한국산학기술학회논문지 (Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society)

  • 제21권1호
  • /
  • Pages.326-337
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1975-4701(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-4688(eISSN)
한국산학기술학회 (The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

보편적 학습설계 측면에서의 고등학교 국어과 교수 실태: 소셜 빅데이터 및 설문조사 분석

An Analysis of High School Korean Language Instruction Regarding Universal Design for Learning: Social Big Data Analysis and Survey Analysis

  • 신미경 (West Texas A&M University 교육학과) ;
  • 이옥인 (전주대학교 중등특수교육과)
  • Shin, Mikyung (Department of Education, West Texas A&M University) ;
  • Lee, Okin (Department of Secondary Special Education, Jeonju University)
  • 투고 : 2019.08.23
  • 심사 : 2020.01.03
  • 발행 : 2020.01.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 뉴스 기사에 나타난 고등학교 국어과 교수 및 보편적 학습설계에 대한 사회의 관심도를 소셜 빅데이터 분석 방법으로 살펴보는 것이었다. 또한 고등학교 국어 수업에서 교사들이 어떻게 보편적 학습설계를 수업에 적용하고 있는지를 살펴보기 위하여 총 330명의 고등학생들을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였다. 소셜 빅데이터 분석 결과, 총 10,339건의 검색 건수 중, 고등학교 국어 교수에 대한 관심과 비교하여 보편적 학습설계에 대한 관심은 현저하게 낮았다. 빅데이터 연관어 분석 결과, 고등학교 국어 교수와 연관되어 검색되어진 용어는 '교육과정'(17.22%)이 가장 높았다. 고등학생들은 국어 교사들이 수업 중 매일 활용하는 빈도가 가장 높은 테크놀로지 관련 수업도구를 컴퓨터(38.79%)라고 인식하였다. 그리고 고등학생들은 국어 교사들이 '교사 주도의 설명식 수업'(52.12%)을 위하여 테크놀로지를 활용하는 빈도가 가장 높다고 응답하였다. 1학년 학생들은 2-3학년 학생들보다 테크놀로지 관련 수업 도구 및 다양한 수업 목적으로 테크놀로지를 활용하는 경우가 더 높은 것으로 나타났다(ps<.05). 마지막으로, 5점 평점 척도 설문조사 결과, 고등학생들은 국어 교사들이 다양한 방식의 학습 참여 제공 및 다양한 방식의 행동과 표현 수단 제공과 관련된 보편적 학습설계 지침을 위해서는 '중간' 정도로 적용한다고 여겼다. 반면 다양한 방식의 표상 제공을 위한 실천 부분에서는 수업 내용을 이해하기 쉽도록 다양한 방식으로 학습자료를 제공하거나 학생들이 새로운 정보를 충분히 이해할 수 있도록 다양한 자료를 제공하는 사항들에서는 상대적으로 더욱 긍정적으로 인식하였다. 1학년 학생들의 경우 교사들의 UDL 적용 실태에 관하여 더욱 긍정적으로 인식하고 있었다.

This study examined the public interest in high school Korean language instruction and the universal design for learning (UDL) using the social big data analysis method. The observations from 10,339 search results led to the conclusion that public interest in UDL was significantly lower than that of high school Korean language instruction. The results of the Big Data Association analysis showed that 17.22% of the terms were found to be related to "curriculum." In addition, a survey was conducted on a total of 330 high school students to examine how their teachers apply UDL in the classroom. High school students perceived computers as the most frequently used technology tool in daily classes (38.79%). Teacher-led lectures (52.12%) were the most frequently observed method of instruction. Compared to the second-year and third-year students, the first-year students appreciated the usage of technology tools and various instruction mediums more frequently (ps<.05). Students were relatively more positive in their response to the query on the provision of multiple means of representation. Consequently, the lesson contents became easier to understand for students with the availability of various study methods and materials. The first-year students were generally more positive towards teachers' incorporation of UDL.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Y. J. Park, E. Y. Kang. "Instructional adaptations and Universal Design for Learning in special education: A comparative literature review", Special Education Research, Vol.15, No.3, pp.251-280, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18541/ser.2016.08.15.3.251
  2. D. H. Rose, A. Meyer. Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, pp.1-216, 2002.
  3. Center for Applied Special Technology. Universal Design for Learning guidelines (Version 2.2). Wakefield, MA: Author, 2018.
  4. S. M. Park, J. K. Park, "Middle school Teacher's perception about Universal Design for Learning (UDL) for inclusive education: Focused on Busan", Journal of Educational Innovation Research, Vol.24, No.1 pp.1-15, 2014.
  5. J. E. Lee, M. S. Yeom, "The perception and application of secondary school teachers for UDL (Universal Design for Learning) in inclusive settings", Special Education Research, Vol.10, No.1 pp.283-304, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18541/ser.2011.02.10.1.283
  6. K. A. Jin, M. W. Nam, H. M. Kim, J. H. Park, S. J. Kim, J. H. Shim. Investigation of the application of 2015 revised national curriculum (middle & high school): Focused on the diversification of instruction and learning methods. Sejong: Ministry of Education, 2018.
  7. E. Y. Kim, M. H. Park, "The effects of UDL reading classes on inclusive elementary students: academic achievement, class participation", The Journal of Elementary Education, Vol..8, No.4. pp.33-60, 2015.
  8. D. M. Browder, P. J. Mims, F. Spooner, L. Ahlgrim-Delzell, A. Lee, "Teaching elementary students with multiple disabilities to participate in shared stories", Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, Vol.33, No.1. pp.3-12, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.33.1-2.3
  9. P. Coyne, B. Pisha, B. Dalton, L. A. Zeph, N. C. Smith, "Literacy by design: A universal design for learning approach for students with significant intellectual disabilities", Remedial and Special Education, Vol.33, No.3, pp.162-172, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510381651
  10. B. Dalton, C. P. Proctor, P. Uccelli, E. Mo, C. E. Snow, "Designing for diversity: The role of reading strategies and interactive vocabulary in a digital reading environment for fifth-grade monolingual English and bilingual students", Journal of Literacy Research, Vol.43, No.1, pp.68-100, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296 X103978732
  11. T. E. Hall, N. Cohen, G. Vue, P. Ganley, "Addressing learning disabilities with UDL and technology. Strategic Reader", Learning Disability Quarterly, Vol.38, No.2, pp.72-83, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948714544375
  12. Ministry of Education. Special education statistics. Sejong: Author, pp.89-119, 2018.
  13. K. Lee, "The analysis of the general public's interest level and sentiments toward people with disabilities based on social big data and offline surveys", Special Education Research, Vol.15, No.4, pp.81-110, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18541/ser.2016.11.15.4.81
  14. Ministry of the Interior and National Information Society Agency. Cases of big data practical use: What big, why big, how big? Seoul: Author, pp.1-82, 2017.
  15. Y. Song. Big data era! With the evolution of SNS and public policy. Seoul, National Information Society Agency, pp.1-27, 2012.
  16. Y.-L. Yu, S.-G. Baek. "Issue analysis of the related mass media's news articles on the 2015 revised national curriculum using automated text analysis", The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, Vol.19, No.3, pp.127-156, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2016.19.3.127
  17. B. Lee. "Intelligence information age and the Korean language education", The Academy for Korean Language Education, Vol.113, No.0, pp.7-36, 2017.
  18. M. H. Park, E. Y. Kim, "Perception and educational needs of teachers about Universal Design for Learning application in elementary schools", Korean Journal of Special Education, Vol.50, No.1, pp.147-171, 2015. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15861/kjse.2015.50.1.147
  19. K. Han, "Awareness of special school teachers on UDL application", The Journal of Special Children Education, Vol.16, No.4, pp.83-120, 2014. https://doi.org/10.21075/KACSN.2014.16.4.83
  20. T. Wei, V. Simko. R package "corrplot": Visualization of a correlation matrix (Version 0.84), 2017.
  21. W. S. Oh, M. S. Oh, "An analysis of inclusive education teachers' perception about application and practice about universal design for learning", Journal of Special Education, Vol.20, No.2 pp.59-81, 2013. https://doi.org/10.34249/jse.2013.20.2.59
  22. H. J. Song, "A study on Korean class participation of high school students", Korean Language Education, Vol.29, pp.111-138, 2012. https://doi.org/10.17313/jkorle.2012..29.111
  23. J. W. Kim, "Korean Language Arts Teachers' Curriculum Reconstruction in the Era of SMART Education", Journal of CheongRam Korean Language Education, Vol.50, pp.37-62, 2014.