwarz S. Prognosis of implants and abutment teeth under combined tooth-implant-supported and solely implant-supported double-crown-retained removable dental prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:813-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12197
  42. Krennmair G, Weinlander M, Krainhofner M, Piehslinger E. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19:164-70.
  43. Marotti J, Gatzweiler B, Wolfart M, Sasse M, Kern M, Wolfart S. Implant Placement under Existing Removable Dental Prostheses and the Effect on Follow-Up and Prosthetic Maintenance. J Prosthodont 2019;28:e752-63.
  44. Stober T, Bermejo JL, Beck-Mussoter J, Seche AC, Lehmann F, Koob J, Rammelsberg P. Clinical performance of conical and electroplated telescopic double crown-retained partial dentures: a randomized clinical study. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25:209-16.
  45. Szentpetery V, Lautenschlager C, Setz JM. Longevity of frictional telescopic crowns in the severely reduced dentition: 3-year results of a longitudinal prospective clinical study. Quintessence Int 2010;41:749-58.
  46. Lian M, Zhao K, Feng Y, Yao Q. Prognosis of combining remaining teeth and implants in double-crown-retained removable dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2018;33:281-97. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5796
  47. Bernhart G, Koob A, Schmitter M, Gabbert O, Stober T, Rammelsberg P. Clinical success of implant-supported and tooth-implant-supported double crown-retained dentures. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:1031-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0592-1
  48. Heckmann SM, Schrott A, Graef F, Wichmann MG, Weber HP. Mandibular two-implant telescopic overdentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:560-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01064.x
  49. Kaufmann R, Friedli M, Hug S, Mericske-Stern R. Removable dentures with implant support in strategic positions followed for up to 8 years. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22:233-41; discussion 242.
  50. Dittmann B, Rammelsberg P. Survival of abutment teeth used for telescopic abutment retainers in removable partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2008;21:319-21.
  51. Mengel R, Kreuzer G, Lehmann KM, Flores-de-Jacoby L. A telescopic crown concept for the restoration of partially edentulous patients with aggressive generalized periodontitis: a 3-year prospective longitudinal study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2007;27:231-9.
  52. Schwarz S, Bernhart G, Hassel AJ, Rammelsberg P. Survival of double-crown-retained dentures either tooth-implant or solely implant-supported: an 8-year retrospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014;16:618-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12023
  53. Rehmann P, Rudel K, Podhorsky A, Wostmann B. Three-year analysis of fixed and removable telescopic attachment-retained implant-supported dental prostheses: Survival and need for maintenance. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015;30:918-24. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3816
  54. Weng D, Richter EJ. Maxillary removable prostheses retained by telescopic crowns on two implants or two canines. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2007;27:35-41.
  55. Brandt S, Brandt J, Ketabi AR, Lauer HC, Kunzmann A. $Locator^{(R)}$ versus ceramic/electroplated double-crown attachments: a prospective study on the intraindividual comparison of implant-supported mandibular prostheses. Clin Oral Investig 2019;23:763-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2491-1
  56. Keshk AM, Alqutaibi AY, Algabri RS, Swedan MS, Kaddah A. Prosthodontic maintenance and peri-implant tissue conditions for telescopic attachment-retained mandibular implant overdenture: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Eur J Dent 2017;11:559-68. https://doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_23_17
  57. Behr M, Hofmann E, Rosentritt M, Lang R, Handel G. Technical failure rates of double crown-retained removable partial dentures. Clin Oral Investig 2000;4:87-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007840050121
  58. Schwindling FS, Dittmann B, Rammelsberg P. Double-crownretained removable dental prostheses: a retrospective study of survival and complications. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:488-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.02.017
  59. Brandt S, Winter A, Weigl P, Brandt J, Romanos G, Lauer HC. Conical zirconia telescoping into electroformed gold: A retrospective study of prostheses supported by teeth and/or implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2019;21:317-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12739
  60. Eisenburger M, Gray G, Tschernitschek H. Long-term results of telescopic crown retained dentures-a retrospective study. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2000;8:87-91.
  61. Coca I, Lotzmann U, Poggeler R. Long-term experience with telescopically retained overdentures (double crown technique). Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2000;8:33-7.
  62. Saito M, Notani K, Miura Y, Kawasaki T. Complications and failures in removable partial dentures: a clinical evaluation. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:627-33. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00898.x
  63. Bergman B, Ericson A, Molin M. Long-term clinical results after treatment with conical crown-retained dentures. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:533-8.
  64. Joda T. Combined tooth-implant-supported telescopic prostheses in a midterm follow-up of > 2 years. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26:536-40. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3289
  65. Weischer T, Mohr C. Implant-supported mandibular telescopic prostheses in oral cancer patients: an up to 9-year retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:329-34.
  66. Ishida K, Nogawa T, Takayama Y, Saito M, Yokoyama A. Prognosis of double crown-retained removable dental prostheses compared with clasp-retained removable dental prostheses: A retrospective study. J Prosthodont Res 2017;61:268-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2016.12.006
  67. Lin CL, Wang JC, Chang WJ. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:107-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01363.x
  68. Michalakis KX, Calvani P, Hirayama H. Biomechanical considerations on tooth-implant supported fixed partial dentures. J Dent Biomech 2012;3:1758736012462025.
  69. Koosha S, Mirhashemi FS. An Investigation of Three types of Tooth Implant Supported Fixed Prosthesis Designs with 3D Finite Element Analysis. J Dent (Tehran) 2013;10:51-63.
  70. Chen Y, Wang C, Huang Y, Feng T, Zou H, Fan Y. Biomechanical evaluation of the natural abutment teeth in combined toothimplant-supported telescopic prostheses: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2017;20:967-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2017.1319941
  71. Mock F, Schrenker H, Stark HK. Success of telescopic crownsa prospective long-term study [in German]. German Dent J 2005;60:148-53.

Cited by

  1. Adhesion as a component of retention force of overdenture prostheses-study on selected Au based dental materials used for telescopic crowns using atomic force microscopy and contact angle techniques vol.121, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104648
  2. Annual review of selected scientific literature: A report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry vol.126, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.06.014
  3. Performance of PEEK based telescopic crowns, a comparative study vol.37, pp.11, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2021.08.020