DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

청소년 대상 파이썬(Python) 활용 교육의 효과에 대한 메타분석

The Meta-Analysis on Effects of Python Education for Adolescents

  • 장봉석 (국립목포대학교 교육학과) ;
  • 윤소희 (동신대학교 기초교양대학)
  • Jang, Bong Seok (Department of Education, Mokpo National University) ;
  • Yoon, So Hee (College of Basic & General Education, Dongshin University)
  • 투고 : 2020.10.16
  • 심사 : 2020.11.03
  • 발행 : 2020.12.01

초록

이 연구는 청소년 대상 파이썬 활용 교육의 효과를 메타분석을 통해 정리하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 자료 분석을 위해 파이썬 활용 교육의 효과를 보고한 선행연구 6편을 선정하였다. 연구 결과를 정리하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 파이썬 활용 교육의 전체 효과크기는 0.684로 나타났다. 둘째, 교육 효과를 종속변수 유형에 따라 비교 분석한 결과, 학업성취도 0.871, 인지적 영역 0.625, 정의적 영역 0.428로 나타났다. 셋째, 인지적 영역의 경우, 자기효능감 0.833, 문제해결능력 0.283, 컴퓨팅사고력 0.276, 코딩 역량 0.251의 순서로 나타났다. 넷째, 정의적 영역의 경우, 학습 흥미 0.56, 프로그래밍 흥미 0.417의 순서로 나타났다. 다섯째, 학교 급의 경우, 중학교 0.851, 고등학교 0.585, 대학교 0.435의 순서로 나타났다. 여섯째, 교과 영역의 경우, 수학 1.057, 디자인 0.595, 정보 0.585, 소프트웨어 0.28의 순서로 나타났다.

This study intends to examine effects of python education for adolescents. 6 primary studies were chosen through careful search process and investigated through meta-analysis. Research findings were as follows. The total effect size was 0.684. Second, the effect sizes of dependent variables were academic achievement 0.871, cognitive domain 0.625, and affective domain 0.428 in order. Third, for cognitive domain, the effect sizes were self-efficacy 0.833, problem-solving 0.283, computing thinking 0.276, and coding competency 0.251 in order. Fourth, for affective domain, the effect sizes were learning interest 0.560 and programming interest 0.417 in order. Fifth, regarding school level, the effect sizes were middle school 0.851, high school 0.585, and college 0.435 in order. Finally, for subject areas, the effect sizes were mathematics 1.057, design 0.595, information 0.585, and software 0.28 in order.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. OECD, The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030, Paris, France, 2018.
  2. Korea Department of Education, 2015 National Revised Curriculum, Sejong, Korea, 2015.
  3. S. J. Bae, "Curriculum design of python programming for improve computational thinking," Master's thesis, Dongguk University, Seoul, 2018.
  4. Department for Education, National Curriculum in England: Computing Programmes of Study, UK Department for Education, 2013.
  5. M. Lutz, Learning Python, O'Reilly Media, 2013.
  6. H. M. Cooper, Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step by Step Approach, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2009.
  7. B. Slatkin, Effective Python: 90 Specific Ways to Write Better Python, Addison-Wesley Professional, 2019.
  8. B. Lubanovic, Introducing Python: Modern Computing in Simple Packages, O'Reilly Media, 2019.
  9. P. Deitel and H. Deitel, Intro to Python for Computer Science and Data Science, Pearson, 2019.
  10. IEEE, Interactive: The Top Programming Languages 2018 [Internet]. Available: https://spectrum.ieee.org/static/interactive-the-top-programming-languages-2018.
  11. J. H. Kim, "Curriculum design of 'problem-solving methods and procedures' section in the informatics subject for enhancing computational thinking: based on Python programming language," Master's thesis, Yonsei University, Seoul, 2015.
  12. H. M. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, and J. Valentine, The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, 2008.
  13. R. G. Orwin, "A fail-safe N of effect size in meta-analysis," Journal of Educational Statistics, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 157-159, 1983. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164923
  14. J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1988.
  15. A. Bandura, "Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency," American Psychologist, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 122-147, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
  16. D. Lee and J. Chung, "The effects of middle school mathematical statistics area and python programming STEAM instruction on problem solving ability and curriculum interest," Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 336-344, 2019. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2019.20.4.336
  17. M. Gurian and K. Stevens, "With boys and girls in mind," Educational Leadership, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 21-26, 2004.