Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study of the Attitude and Perception on Course Evaluation of Nursing Students: Focused on A-University

간호대학생의 강의평가에 대한 태도 및 인식연구 : A 대학을 중심으로

  • Kim, Eun-A (Dept of Nursing Science, Dongshin University) ;
  • Woo, Sang-Jun (Dept of Nursing Science, Dongshin University)
  • Received : 2019.08.21
  • Accepted : 2019.11.20
  • Published : 2019.11.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study analyzed the overall attitude and perception of course evaluation of nursing students, and suggested improvement direction of course evaluation. The sample consist of 428 A-university students in J province. The collected data were analyzed by SPSS 23.0 program using ANOVA, t-test, and $Scheff{\acute{e}}$ test. As a result, it was confirmed that nursing students participated in course evaluation with a careful and correct response attitude, and course evaluation result was reliable. The instructor should share the process of improving the class by reflecting the evaluation results so that the students can recognize the purpose and importance of course evaluation. In addition, it suggested that it is necessary to develop items of a course evaluation reflecting the characteristic of nursing such as clinical practice courses and to revise the evaluation system.

본 연구는 간호대학생의 강의평가에 대한 전반적인 태도 및 인식을 분석하여 강의평가 개선방향을 제시하고자 시행되었다. 이를 이해 J도에 있는 A 대학의 간호대학생 428명을 대상으로 설문 후 SPSS 23.0을 이용하여 기술통계, ANOVA, t-test 및 사후분석으로 $Scheff{\acute{e}}$ test를 시행하였다. 연구결과 간호대학생은 강의평가에 비교적 신중하고 올바른 응답태도로 참여함이 확인되었고, 강의평가 결과는 신뢰성이 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 또한 교수자는 강의평가결과를 반영하여 수업을 개선하는 과정을 학생들과 공유하고, 학생들이 강의평가 취지와 중요성을 인식할 수 있도록 해야할 것이다. 추후 임상실습과목 등 간호학과 특성을 반영한 강의평가 문항개발 및 평가시스템 수정이 필요함을 시사하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. J. W. Kim. (2019). The effects of quality of education servics on student satisfaction, image, commitment and loyalty. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(2), 145-153. DOI :10.14400/JDC.2019.17.2.145
  2. C. H. Ryu. (2001). Development questionaires for the evaluation of instruction program at university. Gyeongyeong yeongu, Hongik University, 26, 339-389.
  3. E. J. Oh. (2009). How to improve course evaluation?. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 21(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2009.21.1.1
  4. J. W. Choi & D. K. An. (2016). A study on the data analysis of the written comments in lecture evaluation, Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(11), 101-106. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2016.14.11.101
  5. K. S. Yang. (2014). Meta-research on the influence of course, instructor, and student characteristics in student evaluation of teaching at universities. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 26(2), 293-322. DOI : 10.17927/tkjems.2014.26.2.293
  6. S. J. Chae, Y. H. Jung & Y. S. Jung. (2015). Factors that influence student ratings of instruction. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 27(1), 19-25. DOI : 10.3946/kjme.2015.27.1.19
  7. M. S. Cho & C. S. Kim. (2014). The relationship between the satisfaction levels of education and clinical practice in the dental hygiene students. Journal of Korean society of Dental Hygiene, 14(5), 649-658. DOI : 10.13065/jksdh.2014.14.05.649
  8. J. H. Kim. (2009). The study of how influences in the environment of college education affects students' lecture evaluation: Based on data of Yuniversity. Master's thesis, Yeungnam University, Daegu.
  9. M. H. Kim. (2005). Validity and reliability of lecture evaluation. Asian Journal of Education, 6(3), 1-24.
  10. S. I. Martin, D. P. Way, N. Verbeck, R. Nagel, J. A. Davis & D. Vandre. (2013). The impact of lecture attendance and other variables on how medical students evaluate faculty in a preclinical program. Academic Medicine, 88(7), 972-977. DOI : 10.1097/acm.0b013e318294e99a
  11. S. C. Yum. (2008). Validating students' ratings of teaching scale and analyzing multilevel models. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 21(2), 25-52.
  12. S. H. Im. (2013). Attitude and perception of elementary pre-service teachers on course evaluation. The Journal of Education Studies. 50(1), 129-140.
  13. S. H. Ahn & S. J. Lee. (2017). Investigation on methods to improve the reliability of education satisfaction surveys : Focused on the S university case. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(2), 71-77. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2017.15.12.71
  14. M. L. Kim, M. S. Kang & M. H. Kim. (2013). The scale development for integrity of responsive attitudes in students' ratings of instruction. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 19(4), 765-784.
  15. I. W. Park. (2012). A study on effects of student ratings of their learning on consistent responses in student ratings of college teaching. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 24(1), 257-281. https://doi.org/10.17927/TKJEMS.2012.24.1.257
  16. M. J. Suh et al. (2003). Nursing faculty competence and nursing faculty's attitude for lecture evaluation. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 9(2), 320-328.
  17. Korean Accredication Board of Nursing Education. (2018). Purpose of nursing education certification evaluation project. KABONE [Online]. http://www.kabone.or.kr/kabon01/index02.php
  18. J. A. Kim, A. K. Lee, M. K. Joo, A. S. Jung, E. J. Jang & J. S. Kim. (2004). Survey on the standards set by the students for the evaluation of instruction for college students of nursing. Kyungbok University Gyeongbognonchong, 8, 415-434.
  19. F. Faul, E. Erdfelder, A. G. Lang & A. Buchner. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
  20. F. Faul, E. Erdfelder & A. G. Lang. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
  21. H. H. Jeong. (2016). A study on students awareness of course evaluation: focusing on integrity of responsive attitudes and satisfaction. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 28(3), 443-470. DOI : 10.17927/tkjems.2016.28.3.443
  22. C. H. Ryu & J. H. Lee. (2005). A study on instructor factors associated with the student evaluation of teaching at universities. Korea Business Review, 9(1), 249-279.
  23. K. S. Han, S. H. Choi & J. C. Park. (2011). Problems in mandatory course evaluations. Communications for statistical applications and methods, 18(1), 35-45. DOI : 10.5351/CKSS.2011.18.1.035
  24. O. S. Ha & M. H. Jung. (2014). A study on the improvement of a student evaluation tool through the analysis of response of student evaluation -focus on 'D' university student evaluation case. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 22(3), 273-294.
  25. S. Y. Shin & J. H. Kwon. (2016). A study on the improvement of the reliability of the course evaluation: Focused on the management of course evaluation system. The Institute of Humanities at Soonchunhyang University, 35(4), 115-145.
  26. M. R. Song, E. M. Kim & S. J. Yu. (2012). Analysis on the competency of nursing students' basic nursing skills. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 12(6), 390-401. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2012.12.06.390