디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제18권12호
  • /
  • Pages.259-266
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

창의적 자기효능감 향상을 위한 디자인씽킹 기반 비교과 프로그램 개발

A Development of Extracurricular Programs for Enhancing Creative Self-Efficacy based on Design Thinking Process

  • 김선희 (서울신학대학교 유아교육과)
  • Kim, Sun-Hee (Department of Early Childhood Education, Seoul Theological University)
  • 투고 : 2020.10.21
  • 심사 : 2020.12.20
  • 발행 : 2020.12.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구의 목적은 대학생들의 창의적 자기효능감 향상을 위한 디자인씽킹 기반 비교과 프로그램을 개발하고 개발된 프로그램의 효과성을 살펴보는 것을 목적으로 한다. 이 연구는 비교과 프로그램의 개발 절차 및 개선점 도출을 통한 프로그램 최적화에도 목적이 있기에 설계기반연구방법을 적용하였다. 연구결과, 첫째, 비교과 프로그램 개발을 위한 절차는 세 단계 즉, 개발 단계와 전문가 검토 단계, 현장 검증 단계로 진행되고, 현장 검증 단계에서는 프로그램의 효과성을 검토할 수 있는 정량적 분석 도구 활용 및 정성 자료 분석과 이를 통한 프로그램 개선으로 진행된다. 둘째, 디자인씽킹 기반 비교과 프로그램은 프로그램의 효과를 극대화하기 위해 단회기 프로그램보다는 전문가 특강 및 학생 중심 활동을 포함한 일련의 요소들로 구성된 30시간의 심화 프로그램으로 개발되었다. 셋째, 개발된 프로그램을 동계·하계 방학 중 두 차례 진행한 결과, 창의적 자기효능감 향상에 긍정적인 효과가 있는 것으로 확인되었다. 이 연구는 대학의 맥락을 반영한 비교과 프로그램을 개발할 때 참고할 수 있는 일반적인 절차를 제공하고 개발된 프로그램의 구체적인 모습과 효과성 확인을 위한 검사 도구의 활용 사례를 제시했다는 데 의의가 있다.

The purpose of this study is to develop a extracurricular programs for enhancing creative self-efficacy of college student based on design thinking process, and to examine the effectiveness of the developed program. Since this study is also interested in suggesting the procedure for extracurricular program development and optimizing programs by derivation of improvements, a design-based research method was applied. Results are as follow; first, the procedure for extracurricular program development proceeds in three stages, second, the programs was developed as a 30-hour in-depth program and was conducted twice during winter and summer vacation, and the last, the program was confirmed that it has a positive effect on improving creative self-efficacy. This study contributed to providing a general procedure that can be referred when developing a program that reflects the context of the university, and to present the specific program and the case that use the test tool to confirm the effectiveness.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Park, N. G. (2017). New Paradigm for Education Reform in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 55(1), 211-240.
  2. Amabile, T. M. (1989). The creative environment. Creative Research Journal, 2(3), 231-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400418909534321
  3. Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York: Harper Collins.
  4. Runco, M. A. (1996). Personal creativity: Definition and developmental issues. In M. A. Runco (Eds.), Creativity from childhood through adulthood: The developmental issues. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  5. Torrance, E. P. (1979). The search for satori and creativity. NY: Creative Education Foundation.
  6. Jung, J. (2012). An Analytical Study on the Trend and the meaning of Researches on Creativity Education. Master's Thesis. Ewha Womans University Graduate School, Seoul.
  7. Cho, Y., Choi, K., Choi, M.K. (2009). An Analysis of Perception of Creativity and Creative Education in Korean Elementary Schools. Education Science Research, 40(3), 215-237.
  8. Lee, K.H., Kim, E.K., Lew,K.H. (2013). The Relationships of Creativity, Problem Solving Ability and Motivation in College Students. Korean Society for Creativity Education, 13(1), 125-139.
  9. Dacey, J. S. (1989). Fundamentals of creative thinking. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
  10. McDonough, P. & McDonough, B. (1987). A survey of American Colleges and universities on the conducting of formal courses in creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 21(4), 271-282. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1987.tb00485.x
  11. Ha, S.Y., Lee, J. (2019). Research Trends on University Creativity Education Program. The Journal of Creativity Education, 19(3), 87-102
  12. Seong, T. (2017). Suggestions for the human character and education in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 55(2), 1-21.
  13. Lee, S. (2017). Educational Psychology in the Age of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The Korea Educational Review, 23(1), 231-260. https://doi.org/10.29318/KER.23.1.10
  14. Kim, H.W., Kang, S.Y.(2018). Effects of extracurricular programs based on Smart Learning for enhancing competency of university students. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(3), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.3.027
  15. Kim, H.W., Kang, S.Y.(2018). Case Study on the extracurricular programs for enhancing core competencies of university students. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(2). 337-357 https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2018.18.2.337
  16. Jang, S.P., Kim, J.I. (2015). Exploring Causes of the Convergence Thinking Skill by Extracurricular Activities: Focusing on Liberal Arts Knowledge and Multicultural Acceptability. The Journal of Educational Research, 13(4), 135-156.
  17. Kelley, D., & Kelley, T. (2014). Creative confidence : unleashing the creative potential within us all (translated by Park, J., Seoul: Chunglim).
  18. Rauth, I., Koppen, E., Jobst, B., & Meinel, C. (2010). Design thinking: An educational model towards creative confidence. In DS 66-2: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on design creativity (ICDC 2010).
  19. Ha, Y., Cho, H. (2016). Development and Validation of Creative Self-Efficacy Scale for College Students. The Korean Journal of School Psychology, 13(1), 55-78. https://doi.org/10.16983/KJSP.2016.13.1.55
  20. Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M.(2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management journal, 45(6), 1137-1148. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069429
  21. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  22. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & LeFevre, J.(1989). Optimal experience in work and leisure. Journal of personality and social psychology, 56(5), 815. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.815
  23. Jobst, B., Koppen, E., Lindberg, T., Moritz, J., Rhinow, H., & Meinel, C. (2012). The faith-factor in design thinking: Creative confidence through education at the design thinking schools Potsdam and Stanford?. In Design thinking research (pp. 35-46). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  24. Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard business review, 86(6), 84-92
  25. Jung, H., & Kim, C.(2018). A Study on the Entrepreneurship Education Framework for Youth based on Design Thinking. Journal of the Korea Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 1-26
  26. Lim, J. M., Lim, J. H., & Ahn, M. L. (2017). The effects of design thinking on cognitive and emotional empathy ability. 2017 The Korean Society for Educational Technology․Korean Association for Educational Information and Media Conference Proceeding. 1-8.
  27. Byun, H. (2015). The Influence of Design Thinking Process to Develop Undergraduates' Creativity. The Journal of Creativity Education, 15(3), 149-167
  28. Kim, S. (2016). A Study on Design Thinking Methods and How to Apply Them at Work Effectively. The Treatise on The Plastic Media, 19(1), 51-57.
  29. Won, Y., Bae, Y., Choi, Y., & Ahn, M.(2019). The Effects of Design Thinking Training on Creativity Competency for College Students. Journal of Educational Technology, 35(2), 193-226 https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.35.2.193
  30. Bakoban, R.A.,&Aligarallah, S.A.(2015). Extracurricular activities and their effect on the student's point average: statistical study. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(20), 2737-2744. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2015.2436
  31. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Science, 2(2), 141-178. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
  32. Collins, A. (1992). Towards a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O'Shea(eds.). New directions in educational technology (pp.15-22). Berlin: Springer.
  33. Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. The Journal of the Learning Science, 13(1), 15-42. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_2
  34. Voigt, C. & Swatman, P.(2006). Interactions in case Discussion: A design-Based Research Approach. School of Computer & Information Scienct, Uniersity of South Australia.
  35. Chon, E., Hwang, Y. (2019). Development and Effectiveness Analysis of Extra-curricula Activities utilizing 3D Printing based on Design Thinking for Engineering College Students. Journal of Digital Contents Society, 20(12), 2407-2416 https://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2019.20.12.2407