DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigating the Improvement of Concept and Inquiry Activities in Elementary School Science Textbook of the 2015 Revised Curriculum - Focus on Earth Science Section -

2015 개정 교육과정 초등학교 과학 교과서에 제시된 개념과 탐구 활동의 개선 방안 조사 - 지구과학 영역을 중심으로 -

  • Received : 2020.09.22
  • Accepted : 2020.12.10
  • Published : 2020.12.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to suggest improvements in the science concepts and inquiry activities presented in the earth science section in the 2015 revised curriculum elementary science textbooks. For this study, two science educator and three elementary school teachers developed a survey questionnaire to investigate science concepts, inquiry activities, and suggest improvements. The survey was conducted two times, and 30 elementary school teachers and three earth science professors (geology, meteorology, astronomy) participated in the survey. As a result, it was investigated that eight concepts in the solid section, three concepts in the fluid section, and one concept in universe and integration section contained misconceptions. It was investigated that the content of inquiry activity needs to be supplemented, with seven elements in solid section, three elements in fluid section, and one in the universe and integration section. According to the research results, if the textbook is revised, it is necessary to accurately confirm the science concepts or content of inquiry activities. Also in the case of science concepts presented in textbooks, it will be necessary to consider not only the scope and sequence of contents but also the process of learning progression.

이 연구의 목적은 2015 개정 교육과정 초등 과학 교과서 내 지구과학 영역에 제시된 개념과 탐구 활동의 내용을 분석하고 개선 방안을 제시하고자 하였다. 이를 위하여 교과 교육 전문가 2인과 초등교사 3인이 함께 교과서 내 개념과 탐구 활동 문제점 탐색과 개선 방안 조사를 위한 설문지를 개발하였다. 설문은 두 차례에 걸쳐 진행되었으며 모두 30명의 초등학교 교사와 3명의 지구과학 내용학 전공 교수가 설문에 참여하였다. 연구 결과 초등학교 교과서의 고체 지구 영역에서는 8개의 개념 요소, 유체 지구 영역에서는 3개의 개념 요소, 우주와 통합 단원에서는 1개의 개념 요소에서 오개념이 포함되어 있는 것으로 조사되었다. 탐구 활동에서도 고체 지구에서 7개 유체 지구에서 3개, 우주와 통합 단원에서 1개씩 탐구 활동 내용에 보완이 필요한 것으로 조사되었다. 따라서 앞으로 교과서가 개정될 경우 내용 요소의 검정 과정을 강화할 필요가 있으며 나아가 교과서에 제시되는 개념의 경우 연계와 위계뿐 아니라 개념이 발달해 나가는 과정도 고려할 필요성이 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, S., & Kwon, J. (1995). Psychological approach on common core of misconceptions by Pascual-Leone's neo piagetian theory. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 15(2), 185-193.
  2. Breslyn, W., McGinnis, R., McDonald, R., & Hestness, E. (2016). Developing a learning progression for sea level rise: A major impact of climate change. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 53(10), 1471-1499. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21333
  3. Byun, T., Baek, J., Shim, H., & Lee, D. (2019). An investigation on the implementation of the 'scientific inquiry experiment' of the 2015 revised curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(5), 669-679.
  4. Chae, D., Lim, S., Lee, H., Han, J., Lee S., & Kim, E. (2016). Development and application of the student-centered elementary science textbook model; Focusing on earth science. Journal of Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 9(1), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2016.9.1.15
  5. Chung, C., Back, K., & Kim, M. (2009). Young children's knowledge of the earth and changes in that knowledge after they engage in earth information activities based on a constructivist approach. Korean Journal of Early Childhood Education, 29(4), 73-96. https://doi.org/10.18023/kjece.2009.29.4.004
  6. Churcher, K. (2007). From the bottom up: Researching in the classroom. Education Canada, 47(3), 64-66.
  7. Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Iberghien, A. (1985). What change in conceptual change?. International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1155-1191. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980201002
  8. Gilbert, J., Osborne, R., & Fensham, P. (1982). Children's science and it's consequences for teaching. Science Education, 66(4), 623-633. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660412
  9. Glynn, M., Yeany, H., & Britton, K. (1991). A constructive view of learning science. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  10. Gomez-Zwiep, S. (2008). Elementary teachers' understanding of students' science misconceptions: Implications for practice and teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(5), 437-454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9102-y
  11. Halim. L., & Meerah, S. M. (2002). Science trainee teachers' pedagogical content knowledge and its influence on physics teaching. Research in Science and Technological Education, 20(2), 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514022000030462
  12. Han, S., Kang, S., & Noh, T. (2010). Preservice elementary school teachers' awareness of students' misconceptions about science topics. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(4), 474-483.
  13. Kim, D., & Hong, S. (2013). A study on fossil conceptions of pre-service elementary school teachers. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 29(3), 23-44.
  14. Kim, E., Lee, H., & Lee, H. (2016). An analysis of pre-service earth science teachers' mental models about coriolis force concept. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(3), 423-434. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.3.0423
  15. Kim, E., Ryoo, S., Park, K., Baek, Y., Park, S., & Cho, D. (2019). Tasks for the future education of elementary schools in the face of a decrease in the population. Journal of Competency Development & Learning, 14(3), 193-221.
  16. Kim J., Ko, Y., Kim, J., Park, S., Lee, B., Lee, J., Lee, C., & Jeong, G. (2012). Historical geology (6th). Seoul: Pakhaksa.
  17. Kim, P., Park, S., Shim, S., Yu, B., Im, C., Hu, S., & Hwang, H. (2003). Constructivism and subject education. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  18. Kim, S. (2020). Analysis of press articles in Korean media on online education related to COVID-19. Journal of Digital Contents Society, 21(6), 1091-1100. https://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2020.21.6.1091
  19. Kim, Y., Yun, S., & Sol, Y. (2020). An exploratory study on the feasibility of on-line international teaching practicum of Korean education universities. Global Creative Leader: Education & Learning, 10(2), 133-160.
  20. Ko, Y., & Lee, H. (2014). Pre-service science teachers' understanding of students' misconceptions in Physics and Perceptions on "Teacher as a Researcher" through the research experience. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(5), 449-457. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.5.0449
  21. Lawrenz, F. (1986). Relationships among student, teacher, and observer perceptions of science classrooms and student achievement. School Science and Mathematics, 86(8), 654-660. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1986.tb11669.x
  22. Lee, B., Kim, H., & Son, J. (2011). Content analysis of energy and climate change in high school science textbook. The Korean Society of Energy and Climate Change Education, 1(1), 13-21.
  23. Lee, G. (2018). Elementary teachers' perceptions on the experiment of making a model of volcanic activity. The Journal of The Korean Earth Science Society, 39(6), 617-629. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2018.39.6.617
  24. Lee, H., Lee, H., Chae, D., Lim, S., & Jeon, J. (2016). Development and application of the student activity-centered high school science textbook model: Focused on earth science. Journal of Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 9(2), 139-150. https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2016.9.2.139
  25. Lee, S., & Lee, B. (2018). High-school physics teachers' difficulties in teaching textbook physics inquiries. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(4), 519-526. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2018.38.4.519
  26. Liston, D. P., & Zeichner, K. M. (1990). Reflective teaching and action research in pre-service teacher education. British Journal of Teacher Education, 16(3), 235-254.
  27. Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2014). Elementary school 3-4 grades: Science textbook 3-1 (2009 revised curriculum). Seoul: Visang.
  28. Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2015). Science curriculum (no. 9). Sejong: Author.
  29. Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2018). Elementary school 3-4 grades: Science textbook (2015 revised curriculum). Seoul: Visang.
  30. Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2019). Elementary school 5-6 grades: Science textbook (2015 revised curriculum). Seoul: Visang.
  31. Mohan, L., Chen, J., & Anderson, C. W. (2009). Developing a multi-year learning progression for carbon cycling in socioecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 675-698. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20314
  32. Osborne, R., & Freyberg, P. (1985). Children's science learning in science. Auckland: Heineman.
  33. Paik, S., & Kim, K. (2013). A study of conceptual change processes among pre-service science teachers relating to conductor and electrolyte as electrified materials. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(6), 1103-1118. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.6.1103
  34. Paik, S., & Song, J. (2002). Analysis of differences of explanation on gas pressure and atmospheric pressure in science textbooks, Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 22(2), 240-251.
  35. Park, D. (2018). A school policy corresponding to rapid demographic changes in Korea. Education Review, 42, 58-91.
  36. Park, H., Sim, J., Choi, H., Lim, H., Park, J., Ahn, H., & Yang, S. (2019). Study on the monitoring and implementation of the 2015 science national curriculum (BD19030006), Seoul: Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity.
  37. Park, J., & Lee, G. (2004). Understanding students' conceptions in the research on conceptual change in science: From misconception to mental model. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(3), 621-637.
  38. Park, J., Han, S., & Noh, T. (2010). Secondary science teachers' awareness and perceptions of students' misconceptions about the particulate nature of matter. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 30(1), 42-53. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2010.30.1.042
  39. Park, S., Shin, Y., Lee, H., Yuk, G., Kim, H., & Kim, Y. (2002). An analysis of science learning concepts in the 7th grade science textbooks of the 7th curriculum -On energy and earth field. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 22(2), 276-285.
  40. Plummer, J., & Maynard, L. (2014). Building a learning progression for celestial motion: An exploration of students' reasoning about the Season. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(7), 902-929. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21151
  41. Song, S. (2019). Can flipped learning be an alternative?: A critical review based on the essence of flipped learning. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(6), 1387-1410. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2019.19.6.1387
  42. Song, Y. (2011). A study on science concept and misconception in young children. The Journal of Child Education, 20(4), 21-41
  43. Vosniadou, S., Kayser, D., Champesme, M., Ioannides, C., & Dimitracopoulou, A. (1999). Modelling elementary school students' solution of mechanics problems. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
  44. West, L. H. T., & Pines, A. L. (1985). Cognitive structure and conceptual change. London, England: Academic press, Inc.
  45. Yang, S. (2001). Geology dictionary. Seoul: Kyohakyongusa.
  46. Yeo, S. (2019). Comparative analysis of contents of climate change on Korean peninsula described in 'science inquiry and experiment textbook' of the 2015 revised curriculum, The Korean Society of Energy and Climate Change Education, 9(3), 187-197.