DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

웹 기반 한국판 섭식장애진단척도 DSM-5의 개발 및 타당화 연구

A Development and Validation Study of the Web-based Korean Version of the Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale DSM-5

  • 이혜린 (인제대학교 섭식장애정신건강연구소) ;
  • 곽경화 (인제대학교 섭식장애정신건강연구소) ;
  • 이유경 (인제대학교 섭식장애정신건강연구소) ;
  • 한수완 (인제대학교 섭식장애정신건강연구소) ;
  • 김율리 (인제대학교 섭식장애정신건강연구소)
  • Lee, Hye Rin (Institute of Eating Disorders and Mental Health, Inje University) ;
  • Kwag, Kyung Hwa (Institute of Eating Disorders and Mental Health, Inje University) ;
  • Lee, You Kyung (Institute of Eating Disorders and Mental Health, Inje University) ;
  • Han, Soo Wan (Institute of Eating Disorders and Mental Health, Inje University) ;
  • Kim, Youl-Ri (Institute of Eating Disorders and Mental Health, Inje University)
  • 투고 : 2020.11.12
  • 심사 : 2020.12.18
  • 발행 : 2020.12.31

초록

연구목적 본 연구의 목적은 한국판 섭식장애 진단척도 DSM-5 (Korean version Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale, K-EDDS)를 웹 기반 진단 시스템으로 개발하고 타당도를 검증하는 데 있다. 방 법 본 연구는 섭식장애 환자(38명)와 대학생(81명)을 포함하여 총 119명이 참여하였다. 모든 참가자는 지필 섭식장애 스크리닝 검사인 Sick, Control, One, Fat, Food (SCOFF) 후 별도의 사이트에서 웹 기반 K-EDDS, 섭식장애검사(Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire, EDE-Q), 임상손상평가(Clinical Impairment Assessment Questionnaire, CIA)를 작성했다. SCOFF 점수가 2점 이상인 사람을 대상으로 EDE (Eating Disorder Examination Interview) 면담을 진행하였다. 검사 후 2주 이내에 웹 기반 K-EDDS, EDE-Q, CIA를 재실시하였다. 결 과 탐색적 요인분석 결과, 신체불만족, 폭식행동, 폭식빈도, 보상행동의 4가지 요인이 추출되어 총 분산의 82.4%를 설명하였다. 웹 기반 K-EDDS의 4개 하위요인은 EDE-Q의 4개 하위요인과 각각 유의미한 상관관계가 있었으며, 우수한 내적 일치도를 보였다(Cronbach's alpha=0.93). 웹 기반 K-EDDS와 EDE의 진단 일치도는 96.83%, 웹 기반 K-EDDS의 검사-재검사 진단 일치도는 92.86%로 우수하였다. 웹 기반 K-EDDS와 CIA에서 환자군과 정상군 간 차이가 유의하게 나타나, 본 척도의 판별 타당도를 검증하였다. 결 론 본 연구를 통해 웹 기반 K-EDDS는 임상 및 연구 현장에서 DSM-5를 기반으로 한 섭식장애 진단에 유용하게 사용할 수 있는 타당한 도구임을 확인하였다.

Objectives : The aim of this study was to develop and to verify the Korean version of the Eating Disorder Diagnosis Scale DSM-5 (K-EDDS) as a web-based diagnostic system, which enables rapid diagnosis of patients for early intervention. Methods : A total of 119 persons participated in the study, including patients with eating disorders (n=38) and college students (n=81). Along with the paper-and-pencil SCOFF, all participants completed the web-based K-EDDS, the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionaire (EDE-Q), and the Clinical Impairment Assessment Questionnaire (CIA). The semi-structured interview using the Eating Disorder Examination Interview (EDE) was conducted for participants with two or more SCOFF scores. Within two weeks, the web-based K-EDDS, the EDE-Q, and the CIA were re-tested. Results : In the exploratory factor analysis, four factors were extracted : body dissatisfaction, binge behaviors, binge frequency and compensatory behaviors. The four subscales of the web-based K-EDDS had significant correlation with each of the four subscales of the EDE-Q. The internal consistency of the web-based K-EDDS was highly satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha=0.93). The diagnostic agreement between the web-based K-EDDS and the EDE was excellent (96.83%), and the web-based K-EDDS's test-retest diagnostic agreement was fairly good (92.86%). The web-based K-EDDS and the CIA also showed significant differences between patients and general population, supporting discriminant validity. Conclusions : This study suggested that the web-based K-EDDS is a valid tool for assisting diagnosis of eating disorders based on DSM-5 in clinical and research fields.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Hudson JI, Hiripi E, Pope Jr HG, Kessler RC. The prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication. Biological Psychiatry 2017;61:348-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.03.040
  2. Sullivan PF. Mortality in anorexia nervosa. American Journal of Psychiatry 1995;152:1073-1074. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.152.7.1073
  3. Ackard DM, Fulkerson JA, Neumark-Sztainer D. Prevalence and utility of DSM-IV eating disorder diagnostic criteria among youth. International Journal of Eating Disorders 2007;40:409-417. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20389
  4. Johnson JG, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. Health problems, impairment and illnesses associated with bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder among primary care and obstetric gynecology patients. Psychological Medicine 2001;31:1455-1466. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291701004640
  5. Striegel-Moore RH, DeBar L, Wilson GT, Dickerson J, Rosselli F, Perrin N, Lynch F, & Kraemer HC. Health services use in eating disorders. Psychological Medicine 2008;38:1465-1474. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291707001833
  6. Stice E, Telch CF, Rizvi SL. Development and validation of the Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale: a brief self-report measure of anorexia, bulimia, and binge-eating disorder. Psychological Assessment 2000;12:123-131. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.12.2.123
  7. Bang EB, Han CL, Jeon YL, Kim YR. The Korean version of Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale DSM-5 (K-EDDS DSM-5): a reliability and validity study. Anxiety and Mood 2018;14:127-134. https://doi.org/10.24986/ANXMOD.2018.14.2.010
  8. Kwahk JE, Jeong HW, Kwak HW. Validation of Web-based Psychological Assessments. The Korean Journal of Cocnitive and Biological Psychology 2008;20:321-337. https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2008.20.4.007
  9. Abend R, Dan O, Maoz K, Raz S, Bar-Haim Y. Reliability, validity and sensitivity of a computerized visual analog scale measuring state anxiety. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 2014;45:447-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.06.004
  10. Junker U, Freynhagen R, Langler K, Gockel U, Schmidt U, Tolle TR, Baron R, Kohlmann T. Paper versus electronic rating scales for pain assessment: a prospective, randomised, crossover validation study with 200 chronic pain patients. Current Medical Research and Opinion 2008;24:1797-1806. https://doi.org/10.1185/03007990802121059
  11. Kvien TK, Mowinckel P, Heiberg T, Dammann KL, Dale O, Aanerud GJ, Alme TN, Uhlig T. Performance of health status measures with a pen based personal digital assistant. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2005;64:1480-1484. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2004.030437
  12. Morgan JF, Reid F, Lacey JH. The SCOFF questionnaire: a new screening tool for eating disorders. Western Journal of Medicine 2000;172:164-165. https://doi.org/10.1136/ewjm.172.3.164
  13. Stice E., Ragan J. A controlled evaluation of an eating disturbance psychoeducational intervention. International Journal of Eating Disorders 2001;31:159-171. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.10018
  14. Fairburn CG, Beglin SJ. Assessment of eating disorders: interview or self-report questionnaire? Int J Eat Disord 1994;16:363-370.
  15. Cooper Z, Fairburn C. The eating examination: a semi-structured interview for the assessment of the specific psychopathology of eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord 1987;6:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-108X(198701)6:1<1::AID-EAT2260060102>3.0.CO;2-9
  16. Heo SY, Rhee MK, Choi YM, Sohn CH, Lee HK, Lee YH. Reliabilityand factor analysis of the korean version of eating disorder examination. Journal of Korean Society for the Study of Obesity 2004;13.1:42-52.
  17. Bohn K, Doll HA, Cooper Z, O'Connor M, Palmer RL, Fairburn CG. The measurement of impairment due to eating disorder psychopathology. Behav Res Ther 2008;46:1105-1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2008.06.012
  18. Burd C, Mitchell JE, Crosby RD, Engel SG, Wonderlich SA, Lystad C, Grange DL, Peterson CB, Crow S. An assessment of daily food intake in participants with anorexia nervosa in the natural environment. International Journal of Eating Disorders 2009;42:371-374. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20628
  19. Silva JR, Behar R, Cordella P, Ortiz M, Jaramillo K, Alvarado R, Jorquera MJ. Validation of the spanish version of the eating disorders diagnostic Scale. Rev Med Chil 2012;140:1562-1570. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872012001200007
  20. Lee SW, Stewart SM, Striegel-Moore RH, Lee S, Ho SY, Lee PW, Katzman MA, Lam TH. Validation of the eating disorder diagnostic scale for use with Hong Kong adolescents. International Journal of Eating Disorders 2007;40:569-574. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20413
  21. Stice E, Melissa F, Erin M. Eating disorder diagnostic scale: additional evidence of reliability and validity. Psychological Assessment 2004;16:60-71. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.16.1.60
  22. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association;2013.