Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Perception Differences between Local Residents and Tourists Regarding Regional Landmark Cognitive Factors

지역 랜드마크 인지요인에 대한 지역주민과 관광객의 인식차이에 관한 연구

  • Choi, Dong-Heui (Division of Hotel & Tourism Management, Gwangju University)
  • 최동희 (광주대학교 호텔관광경영학부)
  • Received : 2019.10.01
  • Accepted : 2019.11.20
  • Published : 2019.11.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to verify what effects regional landmark cognitive factors have on tourist satisfaction and how the effect relationship between regional landmark cognitive factors and tourist satisfaction change due to perception differences between local residents and tourists and to present implications. Analysis results show that landmark cognitive factors could be categorized into the single factors of symbolism, historicity, and tourist satisfaction. Landmark cognitive factors had significant effects on tourist satisfaction and differences occurred in that effect relationship according to local residents and tourists. Therefore, when tourism products are developed through landmarks, if the opinions of local residents are excessively reflected, this can bring about outcomes that actually disregard tourists, so it is important to appropriately reflect various opinions.

본 연구의 목적은 지역의 랜드마크 인지요인이 관광만족에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지, 그리고 지역 랜드마크 인지요인과 관광만족의 영향관계에서 지역주민과 관광객의 인식의 차이로 인해 그 영향관계가 어떻게 달라지는지를 확인하고 그 시사점을 제시하는 것이다. 연구를 위하여 광주광역시의 관광지를 찾은 관광객과 지역주민을 대상으로 2019년 9월 1일부터 10월 6일까지 36일간 설문조사를 실시하였으며, 389부를 회수하여 분석을 실시하였다. 분석결과, 랜드마크 인지요인은 상징성과 역사성으로 관광만족은 단일요인으로 구분되었다. 랜드마크 인지요인은 관광만족에 유의한 영향을 미쳤으며 지역주민과 관광객에 따라 그 영향관계에는 차이가 발생하였다. 그러므로 랜드마크를 통한 관광 상품을 개발하고자 할 때, 지나치게 지역주민의 의견을 반영하게 되면 오히려 관광객들이 외면하는 결과가 있을 수 있으므로 다양한 의견을 적절히 반영하는 것이 중요할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. J. Karmowska. (2002). Cultural Heritage as an Element of Marketing Strategy in European Historic Cities, Centre for European Studies, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland. http//www.cyfronet.krakow.pl/-ncbratas/pdf/full_karmowska.pdf
  2. Z. Cheng & J. Shen (2016). On Very Large Scale Test Collection for Landmark Image Search Benchmarking, Signal Processing, 124(July), 13-26. DOI : 10.1016/j.sigpro.2015.10.037
  3. S. Baloglu & K. W. McCleary. (1999). Amodel of Destination Image Formation, Annals of Tourism Research, 24(6), 868-897. DOI : 10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00030-4
  4. W. Y. Li & H. J. Yun. (2017). The effect of skyscraper-type landmark’s cognition on city image and city satisfaction. International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 31(1), 95-106. DOI : 10.21298/IJTHR.2017.01.31.1.95
  5. H. Y. Kim & G. S. Yang. (2017). The mediating effect of city image on the relationship between a landmark and behavioral intention : Focused on visitors to the Asia Culture Complex. International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research. 31(3), 21-33. DOI : 10.21298/IJTHR.2017.03.31.3.21.
  6. S. M. Kwon & K. P. Lee. (2017). The relationship among cognitive attributes of landmark, local Image and visit intention :focused on Jecheon city. Journal of tourism & leisure research, 29(11), 145-161.
  7. M. H. Yoo. (2010). Relationships among tourism destination landmark, tourism destination image and tourist behavior of Incheon. Journal of Photo Geography, 20(4), 65-76.
  8. K. H. Min. (2014). Study on the impacts of tourists’ landmark recognition factors on tourist attraction image and tourist satisfaction, behavioral intention. Korean Journal of Tourism Research, 29(3), 21-40.
  9. K. Lynch.(1960). The Image of the city. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
  10. J. Peponis, C. Zimring & Y. K. Choi. (1990). Finding the building in wayfinding. Environment and Behavior, 22(5), 555-590. DOI : 10.1177/0013916590225001.
  11. L. Hasanuddin. (2004). Redefining landmarks. Journal Alam Bina, 6, 66-76.
  12. D. Appleyard. (1969). Why buildings are known. Environment and Behavior, 1(2), 131-156. DOI : 10.1177/001391656900100202.
  13. J. H. Kim, J. S. Byeon & S. B. Im. (2002). A study on the relationship between influential range and cognition factor of landmark. Journal. Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 30(4), 9-18.
  14. H. S. Lee & M. J. Oh. (2006). A study on the effect which the tourist image formed by the cultural heritage has on the satisfaction-the case: the visitors at NAMHANSANSUNG & SUWON HAWSUNG. International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 20(1), 1-15.
  15. R. L. Oliver & W. Bearden. (1985). Disconfirmation processes and consumer evaluations in product usage. Journal of Business Research, 13(3), 235-246. DOI : 10.1016/0148-2963(85)90029-3
  16. G. S. Kim & Y. J. Ahn. (2004). The Relationships of Cultural Tourism Attraction Attributes, Resources Interpretation and Tourist Satisfaction. Korean Journal of Tourism Research, 19(1), 247-272.
  17. S. S. Jung & H. Lee. (2019). Analysis of the Difference between Authenticity and Tourism Satisfaction according to Day and Night Scenery :Focusing on Royal Palace Tourism. Research Institute of Korean Traditional Dance, 15(3), 139-168.
  18. D. H. Choi. (2018). The Relationship Influence among Life Style, Tourism Information, and Behavioral Intention on Chinese Tourists: Focusing on the Moderating Tourism Type(Individual Tourism, Group Tourism). Journal of Tourism Sciences, 42(2), 11-28. DOI : 10.17086/JTS.2018.42.2.11.28
  19. G. Ghilagaber. (2004). Another look at chow’s test for the equality of two heteroscedastic regression model. Quality and Quantity, 38(1), 81-93. DOI : 10.1023/B:QUQU.0000013246.83707.6f.