한국융합학회논문지 (Journal of the Korea Convergence Society)

  • 제10권11호
  • /
  • Pages.557-564
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2233-4890(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6353(eISSN)
한국융합학회 (Korea Convergence Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

경찰관의 직무열의에 영향을 미치는 요인

Influential Factors on Job Engagement in Police Officers

  • 투고 : 2019.09.05
  • 심사 : 2019.11.20
  • 발행 : 2019.11.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 국내 경찰관의 직무열의 영향요인을 확인하고자 실시한 서술적 횡단조사연구이다. 본 연구는 제5차 근로환경조사 원시자료를 이차 분석하였고, 연구대상자는 총 185명의 경찰관이다. 수집된 자료는 IBM SPSS Statistics 24.0 프로그램을 사용하여 기술통계, t-test, ANOVA, Pearson's correlations, multiple regression으로 분석하였다. 본 연구의 결과에서 직무불안정성(${\beta}=-.34$, p<.001), 직무보상(${\beta}=.39$, p<.001), 주관적 건강상태(${\beta}=.22$, p<.001)와 조직공정성(${\beta}=.20$, p=.002)은 직무열의에 영향을 미치는 유의한 변수로 확인되었다. 이들 변수들은 경찰관의 직무열의 를 59.3%(F=34.26, p<.001)설명하였다. 즉, 직무불안정성이 낮을수록, 직무보상과 조직공정성이 높을수록, 주관적 건강상태가 양호할수록 직무열의는 높아지는 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 경찰관의 직무열의를 향상시키기 위한 전략 수립시 직무보상, 직무불안정성, 주관적 건강상태, 조직공정성을 관리할 수 있는 체계적이고 통합적인 중재방안이 필요하다.

The purpose of this study was to examine the influencing factors of job engagement among Korean police officers. This was the secondary analysis of data from the 5th Korean Working Conditions Survey (KWCS). The study subjects included 185 Korean police officers. Collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA, Pearson's correlation and multiple regression with IBM SPSS Statistics 24.0 program. Job insecurity (${\beta}=-.34$, p<.001), job reward (${\beta}=.39$, p<.001), subjective health status (${\beta}=.22$, p<.001), and organizational justice (${\beta}=.20$, p=.002) were significant influencing factors on job engagement, explaining 59.3% of the variance (F=34.26, p<.001). Effective and systematic strategies to improve Korean police officers' job engagement should focus on job reward, job insecurity, subjective health status, and organizational justice. The results of this study can be utilized as base data to improve Korean police officers' job engagement.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Korean National Police Agency. (2014). Police Statistical Yearbook. Seoul: Korean National Police Agency.
  2. Statistics Korea. (2007). The Sixth Korean Standard Classification of Occupations. Daejeon: Statistics Korea.
  3. Korea Ministry of Government Legislation. (2017). Korea Ministry of Government Legislation. Police Officers Public Officials Act and Article. Korea Ministry of Government Legislation. [Online]. www.law.go.kr/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=195930#0000
  4. Korean National Police Agency. (2014). White Paper. Seoul: Korean National Police Agency.
  5. B. S. Jung & E. R. Choi. (2017). A meta-analysis on the burnout factors among Korean police officers: Focus on the job characteristics. The Korean Association of Police Science Review, 64(0), 215-238.
  6. J. D. Thompson. (2017). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: Routledge.
  7. W. B. Schaufeli & A. B. Bakker. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 25(3), 293-315. DOI : 10.1002/job.248
  8. W. A. Kahn. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724. DOI : 10.5465/256287
  9. W. B. Schaufeli, M. Salanova, V. Gonzalez-roma, & A. B. Bakker. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
  10. I. S. Kwon & Y. K. Choi. (2011). A study on the antecedents of job engagement and psychological conditions as the mediators. Journal of Human Resource Management Research, 18(4), 113-133.
  11. W. H. Macey & B. Schneider. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.x
  12. J. D. Nahrgang, F. P. Morgeson & D. A. Hofmann. (2011). Safety at work: A meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 71-94. DOI : 10.1037/a0021484
  13. Y. Brunetto, S. T. Teo, K. Shacklock & R. Farr-‐Wharton. (2012). Emotional intelligence, job satisfaction, well‐being and engagement: Explaining organizational commitment and turnover intentions in policing. Human Resource Management Journal, 22(4), 428-441. DOI : 10.1111/j.1748-8583.2012.00198.x
  14. N. Gillet, I. Huart, P. Colombat & E. Fouquereau. (2013). Perceived organizational support, motivation, and engagement among police officers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 44(1), 46-55. DOI : 10.1037/a0030066
  15. K. Breevaart, A. B. Bakker, E. Demerouti & M. van den Heuvel. (2015). Leader-member exchange, work engagement, and job performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(7), 754-770. DOI : 10.1108/jmp-03-2013-0088
  16. S. G. Ha. (2014). The effect of motivation factors on police officers job engagement. The Journal of Social Science, 21(3), 359-380.
  17. C. A. Lee & J. M. Choi. (2019). The moderating effects of organizational culture in the relationship between Korea maritime police officers' public service motivation and job engagement. Korean Review of Organizational Studies, 16(1), 69-99. DOI : 10.21484/kros.2019.4.30.69
  18. W. S. Lim. (2016). The effect of police officers humor sense on job engagement. Journal of The Korean Society of Private Security, 15(4), 157-180.
  19. A. B. Bakker & E. Demerouti. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273-285. DOI : 10.1037/ocp0000056
  20. A. B. Bakker & E. Demerouti. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209-223. DOI : 10.1108/13620430810870476
  21. Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute. (2017). The using guideline of Korean Working Conditions Survey Data. Ulsan: Author.
  22. Eurofound. (2012). Fifth European Working Conditions Survey. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  23. E. Choi & G. S. Jeon. (2016). The impacts of psychosocial work conditions on self-rated health among Korean workers. Korean Journal of Occupational Health Nursing, 25(4), 300-310. DOI : 10.5807/kjohn.2016.25.4.300
  24. S. J. Han & G. H. Na. (2017). The antecedents of public officials' job engagement: Self-efficacy, LMX and organizational justice. Korean Public Personnel Administration Review, 16(4), 191-215.
  25. E. J. Kwon & S. Y. Kim. (2017). The effects of job demands and job resources on burnout and engagement among school health teachers. The Journal of The Korean Society of School Health, 30(2), 103-112. DOI : 10.15434/kssh.2017.30.2.103
  26. S. H. Kim. (2018). A study on the effort-reward imbalance at work in Korean police officers. Korean Police Studies Review, 17(2), 3-28. https://doi.org/10.38084/2018.17.2.1
  27. J. Siegrist. (1996). Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1(1), 27-41. DOI : 10.1037/1076-8998.1.1.27
  28. C. S. Park & K. J. Cho. (2015). Effects of job insecurity and job engagement on turnover intention of paramedics in emergency medical institutions. The Korean Journal of Emergency Medical Services, 19(2), 51-69. DOI : 10.14408/KJEMS.2015.19.2.051
  29. S. J. Ashford, C. Lee & P. Bobko. (1989). Content, cause, and consequences of job insecurity: A theory-based measure and substantive test. Academy of Management Journal, 32(4), 803-829. DOI : 10.5465/256569
  30. S. W. Yoo. (2013). A study on the relationship between the organizational ethical conditions, ethical behaviors and the effectiveness of PR practitioners focused on job satisfaction, job engagement, and professional identity perception of PR practitioners. Journal of Public Relations, 17(1), 97-142. DOI : 10.15814/jpr.2013.17.1.97
  31. C. K. Lee & K. H. Lee. (2007). An empirical study on the relationship of justice factors and organizational commitment: Comparing the difference based on company size. The Korean Small Business Review Innovation, 29(3), 75-98.